The science vs magic wars to happen within 2 years.

I don't think you understand what science means.

I also think you take cartoons a 'little' too serious.

I grew up in foster care...so I never watched cartoons let alone tv. Growing older I see no point in them.

Debunked.

Last Edited by Natures Wrath on 12/23/2012 12:43 PM

Fool.

are you a magician? if so what can you do?

Oh no, the great mushroom war!

There is a great deal of 'magic' to cartoons.

I still don't think you understand what science means...?

Let me tell you. I'd be one of them holding a gun waiting for certain discoveries to be discovered then pulling the trigger if a certain discovery got out of hand.

And the waters shall part, baring what was and is and yet shall be.

Unfortunately, logic would indicate that this shall be used as but another tool of division, and the true harmonics shall be hidden.

Only higher understanding and action can contend this.

What discoveries?

Do you understand your impression is that of a rambling nutjob?

You still have not proven that you understand what science means which brings me to the conclusion that you do not know what science means, which makes anything you say or think about science - to be factually incorrect. As can be witnessed by your incoherent ramblings.

Science is demanding an answer. It is the question and the answer at the same time. Science is trying to understand and make sense of the world and everything around and within it.

In your words. Sounds like a foolish affair in mine.

It sounds foolish to you, but guess what, you're using a computer. Internet. Language. Maybe glasses? Medicine?

Grow up, is what I'm trying to say.

A Certain Magical Index (とある魔術の禁&#26​360;目録(インデック​ス), Toaru Majutsu no Indekkusu?) LOL

Science is making an assumption or theory and then contriving a set of circumstances to obtain a result that can be reproduced every time within a given range of statistical acceptability, usually the small percentage of unknown is attributed to measurement error.

Science is also heavily dependent on the idea that if this event can be reproduced every time within that range of acceptable uncertainty, independent of any macro time elements it is a universal law. Or, this allows science the ability to perform their act in the immediate and then extrapolate this theorem to infinity. It assumes that all of the elements under control during the time of the event are constant and will be constant forever. That takes faith, so at best science is a religion at worst it is occult as all the occult attempts to manipulate and control our environment.

Science as a tool of theoretical approach or the religion of materialist empiricist science?

For they are as different as waves and particles.

Pre-tending & making-belief are often ill understood, and the teachers of truth feared and shied away from.

OP, would you kindly tell me more?

What shall set this conflict off?
How shall it manifest?
What does your eye see?

Sorry, in other words you more or less defined philosophy not science. Philosophy is not science.

And you're an idiot for typing that out.

"that takes faith"...

well, no, it is the opposite of requiring faith. You sir, need to go back to school or lay off the doobie.

Something new on the nuclear front.