Geoengineering & Solar Radiation Management: The 'Climate Change' Solution EXPOSED! | |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.bbc.co.uk] - 30 September 2011 Quoting: for truth"A pioneering test of a climate "tech fix" planned for October faces a six-month delay as scientists discuss the issues it raises with their critics. The test is part of the UK-based Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (Spice) project. It would use a balloon and a kilometre-long hose to spray water into the upper atmosphere - a prelude to spraying climate-cooling sulphate particles." [link to www2.eng.cam.ac.uk] - SPICE Project Quoting: for truth"The SPICE Project will investigate the benefits, risks, costs, and feasibility of solar radiation management through the deployment of reflective aerosol particles into the Earth's atmosphere." [link to www2.eng.cam.ac.uk] - SPICE Research Objectives and Hypothesis "Evaluating candidate particles: What is the 'perfect' particle, that maximizes solar radiation scattering, minimizes the greenhouse effect and the impact on the stratospheric ozone layer and has minimal impact on climate, weather, ecosystems and human health?" "Delivery Systems: What are the various options for delivery of particles? What is the feasibility of using a tethered-balloon pipe to inject particles and/or gases into the stratosphere in a more cost-effective and sustainable way than alternative methods?" "Climate and environmental modelling: What are the most effective locations for injection? How can we best use past volcanic analogues? What are the climate and environmental impacts of stratospheric particles?" "...perform an assessment of candidate aerosol particles (sulphuric acid, sea-salt, other salts, minerals, and metal oxides) from the available literature and simple modelling of the key reactions, surface properties, agglomeration and sedimentation rates, and light scattering theory." It would appear that metal oxides like aluminum oxide may be potential candidates. I wonder how the relfective properties of aluminum oxide stack up against alternatives? Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 06:43 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Optics of cosmic dust By Gorden Videen, Miroslav Kocifaj Quoting: for truth[link to books.google.com] "We also study a few aluminum oxide powders that have been used in experiments. Albedo of these samples is very high, up to 95%." Increase your albedo! Quoting: for truth[link to www.boston.com] "Candidate sunscreens include sulfate aerosols, aluminum oxide dust, "or even self-levitating and self-orienting designer particles engineered to migrate to the Polar Regions and remain in place for long periods." Any drawbacks? Given current trends, carbon dioxide would continue to build up in the Earth's atmosphere and oceans, possibly devastating fishing life. A bigger albedo wouldn't help there. And placing an aluminum oxide umbrella over part of the Earth could alter rainfall patterns in unpredictable ways, causing hardship and political strife." Aluminum and sulphate oxides are DEFINITELY being considered as potential candidates for usage, this much is clear. ISSUES OF CONCERN 1. Human Health impacts 2. Environmental impacts 3. Prevalence and levels of proposed oxides in soil tests (Past vs. Present) Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 06:59 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The 30th Annual American Association for Aerosol Research Conference is going on from October 3-7, 2011. [link to aaar.conference2011.org] Quoting: for truth"Those of you who have submitted abstracts will have an opportunity to present your latest findings to an intellectually engaged and professionally dedicated community." Let's take a look at some of those abstracts: TOPIC AREAS - Aerosols, Clouds and Climate - Combustion - Aerosol Exposure - Homeland Security ??? Why is Homeland Security a topic of discussion among Aerosol Research Scientists? Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 06:44 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aerosols & Precipitation Quoting: for truth"With this symposium we hope to use new and recent research to highlight some of the many ways that aerosol particles can affect precipitation." [link to aaar.conference2011.org] Health Disparities & Ambient Air Particle Pollution "Certain individuals distinguished by intrinsic or extrinsic factors are more sensitive to or vulnerable to the effects of environmental exposures, and in particular air particle pollution." - racial and ethnic minorities - low-income groups - women - children - disabled/elderly Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 06:46 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So what do the future AAAR Conference Chairs have to say? Sergey Nizkorodov, Conference Chair (2012) Quoting: for truth"Human-generated aerosols can enter the atmosphere directly, as is the case with soot emitted by internal combustion engines in cars and trucks, he explains. Aerosols are also produced when molecules in the gaseous state enter the atmosphere and react with other chemicals, he adds. A classic case: burning fossil fuels releases sulfur dioxide gas into the air, which then turns into sulfuric acid aerosols." [link to www.scientificamerican.com] Murray Johnston, Conference Chair (2013) Quoting: for truth"Aerosol particles are important in a variety of air pollution processes. In particular, epidemiological studies suggest a link between particle mass (PM) concentration and human health. There is growing evidence that fine particles are toxic, possibly independent