Evolution is Bullshit! The Process of Digesting Your Food Alone Debunks the Theory

Billions of years of random mutations followed by non-random natural selection. You forgot that last part, which is really important.

They just believe that water raining on rocks creates a living cell organism.

Isn't public education wonderful?

No, it eventually created -- through innumerable tiny incremental changes over a long span of time -- a molecule that could self-replicate. Cells and organisms came later.

It is a caricature of evolution to think that a functioning cell just popped into existence, with all of its complex subsystems already in place from the get-go. No biologist claims this. That's not how evolution works.

Evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

If you ever needed proof of evolution...read this and get back to me.

In other words: Humans descended from a fish over billions of years. That is what you believe.

Insofar as public education no longer teaches that the earth is flat, that earth the center of the universe, that the universe is only 6000 years old, and that human origins can be traced back to Eden and a literal sixth day of creation, yes -- it's a step in the right direction.

It really is fascinating that you believe this.

Right.. it teaches that human origins can be traced back to the ancestors of worms.

Some day perhaps they will get the naturalism cults out of science class.

Sigh. Must I repeat myself? Not a "fish." And not "believe."

If you can't grasp the differences, further discussion is pointless.

It's pointless anyway, since it's clear that your mind is made up.

Willful ignorance is invincible ignorance. Enjoy your mythological Dark Ages.

If it started with a microbe and ended up with us shouldn't we be seeing things walking out of the water, has the process of evolution stopped or is it still ongoing, shouldn't every stage between microbe and us exist or was it a one of thing?

Not just me. 99.9% of scientists in relevant fields (biology, etc.) also affirm this. (I won't misuse the loaded term "believe.")

What I find fascinating, in a grim sort of way, is that the majority of the American populace rejects this. Not on the basis of valid evidence to the contrary, but simply because it happens to clash with their beloved but baseless religious beliefs.

And replace it with supernaturalism cults?

Shouldn't science classes teach science, rather than myth or superstition?

Its such a gradual process, its almost glacial - the evidence is all around us, more importantly it hasn't stopped its just so gradual that we can not see it happening right now - only evidence that it has happened in the past.

Your not right.. You are stating what you think.. Again you have no hard proof just what you think. And by saying others are wonrg that just makes you a half-wit asshole. Guess you are to stupid to all other points. Must be nice only having one brain ceil that works.

Seems like reality is creeping in on some Religion to me.

Science is empirical, Religion is a Dart throw.


I'm a Human by Alien Design, as we are Spiritual beings having a Meat talking or Human experience.

It will pass.

You need to learn a bit more. Read some books rather than watching so much YouTube.

Funny how no one has explained digestion from an evolutionist standpoint, but I am used to that, as too many topics are cast by the way side from top evolutionist believers, no matter the degree they carry. It always comes down to, 'As of right now, I can't explain it, the evidence is there, but not the explanation' or they revert to 'Ok, then tell me what created God'.

You could but you would rather threaten unbelievers with your fiction novel. Pathetic.

I have always said, for years now......that if there was such a thing as evolution, then WHY are there STILL apes & monkeys, etc.????

Wouldn't they have been done away with, along the evolutionary path???!

so far NO ONE has bothered to try to answer this...and I'm really curious......your thoughts, please???????

So you believe it because a majority of academics support it?

This is sort of like the old creationist objection, "If men evolved from monkeys, how come monkeys aren't still evolving into people?"

The answer is (as it so often seems to be, in responding to objections from those who don't really understand evolution): because that isn't how evolution actually works. That is a cartoonish caricature of evolution, a phony strawman set up in order to be knocked down in order to score some hollow points against the science.

Humans and apes both evolved (or descended, if it helps to avoid the emotionally charged "e" word) from a common ancestor. But that wasn't "destined" to happen; there was nothing "built in" within that common ancestor that would somehow dictate that humans and apes would eventually descend from it. That result was just the luck of the draw, given how subsequent random mutations followed by non-random natural selection happened to play itself out, in that particular case and under those particular circumstances, at the time, with small incremental changes slowly accumulating over millions of years.

Go easy on them.. they're still trying to convince people that lizards grew wings and learned how to fly.

Because apes and monkeys are not "destined" to turn into humans. It's not as if evolution was some predetermined, built-in programming with a specific goal in mind.

In other words, you don't wind up monkeys and watch them slowly turn into men. Evolution has never said so, though creationists who misunderstand evolution think that's what it's all about (and then rightly critique that false understanding).

We did not descend from apes. Apes are not our "grandparents" (another common creationist caricature).

Apes and humans both descended from a common ancestor. Apes are therefore more like our cousins than our grandparents.

It is no more logical to expect apes to turn into humans than it is to expect humans to turn into apes.

billions of years of unconscious trial-and-error.

No, not because a majority of academics support it. Because mountains of compelling scientific data overwhelmingly confirm it.

99.9% of academics in relevant fields recognize this, because they are aware of (and understand) the data.

But because non-academics in non-relevant fields who are unaware of the data and/or do not understand the data vastly outnumber them, the result is that most people blindly reject the fact of evolution (which all of the data points to).

first off, evolution is pure fucking fact, secondly it doesn't debunk God. since evolution is actually literally considered fact in the science community, why can't christians get over the fact that if their God made everything, it made evolution also? both can exist. if you don't think evolution is real then you are severely uneducated.

Okay, so you believe there is overwhelming scientific evidence to support it. That's a common mantra.

"Unconscious" is actually a good way of indicating how evolution did not (and does not) set out along some "deliberate" or "directed" path. It simply proceeds blindly, as dictated by random mutations which then turn out to be either favorable or unfavorable given the then-current prevailing circumstances.