20000 years ago aliens brought the Moon in Earth’s orbit. Since then, the Gods and Angels were depicted with a halo or circle above their heads

I find this particular theory pretty intriguing.
THink about it, from a strategist pov, and you realize that if this were an amphitheater, the Moon is just too much in a perfect location. And the particular location is just right for control, invisible monitoring.
A human farm with the controllers holing up in the Moon is an idea that is just very very possible.

Thanks for bringing this up!

Last Edited by abhie on 12/03/2012 06:37 AM

What I’m saying is that the entire iconography that many have thought it was dedicated to Sun Gods or Sun worshiping is actually dedicated to the Moon and the Moon-bringers.

Just imagine yourself living 20000 years ago, when there was NO MOON, and all of a sudden, new Gods appear, bringing with them this BIG MOON.

They were compelled to capture this GREAT event (in the most unequivocally way) in any form of art they practiced; and what a better way to depict the “bringers of the Moon” than this horned-moon Osiris?

come on!

So, how do we get rid of it?

We push it a little !

maybe the moon's a death star?

Like on star wars.

i hear it's artificial. Check out 'who built the moon' or 'our mysterious spaceship moon' books from amazon.com

There's plenty of evidence there was, and none that there wasn't.
For example there are human-made artefacts older then that
that depict the moon phases.


Not according to physicists.


Meaningless humbug.

It's neither perfect nor unnatural, just improbable.


Lie.

And even if we couldn't get through them we could get around them.
They are called BELTS for a reason.

Back to the drawing board.

"For example there are human-made artefacts older then that that depict the moon phases."
Maybe we should take a closer at the carbon dating accuracy first... and then. you cannot carbon-date a rock or some tools. (I'm mobile right now so I can't chat too much..)

Really? 'plenty of evidence'?
Well, make me a believer and show it to me...

so thats why everyone goes nutts when the moon is full, cause that is when the installation of programz occurs

What, the same physicists like Lord Kelvin ("Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible")
or Einstein’s relativity (the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit and yet the neutrinos at CERN faster than light [link to www.nytimes.com] )
or NASA's John Mather (Nobel prize for proving "Big Bang" with a defective satellite/horn_antenna [link to www.bibhasde.com] )

You have to do better than this...

I imagine myself in your office right now:
- “Boss , I need some help.”
- “What?”
- “Can you dispatch this one from me because he requires some technical skills though…”

How did you get the delusion that this is an educational site?

OP's claim is counter-mainstream.
He has the burden of proof.
His ignorance of the evidence against him does not help him.
It reveals that he didn't bother to research it.

Google Scholar exists for a reason. Go knock yourself out.


Not an engineer.


They weren't.
Keep up now.

As pretty much everyone, including the experimenters themselves, predicted, they made a mistake.
No superluminal neutrinos.

Anyhoo, FTL would be new physics, not "unnatural."
We discover new physics all the time.


Rule of thumb about websites.
If it looks like it was designed by a crank, it probably was.
Do you even know what "anisotropy of cosmic background radiation" means?


You have a point to make?

Care to name any physicist who actually thinks that the physics of the Moon is "unnatural" per OP's claim?

Not to bug you but do you care to explain to me the spred of a graveton?? Yes the particle of gravity?? You ser a photon takes 7 minutes give or take from the sun to the earth. How long does a graveton take?? Its basicly instant otherwise we would float away in space. If 2 objects cant communicate threw gravity we wouldent be stuck here. So please sir, lightspeed is in universal matters snailspeed.


Regarding the moon, me i dont know what it is but if you look at it it seems pretty damn out of place, its fairly big compared to our planets size. I cant see that its comming from here.

Me and this is my peronal belife, i think the moon is the arch. That is the vessel our ancestors came in. Togeather with plants and animals from our now destroyed homeworld. I think we are on the way to destroy this one to. The moons seems to be hollow to. When NASA bombed it some years ago it rang like a bell. Solid objects dosent ring.

But hey this is my thoughts on it. And i do not claim to have the truth as everybody here, i just share what i think.

Phiiiuu!
Thank you brother! (I thought I was dying…)
He got me into a corner and he didn't stop… and he was so acid, so ironic and so little vanity...
You Sir are the first one I see, capable to quote from my mind:
Gravity its basically instant otherwise we would float away in space.
Indeed, at a 40000 light-years radius of this galaxy, if the speed of gravity would had not been instant, the delayed gravity force towards the center of the galaxy (aka the 'centripetal force' in this case), would have allowed matter to escape from the its current rotation.

