| Users Online Now: 2,064 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 998,437 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,337,508 | Threads Today: 329 | Posts Today: 5,249 |
| 10:59 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,064 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 998,437 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,337,508 | Threads Today: 329 | Posts Today: 5,249 |
| 10:59 AM | ||
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10584905  United States07/28/2012 06:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles: Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1203458 [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding: [link to www.n3kl.org] According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified: [link to www2.nict.go.jp] The pressure should be much higher! Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period: [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days. This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10584905 United States07/28/2012 06:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look at this photograph, it's the lasco c2 image. notice the particles: Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1203458 [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] For the first time in 11 years, this NOAA space weather website is not responding: [link to www.n3kl.org] According to what we a re seeing on the lasco c2 image, this data is falsified: [link to www2.nict.go.jp] The pressure should be much higher! Normally, the position of the sun would be apparent on this graphic , usually with a low flux reading during a quiet period: [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] Again, I am absolutely positive that solar data and space weather data is being withheld and falsified, and looking at the lasso c2 image it is quite apparent there is an unusual event occurring and an intense outburst of radiation, a very severe x ray flare from a sunspot that is rotating into position to become noneffective within 5-7 days. This turn of events does not bode well and I am absolutely certain after observing theses data spreads fro 12 years that the information is being falsified. |
HnryBwmn  User ID: 20457242 United States07/28/2012 08:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want to, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. No shit. Spend $10 already. You can educate the ignorant, but you can't fix stupid! |
| HnryBwmn User ID: 20457242 United States07/28/2012 08:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yeah pretty much knew most of your regulars would turn on you in the end. old henry was a given, who claimed once he was well in his eighties. I think he might just be a nut. but that's probably giving him way too much credit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20125272 anyway, I was doing some camping all last week and almost every hour there was a tree branch falling down. thought at first it was just squirrels or birds dropping things. some maybe. but most are heavy sounding. just kept thinking about what you said, that it can be pretty dangerous to even walk in the woods with the state our trees are in now. heavy humidity here too, which has always been bad here this time of year, but i swear it's even worse this year. This has degraded into childish stupidity. AA, if you called me "Brown" before go get it and quote it. Poster above, go find it, (80 years old???) and quote it. Dementia, how does it work? You can educate the ignorant, but you can't fix stupid! |
| HnryBwmn User ID: 20457242 United States07/28/2012 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: RTS REDUX originating from someone who admitted he had no clue that some cosmic rays come from the Sun and had no idea that NICT is Japanese..THAT comment is really SPECIAL  It is a very minor oversight that the NICT simulation was a Japanese simulation derived from the US ac satellites data. As an astrophysicist myself, I believe I have a right to dissent on charged particles coming from the Sun being called 'cosmic' rays/ Cosmic implies from outside the solar system and when I was young the textbooks never mentioned the Sun as a source. I do not believe charged particles from the Sun should be classified as cosmic rays, at any rate. There has to be some special quality about them that sets them apart to give them a meaningful definition, and coming from outside the solar system is IT. I don't mind you being here as you help me a hell of a lot better than someone who just nods in agreement or is nice but simply posts his own ideas on my thread. You have been consistently wrong and your questions and retorts bolster my position. To at this point claim things are normal in the space weather environment or on this planet is self defeating, and exposes you and your agenda. a minor oversight?  