New, approved flu vaccine represents landmark in flu vaccine technology...

You're making that figure up.


Gardasil was released in the June of 2006. Call it 78 months ago for ease of calculations.
So if there were "over 100 deaths per month from Gardasil that would mean that there have been over 78,000 deaths from it?
Is that correct?
Well it has to be as that's what you're saying.

Up until November 2012 there has been 24,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS.
Just so you understand what a reported adverse effect is; anything in the Reportable Events Table which happens to a patient within a certain time-period after a vaccination can be reported as an adverse effect. It doesn't mean that the vaccination actually caused it, just that it has been reported.
These can range from a mild headache to anaphylaxis. Naturally a death would also be reported.

Do you understand that?

Now lets look at the numbers again.
You say you got this figure of "over 100 per month" from VAERS. Really?
Just to reiterate, there have been 24,000 reported events (that figure is easily researchable in VAERS. It's even referenced on anti-vax sites) yet you say there has been over 78,000 DEATHS (which generally only form a minute percebtage of reported events). Now if we assume that your wildly incorrect figures are somehow not incorrect, if we were to add all of the other events in proportion we would probably be looking at over 1 million reported events.

That's not the correct figure is it?
You've made this all up yourself I think.

Either that or you really do need to do your research better.

(As a footnote VAERS is an incredibly poor source to try to combine vaccines with effects. As I mentioned above, events can be reported whether they're caused by the vaccine or not. Using VAERS for research like that is essentially dumpster diving. You never know what you're going to one day to the other).

The recombinant DNA is also used in the Gardisil shot. Over 100 girls die each month after getting that vaccine.

Wonder why.......

Our nation has reached a landmark in influenza vaccine history with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of a new seasonal flu vaccine, called Flublok, made with novel technology.

This method uses recombinant DNA and a modified baculovirus (a virus that infects insects) to produce a safe and effective human flu vaccine.

Story Here:

[link to www.whptv.com]

You're making that figure up.


Gardasil was released in the June of 2006. Call it 78 months ago for ease of calculations.
So if there were "over 100 deaths per month from Gardasil that would mean that there have been over 78,000 deaths from it?
Is that correct?
Well it has to be as that's what you're saying.

Up until November 2012 there has been 24,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS.
Just so you understand what a reported adverse effect is; anything in the Reportable Events Table which happens to a patient within a certain time-period after a vaccination can be reported as an adverse effect. It doesn't mean that the vaccination actually caused it, just that it has been reported.
These can range from a mild headache to anaphylaxis. Naturally a death would also be reported.

Do you understand that?

Now lets look at the numbers again.
You say you got this figure of "over 100 per month" from VAERS. Really?
Just to reiterate, there have been 24,000 reported events (that figure is easily researchable in VAERS. It's even referenced on anti-vax sites) yet you say there has been over 78,000 DEATHS (which generally only form a minute percebtage of reported events). Now if we assume that your wildly incorrect figures are somehow not incorrect, if we were to add all of the other events in proportion we would probably be looking at over 1 million reported events.

That's not the correct figure is it?
You've made this all up yourself I think.

Either that or you really do need to do your research better.

(As a footnote VAERS is an incredibly poor source to try to combine vaccines with effects. As I mentioned above, events can be reported whether they're caused by the vaccine or not. Using VAERS for research like that is essentially dumpster diving. You never know what you're going to one day to the other).

With proper nutrition and some supplement assistance...ad some high intensity exercise, the body wont need anything even with older age

This is true

Our nation has reached a landmark in influenza vaccine history with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of a new seasonal flu vaccine, called Flublok, made with novel technology.

This method uses recombinant DNA and a modified baculovirus (a virus that infects insects) to produce a safe and effective human flu vaccine.

Story Here:

[link to www.whptv.com]

The recombinant DNA is also used in the Gardisil shot. Over 100 girls die each month after getting that vaccine.

Wonder why.......

The recombinant DNA is also used in the Gardisil shot. Over 100 girls die each month after getting that vaccine.

