| Users Online Now: 1,396 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 476,291 | |
| Pageviews Today: 612,907 | Threads Today: 184 | Posts Today: 2,156 |
| 05:23 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,396 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 476,291 | |
| Pageviews Today: 612,907 | Threads Today: 184 | Posts Today: 2,156 |
| 05:23 AM | ||
NOSTRADAMUS PREDICTED PRINCE WILLIAM'S SON TO COME IN JULY 2013 = RETURN OF CHRIST. | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44236700  United States07/29/2013 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44236700 United States07/29/2013 06:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43240139  Portugal07/29/2013 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Face Palmer  User ID: 44234997  Germany07/29/2013 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, thats all I can do. I'm sorry.  "The world will soon wake up to the reality that everyone is broke and can collect nothing from the bankrupt, who are owed unlimited amounts by the insolvent, who are attempting to make late payments on a bank holiday in the wrong country, with an unacceptable currency, against defaulted collateral, of which nobody is sure who holds title." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. - H.L. Mencken, In Defense Of Women |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44236700 United States07/29/2013 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1999 years + 7 months = JULY 2000. Isn't it clearer? wtf 1999 years plus 7 months is 1999 years and 7 months, thus 1999 years and the month of july this is so dumb its funny lol You should go back to school, at least for the basic maths courses: the year 1999 goes until 31st december 1999 to which you add 7 months! Hence JULY 2000. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44236700 United States07/29/2013 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43240139 Portugal07/29/2013 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1999 years + 7 months = JULY 2000. Isn't it clearer? wtf 1999 years plus 7 months is 1999 years and 7 months, thus 1999 years and the month of july this is so dumb its funny lol You should go back to school, at least for the basic maths courses: the year 1999 goes until 31st december 1999 to which you add 7 months! Hence JULY 2000. not once its said 31/12/1999 lol stop trying so hard but ok lets do it reverse.. at the best case for you: july 2000 minus 7 months equals 2000, so its impossible to fit your so much desired theory |
| Face Palmer User ID: 44234997 Germany07/29/2013 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44236700 It's called PBD Pathetic Bullshitflag Disorder. "The world will soon wake up to the reality that everyone is broke and can collect nothing from the bankrupt, who are owed unlimited amounts by the insolvent, who are attempting to make late payments on a bank holiday in the wrong country, with an unacceptable currency, against defaulted collateral, of which nobody is sure who holds title." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. - H.L. Mencken, In Defense Of Women |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43700446 United States07/29/2013 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wtf 1999 years plus 7 months is 1999 years and 7 months, thus 1999 years and the month of july this is so dumb its funny lol You should go back to school, at least for the basic maths courses: the year 1999 goes until 31st december 1999 to which you add 7 months! Hence JULY 2000. not once its said 31/12/1999 lol stop trying so hard but ok lets do it reverse.. at the best case for you: july 2000 minus 7 months equals 2000, so its impossible to fit your so much desired theory It is not written 31/12/1999 NOR written July 1999, but year 1999 + 7 months). It means that both theories SEEM valid, EXCEPT THAT OP'S IS BEST FITTED WITH THE REAL EVENTS! A FUTURE KING OF UK (THE GREAT KING OF ANGOLMOIS = KING OF ANGLOIS / ENGLISH) IS BORN ON JULY 2013! In addition, the father of a son born in July 1999 will also be the father of a son born in July 2013. THIS IS THE KEY LINK! But this, you are not privy to. Nostradamus wrote for the ones involved in his prophecy. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43700446 United States07/29/2013 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43240139 Portugal07/29/2013 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wtf 1999 years plus 7 months is 1999 years and 7 months, thus 1999 years and the month of july this is so dumb its funny lol You should go back to school, at least for the basic maths courses: the year 1999 goes until 31st december 1999 to which you add 7 months! Hence JULY 2000. not once its said 31/12/1999 lol stop trying so hard but ok lets do it reverse.. at the best case for you: july 2000 minus 7 months equals 2000, so its impossible to fit your so much desired theory It is not written 31/12/1999 NOR written July 1999, but year 1999 + 7 months). It means that both theories SEEM valid, EXCEPT THAT OP'S IS BEST FITTED WITH THE REAL EVENTS! A FUTURE KING OF UK (THE GREAT KING OF ANGOLMOIS = KING OF ANGLOIS / ENGLISH) IS BORN ON JULY 2013! In addition, the father of a son born in July 1999 will also be the father of a son born in July 2013. THIS IS THE KEY LINK! But this, you are not privy to. Nostradamus wrote for the ones involved in his prophecy. ok so what you say is that you and those who believe this adapt the quatrains to whatever you think it fits better according to the events.. even worst than bad math |
