Moon Hoax Proof: There Was NOT Just a Spacesuit To Shield Properly the Cosmic Radiation / Missions Itself

What retards inhabit this place.

[link to www.clavius.org]

[link to www.clavius.org]

Referring to clavius is like using wikipedia, or snopes, as a reference.

You FAIL!

WHY you did post the same bullshit again and again?


.

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/29/2013 03:12 PM

Don't try so hard. It is known to any rational mind now. Now that we see from the distence of 40 years. We never went to the moon. Neil said it himself while crying. There is no one strong enough to appologize for the lie. It is up to us to slowly lead on the path of truth.

Ask yourself why we have no moon rovers?

Ask yourself what we know about our closest next step?

Realize why some felt it neccessary to lie.

Give a good economic reason why we would have gone back?

Anyway if you follow that way, WHY 6 missions? to do WHAT?


.

There was a little thing called the cold war going on at the time. It was all about proving superiority. Had Russia gone on to do the same the US would have gone further and built bases on the moon etc. Militarization of space was a big deal then.

But there was no potential to earn money buy going to the moon. Therefore when the Russians did not compete there was no reason to go back.

Scientific expeditions have continued. But that does not require manned travel.

Man I love these threads.

Last Edited by Lucky Charms on 01/29/2013 03:33 PM

You cant prove that we never went to the moon. It's illogical.

Also how does the lack of radiation protection prove that we never landed humans on the moon. What makes you think the radiation would kill you, or even do damage within the span of time that the astronauts would have been exposed?

What retards indeed.

At least, do you know what are the cosmic rays?

SO just because I'm a retard, YOU TELL ME NOW.


.

Hi energy particles that originates outside the solar system (and probably even the galaxy).

The astronauts experienced the when they would see flashes of light even with their eyes closed. This is when a cosmic ray would hit their eyeball giving off light. This shows there high energy to be able to do this.

Lucky short exposures are not as harmful as you seem to think.

Cold War was a farce. Both countries were ruled by the same banking families. Propagandized so that both sides could build up highly profitable armaments.

The Apollo's Saturn V rocket used up 96% of its fuel in 10 minutes, reaching only 118 miles altitude.

My spelling is so bad; maybe I am the retard.

Of course you're right, OP. Not only that, but the official NASA story about the space suits being able to keep the astronauts cool in the direct sunlight on the moon is absolute horseshit as well. Here's an excerpt from an article posted on William Cooper's site (much less than 50%, to keep the ban hammer at bay):

"NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance.

NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will NOT evaporate destroying their own bogus "air conditioning" explanation."

The article is posted at: [link to www.mt.net]

We didn't land on the moon. No way, no how.

But the ice on the coils is heated by the heat of the water returning from the suit. It then sublimates (not evaporates) away carrying away the heat from the suit.

The ice on the moon never receive any sunlight OR any external heat. So will not sublime away.

It all makes sense.

And also, what about the electrical consumption of that suite (if it really was air conditioned), where was the BIG battery pack with such power... A BIG MISTERY


.

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/29/2013 05:54 PM

check this, from 43:54

[link to youtu.be]

Have you seen the size of the backpacks on the suits? They were huge and weighed 82kg on Earth. What makes you think there could not be a battery inside? Besides it the cooling system didn't work like a hoe air conditioner and would not have drawn as much power. But plenty of power would have been needed for all the other systems.

This link shows you how a modern suit works
[link to science.howstuffworks.com]

What???? where was stored the battery then and what is the watt consumption per hour of the spacesuite.



.

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/29/2013 04:22 PM

What you are right about OP is the danger of cosmic rays for longer missions (say to mars).

It may be that without significant shielding a human would not survive the damage caused by them.

+1

Says in the link I gave for a modern suit.

The EMU battery is made of 11 zinc cells connected in series. The battery provides about 27 amp-hours of electrical current, and can be recharged inside the shuttle.

No idea about the suits for apollo. Why don't you try looking it up. I am sure you could find an answer if you tried for once.

I found the answer pretty easily. DId you even try OP?

Can you copy and paste here what you've just wrote about the battery/consumption from the link you have provided?

PS you can paste entire paragraph.



.

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/29/2013 04:35 PM

I did copy and paste it. It is not on the first page though.

Nobody can say

In 40 years

No answers....."they" fooled us because they could. Keep us on the treadmill.

So, can you specify the page number plz?


.

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/29/2013 04:40 PM

[link to science.howstuffworks.com]

They brought a dune buggy



Ha
Ha
Ha

Critical thinking people....with 40 year perspective

Fake moon landing

Lava rocks and black opps

Strange. The usual shills (AstroShill, HalcyonShill) haven't shown up, yet.

I wonder where they are?

Re-taking Shill 101, at Shill-Central U, perhaps?