Russia tells America - don't give up your guns

well, in yer case it would mean any of the weapons that you own.

lol no, we are not going to engage russia

A chilling snippet from the article:

Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.
------


The above sentiments were no doubt based on thoughts extracted from the rotten skulls of all the hypocrites like Feinstein, Shumer, Boxer etc who have firearms themselves plus a herd of armed guards.

I haven't heard a single credible source say that our government was going to ban ALL guns. It's about banning assault rifles. What's so wrong with that?

It's not unconstitutional to place certain limits to rights we are guaranteed in the constitution. While we have freedom of speech, it is within certain restrictions. While we are free from search and seizure by the Fourth Amendment, that too is subject to certain constitutional exceptions.

Why wouldn't the Second Amendment be any different?

And once they're banned, and a shooting occurs with a rifle or pistol, a ban will follow after that. There's a reason why Obama pretends to cry over the deaths of school children in the US while at the same time has no trouble bombing any one else in other countries where it won't effect his reputation.

I keep asking the gun control fans, "what is an assault rifle" to date none can answer.

"shall not be infringed" seems pretty absolute, to me at least.

The Founders knew what they were doing.

It is valid, trust me.

he never cries over the dead in chicago, never. the number has reached 500 this year alone and not one obama tear. one would think he only cares about shootings when there is a political benefit to his agenda? that couldn't be could it?

I'm a British subject.

I don't own any firearms.

Though I could, quite legally, own shotguns and rifles.

Good argument. Unfortunately the Supreme Court does not agree with you.

A rifle intended for assault purposes, I would presume.

So...a rifle in the hands of a criminal

And the slippery slope argument is a good one, but I seriously don't see revocation of the Second Amendment anytime in the immediate future. Just some much needed restrictions.

What I c in the gun control debate is another divider between "we the people". While "I the government" keeps the debate going - they do it w/abortion - same sex marriage & more. we now live in red or blue states, people r moving into area's that r considered more acceptable to the poultices. So now it's ban this gun or that gun. Have u noticed while u want them 2 control the type of weapon we can have, they have eroded the 4th, 7th & really want the 1st?

Is this check point, 1 of 4 or 5 between San Diego & PHX in violation of the 4th?

:BPCP1:

Strictly speaking, all modern "assault rifles" are modelled on the concept of the German FG-42.

A carbine-like paratrooper rifle, ("Fallschirm Gewehr") using an intermediate-power cartridge, and having selective-fire capability (auto or semi-auto), and having a large-capacity magazine (30 rounds or more).

Kalashnikov used the FG-42 as the prototype for the infamous AK-47.

I woke up in the twilight zone.

What I c in the gun control debate is another divider between "we the people". While "I the government" keeps the debate going - they do it w/abortion - same sex marriage & more. we now live in red or blue states, people r moving into area's that r considered more acceptable to the poultices. So now it's ban this gun or that gun. Have u noticed while u want them 2 control the type of weapon we can have, they have eroded the 4th, 7th & really want the 1st?

Is this check point, 1 of 4 or 5 between San Diego & PHX in violation of the 4th?

[link to english.pravda.ru]
At least they have this right

In the US, I believe they added flash suppressor & bayonet mount. The US military says any fully automatic, which was banned in 82.

excellent point

never mind the redefinition of certain public spaces, such as airports, so that constitutional rights do not apply while you are within those boundaries

I imagine they could begin to redefine all kinds of spaces: highways, shopping malls, parks, residential districts...until the bill of rights is effectively null and void without ever having to be annulled

think of that disgusting roadside anal cavity search done to thoser two women just recently in Texas for no reasonable suspicion ...if that doesn't violate the 4th, I'm not sure what would

Notice how it was a one-glove, anal-then-vaginal probe, on two women?

They are doing this shit on purpose, folks!

Glad to see this pinned! (we posted this within a minute of each other)



a few excerpts:

it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.
------
We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.
------
While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.
------
For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position.

I woke up in the twilight zone.

Glad to see this pinned! (we posted this within a minute of each other)



a few excerpts:

it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.
------
We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.
------
While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.
------
For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position.