The Sun(obviously)emits Cosmic Rays,around %90 of Cosmic Rays are in the form of Protons..here read Wiki about them [link to en.wikipedia.org] I'll quote a little if you don't want to click the link: 'About 89% of cosmic rays are simple protons or hydrogen nuclei, 10% are helium nuclei or alpha particles, and 1% are the nuclei of heavier elements. These nuclei constitute 99% of the cosmic rays. Solitary electrons (much like beta particles, although their ultimate source is unknown) constitute much of the remaining 1%. The variety of particle energies reflects the wide variety of sources. The origins range from processes on the Sun (and presumably other stars as well), to as yet unknown physical mechanisms in the farthest reaches of the observable universe'. Hope that helps. AA - I was expelled from School at age 15,I have no qualifications - What do you have in terms of Education/Higher Learning..I ask because you say you are known Astrophysicist? Thank you for that. This is more info/knowledge/learning than any other posts since "AA" returned. If there is to be learnig how about explaining all the charts in laymans' terms instead of the immature issues you persistently dwell on (AA)? [link to www.n3kl.org] You can educate the ignorant, but you can't fix stupid! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20739972 United States07/28/2012 08:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: RTS REDUX you are delusional if anything there was a flare from 1520 that went unreported [link to spaceweather.com] [link to www.youtube.com] It was NOT an m-3 solar FLARE FROM A SUNSPOT. I HAVE AN EXTENSIVE ARCHIVES OF XRAY FLARES OF VARYING INTENSITIES FOR COMPARATIVE PURPOSES and am absolutely positive this was NOT a solar x ray flare.. The x ray flux originated from very distinct coronal hole I referenced above, which is as dark and deep as I have ever seen save the one last month, It's the same one. Same shape, same place of the Sun. It's a hole in the suns magnetic containment caused by a failure or anomaly of the Suns magnetic field.. I would like to add to this post that you have been most helpful in allowing me to explain what is really happening by questioning my opinions. I don't like you on a personal level because U know your mission is to deceive, but if it works why change it? I would never have banned you or any of the other detractors but would have edited out argumentation posts unrelated to the subject or respectful material with no other purpose but to inflame passion and disconnect rational dialogue.. I DO NOT BELIEVE IN CENSORSHIP, SHIT ALWAYS FLOATS TO THE TOP AND STARTS TO STINK SOONER OR LATER, Any moran with half a brian can see a flare in that video dipshit  Wow. RTS,this AA is incredibly stupid hey!? Simply incredible B.S. all through his quoted comment above ^ Looks like this shit has floated to the top. For everyone who is being decived by AA - You are being,um,decived..now come to NiNz,read up there if you are into Solar/Earth Physics,there is nothing here(apart from a few titbits)that come from someone who wants you to learn..his comment above proves this(claiming that of all his records of flares none look like the one/s in the Video,clearly flaring). ninz lost any respect i had when she begged $$$$ for the injury that "aledgedly" happened when the questions as to weither it was true or not came up, that thread was completely infilltrated by posters that attacked anyone who had questions and as tree girl said, there is an elitistness to that thread that IMHO makes it impossible to feel free to participate I have always liked this one because, as was stated earlier, as an ac, the op here can not extensively delete views, data, or bain people carry on AA, good job |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20739972 United States07/28/2012 08:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: RTS REDUX originating from someone who admitted he had no clue that some cosmic rays come from the Sun and had no idea that NICT is Japanese..THAT comment is really SPECIAL It is a very minor oversight that the NICT simulation was a Japanese simulation derived from the US ac satellites data. As an astrophysicist myself, I believe I have a right to dissent on charged particles coming from the Sun being called 'cosmic' rays/ Cosmic implies from outside the solar system and when I was young the textbooks never mentioned the Sun as a source. I do not believe charged particles from the Sun should be classified as cosmic rays, at any rate. There has to be some special quality about them that sets them apart to give them a meaningful definition, and coming from outside the solar system is IT. I don't mind you being here as you help me a hell of a lot better than someone who just nods in agreement or is nice but simply posts his own ideas on my thread. You have been consistently wrong and your questions and retorts bolster my position. To at this point claim things are normal in the space weather environment or on this planet is self defeating, and exposes you and your agenda. a minor oversight? The Sun(obviously)emits Cosmic Rays,around %90 of Cosmic Rays are in the form of Protons..here read Wiki about them [link to en.wikipedia.org] I'll quote a little if you don't want to click the link: 'About 89% of cosmic rays are simple protons or hydrogen nuclei, 10% are helium nuclei or alpha particles, and 1% are the nuclei of heavier elements. These nuclei constitute 99% of the cosmic rays. Solitary electrons (much like beta particles, although their ultimate source is unknown) constitute much of the remaining 1%. The variety of particle energies reflects the wide variety of sources. The origins range from processes on the Sun (and presumably other stars as well), to as yet unknown physical mechanisms in the farthest reaches of the observable universe'. Hope that helps. AA - I was expelled from School at age 15,I have no qualifications - What do you have in terms of Education/Higher Learning..I ask because you say you are known Astrophysicist? if all this is true, why does the apparent size of the sun not change? over billions of years the sun or a star would constantly be sluffing mass, which would mean, one day it would be the size of a basketball any basketball size stars out there? |
