Nordic race is dying - Blonde-haired, blue-eyed people getting extinct

Don't buy it, sorry. My mother is intelligent, yes, as is my sister (both blue-eyed blondes, the children of blue-eyed blondes on both sides), but in IQ testing, my intelligence is 15 points higher than theirs. I grant that my intelligence quotient is above average by a good deal, but why is it that I'm more intelligent than either of them when my father is native american and I have brown hair and green eyes?

Training? That's what you call indoctrination nowadays? Let me guess you married a latina or an asian and have mixed kids right? Contributing to the genocide of whites makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside I bet.

Now what is your objection to whites having their own countries just like everybody else?

Id rather throw those out that dont belong here. Thank you.

No non-white countries allow massive white immigration...not that whites, for the most part, would wish to live in the 3rd world.

you are confusing the recessive nature of the hair colour and eye colour with the fighting gene.

Now if Jews get Israel and the Japanese own Japan then why not Whites having their own homelands?

I suppose I've done my part to continue it then.. two blonde hair, blue eyed boys.

My wife is black, actually. By "training," I mean independent survival skills. I intend my children to survive even if civilization itself collapses. I don't give a crap one way or another if "whites" go extinct. They're just one breed of human, and their genes still survive, adding to the overall survivability of the species.

I care nothing for a country composed of all white, anymore than than I care for a kennel composed of nothing but poodles.

how much do you get paid for shilling?

[link to erectuswalksamongst.us]

Basically you've mated with a primate.

genetics is not as simple as they pretend.

ever wonder why our young men are sent into action with no armor in vehicles with no armor?
selective culling. no joke.

And since it worked, I guess we're the same species after all. Well, there goes your theory!

Different species. Tigons and ligers oh my!

Dumb 101:

It was on TV. It must be true.
My teacher said it. It must be true.
It's in my textbook. It must be true.
The Reverend said so. It must be true.
He's a Ph.D. and he says it's so. It must be true.
She has written 69 books and she says it's so. It must be true.
Everybody says so. It must be true.

If you agree with the above, then what in hell do you need a brain for? A brain is for thinking and if what you believe is not based upon thought, then you've answered my question. You are little more than a ventriloquist's dummy -- and ZOG LOVES YOU!!!

We are told that all yapping bipeds belong to the same species, Homo sapiens. Homo is the genus name -- a classification much broader in scope than species. Sapiens is the species name under the genus. Let's talk about fruits -- real ones, not feces loving perverts. Let's talk about the oranges which Eskimos never eat but get their vitamin C quota anyway -- from animal sources. Let's go scientific with the names. Let's stick to the genus Citrus.

Orange: C. sinensis. Sour orange: C. aurantium. Tangerine: C. reticulata. Citron: C. medica. Grapefruit (pomelo) C. paradisi. Grapefruit (pummelo) C. grandis. Lime: C. aurantifolia. Lemon: C. limonum.

All of the above species are INTER-FERTILE and many hybrids exist and are marketed. Most of these fruits closely resemble each other and some people cannot tell one from another without a supermarket sign. The biological differences are small in comparison to the MAJOR differences between the nigeroid and the honkiod and the gookoid, YET (as I have also discussed relative to crows and foxes -- and penguins are a far more rich example) WE ARE TOLD that weez all b'longs ta da same species. Did you ever really think about this? Did you? Ever?

It takes VERY LITTLE to tell a black man's part from its white counterpart. Black hair HAS NO CORTEX, for example. One hair -- one microscope and the difference is as plain as Goldfarb's nose. Blacks are about as related to Whites as the lemon is to the tangerine. They belong to different species and anyone who has ever been around Black people knows -- unless they are zonked out on drugs or a true believer in American Marxist educational "truth" -- that Blacks and White differ far more than skin color. In fact, skin color is the LEAST SIGNIFICANT of these differences.

For the lack of better names, there are 3 species of yammering hairless apes: Home sapiens (white), Homo nigerus (black) and Homo mongulus (yellow). All other hoomun beans are mixtures of these species -- mongrels of one fornication formulation or the other.

If you think this is all not so OK, then go back to the beginning where you see Dumb 101, and read those 7 lines slower this time. If that doesn't change anything, then you probably love MTV.

Did you looking on a world map, never entertained the thought that there is a difference between black countries and white countries?

Of course you can do what you want, but I dont want Europe do be like Detroit one day.

MTV has sucked ever since they stopped playing music, lol. The citrus example proves that you're educated, but not wise. If you don't understand that humans differ less than pumelos and Buddha hands, then you have some learnin' to do.

That's a matter of culture, not "race."

None, if it's not America. People quick to make it out like it should be ought to remember the red-skins native to this place that they stole from and use bio-warfare on to get a foot in the door here.

I just proved to you that humans are not all the same species. Humans differ much, much more than you'll ever admit I think.

You think all races are equal but only one race created modern civilization and virtually everything associated with it.

Maybe you should read this:
[link to nastytomato.spam]

[link to nastytomato.spam]

tomato bubble it's a wonderful race

Hmmm more information suppression.