| concernedpa. User ID: 20452760 United States07/29/2013 01:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A wrench in your theory Quoting: Anonymous Coward 39870152 their child is a girl already been announced Twins No way she is not big enough for that nope it is just one in there |
| concernedpa. User ID: 20452760 United States07/29/2013 02:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A wrench in your theory Quoting: Anonymous Coward 39870152 their child is a girl already been announced Twins No way she is not big enough for that nope it is just one in there |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 02:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44236700 wtf 1999 years plus 7 months is 1999 years and 7 months, thus 1999 years and the month of july this is so dumb its funny lol You should go back to school, at least for the basic maths courses: the year 1999 goes until 31st december 1999 to which you add 7 months! Hence JULY 2000. not once its said 31/12/1999 lol stop trying so hard but ok lets do it reverse.. at the best case for you: july 2000 minus 7 months equals 2000, so its impossible to fit your so much desired theory It is not written 31/12/1999 NOR written July 1999, but year 1999 + 7 months). It means that both theories SEEM valid, EXCEPT THAT OP'S IS BEST FITTED WITH THE REAL EVENTS! A FUTURE KING OF UK (THE GREAT KING OF ANGOLMOIS = KING OF ANGLOIS / ENGLISH) IS BORN ON JULY 2013! In addition, the father of a son born in July 1999 will also be the father of a son born in July 2013. THIS IS THE KEY LINK! But this, you are not privy to. Nostradamus wrote for the ones involved in his prophecy. ok so what you say is that you and those who believe this adapt the quatrains to whatever you think it fits better according to the events.. even worst than bad math I think you do your best to appear stupid. It was written that there were two ways to interpret the first line of the quatrain: July 1999 or July 2000 according to the way you interpret the 7 months. These are including OR are added to 1999. Then you add 13 years (Hades heaven cycle). To better choose one of these two interpretations you must consider the third line and define who is 'The Great King of Angolmois'. The best anagram is the one that respects the order of the letter. This anagram is ANGLOIS, which is ANGLAIS in old French. ANGLAIS means ENGLISH. So, 'The Great King of Angolmois' is the KING OF ENGLISH, King of UK today. In addition, ANGOLMOIS stands for ANGOUMOIS which is the name of a region formely belonging to the British crown during the Hundred Year War having occured just before Nostradamus birth. The other best anagrams (in French) are LAW of the BLOOD, BLOOD of the LION and SOLOMON. The anagram MONGOLS is the worst in the context of Nostradamus' time. Another problem is the calendar used by Nostradamus, which is the JULIAN calendar. There were different theories which didn't fit with this constraint. THEREFORE, the birth of a future KING OF ENGLISH IN JULY 2013 is the best option to rightly interpret this quatrain. AS A MATTER OF FACT, A REAL BRITISH ROYAL BABY IS BORN IN JULY 2013 IN THE JULIAN CALENDAR! The personal clue about July 1999 (birth of a previous baby boy from the future father of the royal baby Christ) is nothing but a bright addition and indication of the right JULY 2013 interpretation. It explains why Nostradamus chose to write the year 1999, 7 months, to announce the birth of Christ (resurrection of 'The Great King of Angolmois') since this quatrain is the ONLY ONE where a date is used. The other instance of a date in Nostradamus' litterature is the Epistle to the Great King Henryc Secondus where he speaks about the Christ Return (2033), but this time for his ministry. |