| HnryBwmn User ID: 20457242 United States07/28/2012 08:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here are some current Solar/Earth Facts for the interested Quoting: Spittin'Cesium : ) [link to www.youtube.com] 2 Minute Gnewz. Again I just got more data and important information than everything from "AA" since his return. Kinda verifies what RTX said about a flare that "AA" said didn't happen. You can educate the ignorant, but you can't fix stupid! |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973  Netherlands07/28/2012 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1107610 It was NOT an m-3 solar FLARE FROM A SUNSPOT. I HAVE AN EXTENSIVE ARCHIVES OF XRAY FLARES OF VARYING INTENSITIES FOR COMPARATIVE PURPOSES and am absolutely positive this was NOT a solar x ray flare.. The x ray flux originated from very distinct coronal hole I referenced above, which is as dark and deep as I have ever seen save the one last month, It's the same one. Same shape, same place of the Sun. It's a hole in the suns magnetic containment caused by a failure or anomaly of the Suns magnetic field.. I would like to add to this post that you have been most helpful in allowing me to explain what is really happening by questioning my opinions. I don't like you on a personal level because U know your mission is to deceive, but if it works why change it? I would never have banned you or any of the other detractors but would have edited out argumentation posts unrelated to the subject or respectful material with no other purpose but to inflame passion and disconnect rational dialogue.. I DO NOT BELIEVE IN CENSORSHIP, SHIT ALWAYS FLOATS TO THE TOP AND STARTS TO STINK SOONER OR LATER, Any moran with half a brian can see a flare in that video dipshit Wow. RTS,this AA is incredibly stupid hey!? Simply incredible B.S. all through his quoted comment above ^ Looks like this shit has floated to the top. For everyone who is being decived by AA - You are being,um,decived..now come to NiNz,read up there if you are into Solar/Earth Physics,there is nothing here(apart from a few titbits)that come from someone who wants you to learn..his comment above proves this(claiming that of all his records of flares none look like the one/s in the Video,clearly flaring). ninz lost any respect i had when she begged $$$$ for the injury that "aledgedly" happened when the questions as to weither it was true or not came up, that thread was completely infilltrated by posters that attacked anyone who had questions and as tree girl said, there is an elitistness to that thread that IMHO makes it impossible to feel free to participate I have always liked this one because, as was stated earlier, as an ac, the op here can not extensively delete views, data, or bain people carry on AA, good job NiNz only deletes posts that are totally off topic or are rude..come there now..there is no elitism now,if there ever was - Feel free there to ask most any question and someone will(even if it takes a while)answer it for you as best they can. Honestly,don't feel like you are'nt free to chime in over there : ) Who is resident on this thread for information? I've never really used it,spare' when it first begun. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20739972 United States07/28/2012 08:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want to, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. No shit. Spend $10 already. why buy something you can get for free go ahead and send noaa you check for the air you breathe |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20739972 United States07/28/2012 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow. RTS,this AA is incredibly stupid hey!? Simply incredible B.S. all through his quoted comment above ^ Looks like this shit has floated to the top. For everyone who is being decived by AA - You are being,um,decived..now come to NiNz,read up there if you are into Solar/Earth Physics,there is nothing here(apart from a few titbits)that come from someone who wants you to learn..his comment above proves this(claiming that of all his records of flares none look like the one/s in the Video,clearly flaring). ninz lost any respect i had when she begged $$$$ for the injury that "aledgedly" happened when the questions as to weither it was true or not came up, that thread was completely infilltrated by posters that attacked anyone who had questions and as tree girl said, there is an elitistness to that thread that IMHO makes it impossible to feel free to participate I have always liked this one because, as was stated earlier, as an ac, the op here can not extensively delete views, data, or bain people carry on AA, good job NiNz only deletes posts that are totally off topic or are rude..come there now..there is no elitism