Philosophical Question(s) [logic proof]

After pondering for many years and reading many books, I've drawn a few conclusions from what I call logic experiments. Though without a reference, I sometimes wonder just how logical I've been.

I've read books by Seth, by Alan Watts, Joseph Benner, etc...just to give you a starting point to understand the beginning statements that I consider to be a fact.

1: There is no separation from the source.

2: As "above" so "below".

3: What is "inside" is reflected in what is "outside".

[Now...one can debate whether there even *is* an outside, but that's not where I want to go right now in developing the above statements.]

If 1 is true, then my brain cannot make a mistake. Nothing in life can be a mistake. There can be errors technically, but the error is always made *on purpose*. If my brain misinterprets the information from it's source, then even that is not in error, because the brain is in the image of it's source. To me, this is the meaning of "the play's the thing".

If, 1 and 2 are true, then the things I read and methodologies I practice don't *create* a better connection to source, they *reflect* that the source is creating a better translation / representation by it's brain.

If 3 is true then worrying about what's "out there" and trying to change it externally is a waste of time. It's all reflecting me. Now, the only way I can explain this along with the 6 billion other people on this "planet" is that there are an infinite number of universes or the universe is a psychological construct and thus takes up no space. Space in that regard would just be a translation of a source concept. I interact with only *one* version of a person, place or thing and the one chosen best fits my story/play. So, I may see someone get hurt, but that version of them is only one...there are many others. They likewise are creating a universe where they interact with only one version of me. When we separate, the universes no longer "touch". (See brane theory / M theory to follow up)

Ergo...there's *never* anyone else to change but myself, and I am not my body or brain. The change is instigated by the source of the brain and body (which is also not separate from it). The brain is the interpreter/experiencer of the knowing unmoved mover...the creator.

----------------

Does this logic proof make sense to anyone else? Are there errors in my original 3 statements? I could have used more starting "facts" for the proof, but I thought they would actually be unecessary. I could derive many more understanding from these 3 statements, but I opted to keep it "short". Where else would y'all like to take these statments?

IOW, I've been curious as to why people get bent out of shape by those who want to be wealthy or have stuff. I don't think that these things are necessary, but if these statements are true, then there can be a way for people to have their stuff and still not be detrimental to others and the environment. The "fact" that they are detrimental seems to me to be reflecting a belief system.(outside reflects inside)...thus to me it's a wake up call to change ME, not get upset by what others are doing.

Anyway by those 3 statments, to me *anything* is possible. Everything is a miracle and miracles can and do happen constantly.

Thanks for reading,
Ceci