of composition. It is likely that a thorough understanding of health effects will ultimately require more information on the chemical composition of these particles in the atmosphere." [link to cfpub.epa.gov] According to Sergey, contrail formation COULD be considered a type of aerosol due to being composed of burnt fossil fuel gases. Contrails CANNOT then, be pushed aside as simply exhaust + condensation if we're considering integrating potential applications. If contrails are a type of aerosol, wouldn't it make sense that they be looked at as a potential delivery mechanism for future experimentation? The SPICE Project, which is albeit underway, is currently suggesting the usage of weather balloons to inject aerosols into the atmosphere. [link to www.physorg.com] Quoting: for truth"The project, sponsored by several United Kingdom research councils (meaning government money) most prominently the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council...What’s missing in the current news cycle though is information on whether the group has been conducting ground based testing of the concept or whether construction of the test balloon and/or giant hose has begun." Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 06:33 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Spice In Rocks With The Challenges Of Geoengineering Quoting: for truth[link to www.groundreport.com] "More nations should be involved in this deliberation; the United States with an advanced space agency and prominent higher colleges should present more sides to this project." The word ^ 'sides' ^ links the the below: Quoting: for truth ----->"national security risks of deployment of climate remediation technologies" [link to www.bipartisanpolicy.org] Quoting: for truth"Washington, DC – Leading experts on climate change science and technology comprising the Bipartisan Policy Center’s (BPC) Task Force on Climate Remediation Research today released a report calling for a coordinated federal research program to explore the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies." Two distinct rationales for a climate remediation research program form the basis of the report: • The physical risks of climate change are real and growing. • The geopolitical and national security risks of deployment of climate remediation technologies by some other countries or actors are real. As a result, the Task Force believes that the United States must have the knowledge required to: 1. Judge whether particular climate remediation techniques could offer a meaningful response to the risks of climate change; and 2. Evaluate steps other nations may be in a position to take, and lead the important international conversations that are likely to emerge around these issues in the years ahead. The report notes that climate remediation proposals generally fall into two broad categories: • Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): CDR strategies aim to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, thereby addressing the root causes of climate change. • Solar Radiation Management (SRM): SRM strategies aim to counteract or mask the effect of rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere by increasing the amount of solar energy that is reflected back into space. Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 07:05 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FYI, this is the type of domestic issue that OWS is meant to make a distraction of. This is REAL, FACTUAL, ongoing efforts to use the upper atmosphere as a climate change solution science experiment. Just yesterday the BCP Task Force suggested that "some research into climate remediation, not to mention climate remediation efforts themselves, could pose risks and raise new ethical, legal and social issues of broad public concern." This Blue Ribbon Task Force calls on the Federal Government to: "require more robust forms of oversight than usual, involving more diverse kinds of experts and more public involvement" "conduct[ing] public communication and engagement activities." This press release from the BPC comes just days after a 9News report in Denver explained to residents the reasoning behind 'persistent contrail formation' due to a MAJOR influx of such activity on the day of a city-wide anti-terrorism drill. [link to www.9news.com] Although the meteorologist attempts to explain the phenomenon, his explanation regarding atmospheric temperature left some puzzled. I guess you can't say he didn't 'engage public communication' however... Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/05/2011 06:44 PM |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/05/2011 07:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | David Whelan, Ph.D., NAE Quoting: for truthBoeing Defense, Space, and Security Chief Scientist and Vice President, Strategic Innovation, Phantom Works Former Director of the Tactical Technology Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [link to scpnt.stanford.edu] Apparently David Whelan worked on improving global positioning capabilities, space-based radar, etc. He was also one of four lead engineers to develop the B-2 Bomber. Funny how he's now a member of the BPC Task Force on Climate Remediation. "Dr. Whelan was Director of the Tactical Technology Office at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), where he led the development of enabling technologies, such as unmanned vehicles and space-based radar systems." Quoting: for truth[link to americasclimatechoices.org] Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 06:50 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1713958 10/05/2011 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1713958 10/05/2011 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/06/2011 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