now,if there ever was - Feel free there to ask most any question and someone will(even if it takes a while)answer it for you as best they can. Honestly,don't feel like you are'nt free to chime in over there : ) Who is resident on this thread for information? I've never really used it,spare' when it first begun. I have seen people ask, whats that mean, only to be ignored, at the least |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/28/2012 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1320206 It is a very minor oversight that the NICT simulation was a Japanese simulation derived from the US ac satellites data. As an astrophysicist myself, I believe I have a right to dissent on charged particles coming from the Sun being called 'cosmic' rays/ Cosmic implies from outside the solar system and when I was young the textbooks never mentioned the Sun as a source. I do not believe charged particles from the Sun should be classified as cosmic rays, at any rate. There has to be some special quality about them that sets them apart to give them a meaningful definition, and coming from outside the solar system is IT. I don't mind you being here as you help me a hell of a lot better than someone who just nods in agreement or is nice but simply posts his own ideas on my thread. You have been consistently wrong and your questions and retorts bolster my position. To at this point claim things are normal in the space weather environment or on this planet is self defeating, and exposes you and your agenda. a minor oversight? The Sun(obviously)emits Cosmic Rays,around %90 of Cosmic Rays are in the form of Protons..here read Wiki about them [link to en.wikipedia.org] I'll quote a little if you don't want to click the link: 'About 89% of cosmic rays are simple protons or hydrogen nuclei, 10% are helium nuclei or alpha particles, and 1% are the nuclei of heavier elements. These nuclei constitute 99% of the cosmic rays. Solitary electrons (much like beta particles, although their ultimate source is unknown) constitute much of the remaining 1%. The variety of particle energies reflects the wide variety of sources. The origins range from processes on the Sun (and presumably other stars as well), to as yet unknown physical mechanisms in the farthest reaches of the observable universe'. Hope that helps. AA - I was expelled from School at age 15,I have no qualifications - What do you have in terms of Education/Higher Learning..I ask because you say you are known Astrophysicist? if all this is true, why does the apparent size of the sun not change? over billions of years the sun or a star would constantly be sluffing mass, which would mean, one day it would be the size of a basketball any basketball size stars out there? It does change size..as it loses Mass it's abilty to hold itself as close together through Gravity causes it to slowly begin expanding. Yes,there are Basketball Size Stars out there : ) Neutron Stars for instance,it is said that just a Teaspoon worth of a Neutron Star would way more than Planet Earth due to its' immense Density. Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 07/28/2012 08:39 AM The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/28/2012 08:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Spittin'Cesium Wow. RTS,this AA is incredibly stupid hey!? Simply incredible B.S. all through his quoted comment above ^ Looks like this shit has floated to the top. For everyone who is being decived by AA - You are being,um,decived..now come to NiNz,read up there if you are into Solar/Earth Physics,there is nothing here(apart from a few titbits)that come from someone who wants you to learn..his comment above proves this(claiming that of all his records of flares none look like the one/s in the Video,clearly flaring). ninz lost any respect i had when she begged $$$$ for the injury that "aledgedly" happened when the questions as to weither it was true or not came up, that thread was completely infilltrated by posters that attacked anyone who had questions and as tree girl said, there is an elitistness to that thread that IMHO makes it impossible to feel free to participate I have always liked this one because, as was stated earlier, as an ac, the op here can not extensively delete views, data, or bain people carry on AA, good job NiNz only deletes posts that are totally off topic or are rude..come there now..there is no elitism now,if there ever was - Feel free there to ask most any question and someone will(even if it takes a while)answer it for you as best they can. Honestly,don't feel like you are'nt free to chime in over there : ) Who is resident on this thread for information? I've never really used it,spare' when it first begun. I have seen people ask, whats that mean, only to be ignored, at the least I would have thought a non-answer might simply mean the right person missed the question or if you are completely ignored,just one of those things..I see most People when the crew are in the house get responces to their Questions or if they don't know,they'll say : ) At the least over their you will learn more than I have seen going on here. There's just conjecture going back and forth about AA. Last Edited by Spittin'Cesium on 07/28/2012 08:46 AM The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20739972 United States07/28/2012 