| Just me User ID: 42949752  Canada07/30/2013 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The famous quatrain X-72 of Nostradamus is now clear for educated people: the SON of Prince William, future king of United Kingdom, is the Great King of Angolmois to come in next July. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37524754 French Version: 1) L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois, 2) Du ciel viendra un gran Roy effrayeur. 3) Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois. 4) Avant apres Mars regner par bon heur. English Translation: 1) The year thousand nine hundred ninety nine seven month, 2) From the heaven there will come a great King of Terror: 3)To bring back to life the great King of Angolmois, 4) Before after Mars to reign by good luck. Here is the meaning: 1) 1999 + 7 months (July) 2) King of Terror = Hades = Death = card 13 in the tarot deck = 13 Years since heaven could mean the revolutions of Earth around the sun, i.e. the cosmic clock, 3) King of Angeln = King of England (Angeln = old name of England) = King Arthur, the ONCE AND FUTURE KING, 4) He will reign before and after a big war (WWIII) for our best fate. The son of (Prince) the Duke of William (future King of UK) and Duchess Catherine is due on July 13th, 2013. 1999 + 7 months + 13 years = July 2013. This quatrain X-72 is the only one with a date. But this date has been coded to protect the the next Great Monarch many propheties have talked about. I think this quatrain represents the Return of Christ, and UK will be the NEW JERUSALEM.  Is it just me? That shit could mean anything. besides 1999 + 13 + 7 doesnt add up to july 2013 It at a stretch adds up to july 2012 So another nostradumbass prediction that means fuck all. This is just you! You didn't read the thread and then can't rightly understand the meaning of this quatrain from a French expert perspective. If you had read the thread, you would have seen that this first two lines of the quatrain X-72 have been addressed at least TEN TIMES. THIS QUATRAIN X-72 IS THE ONLY ONE WITH A DATE. IT MUST BE VERY IMPORTANT. The first two lines stands for : YEAR 1000 + 900 + 90 + 9 + 7 MONTHS = JULY 2000 WILL COME A CYCLE OF 13 YEARS (HADES = KING OF TERROR = KING OF DEATH = 13th CARD OF TAROT). Then, JULY 2000 + 13 YEARS = JULY 2013. The word 'RESURRECT' in the third line shows that only DEATH (HADES) can get 'THE Great King of Angolmois' back to life. THE ONLY FIGURE BEING RESURRECTED IN NOSTRADAMUS' MIND IS...CHRIST! Since the only other dates NOSTRADAMUS PREDICTED are the precise dates of the 7,000 years (beginning and end of this 7,000 years, then the advent of the MINISTRY of Christ 1,000 years before, i.e. 2033) in the epistle to King Henryc Secondus (The Great Monarch = Chyren the rescuer), THEN THE ONLY OTHER PLACE WHERE THERE IS A DATE - QUATRAIN X-72 - IS ALSO ABOUT CHRIST'S RETURN: HIS BIRTH FROM HEAVENS, AKA AN EXTRADIMENSIONAL SPACESHIP. So, another dumbass trying to make better than the specialists. You should have read the thread before speaking. 1999 + 7 months = july 1999 july 1999 + 13 years = july 2012 so... the rest doesnt even matter if you start with a false premise a "specialist" that doesnt even do math? nice Tsk, tsk...you guys can't read... It's the sun...of prince William...and I'm sure he would prefer.. Billy the kid. |
| Just me User ID: 42949752 Canada07/30/2013 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 03:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was written that there were two ways to interpret the first line of the quatrain: July 1999 or July 2000 according to the way you interpret the 7 months. These are including OR are added to 1999. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44123737 Then you add 13 years (Hades heaven cycle). To better choose one of these two interpretations you must consider the third line and define who is 'The Great King of Angolmois'. The best anagram is the one that respects the order of the letter. This anagram is ANGLOIS, which is ANGLAIS in old French. ANGLAIS means ENGLISH. So, 'The Great King of Angolmois' is the KING OF ENGLISH, King of UK today. In addition, ANGOLMOIS stands for ANGOUMOIS which is the name of a region formely belonging to the British crown during the Hundred Year War having occured just before Nostradamus birth. The other best anagrams (in French) are LAW of the BLOOD, BLOOD of the LION and SOLOMON. The anagram MONGOLS is the worst in the context of Nostradamus' time. Another problem is the calendar used by Nostradamus, which is the JULIAN calendar. There were different theories which didn't fit with this constraint. THEREFORE, the birth of a future KING OF ENGLISH IN JULY 2013 is the best option to rightly interpret this quatrain. AS A MATTER OF FACT, A REAL BRITISH ROYAL BABY IS BORN IN JULY 2013 IN THE JULIAN CALENDAR! The personal clue about July 1999 (birth of a previous baby boy from the future father of the royal baby Christ) is nothing but a bright addition and indication of the right JULY 2013 interpretation. It explains why Nostradamus chose to write the year 1999, 7 months, to announce the birth of Christ (resurrection of 'The Great King of Angolmois') since this quatrain is the ONLY ONE where a date is used. The other instance of a date in Nostradamus' litterature is the Epistle to the Great King Henryc Secondus where he speaks about the Christ Return (2033), but this time for his ministry. Add to these explanations you can add that: 1) the royal baby George (The Great King of Abgolmois) was born the VERY DATE of the VERY RARE STAR OF DAVID ALIGNEMENT. Among the anagrams of ANGOLMOIS we have BLOOD of the LION, LAW of the BLOOD, SOLOMON (King Judah / David / Solomon bloodline). 