OMG. Mitt Romney's, father George W. Romney, Not A Natural Born Citizen

Nothing like a monkey wrench throned into the cog..

Not another one. Here we go again.

I wonder If Orly is up to taking on this one? Ha!

Willard??

How bizarre. The whole thing ... "George W.", "Willard", and the whole eligibility question.

Quoting from a recent White House gala, "curiouser and curiouser"...

Mr. George W. Romney, was elected Governor of Michigan. Because there was talk George W. might run for the presidency, his citizenship eligibility came into question and because it extends to the child at the time of birth, there is now question regarding Willard (Mitt) Romney:


Mitt Romney's, father George W. Romney, Not A Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America, and was NOT, eligible for the Office of President, by Pinckney G. McElwee of D.C. Bar.)


Congressional Record (House) June 14, 1967


"I find no proper legal or historical basis on which to conclude that a person born outside of the United States could ever be eligible to occupy the Office of the President of the United States. In other words, In my opinion, Mr. George Romney of Michigan Is Ineligible to become President of the United States because he was born In Mexico and is, therefore, not a natural-born citizen as required by the United States Constitution."


Thus, we have the same situation as with Obama/Soetoro: A father born in a foreign country who never became a U.S. citizen. Several people have been doing some serious research on this:

[link to www.rense.com]

Maybe Congress will repeal born citizenship as a presidential requirement and Arnie will become president one day after all.

I have to commend you on your thread last night GG. It was inspiring. Thanks..

congrssional record (House) June 14, 1967


[link to www.scribd.com]

Nice one, Thanks

Same for Rubio of Florida.

pin please

No issue...George Romney was a naturalized citizen at the time...very different than Obama who's father was a foriegn national and wasn't then or ever was a US citizen.

Obama is NOT a "Natural Born" citizen btw....but the SCOTUS will never see a case before he's gone this Nov.

Bye bye Mitty such a pity...

I would like to hear what Edwin Vieira, would say on this. Edwin is a real constitutional scholar.

Aw, thank you, NS - I think Ron Paul has inspired many of us who would have otherwise given up. We may not win the election, but if we keep focused, we will eventually win :)

The only mormon colonie in Mexico would be an FLDS compound which really makes you wonder.

it only matters where you're born not where your parents born, anything else is made up meaningless bullshit.

Do you have a clue?

There is a HUGE difference between "naturalized citizen" versus "natural-born citizen", Bucko.

What is a natural born citizen?



[link to www.youtube.com]

Ah, yes, but it is you, Russia Bucko, who cannot read.

Sorry to the other Bucko from America.

While Romney was born in Mexico, he was still considered a viable and legal candidate for United States president. His Mormon grandfather and his three wives had fled to Mexico in 1886, but none of them ever relinquished U.S. citizenship. While the Constitution requires that a president must be a natural-born citizen, the first Congress of the United States in 1790 passed legislation stating: "The children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the sea, or outside the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens of the United States." Romney and his family fled Mexico in 1912 prior to the Mexican Revolution. However, the Naturalization Act of 1795 repealed the Act of 1790[citation needed] and removed the language explicitly stating that the children of U.S. citizens are natural-born citizens. As such, it is not clear that Romney was actually eligible for the office of president

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Barry was a fat little fucker !

Now Barry is a skinny little fucker !

Any candidate, Republican, Democrat, Green Party, Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Constitution Party - you name it - cannot expect to put a candidate on the ballot for president if that candidate isn't eligible under the Constitution. It doesn't matter if that candidate is a person of color, Caucasian, Asian or Hispanic. The only thing that matters for ballot qualification is constitutional eligibility. Will we see Romney held to the same standards as the effort to expose Soetoro for the fraud and liar he is?

Don't understand your point. George Romney is not running for president, Mitt is. Mitt was born in the US so he is eligible.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Then there is this:

The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term natural born citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship by birth or at birth, either by being born in the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship at birth.


Are you aware John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone and McCain never released his birth certificate.

yeah you can't reason with birthtards dude they genuinely believe that it's possible for someone born on US soil to not be eligible to be president.

if he was born on us soil he is a us born citizen

Your defintions are wrong. Naturalized is if you were not born in the US or to US parents. Natural born is born in the US. Naturalization is a legal process of becoming a US citizen and hence you are naturalized.

[link to www.uscis.gov]

[link to www.uscis.gov]