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I aquired a very nice azonics dual probe digital temp indicator a few years back. at the beginning of last summer, i dug it out, ran a quick cal check on it and set it up in the window in the shade, with ample space around it and airflow. myself and buddies proceded to monitor temps last year, and compare them to the reported high temps on MSM weather reports. we consistantly were getting 115-121 degrees in the heat of the day. MSM was skewing the data, IMHO. how we have to ask why would they. well, it seems that there are laws in place that govern working/living when the outdoor temp goes over 100. non a/c'd auto repair shops can not stop employees from taking breaks every 15 minutes. I believe its the same for all outside workers. the power company can not shut off your power even if your bill is behind I feel fairly confident there is a concerted effort to hide the info. the car outside temp gauge yesterday got up to ~111 yesterday this is the reason for the "heat index" in the first place. makes you mind not think "heck no, it was way hotter than 98 yesterday, the average sheeple would say, oh it was just the humidity that made it feel that way the original concept of this thread was censored data, and I find it interesting that even on a local level it is very true dr |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20739972 United States07/28/2012 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I aquired a very nice azonics dual probe digital temp indicator a few years back. at the beginning of last summer, i dug it out, ran a quick cal check on it and set it up in the window in the shade, with ample space around it and airflow. myself and buddies proceded to monitor temps last year, and compare them to the reported high temps on MSM weather reports. we consistantly were getting 115-121 degrees in the heat of the day. MSM was skewing the data, IMHO. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20739972 how we have to ask why would they. well, it seems that there are laws in place that govern working/living when the outdoor temp goes over 100. non a/c'd auto repair shops can not stop employees from taking breaks every 15 minutes. I believe its the same for all outside workers. the power company can not shut off your power even if your bill is behind I feel fairly confident there is a concerted effort to hide the info. the car outside temp gauge yesterday got up to ~111 yesterday this is the reason for the "heat index" in the first place. makes you mind not think "heck no, it was way hotter than 98 yesterday, the average sheeple would say, oh it was just the humidity that made it feel that way the original concept of this thread was censored data, and I find it interesting that even on a local level it is very true dr must add a few things, location houston tx, I have 35 years experience in the metrology world (no not weather...lol) offset seemed to be fairly consistant at 17 degrees, which we laughingly call the liars correction factor (their low temps were consistant with our lows, only high temps over ~90 seemed to have this trend) |
| DoomPoon User ID: 20600842 United States07/28/2012 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. Try posting as me and see how long it takes to be exposed. There is no one on this planet who can imitate me. They tried it many years back but gave up when everyone could instantly see it wasn't me posting. I have a unique style of writing as well as a singular unduplicatable personality (see, I invented a word that doesn't exist but should, part of my unique writing style) , my personality shines through any cloud of disinformation .My extensive and dynamic knowledge of science is unmatched as far as I have been able to ascertain, and my ability to confront detractors instantly is shared by few and legendary. I have caused many disinfo ops to go nuts or quit. REDUX is an example of one I drove to obvious insanity. WARNING: THE ABOVE POSTER IS AN IMPOSTER, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK. Me thinks (s)he tries TO hard. Peace, DP ___________________ An open mind, requires an open heart. |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/28/2012 09:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flare showing on SDO Image but not on GOES X-Ray? [link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov] <--- Top Left. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/28/2012 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Gunnz, lots of Gunnz User ID: 18199250  Australia07/28/2012 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the human "race" sends a device into space, and suddenly they know everything about the universe and how it functions. They don't have a clue, about anything out there. And forget measurements. Measurements by devices are linear, and restricted to the actual purpose of what it is supposed to be detecting. The devices are detecting shadows, if you could put it into simple explanations. Corp/o/Ration A Single Entity (group with the same paragon) Restricting consumption of scarce commodities. |
