Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28180969 United States 02/03/2013 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28180969 United States 02/03/2013 11:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you want people's eyes to open, you've got to make it very simple. I'm interested in this case, but your first post seems like a LOT of work to go through. Quoting: Zuzu's Petals Short and sweet and to the point if you want to wake up the The smarter ones will take the time to look it over, if it seems well thought out, and this one does. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32239614 United States 02/03/2013 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 33479678 Canada 02/04/2013 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay Please let me make this REALLY clear... x -Files SEASON 5 EPISODE 7 CALLED "EMILY" first aired DECEMBER 14 1997, 1+9+9+7 = 26 26 Sandy Hook Victims. 15 Year anniversary... AIRED SAME DAY AS SANY HOOK SHOOTING... DECEMBER 14 2012 THE SAME ACTORS 15 YEARS AGO WERE THE SAME ONES IN THE SANDY HOOK SHOOTING..OR SO CALLED... THIS IS COLLABORATION....IN YOUR FACE INSULT. SAME DAY. SAME POSTER CHILD NAME "EMILY" SANDY HUNRRICANE IN THE BEGINNING.. SAND IN THE COFFIN IN THE END ..."EMILY DID NOT EXIST.. SHE WAS TO SERVE AN AGENDA" THIS IS WHAT MOLDER WAS TALKING TO SKULLY....ITS IN PLAIN SIGHT IN THE EPISODES..SICKENING...MUCH MUCH MORE... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28180969 United States 02/04/2013 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How could this be staged using fake parents? What about all the people in sandy hook who's children attend that school. Surely if these actors were brought in the people of sandy hook would call them out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30635922 I saw a video the other day that seemed to show the school wasn't even an active school. The whole thing is a fake. This used to be some one-traffic light bar corner, and then turned into a movie set a couple of years ago. Wake up and smell the coffee, bub! |
Sungaze_At_Dawn User ID: 1458670 Canada 02/04/2013 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33366952 United States 02/04/2013 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sorry. Has anyone seen that dad laughing the day after his daughter was supposedly gun down? Thought that alone would make it clear that this case was closed. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33366952 Sorry pro-Obama gun control shills, but we got you all in check. The most convincing to me is the walking in circles thread on here. Up to that point there were so many things and so obvious I didnt know. Like could pics and video and stuff be altered. Then I saw that video and I was still like o well this really doesnt prove anything,until it zoomed out A supposed father laughing the day after his daughter was gunned downed. That's all I gotz to say. LMAO hire better actors next time. Seriously. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1524508 United States 02/04/2013 12:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26152891 United States 02/04/2013 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 33479678 Canada 02/04/2013 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 Excuse me .... I take my work very serciousy...I do not put out misinformation or disimformation...when you enter the password into the software as we showed you....it deletes it..We even gave out a link for you to check out...Dont knock it b4 you research it....I havent slept in 3 days...I work and I am also passionate on getting this info out ..i dont waste time cause i have nothing better to do... And I care about my reputation and credibility...this is why its posted a month later to research and study evidence. Thank you for your comment however. I understand its alot to absorb. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 33479678 Canada 02/04/2013 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 Excuse me .... I take my work very serciousy...I do not put out misinformation or disimformation...when you enter the password into the software as we showed you....it deletes it..We even gave out a link for you to check out...Dont knock it b4 you research it....I havent slept in 3 days...I work and I am also passionate on getting this info out ..i dont waste time cause i have nothing better to do... And I care about my reputation and credibility...this is why its posted a month later to research and study evidence. Thank you for your comment however. I understand its alot to absorb. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33262906 United States 02/04/2013 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28180969 United States 02/04/2013 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay Please let me make this REALLY clear... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33479678 x -Files SEASON 5 EPISODE 7 CALLED "EMILY" first aired DECEMBER 14 1997, 1+9+9+7 = 26 26 Sandy Hook Victims. 15 Year anniversary... AIRED SAME DAY AS SANY HOOK SHOOTING... DECEMBER 14 2012 THE SAME ACTORS 15 YEARS AGO WERE THE SAME ONES IN THE SANDY HOOK SHOOTING..OR SO CALLED... THIS IS COLLABORATION....IN YOUR FACE INSULT. SAME DAY. SAME POSTER CHILD NAME "EMILY" SANDY HUNRRICANE IN THE BEGINNING.. SAND IN THE COFFIN IN THE END ..."EMILY DID NOT EXIST.. SHE WAS TO SERVE AN AGENDA" THIS IS WHAT MOLDER WAS TALKING TO SKULLY....ITS IN PLAIN SIGHT IN THE EPISODES..SICKENING...MUCH MUCH MORE... Are you KIDDING ME?? Here is a youtube, and now you can see why the shills are so SHRILL here. Check out around 1:03, 1:04 here. You'll see "Sally Cox's" hooked nose, sure enough... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33432846 United States 02/04/2013 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26152891 United States 02/04/2013 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 Excuse me .... I take my work very serciousy...I do not put out misinformation or disimformation...when you enter the password into the software as we showed you....it deletes it..We even gave out a link for you to check out...Dont knock it b4 you research it....I havent slept in 3 days...I work and I am also passionate on getting this info out ..i dont waste time cause i have nothing better to do... And I care about my reputation and credibility...this is why its posted a month later to research and study evidence. Thank you for your comment however. I understand its alot to absorb. maybe you take it seriously, but you need to contact the makers of BananaScreen and ask them to explain how their program works. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11202444 Philippines 02/04/2013 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How could this be staged using fake parents? What about all the people in sandy hook who's children attend that school. Surely if these actors were brought in the people of sandy hook would call them out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30635922 There were no paid actors. There were real victims and pretenders mixed together. The pretenders are part of the occult cabbal that runs America. They will never talk. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33517409 Canada 02/04/2013 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 |