But the Netherland-Man has a point:
“How did you get the delusion that this is an educational site?
OP's claim is counter-mainstream.
He has the burden of proof.
His ignorance of the evidence against him does not help him.
It reveals that he didn't bother to research it.” (God, it hurts only watching these words!)

So where is that physicist who dared to question the Moon’s behavior as "natural" (and we didn’t censor his papers yet) ?

Well, I guess John Lear doesn’t count so I will have to dig deeper. (Can I use some remote-viewing arguments? Or can I use some ancient stories?)

It is as if all the other 7000 daily GLP-posts are fully backed-up by evidence, but not this one...

Anyway, I will try to come up with something. Give me some time

What, nothing yet ?

still waiting bkdg

Highly plausible considering the data that supports this - however many seems to overlook that fact that a creational force of that magnitude can not be malevolent. There can not be a prevalent service-to-self on a that level or else it would not work.

The exact same data as presented here can be interpreted from a benevolent viewpoint too.

Learning is a painful process. It can be done through reflection and thinking or through experience (that keeps looping until lesson is learned).

Man has free will - but it has to be used to be purposeful - and reasoning is the core of this purpose.

I know one thing for sure, there does not exist a single satisfactory explanation for the Moons existence.

The only response people should have when asked how it got there is "I have no fucking clue, but I think..."

It's fine to side with a specific theory, but everyone needs to keep an open mind at this point.

The moon has been in orbit with the earth for much longer than 20 thousand years.

Evidence?

The moon is tide locked. We only see one face of the moon because its orbit around the barycenter with earth is nearly the same length as its rotation on its axis.

And we know that that has been the case for a very, very long time due to the two faces of the moon.

The nearside, the side we always see has huge lovely mares (seas) and a light sprinkle of craters. The far side is heavily impacted with few seas.

[link to www.lpi.usra.edu]

Considering that that side faces 'out' from the barycenter, it is going to be exposed to far more impacting events than the 'inside' face (which we see all the time).

Furthermore, the moon is not a sphere. It is egg shaped, and that is due to its being tide-locked to the earth, Were as earth has a tiny bulge (tide) that follows the moon in the sky, the moon has been tide locked for so long its bulge is exaggerated and set in a very deep solid crust.

Here on earth the evidence we have that the moon has been around for a very long time is Tidal Pools. Like it or not, geological layer below geological layer reveals regions that were tidal pools millions upon millions of years ago with lifeforms that clearly lived in a tidal environment.

Looking at Venus we see what happens to a planet that has no large moon. Venus is not a place you want to visit. While She had massive volcanic activity in her past, she appears to have none now.

Mars has two small moons, and fared just a wee bit better, and apparently had water for a good long time. But without a large massive body to help keep the core and mantle fluid (tidal kneading), Mars cooled off and the magnetic field dropped and thus the atmosphere was blown away in the solar wind and water evaporated away.


I predict as time goes on and as man's knowledge of exo-planets increases they are going to discover that a large moon is key for a planet to form a stable life bearing climate.

The moon stabilizes the earth's axial tilt - without the big heavy moon, earth would wobble rapidly, and tilt every which way, and climate would change far faster and more often than life can adapt to it.

The moon kneads the earths core and mantle, helping to keep it hot enough to keep the earth cycling material from the inside to the outside. Geological activity is mandatory for life, as it brings up new material for life to grow on.

One star for typical GLP dumbassery.

Carl Sagan, for one.

speranta

bkdg carbon shitty dating

I visited a museum in Spain were they had this Madonna painting with a halo ...

Took some pictures and inverted them , to my surprise the halo script in the borders came clear ...

"For microwave use only" Got one of those big panasonic plates placed it behind head and it matched the Virgin Marry icon halo 100% ....

The problem .... Time traveling from this ERA to the past ....? or we are indeed in a fucking matrix type deceit ...

HERE is the EVIDENCE ...

[link to www.google.com.pr (secure)]

the first ones deceiving you are the religious councils themselves the ones that do not permit the ALIEN life disclosures along with free energy , cancer cures and freedom.

it's not 'time travel'.
lately (20Kyears), it's a prison and they are guardians

I disagree with 'only the benevolents can build big things'

Look at the Palm Islands made by the malevolet Arab Emirates
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

or big bombs
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

etc

This moon, it's not a GodLike creation (like the Sun)