TRUTH ALERT: Romney is not buying votes. Ron Paul is spending more money per vote than any of the other candidates.

Maybe you are right, fighting against tyrrany is hard and can be costly. Maybe we should all just elect someone who loves the Patriot Act and NDAA because it is better to cower than resist the erosion of our freedoms.

BUT YOU STILL HAVE NOT CONVINCED ME OF IT.

The figures used in the article come directly from the filings from each candidate's campaign. Are you saying that Ron Paul's campaign lied? The only way that the information presented in the article could be false is if the Ron Paul campaign lied.

Keep calling the facts propaganda if you want, but the so-called propaganda comes directly from the Ron Paul campaign's filings.

Ron Paul will win.

Anybody who uses mainstream media as a source is to be untrusted.

Even if they are just sheep regurgitating shit.

Actually, no.

Ron Paul's campaign says he is winning easily.

Of course, you wouldn't link to that, would you?

Link to a Ron Paul site.

I dare you.

OK, so Ron Paul hasn't won a single state, he is in last place in the delegate count with 5% of the delegates so far, and he is polling 10% in the average of national GOP preference polls.

But Ron Paul's campaign says he is winning easily.

If you factor in the amount of money spent on major network MSM news shows where they talk about the presidential election, and divided up proportionally based on time spent talking about each candidate, then added that number to the total from the OP's first post:

Romney would equate more towards $160 per vote, maybe even $1600, depends on how expensive a 30 second ad is for a headline show on ABC, CNN, or FOX.

It is sad that the OP doesn't recognize that, or quite a few people in this thread.


Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich have each had multiple more times money spent on publicity for their votes than Ron Paul.

Yet somehow Ron Paul still has the biggest support, the most energetic rallies, etc.


Hmm, wonder why?

Because he is the true choice of the people. Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich are buying their way into votes.

The 5% of delegates is a number generated based on guessing by the establishment and MSM. The number is highly manipulated and is not accurate at all. A more accurate number would be around 30% of the delegates so far.

Also, the 10% average in "National Polls" are constructed in such a way as to make sure they are targeting demographics that support Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney.

They're calling landline home phones mostly, and the majority of people under the age of 45 do not have a home phone anymore.

The people over the age of 45 are the ones who get their news only from the MSM. The same people distorting the facts.

The internet polls are almost always favoring Ron Paul, because the same people who use the internet, get news information from sources other than the narrow agenda of the MSM viewpoint.

Because of this, they see the truth and vote for Ron Paul.



These things are all structured to be biased towards Ron Paul.


The establishment is DEATHLY afraid of him winning and the true voice of the patriotic American people speaking up.

Wonkish, isn't a forum like free republic or townhall more to your political compatibility? So you don't like Ron Paul. Do you like the Federal Reserve? Are you interested in the preservation of a monetary scam? Does an internationalist banking cartel benefit you and your family in any way? Please tell us if you have ulterior motives, because the winning issue is the fact that the Federal Reserve is being criticised for ripping off the American working class, and for that Ron Paul deserves credit.

Ron Paul is right on the fiat dollar about the Fed Res.

[link to iaconoresearch.com]

OP is just trolling.

Trolling? What OP said is absolutely true. Have a look at the link and also at the FEC filings.

Yet again, more freedom phrases but you are still not acknowledging the FACT that Ron Paul is spending more than any other candidate.

Keep telling yourself that buddy...who knows you might even have a dream where that actually comes true and the BAM

Reality will hit you hard

Why don't you post it and refute the claims in the article?

The only way that the figures in the article could be false is if the Ron Paul campaign lied in their filings---which by the way is illegal.

FAIL!!!

The 10% figure is coming from pollsters who are using a random sampling method. As for your comments about cell phones, they are also calling cell phones that statement is bunk.

i thought wonkish was a woman. no??

Ah yes, anyone who is not willing to drink the Ron Paul koolaid should be silenced and put aboard a one way FEMA train so they cannot voice their opinion and promulgate ACTUAL FACTS that could potentially expose Ron Paul for the fruit bat that he really is.

Nope. The numbers in the article come directly from FEC filings. The Paulbots claim to be all about TRUTH but when the truth does not perpetuate their confirmation bias then they automatically reject them.

Well now that the Ron Paul detracto bots are done trying to suppress the truth with their nonsensical trolling/shilling, we can get back on topic.

It's not easy to debate real numbers in the FEC filings that the candidates filed themselves.