Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED

I just looked at the hands of "victim" Lauren Rousseau...

... I'd be willing to bet my entire life's savings that that pic is ENTIRELY Photoshopped. Just look at those hands... they make her look like she's 500 pounds:

[link to assets.nydailynews.com]

That is the dead girl's sister wearing her dress. There were three sisters total. Only two are up there with the President. Her face doesn't even look like Emily Parker's. At least this is what I am assuming. Just because it is the same dress, doesn't mean it is Emily.
Now some of the things that I have seen, do not make sense, but other things, I can see that people are desperate to make their case that this was a Psyop. I admire real factual information, but to assume that this girl with the President is Emily, to me is sloppy assumptions.

WTF IS RIGHT!!!

Click this link its the same as above people. Dated 12-11-2012 3 days prior............

What the hell? I am over there looking and those are defiantly dated for the 11th. and 12th.

In both the family pics that are circulating, "Emilie"
is added to the right of each via photoshop.

If somebody has the "white" pic handy, too? You can see in the "RED" photo,
that the daughter on the far left has no legs via photoshop error. Then the dad has his ring finger extended so that you don't notice she is also throwing the devil sign (that would be over the top since the smallest child already has assumed this position with the fingers in her mouth.

The photo of Emilie is surrounded by pink flowers not in keeping with the rest of the background and shows that part of their background scenery is morphed over the pink to give continuity. But, the shade of green is off for it to have been on the same shrub.

[link to fotoforensics.com]

How can "they" be so stupid?

Wow...I didn't even notice the double devil sign! I did however notice that each of them have three fingers exposed and spread. All except for Emilie.

Talk about a compromised thread... and a compromised forum in general.

Notice that this thread was initally pinned when it only contained easily debunked nonsense. Once we found out some hard facts to prove that one of the donation sites was truly created on December 13th FOR THE SANDY HOOK VICTIMS, what do you know? The thread is unpinned, left to fade away amidst a bunch of new age bullshit.

Also notice how many ratings this rather small thread has--currently, 40. A very high number of ratings for a thread this size. Obviously there is a campaign here at GLP to downvote Sandy Hook threads which contain facts.

Lastly, look at all of the derailers who have come out since the posts about Desaree Juarez's donation page began.

What a waste of time.

Mother Teresa Rousseau (of the copy editor of Danbury NewsTimes and bringer of kid's obituaries from who knows what source) and Bill Leukhardt ( reporter with the Hartford Courant, also busy beaver in circulating unnamed
source news confusion during the event.

Here they are holding up the hoakiest hoaxiest portrait of their the daughter Lauren, who's dad's a, (be prepared to be
shocked) portrait photographer.

[link to www.nydailynews.com]

Here is Desaree's Twitter page, which is set to private.

Check it out... "Proud Army Wife".

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

They arent that stupid. Its "in your face" shit now. 9/11 was a test.... they seen that they can murder 3000 people while the world watches and get away with it even after the people "awakened" to the real truth.

Now they just dont care if we know. Its kinda like putting on a ski mask and baseball batting someone who is suppose to testify against you in court. They "know" who did it and why... but there is nothing they can do about it.
Its pure intimidation at this point.

That's weird because here is her other twitter profile

[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

I guess she forgot how to spell her own name...

I just saw the headline: "CT MASSACRE LINKED TO MAJOR BOMBING PLOT" (at TDS.net, a news site). Anyone else heard anything about this latest BS?

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


It's the thought that counts! And we will be able to say Peace and safety once guns are out of our hands.


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

It says you can change the link ONCE, so I think that means you can Chnange it one time.

Good find!

I was thinking the same thing. A pro wouldn't want her hands to show at all...they would be in her lap.

"At this point it should be pretty obvious to everyone. Unfortunately most people are so brain damaged and hypnotized it doesn't make a difference."

i bet they could call a nationwide press conference, bring out everybody involved in the sandy hook saga including adam lanza and the child victims, then announce that the whole thing was a cinema verite public service campaign. a new type of high-impact reality TV geared towards simulating tragedies to spark public debate.

i bet no one would hold it against them.

then there could be a musical revue complete with dancers [chief ME carver in drag, anyone?], a puppet show for the kids, and then a big barbeque, all topped off by a stirring speech from president obama [pre=recorded] given from the oval office.

i am half serious...or is that one-quarter serious...or am i just doing dark comedy, i don't know.

but i do know the line between reality and insanity is being increasingly blurred. and i do know they desperately want your guns, want them badly enough to kill hundreds more kids. consider the possibility that they'll do multiple "sandy hooks" at several schools all at the same time, in a multi-pronged attack similar to 9/11....only this time it will be blamed on "anti-government gun nuts".

they almost HAVE to inflict somthing like that if they want public sentiment to be behind them...right now the polls are showing that most people are against an across-the-board gun ban.

kind of like most of us were against certain 'other' things, prior to 9/11.

Ummm...... How about not busted....Well at least for this website conspiracy not Sandy Hook in general.

Here's the results for newtownmemorialfund.org from whois.domaintools.com:

[link to whois.domaintools.com]

It confirms that the page was created at:

Created On:14-Dec-2012 21:23:33 UTC

Well a five minute Google search solved that one.....

Bring on the next...

Maybe you should do a bit of digging yourself next time before taking something and running with it.

Honestly, I think your giving them way too much credit. The BHO administration is full of young techno types who think they are very smart. They know about the technology, but they don't know how to use it professionally like someone who has actually held a job supporting said technology. Think about it, the Adobe Acrobat birth certificate, social security applications etc were done by someone who knew how to use the application , but failed to grasp the details of how it could be tracked. The Sandy hook tragedy, if it in fact happened at all is wrought with the same scenario. Someone knows how to use the technology from a user level, but does not understand enough detail to make it look legitimate.

As far as I am concerned, Sandy Hook was a democratic operative or party operation designed to do nothing more than be a pretense to go after gun ownership.