Wonder why.......

You're making that figure up.


Gardasil was released in the June of 2006. Call it 78 months ago for ease of calculations.
So if there were "over 100 deaths per month from Gardasil that would mean that there have been over 78,000 deaths from it?
Is that correct?
Well it has to be as that's what you're saying.

Up until November 2012 there has been 24,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS.

Actually if you go to the Flublok site they mention there are none of the usual adjuvants like thimerosol etc.

The only way to get out of this one is if you have an allergy to latex as the stopper is rubber.

You're making that figure up.


Gardasil was released in the June of 2006. Call it 78 months ago for ease of calculations.
So if there were "over 100 deaths per month from Gardasil that would mean that there have been over 78,000 deaths from it?
Is that correct?
Well it has to be as that's what you're saying.

Up until November 2012 there has been 24,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS.
Just so you understand what a reported adverse effect is; anything in the Reportable Events Table which happens to a patient within a certain time-period after a vaccination can be reported as an adverse effect. It doesn't mean that the vaccination actually caused it, just that it has been reported.
These can range from a mild headache to anaphylaxis. Naturally a death would also be reported.

Do you understand that?

Now lets look at the numbers again.
You say you got this figure of "over 100 per month" from VAERS. Really?
Just to reiterate, there have been 24,000 reported events (that figure is easily researchable in VAERS. It's even referenced on anti-vax sites) yet you say there has been over 78,000 DEATHS (which generally only form a minute percebtage of reported events). Now if we assume that your wildly incorrect figures are somehow not incorrect, if we were to add all of the other events in proportion we would probably be looking at over 1 million reported events.

That's not the correct figure is it?
You've made this all up yourself I think.

Either that or you really do need to do your research better.

(As a footnote VAERS is an incredibly poor source to try to combine vaccines with effects. As I mentioned above, events can be reported whether they're caused by the vaccine or not. Using VAERS for research like that is essentially dumpster diving. You never know what you're going to one day to the other).

Being the only in my family that opted out of the flu shot, I am the proud owner with the flu right now.

The stuff sucks, and im definitely going to get the shot next year.

I don't know if they are making the 100 deaths a month up.

I do know that your math is wrong and 78 x 100 = 7800.

It does not equal 78000.

You're making that figure up.


Gardasil was released in the June of 2006. Call it 78 months ago for ease of calculations.
So if there were "over 100 deaths per month from Gardasil that would mean that there have been over 78,000 deaths from it?
Is that correct?
Well it has to be as that's what you're saying.

Up until November 2012 there has been 24,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS.
Just so you understand what a reported adverse effect is; anything in the Reportable Events Table which happens to a patient within a certain time-period after a vaccination can be reported as an adverse effect. It doesn't mean that the vaccination actually caused it, just that it has been reported.
These can range from a mild headache to anaphylaxis. Naturally a death would also be reported.

Do you understand that?

Now lets look at the numbers again.
You say you got this figure of "over 100 per month" from VAERS. Really?
Just to reiterate, there have been 24,000 reported events (that figure is easily researchable in VAERS. It's even referenced on anti-vax sites) yet you say there has been over 78,000 DEATHS (which generally only form a minute percebtage of reported events). Now if we assume that your wildly incorrect figures are somehow not incorrect, if we were to add all of the other events in proportion we would probably be looking at over 1 million reported events.

That's not the correct figure is it?
You've made this all up yourself I think.

Either that or you really do need to do your research better.

(As a footnote VAERS is an incredibly poor source to try to combine vaccines with effects. As I mentioned above, events can be reported whether they're caused by the vaccine or not. Using VAERS for research like that is essentially dumpster diving. You never know what you're going to one day to the other).

With proper nutrition and some supplement assistance...ad some high intensity exercise, the body wont need anything even with older age

Vaccines are one of this country's darkest secrets.. Research military vaccinations from 1918-2000 specifically typhoid fever. We created that epidemic, and most others.