| ehecatl User ID: 20746516  Mexico07/28/2012 10:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want to, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. No shit. Spend $10 already. why buy something you can get for free go ahead and send noaa you check for the air you breathe The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. Try posting as me and see how long it takes to be exposed. There is no one on this planet who can imitate me. They tried it many years back but gave up when everyone could instantly see it wasn't me posting. I have a unique style of writing as well as a singular unduplicatable personality (see, I invented a word that doesn't exist but should, part of my unique writing style) , my personality shines through any cloud of disinformation .My extensive and dynamic knowledge of science is unmatched as far as I have been able to ascertain, and my ability to confront detractors instantly is shared by few and legendary. I have caused many disinfo ops to go nuts or quit. REDUX is an example of one I drove to obvious insanity. WARNING: THE ABOVE POSTER IS AN IMPOSTER, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK. Me thinks (s)he tries TO hard. Peace, DP The thing is he does not even have to pay $10 to better define the impersonator issue. Just open up a free GLP account, named perhaps - The Real Robert Hawkins And he could always jump back to this thread as AA under various ID numbers if he gets banned at times as Robert Hawkins. Last Edited by ehecatl on 07/28/2012 10:44 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7554855  Canada07/28/2012 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AA also we are going to see quite quickly if your prediction of continuous heating is correct as in a few weeks the temperatures in the arctic will start to taper dramatically in normal circumstances and the melt season will end in september if all is still at least somewhat normal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18342848 I really do not see how the delivery drivers in southern locales have not all dropped dead by now if we are really being bombarded by as much damaged solar radiation as you said. I mean they are driving around in metal vehicles all day at low latitudes. Call it debunking if ya want I'm just raising a point though. A question really. Why aren't they all dropping dead? I think this is a good point & deserves an answer. Perhaps there are pockets where the rads are greater than in other places? Here in Ontario we have been getting fried this Summer. The land is so dry & grasses burnt. Farmers loosing their crops means very high food prices in the coming seasons. I'm seriously thinking of getting a small hydroponic system. |
| Spittin'Cesium User ID: 14589973 Netherlands07/28/2012 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AA also we are going to see quite quickly if your prediction of continuous heating is correct as in a few weeks the temperatures in the arctic will start to taper dramatically in normal circumstances and the melt season will end in september if all is still at least somewhat normal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18342848 I really do not see how the delivery drivers in southern locales have not all dropped dead by now if we are really being bombarded by as much damaged solar radiation as you said. I mean they are driving around in metal vehicles all day at low latitudes. Call it debunking if ya want I'm just raising a point though. A question really. Why aren't they all dropping dead? I think this is a good point & deserves an answer. Perhaps there are pockets where the rads are greater than in other places? Here in Ontario we have been getting fried this Summer. The land is so dry & grasses burnt. Farmers loosing their crops means very high food prices in the coming seasons. I'm seriously thinking of getting a small hydroponic system. Why would they be getting more Rads. in a Metal Vehicle? If anything they'd recieve less. The thing that hath been, is That which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun. Ecclesiastes 9:1 |
| HnryBwmn User ID: 20457242 United States07/28/2012 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AA also we are going to see quite quickly if your prediction of continuous heating is correct as in a few weeks the temperatures in the arctic will start to taper dramatically in normal circumstances and the melt season will end in september if all is still at least somewhat normal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18342848 I really do not see how the delivery drivers in southern locales have not all dropped dead by now if we are really being bombarded by as much damaged solar radiation as you said. I mean they are driving around in metal vehicles all day at low latitudes. Call it debunking if ya want I'm just raising a point though. A question really. Why aren't they all dropping dead? I think this is a good point & deserves an answer. Perhaps there are pockets where the rads are greater than in other places? Here in Ontario we have been getting fried this Summer. The land is so dry & grasses burnt. Farmers loosing their crops means very high food prices in the coming seasons. I'm seriously thinking of getting a small hydroponic system. Why would they be getting more Rads. in a Metal Vehicle? If anything they'd recieve less. It's the reference that AA said that metal roofs when hit by high proton flux are converted to Gamma...... Extreme proton flux would result in excessive gamma radiation. Not good. Yer hair is gonna fall out as your brain gets microwaved. You can educate the ignorant, but you can't fix stupid! |