doo doo butter User ID: 1441655 United States 10/06/2011 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Was it bad for the Ancients....? I'm gonna say no. This is why. Manmade radiation and manmade products create cancer. Its already being proven. So why are we blaming the sun for cancer when free radicals exist because of the chemicals we ingest (commonly referred to as food) the chemicals we put on our skin in our hair and on wounds??? I'll tell you why. Because the Elites don't want us to receive as our ancients did. Especially IF IT COULD MUTATE OUR DNA INTO BEING EVEN GREATER THAN IT IS. Thus, the TRUE argument of why geo-engineering exists at all. 1. Excess chemical storage and by-product abundance 2. Profit 3. To deter the sun's natural powers from the corporate slaves. 4. To prevent a possible and most likely acceleration in our DNA. 5. Control the weather for warfare uses. |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/06/2011 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excellent collection of facts op. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1713958 I personaly believe that large scale geoengineering has commenced and due to those unknown risks, we will be the last to know. 5* and Thanks for taking a moment from OWS exposure doom to opine! I couldn't agree with you more. Last Edited by qwerty123 on 10/06/2011 07:07 PM |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 2698511 United States 10/07/2011 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excellent Thread . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/07/2011 03:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 2698511 United States 10/07/2011 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You think in a logical sequenced manner which is hard for detractors to attack . . . However, you will probably feel their indignation sooner or later . . . hang tough . . . Once they discover you they will attack . . . Best wishes . . . George B. . . . Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/18/2011 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Boatsmac User ID: 1539751 United States 10/18/2011 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 10/18/2011 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 07/17/2012 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "According to Martin Lukacs writing in The Guardian, a team lead by engineers David Keith and James Anderson want to spray sunlight-reflecting sulfate particles into the upper atmosphere, a small-scale simulation of a volcanic eruption, to see if they can cool the climate." |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 07/17/2012 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.sfgate.com] "Are Geo-Engineers playing God with our weather? That question and many others will be pondered during three days of discussion centered on science, action plans and solutions at the Consciousness Beyond Chemtrails Conference to be held from August 17 – 19, 2012, at the historic 1250+ seat Ebell Theater in Los Angeles - a suitably grand venue for the largest gathering against Geo-Engineering & Chemtrails in history." |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 07/17/2012 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.wired.com] "Deploying giant space mirrors and spraying particles from stadium-sized balloons may sound like an engineer’s wild fantasy, but climate models suggest that the potential of geoengineering to offset rising atmospheric carbon dioxide may be significantly overstated." |
qwerty123 (OP) User ID: 1280532 United States 07/17/2012 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to blogs.smithsonianmag.com] Quoting: qwerty123 "According to Martin Lukacs writing in The Guardian, a team lead by engineers David Keith and James Anderson want to spray sunlight-reflecting sulfate particles into the upper atmosphere, a small-scale simulation of a volcanic eruption, to see if they can cool the climate." [link to en.wikipedia.org] "Sulfates occur as microscopic particles (aerosols) resulting from fossil fuel and biomass combustion. They increase the acidity of the atmosphere and form acid rain." [link to www.epa.gov] [link to www.epa.gov] "Prior to falling to the earth, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) gases and their particulate matter derivatives—sulfates and nitrates—contribute to visibility degradation and harm public health." "These gases interact in the atmosphere to form fine sulfate and nitrate particles that can be transported long distances by winds and inhaled deep into people's lungs. Fine particles can also penetrate indoors. Many scientific studies have identified a relationship between elevated levels of fine particles and increased illness and premature death from heart and lung disorders, such as asthma and bronchitis." [link to www.lenntech.com] Globally sulphuric substances can have the following effects on human health: - Neurological effects and behavioural changes - Disturbance of blood circulation - Heart damage - Effects on eyes and eyesight - Reproductive failure - Damage to immune systems - Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder - Damage to liver and kidney functions - Hearing defects - Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism - Dermatological effects - Suffocation and lung embolism Global Depopulation Agenda Last Edited by qwerty123 on 07/17/2012 01:42 PM |