POLL : Do you believe Andrew Breitbart was whacked?

Here you go - it was his father-in-law that said it

Thread: BREITBART: Media says history of heart problems; Father-in-law says 'I'm not aware of heart probs'

I just read that awhile ago. Interesting article. I hope the ME doesn't get whacked.

I KNEW all the alleged heart condition crap was all BOGUS MSM propaganda.

This is proof.....and yeah....hopefully Medical Examiner doesn't get whacked....or bought off.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/03/2012 09:15 PM

The msm "math"doesn't, at all, add up. One too many coincidents.......etc.......
.......Houston, WE (truly) have a problem.

Thanks for an indeed quite provacative post.

You guys already post this?
[link to losangeles.cbslocal.com]

CORONER DELAYED AUTOPSY RESULTS PENDING TOXICOLOGY REPORTS. THAT MEANS THEIR WAS NO FREAKIN' MASSIVE CORONARY. ORSON BEAN KNEW THAT (FATHER IN LAW).

I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS!!!!

Why were all the breitbart threads taken off? This is the first one I could find today....

Be afraid...be very afraid..

That's probably why they took him out, when and how - to send a message and make everyone nervous and paranoid.

Don't create conspiracy where none exists....we have enough REAL conspiracy problems already.

The Breitbart threads....enjoy.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/03/2012 11:36 PM

I think he was murdered. His business partner and close friend, I forget his name, said that a year ago Breitbart spent five days in the hospital and they discovered a heart problem. He said as a result, since then, he's been on medication, got a personal trainer and lost weight. If he was in the hospital for five days, there has to be other people that know it.

Not true. The coroner didn't say that there wasn't a heart problem. There could very well be signs of a heart attack, but they want to find out first if there are signs of poisoning or if he was snorting cocaine all night.

I'm just being factual here. I loved and admired Andrew, and I don't think they'll find any drugs in his system that he, himself, put there.

Those records should be available...if it really happened.

Food for thought.......
Who is this alleged "business partner" they are referring to? Friend or foe?

Da fackts is wuts we want.

So you have your lynching Bert....I thought you were "real" , but you're not. Sad. Who is real here?

I don't want a lynching...I want TRUTH and the CRIMINALS exposed.

...and so do approx 90% of GLP.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/03/2012 11:59 PM

Look, if you want to take someone out because they are a threat, you do it very quietly, sometimes slowly so that there is no question that it must have been natural - nothing connected to whatever reason you want them gone.

However, if you also want to send a message to others that they may suffer the same fate, you leave enough questions regarding the "accidental" or "natural" nature of the death as well as other clues as to why - the "message" will then be received by those it is intended for.

In AB's case, if he was murdered, it most likely would be because of the Obummer tapes. And, since there are WAY too many coincidences involved with his death, the natural assumption is that it also serves as a warning message.

If not, then Obutt hired some pretty lame hitman.

I totally agree with you.
Years back, there was some British guy / spy / informant...(i forget entire story now)...or something, who gave alleged info about the WMD's to the Bush adminstration.
That guy ended up dead in a field in Britain of alleged "natural causes" as well.
What was a clear message....and a cleanup of a loose end.

Breitbarts death reeks of this as well....on both counts.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/04/2012 12:08 AM

Bert. I know you were asked to start a thread concerning this. I would hope you would be non biased, but that is not what I am seeing by your recent posts on the A.Breitbart threads. If the hit numbers here are correct, your threads impact opinion and if you care, you won't mislead others. Carry on as you say:) Allisa4757

I swear to you on a stack of bibles this was pure curiosity because Breitbarts death is SO suspicious.
No one asked me to start this thread.

Yes...I am going to keep this as non-biased as possible in my own thread....but the thing REEKS TO HIGH HELL of conspiracy.
You know it, I know it....90% of GLP knows it.

...and thank you Alissa.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/04/2012 12:22 AM

Breitbart’s Footage Shows Obama ‘Palling Around’ With Terrorists

"The footage that Andrew Breitbart planned to release just hours after his untimely death would have proven hugely damaging to President Obama’s re-election hopes, because it shows Obama fraternizing with Weather Underground terrorists whose goal it was to set up a Communist dictatorship inside the United States."

(more at link)

[link to theintelhub.com]

O'bama's handlers have gone to great lengths monetarily to erase his past.
The elite in this country have NO bounds in what they will do to maintain and secure their control.
Breitbart was nothing more than a common street thug to them. And therefore easily "dismissed".

I would like to see the tapes released, but there are few with enough reputation to pull it off.

As Yogi Bera once said...."It ain't over 'till it's over"
...and the elections are not here yet.
...nor is the proper timing leading up to them.


Read what Breitbart said about the tapes.....

“I’ve got videos. This election we’re going to vet him”

“To show why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008.”

“The videos are going to come out; the narrative is going to come out that Barack Obama met a bunch of silver ponytails back in the 1980s like Bill and Bernadine Dohrn, equally radical, who said one day we’re going to have the presidency. And the rest of us slept while they plotted….”
[link to www.deathrattlesports.com]

:ayerschng:

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/04/2012 02:00 AM

andrew is part of the backlash that is coming. he's not really dead.

I'm not sure March 1 was the day to release them.
The day after the DNC acceptance speech would have been the ideal timing.

Now if Hillary can get them into her conniving little fingers...

In light of what has happened....did you think they were going to keep that date?
7-10 days was the new timeline.....but I wouldn't be surprised if they hold onto them to just before the election before dropping them on the MSM.

Watch the MSM go NUTS then.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/04/2012 02:16 AM

I've actually wondered that.

I could see that as a very well played strategic move on his part and whomever is collaborating with him.

MSM would have buried it this week.
They are already pissing themselves over Limbaugh.

Release date needs to be a time when they are getting leg shivers over O'Bama.

Some things are too big to bury.
Why?

1) Arpio's ongoing investigation and connection/ tie in with what is on Breitbart's tapes.

2) Breitbart's death assured this can't be ignored when they come out.

Timing the tapes now is critical....and hopefully Arpio comes out with his info at the proper time as well.


A...ONE....TWO punch right to the SOCIALIST RADICALS COLLECTIVE JAW.



Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/04/2012 02:59 AM

Snipped this for readability.

Who has enough credibility to release the tapes and would be willing to touch them?
I'm not sure his "business associates" like the idea of taking one last midnight stroll.

1) If required...tapes can easily be leaked anonymously....you know that.
It doesn't matter who releases them really.
They will be scrutinized in the same way regardless.

2) Arpio is a sort of "wingman" for Breitbart.
They both made statements the coincided with the same people...both being objects of the investigation and tapes.
That's some heavy duty dog doo.

That's another thing that's been bugging me about all this

knowing what was on the line

how at risk he was

yet AB chose to go out to a bar drinking ALONE the night before????

Either he was TOTALLY naive

Or, he felt he had some pretty 'heavy' backup watching out for him

Or, like an AC recently mentioned - it was a set up, and he's not really dead