| ehecatl User ID: 20746516 Mexico07/28/2012 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. Try posting as me and see how long it takes to be exposed. There is no one on this planet who can imitate me. They tried it many years back but gave up when everyone could instantly see it wasn't me posting. I have a unique style of writing as well as a singular unduplicatable personality (see, I invented a word that doesn't exist but should, part of my unique writing style) , my personality shines through any cloud of disinformation .My extensive and dynamic knowledge of science is unmatched as far as I have been able to ascertain, and my ability to confront detractors instantly is shared by few and legendary. I have caused many disinfo ops to go nuts or quit. REDUX is an example of one I drove to obvious insanity. WARNING: THE ABOVE POSTER IS AN IMPOSTER, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK. Me thinks (s)he tries TO hard. Peace, DP Yeah, I'm resisting forming an opinion one way or the other at that at this time on that. But the "agent 74444", for my short knowlege of glp, is confirmed to be the long time tracker and antagonist or shill to AA. I might be seeing patterns when there is nothing, but if one looks at all the posts of the AA of the last day and a half, it seems to read as if on each post a singular particular trait exemplified, as if marked off on a check list of classic AA characteristics. In fact you can just about use the series of posts of the last day and a half to reconstitute the check list of most of the AA/IDW/RobertHawkins writing style characteristics, and through all those posts there is an almost total lack of substance, not that the real AA lacked substance at times too. I think I could impersonate AA for at least a few posts if I tried hard enough, but what that means is uncertain because there are probably a lot like me who are decisively undecided. So the meaning of "to successfully impersonate AA", is to fool one or two who post? One would benefit in writing the script with the checklist of AA posting characteristics, like a few long time confirmed dedicated shill detractors have. I have neither the time or interest to do this, so I doubt that I would try, unless it were just one AA post as a joke. In the long term I doubt that his dedicated shills would invest the time either. But earlier in this thread, AA says that some of the AA posts in this thread are by impersonators, but I don't think he mentioned which posts in particular. I may take more time to see how this AA engages and lasts before I form a little more of an opinion, but I hope to God that I never form a solid belief, about that or about just about anything else. Good to see you back AA BTW, if you are the real one. Last Edited by ehecatl on 07/28/2012 12:47 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17559653  United Kingdom07/28/2012 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7554855 Canada07/28/2012 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the human "race" sends a device into space, and suddenly they know everything about the universe and how it functions. Quoting: Gunnz, lots of Gunnz They don't have a clue, about anything out there. And forget measurements. Measurements by devices are linear, and restricted to the actual purpose of what it is supposed to be detecting. The devices are detecting shadows, if you could put it into simple explanations. I totally agree. Human arrogance is out of control. Only way to fix it, is the reset button, unfortunately. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7554855 Canada07/28/2012 12:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. Try posting as me and see how long it takes to be exposed. There is no one on this planet who can imitate me. They tried it many years back but gave up when everyone could instantly see it wasn't me posting. I have a unique style of writing as well as a singular unduplicatable personality (see, I invented a word that doesn't exist but should, part of my unique writing style) , my personality shines through any cloud of disinformation .My extensive and dynamic knowledge of science is unmatched as far as I have been able to ascertain, and my ability to confront detractors instantly is shared by few and legendary. I have caused many disinfo ops to go nuts or quit. REDUX is an example of one I drove to obvious insanity. WARNING: THE ABOVE POSTER IS AN IMPOSTER, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK. Me thinks (s)he tries TO hard. Peace, DP Yeah, I'm resisting forming an opinion one way or the other at that at this time on that. But the "agent 74444", for my short history on glp, is confirmed to be the long time tracker and antagonist or shill to AA. I might be seeing patterns when there is nothing, but if one looks at all the posts of the AA of the last day and a half, it seems to read as if on each post a singular particular trait exemplified, as if marked off on a check list of classic AA characteristics. In fact you can just about use the series of posts of the last day and a half to reconstitute the check list of most of the AA/IDW/RobertHawkins writing style characteristics, and