Gary Johnson and Jill Stein have been chosen for the next third party debate | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/25/2012 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 2245483 United States 10/25/2012 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | big news Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/25/2012 11:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Gary Johnson: 26,187 first votes plus 1,962 runoff votes = 28,149 Jill Stein: 15,013 first votes plus 292 runoff votes = 15,305 Rocky Anderson: 3,938 votes plus 444 runoff votes = 4,382 Virgil Goode: 2,698 votes plus no runoff votes = 2,698 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25390958 United States 10/25/2012 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25390958 Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter Well... I assure you, I'm not a stoner. I'm just sick of a broken two party system, and since I have the freedom to vote for WHOEVER I want, I will exercise that right. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25877237 United States 10/26/2012 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 2245483 United States 10/26/2012 12:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25390958 Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter well, I assure you, I am a stoner, but where would I live if not my home? Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22573986 United States 10/26/2012 12:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25390958 Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter well, I assure you, I am a stoner, but where would I live if not my home? |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24960373 United States 10/26/2012 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24960373 United States 10/26/2012 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ALL presidential candidates should have FULL disclosure of college records, passports, marriage/divorce and taxes. SIMPLE. (this means YOU Obama and Romney) IF not...they are no better than liars, cheaters and thieves and you are supporting lies, cheating, stealing and private deals by letting them get away with it. We as AMERICANS have to have our background checked, from credit to criminal history at minimum wage jobs now and have to fill-out DEPARTMENT of HOMELAND SECURITY paperwork to work at call centers and Burger King. How exactly is it OK for them to do this to us and NOT disclose everything on their end? You know what is really sickening? There was a third-party debate yesterday (FOUR CANDIDATES) and Larry King hosted it (retired from CNN) and CNN didn't even carry it. People can and SHOULD vote for whom ever they want, but to not even tell the public en mass that they have choices (not just two) is NOT democracy and is in fact sickening and insulting to every solider/sailor/marine/airmen that ever served, the Constitution and all those that have gone before us. Remember: voting for Obama or Romney is a vote for "MONSANTO" and since both of those two candidates are bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs and BOTH have met with the Bilderbergers, it doesn't matter which one if someone votes for either one of them. Vote for Obama or Romney and YOU support GOLDMAN SACHS, MONSANTO and the Bilderbergers along with additional support to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Tri-Lateral Commission. IF you were NOT aware of this and have not done research on this..then how can you "HONESTLY" vote? |
American Poet User ID: 12807171 United States 10/26/2012 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well we gotta change this obviously misleading mission statement by the Commission on Presidential Debates. In fact, it should be changed to allow all candidates, or abolished. They lie right here: Our Mission The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004 and 2008. [link to www.debates.org] By allowing them to continue to weave their way as a credible organization, in which they specifically state and create rules so as only to allow Democrats and Republicans to debate, it will instill in people that there only are two parties and third parties are fringe movements not to be taken seriously. Dont rely on MSM, other than RT of course, to tell you. Deliberate interference of freedom of choice is definitely another area of frustration with the US population. We aren't stupid. People are starting to realize the deck is stacked against them. Keep pushing. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine. |
Squatting Cat User ID: 14350080 United States 10/26/2012 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like them BOTH and think they should run together if it was possible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24960373 Either way...I PROMISE that one of them will be getting my vote next month. There are some differences between the 2. Johnson is for a Fair Tax. I am not sure about this and how it will impact the poor. Does anyone have an educated opinion about this? Jill Stein, being a Green Party canidate, is for stopping Global Warming. Does anyone know if she supports Cap and Trade, or carbon credits? |
*Evan* User ID: 21948600 United States 10/26/2012 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25390958 Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter Well... I assure you, I'm not a stoner. I'm just sick of a broken two party system, and since I have the freedom to vote for WHOEVER I want, I will exercise that right. |
*Evan* User ID: 21948600 United States 10/26/2012 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25390958 Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter Well... I assure you, I'm not a stoner. I'm just sick of a broken two party system, and since I have the freedom to vote for WHOEVER I want, I will exercise that right. Someone told me the other day I was wasting my vote. Wasting the vote that soo many have fought and died for me to have.. lol So according to that person, they fought and died for me to vote with the majority.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3684582 United States 10/26/2012 04:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WildFlower User ID: 24852744 United States 10/26/2012 06:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1477165 United States 10/26/2012 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
American Poet User ID: 12807171 United States 10/26/2012 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21211135 United States 10/26/2012 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | problem with these is that they are, at their base, part of the entitlement crowd. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25390958 Had they ANY following not based as an Oblather psyop, you'd have noticed by now. Both want to rule over a party with no agenda than 'less' for the liberaltarians, and 'more' for the greens. Less or More, are not functional agendas, and that's why they dont have a following other than stoners living at home or in a shelter Well... I assure you, I'm not a stoner. I'm just sick of a broken two party system, and since I have the freedom to vote for WHOEVER I want, I will exercise that right. Someone told me the other day I was wasting my vote. Wasting the vote that soo many have fought and died for me to have.. lol So according to that person, they fought and died for me to vote with the majority.. I saw that comment. I'm usually lurking around reading through the threads. It really made my head spin. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21211135 United States 10/26/2012 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4727082 United States 10/26/2012 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wylfdane (OP) User ID: 23564378 United States 10/26/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well we gotta change this obviously misleading mission statement by the Commission on Presidential Debates. In fact, it should be changed to allow all candidates, or abolished. They lie right here: Quoting: American Poet Our Mission The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004 and 2008. [link to www.debates.org] By allowing them to continue to weave their way as a credible organization, in which they specifically state and create rules so as only to allow Democrats and Republicans to debate, it will instill in people that there only are two parties and third parties are fringe movements not to be taken seriously. Dont rely on MSM, other than RT of course, to tell you. Deliberate interference of freedom of choice is definitely another area of frustration with the US population. We aren't stupid. People are starting to realize the deck is stacked against them. Keep pushing. Well said, Poet. And thanks for the link. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3940512 United States 10/26/2012 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i am going to vote for one of these two. i have voted 3 times now for 3rd party candidates for president. i am also going to take great happyness in voting against this walsh dickhead in illinois, in favor of duckworth... otherwise socialist and some dems... but 3rd party always for president. dont think i could live with myself if i supported the freaking warmongers who are killing so many people in our name..... |
American Poet User ID: 12807171 United States 10/26/2012 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well we gotta change this obviously misleading mission statement by the Commission on Presidential Debates. In fact, it should be changed to allow all candidates, or abolished. They lie right here: Quoting: American Poet Our Mission The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004 and 2008. [link to www.debates.org] By allowing them to continue to weave their way as a credible organization, in which they specifically state and create rules so as only to allow Democrats and Republicans to debate, it will instill in people that there only are two parties and third parties are fringe movements not to be taken seriously. Dont rely on MSM, other than RT of course, to tell you. Deliberate interference of freedom of choice is definitely another area of frustration with the US population. We aren't stupid. People are starting to realize the deck is stacked against them. Keep pushing. Well said, Poet. And thanks for the link. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine. |