You know the racists are proven right by such dirty tricks.

Nope, GLP blocks that one. Sucks to be you!

Oh, really? Then why is Haiti such a poor country, although it is not situated in Africa?

No, it validates my point. Like this:


FIRST, the 'racists' are RIGHT.

And SECOND, I can PROVE IT IN JUST ONE SENTENCE.

But first, allow me to introduce myself. My name is John "Birdman" Bryant. I am the author of 40 books, a member of the legendary high-IQ society Mensa, have had my works praised by many of the world's most distinguished men including Nobel prizewinners, and am listed in many of the standard biographical references, including Who's Who in America and Who's Who in the World. I also run a website (the one you are on) which is devoted, among other things, to breaking the embargo on information about race and related matters which the Establishment media have sought to suppress.

I said earlier that I could prove that the 'racists' are right in one single sentence. My proof stems from the fact that racial matters are never genuinely debated today, because the only thing you ever see in the major media is the politically-correct 'anti-racist' viewpoint. The 'other side' is never allowed to make its case, ie, THE 'RACIST' SIDE IS SUPPRESSED. And you sure as hell can't have a debate about race if one of the sides is never allowed to speak. So here is the one-sentence proof that the 'racists' are right:

THERE IS NO REASON TO SUPPRESS A VIEWPOINT UNLESS IT IS TRUE, because a false viewpoint can easily be combatted with facts and logic, while truth cannot be combatted except by lies which are vulnerable to refutation.

Or to put it another way, the 'racist' view HAS to be suppressed, because if it weren't, MOST PEOPLE WOULD BECOME 'RACISTS'!

So what is the 'racist' view? Very simply, it is one that takes the facts I cite below -- along with a lot of others -- into account.

* FACT: Blacks make up 12% of the population, yet are 50% of the prison population.

* FACT: This means that blacks commit NINE TIMES the crimes of whites. (That's NOT 9% -- it's 900%!) It means that if there were equal numbers of blacks and whites in our population, NINE OF EVERY TEN CRIMINALS WOULD BE BLACK. NOTE: Some have claimed that black crime is high because 'racist' cops target blacks for arrest and 'racist' judges heap convictions on innocent blacks; but statistics belie this: Three of the cities highest in crime are Washington DC, New Orleans and Detroit; and yet the government of all these cities is in black hands; so clearly the cause of high crime in these cities is not 'racial targeting of blacks'. More generally, black crime is high WHEREVER you go; and it would be the world's most absurd conspiracy theory to suppose that the across-the-board high crime rates for blacks originated in a collusion of whites in every city and burg in the nation to target blacks and/or cook the books.

* FACT: If present demographic trends continue, whites will be a minority in America in only 50 years. Whites are already less than 50% of the population in California. Between blacks and Hispanics, whose crime rate is about 4 times that of whites, we can expect to see huge escalations in crime against whites as they become fewer in number and thus more vulnerable both physically and politically.

* FACT: 90% of all inter-racial crime is black-on-white (ie, committed BY blacks AGAINST whites).

* FACT: There are 20,000 black-on-white rapes every year in the US, but fewer than 100 white-on-black rapes.

* FACT: The majority of hate crimes are committed by blacks, in spite of the fact that blacks make up only 12% of the population, and in spite of the great reluctance of authorities to report hate crimes when they are committed by blacks. (That means that blacks commit VASTLY MORE hate crimes in proportion to their numbers than whites!)

* FACT: The average white IQ is 100; the average American black IQ is 85; the average African black IQ is 70 (borderline retarded). There has never been a civilization worthy of the name founded by blacks, and blacks have not even been able to retain the civilizations which have been created for them by whites ("white colonialism"). Note: Contrary to black propaganda, the ancient Egyptians were not black -- their sculptures, portraits and mummies all clearly show Caucasian features. Second note: Critics commonly claim that blacks score low on IQ tests because such tests are culturally biased. In fact, however, as black Prof Walter Williams has pointed out, blacks actually do BETTER on tests that are culturally biased.

Seems to me like his rantings are based largely in ignorance of things. My cousin Mary, for example, has mixed children (half black, half white), and they are beautiful, smart, and sweet. Her daughter look almost identical to her. People just look for differences so they can think they're better than the guy across the street. Regarding the Detroit example and your thoughts there: Exactly. Breed excessive poverty into a population as a dominant trait for so long, and it's going to come out the same pretty much no matter what as far as the living environment goes.

Indeed we have done well

Because they raped all their productive farmland, all the topsoil is gone, and they never had much in the way of mineral resources in the first place?

Yeah like Africa...mud huts and poverty. It's in their genes. Wherever you have Africans you have African conditions.

You forgot the part where they killed off all the whites.

The standard reply for any stereotype is, "Except the ones that aren't."

Detroit, Haiti, Africa, France "youths", UK "youths", Brazilian Favelas. The examples are endless. Its not a matter of individuals its a matter of averages.