through all those posts there is an almost total lack of substance, not that the real AA lacked substance at times too. I think I could impersonate AA for at least a few posts if I tried hard enough, but what that means is uncertain because there are probably a lot like me who are decisively undecided. So the meaning of "to successfully impersonate AA", is to fool one or two who post? One would benefit in writing the script with the checklist of AA posting characteristics, like a few long time confirmed dedicated shill detractors have. I have neither the time or interest to do this, so I doubt that I would try, unless it were just one AA post as a joke. In the long term I doubt that his dedicated shills would invest the time either. I may take more time to see how this AA engages and lasts before I form a little more of an opinion, but I hope to God that I never form a solid belief, about that or about just about anything else. Good to see you back AA BTW, if you are the real one. For the most part, I'm a lurker/observer in this thread. I'm also a student, trying to learn what's happening with our Sun.....so I'm really a nobody. But, as an observer of the posts from AA, I will say this. The old AA always explained why he was missing for any period of time, but this now returned (new) AA never explained why he has been away for so long, & instead, goes on the attack of Henry who tried to preserve AA's better material in a new thread. Also, where is Parvati (or) maybe I should be asking "who" really is Parvati? I would've thought she would be posting here since AA(?) returned? Either way, seems this thread has returned again to some more drama, & very little real content to learn from. So much for informing/helping mankind. Spitting Cessium....thank you for your informative posts. |
| Anonomous Astrophysist User ID: 20746516 Mexico07/28/2012 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12817237 United States07/28/2012 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12817237 United States07/28/2012 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the original thread that AA started as an AC and with constantly changing id#s, is there is no ultimate way for him to prevent impersonators, or for readers to be sure, in the short term at least who they are dealing with, plus he could not moderate the thread. Likewise he can't prevent any of us from posting anything we want, or even posting as him if we want, during one of his absences. Quoting: ehecatl There are certain advantages for the author of a thread to have a sign-in ID. Try posting as me and see how long it takes to be exposed. There is no one on this planet who can imitate me. They tried it many years back but gave up when everyone could instantly see it wasn't me posting. I have a unique style of writing as well as a singular unduplicatable personality (see, I invented a word that doesn't exist but should, part of my unique writing style) , my personality shines through any cloud of disinformation .My extensive and dynamic knowledge of science is unmatched as far as I have been able to ascertain, and my ability to confront detractors instantly is shared by few and legendary. I have caused many disinfo ops to go nuts or quit. REDUX is an example of one I drove to obvious insanity. WARNING: THE ABOVE POSTER IS AN IMPOSTER, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK. Me thinks (s)he tries TO hard. Peace, DP Yeah, I'm resisting forming an opinion one way or the other at that at this time on that. But the "agent 74444", for my short knowlege of glp, is confirmed to be the long time tracker and antagonist or shill to AA. I might be seeing patterns when there is nothing, but if one looks at all the posts of the AA of the last day and a half, it seems to read as if on each post a singular particular trait exemplified, as if marked off on a check list of classic AA characteristics. In fact you can just about use the series of posts of the last day and a half to reconstitute the check list of most of the AA/IDW/RobertHawkins writing style characteristics, and through all those posts there is an almost total lack of substance, not that the real AA lacked substance at times too. I think I could impersonate AA for at least a few posts if I tried hard enough, but what that means is uncertain because there are probably a lot like me who are decisively undecided. So the meaning of "to successfully impersonate AA", is to fool one or two who post? One would benefit in writing the script with the checklist of AA posting characteristics, like a few long time confirmed dedicated shill detractors have. I have neither the time or interest to do this, so I doubt that I would try, unless it were just one AA post as a joke. In the long term I doubt that his dedicated shills would invest the time either. But earlier in this thread, AA says that some of the AA posts in this thread are by impersonators, but I don't think he mentioned which posts in particular. I may take more time to see how this AA engages and lasts before I form a little more of an opinion, but I hope to God that I never form a solid belief, about that or about just about anything else. Good to see you back AA BTW, if you are the real one. While waiting to see if AA shows back up....Did your potatoes in the box ever sprout? |