t User ID: 33351892 United States 02/04/2013 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25401697 United States 02/04/2013 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | some bullshit "team" thats gonna be a different "team" next time around and so fort. sports are pathetic. the team is really made up of people who don't even play the sport. how generations of individuals get sucked into all the bullshit is a mystery to people like me i guess. before the hate gets directed towards me sportos, how many of you sport fans can actually run a mile or two..or 5 like i can? nice post BTW OP. in a world that looses fact to the relentless ever changing and distracting power of the present moment, it's good to have people so dedicated to connecting the dots.. unless you're a paid shill and this is all deeper than anyone thinks. can never be too careful. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33517409 Canada 02/04/2013 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 16:19 he got a green bar on the woman after he got a green on the man but he didn't update the model on the program. wtf is that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26152891 United States 02/04/2013 12:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26152891 United States 02/04/2013 12:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He got a green bar in the first one. That is the program saying "Yes I can identify the features of the person in this photo." If it thinks that the person is the same as the original model then the second bar would also turn green. The first bar is showing you how well the program can identify the the new image. It has nothing to do at all with whether the image matches the original model. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26152891 United States 02/04/2013 12:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the reason for the two bar system is so it can tell you how confident it is in reading the image you are presenting, and then whether the image matches your model. With strange angles and lighting the software uses the first bar to show you how well it can read your image. Then, based off of how well that image is read, it gives a second bar to show whether or not it is a match. If you have a low first bar but a high second bar, you may need a better source image because lighting or other factors could be throwing it off. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26152891 United States 02/04/2013 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33517409 Canada 02/04/2013 12:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The face recognition filter needs improvement. It is highly unreliable and during our testing we were able to unlock the computer using five different ID cards. [link to www.softpedia.com] This shit is another FAIL!! All these idiots trying to debunk the shooting and they are all full of shit. Let the dead rest in peace FFS |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33640533 United States 02/04/2013 12:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sorry. Has anyone seen that dad laughing the day after his daughter was supposedly gun down? Thought that alone would make it clear that this case was closed. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33366952 Sorry pro-Obama gun control shills, but we got you all in check. I could (at least in theory) explain the rapid cycling mood changes by saying they were on high doses of drugs designed to prevent PTSD. This would cause them to disassociate and act in the manner shown. I don't know that could explain the coroner's behavior, though. So put my theory back in the closet with evolution, for possible further exploration. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32337312 United States 02/04/2013 12:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | clearly these guys have no idea how this software works. It is showing 0 confidence in the models matching and they think they got something. The first bar shows only how confident the software is in identifying the features of the image it is being shown. If the first bar is green it has the features locked in, then if the second bar is also all green it is saying those features match the original model. The first bar means nothing without the second bar also being green,.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 You are making sense. You must be a shill. (Sarcastic of course) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33517409 Canada 02/04/2013 12:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He got a green bar in the first one. That is the program saying "Yes I can identify the features of the person in this photo." If it thinks that the person is the same as the original model then the second bar would also turn green. The first bar is showing you how well the program can identify the the new image. It has nothing to do at all with whether the image matches the original model. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 the reason for the two bar system is so it can tell you how confident it is in reading the image you are presenting, and then whether the image matches your model. With strange angles and lighting the software uses the first bar to show you how well it can read your image. Then, based off of how well that image is read, it gives a second bar to show whether or not it is a match. If you have a low first bar but a high second bar, you may need a better source image because lighting or other factors could be throwing it off. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 He got a green bar in the first one. That is the program saying "Yes I can identify the features of the person in this photo." If it thinks that the person is the same as the original model then the second bar would also turn green. The first bar is showing you how well the program can identify the the new image. It has nothing to do at all with whether the image matches the original model. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26152891 The face recognition filter needs improvement. It is highly unreliable and during our testing we were able to unlock the computer using five different ID cards. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33517409 [link to www.softpedia.com] This shit is another FAIL!! All these idiots trying to debunk the shooting and they are all full of shit. Let the dead rest in peace FFS you can unpin this GARBAGE thread now! It has been debunked. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11202444 Philippines 02/04/2013 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sorry. Has anyone seen that dad laughing the day after his daughter was supposedly gun down? Thought that alone would make it clear that this case was closed. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33366952 Sorry pro-Obama gun control shills, but we got you all in check. I could (at least in theory) explain the rapid cycling mood changes by saying they were on high doses of drugs designed to prevent PTSD. This would cause them to disassociate and act in the manner shown. I don't know that could explain the coroner's behavior, though. So put my theory back in the closet with evolution, for possible further exploration. Would that also explain why laughing dad set up a facebook donation page with detailed bank information the day after his little girl was murdered? |
BossBitch User ID: 32487642 United States 02/04/2013 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's say we had undeniable proof this is a whole setup, aside from the this or that conspiracy theories, what could we do about it? What should we do about it? Quoting: Holldoll Exactly. This has been bothering me for a long time. Everybody is so excited to bust them, but really, what do we do then? Especially if everybody in the govt is involved all the way down. They could laugh in our face and tell us to get lost if they wanted, and there is not a damn thing anybody could do about it. |