2) the royal baby George was born as a leo / LION for his kingdom goes to Australia and New Zealand where it was already Tuesday July 23th, the VERY FIRST DAY OF THE LEO SIGN. Jesus was a LAMB (sign of Aries) and must come back as a LION (sign of leo)...in a royal family whose main symbol is a...LION. 3) the royal baby is named GEORGE, the VERY ONE WHO DEFEATED THE DRAGON! That's another Jesus' reference since he defeated the Reptilians...and comes back to bring to the earth an era of peace without reptilians for a period of 1,000 years. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 06:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was written that there were two ways to interpret the first line of the quatrain: July 1999 or July 2000 according to the way you interpret the 7 months. These are including OR are added to 1999. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44123737 Then you add 13 years (Hades heaven cycle). To better choose one of these two interpretations you must consider the third line and define who is 'The Great King of Angolmois'. The best anagram is the one that respects the order of the letter. This anagram is ANGLOIS, which is ANGLAIS in old French. ANGLAIS means ENGLISH. So, 'The Great King of Angolmois' is the KING OF ENGLISH, King of UK today. In addition, ANGOLMOIS stands for ANGOUMOIS which is the name of a region formely belonging to the British crown during the Hundred Year War having occured just before Nostradamus birth. The other best anagrams (in French) are LAW of the BLOOD, BLOOD of the LION and SOLOMON. The anagram MONGOLS is the worst in the context of Nostradamus' time. Another problem is the calendar used by Nostradamus, which is the JULIAN calendar. There were different theories which didn't fit with this constraint. THEREFORE, the birth of a future KING OF ENGLISH IN JULY 2013 is the best option to rightly interpret this quatrain. AS A MATTER OF FACT, A REAL BRITISH ROYAL BABY IS BORN IN JULY 2013 IN THE JULIAN CALENDAR! The personal clue about July 1999 (birth of a previous baby boy from the future father of the royal baby Christ) is nothing but a bright addition and indication of the right JULY 2013 interpretation. It explains why Nostradamus chose to write the year 1999, 7 months, to announce the birth of Christ (resurrection of 'The Great King of Angolmois') since this quatrain is the ONLY ONE where a date is used. The other instance of a date in Nostradamus' litterature is the Epistle to the Great King Henryc Secondus where he speaks about the Christ Return (2033), but this time for his ministry. Add to these explanations you can add that: 1) the royal baby George (The Great King of Abgolmois) was born the VERY DATE of the VERY RARE STAR OF DAVID ALIGNEMENT. Among the anagrams of ANGOLMOIS we have BLOOD of the LION, LAW of the BLOOD, SOLOMON (King Judah / David / Solomon bloodline). 2) the royal baby George was born as a leo / LION for his kingdom goes to Australia and New Zealand where it was already Tuesday July 23th, the VERY FIRST DAY OF THE LEO SIGN. Jesus was a LAMB (sign of Aries) and must come back as a LION (sign of leo)...in a royal family whose main symbol is a...LION. 3) the royal baby is named GEORGE, the VERY ONE WHO DEFEATED THE DRAGON! That's another Jesus' reference since he defeated the Reptilians...and comes back to bring to the earth an era of peace without reptilians for a period of 1,000 years. Note that his birth on Monday July 22nd at 16h24 local time is at one minute from the LEO sign. But for a KING with so many oversees kingdoms this minute is nothing but the thickness of a line made by a pen (1 minute in the astrological chart is 24 mn in our time) included in a larger line starting in Australia where the sign is a full LEO with 12 hours from London. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 08:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Whatever, the NEW GEORGE WILL BE BORN THIS WEEK, hence a full LEO. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44123737 United States07/30/2013 08:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One minute of an astrological chart represent 1/1800 of a whole sign span. We can say that George is a LEO without doubt when considering his places of influence (kingdoms) and due to his presentation to the public the day after his birth. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44123737 Whatever, the NEW GEORGE WILL BE BORN THIS WEEK, hence a full LEO. To this we can add that the royal baby has been named on July 24th (full leo sign) which was when George was born to the public's eye and consciousness. The name of a baby is generally given / chosen BEFORE his birth, or the very day of his birth. But not this time. The parents surely wanted to give him a proper sign (leo) for a future king of UK. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44307108 Canada07/30/2013 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was written that there were two ways to interpret the first line of the quatrain: July 1999 or July 2000 according to the way you interpret the 7 months. These are including OR are added to 1999. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44123737 Then you add 13 years (Hades heaven cycle). To better choose one of these two interpretations you must consider the third line and define who is 'The Great King of Angolmois'. The best anagram is the one that respects the order of the letter. This anagram is ANGLOIS, which is ANGLAIS in old French. ANGLAIS means ENGLISH. So, 'The Great King of Angolmois' is the KING OF ENGLISH, King of UK today. In addition, ANGOLMOIS stands for ANGOUMOIS which is the name of a region formely belonging to the British crown during the Hundred Year War having occured just before Nostradamus birth. The other best anagrams (in French) are LAW of the BLOOD, BLOOD of the LION and SOLOMON. The anagram MONGOLS is the worst in the context of Nostradamus' time. Another problem is the calendar used by Nostradamus, which is the JULIAN calendar. There were different theories which didn't fit with this constraint. THEREFORE, the birth of a future KING OF ENGLISH IN JULY 2013 is the best option to rightly interpret this quatrain. AS A MATTER OF FACT, A REAL BRITISH ROYAL BABY IS BORN IN JULY 2013 IN THE JULIAN CALENDAR! The personal clue about July 1999 (birth of a previous baby boy from the future father of the royal baby Christ) is nothing but a bright addition and indication of the right JULY 2013 interpretation. It explains why Nostradamus chose to write the year 1999, 7 months, to announce the birth of Christ (resurrection of 'The Great King of Angolmois') since this quatrain is the ONLY ONE where a date is used. The other instance of a date in Nostradamus' litterature is the Epistle to the Great King Henryc Secondus where he speaks about the Christ Return (2033), but this time for his ministry. Add to these explanations you can add that: 1) the royal baby George (The Great King of Abgolmois) was born the VERY DATE of the VERY RARE STAR OF DAVID ALIGNEMENT. Among the anagrams of ANGOLMOIS we have BLOOD of the LION, LAW of the BLOOD, SOLOMON (King Judah / David / Solomon bloodline). 2) the royal baby George was born as a leo / LION for his kingdom goes to Australia and New Zealand where it was already Tuesday July 23th, the VERY FIRST DAY OF THE LEO SIGN. Jesus was a LAMB (sign of Aries) and must come back as a LION (sign of leo)...in a royal family whose main symbol is a...LION. 3) the royal baby is named GEORGE, the VERY ONE WHO DEFEATED THE DRAGON! That's another Jesus' reference since he defeated the Reptilians...and comes back to bring to the earth an era of peace without reptilians for a period of 1,000 years.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44307108 Canada07/30/2013 11:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44688818 Canada08/06/2013 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44845746 United States08/09/2013 05:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24942896 United States08/10/2013 03:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44868517  Denmark08/10/2013 03:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I never said that the birth of William's son will be natural. I do believe it will be supernatural. Christ has already been born and died what you propose is blasphemy Christ doesn't have to be reborn he is here now and will come back to judge You need to read the bible. It is obvious you aren't a Christian and know about the real CHrist The anti christ will be a supernatural event but it is dangerous to pin names to it People have been doing this for centuries and have ALWAYS been wrong there have been people LIKE an anti christ such as Hilter ,and others but the real anti christ NO ONE can predict you are stabbing in the dark in my opinion |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24942896 United States08/10/2013 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOT ONE CHRISTIAN has ever seen or heard Jesus-Christ in flesh or spirit, BUT ALL CHRISTIANS KNOW WHAT HE WILL DO OR BE, OR NOT DO OR NOT BE, FOR HIS RETURN, EVEN WHEN NOTHING CLEAR IS WRITTEN IN THE SCRIPTURES ABOUT IT! NOTHING CLEAR. If you disagree with them you just are evil or say blasphemy. They have no choice to defend their opinion (just OPINIONS) but to demonize you and your claims while they have not a clue about the future and Christ's plan. CHRISTIANS LOVE TO LIE TO THEMSELVES. WHAT A PITY! WHEN THEY WILL DISCOVER THE ETS SOON, THEY WILL BELIEVE THEY ARE DEMONS WHEN THERE ARE PLENTY OF EXAMPLES OF ANGELS / BENEVOLENT ETS IN THE BIBLE! THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE CHRIST'S PLAN TO RETURN BUT THEY WILL TELL YOU THAT THEY KNOW MORE THAN CHRIST HIMSELF ABOUT WHAT IS GOOD TO DO OR BE FOR CHRIST HIMSELF. THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT JESUS-CHRIST, THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR BELIEFS. IF HE EVER INTRODUCES HIMSELF TO THEM TODAY THEY WILL NOT BELIEVE HIM IF HE DOESN'T FIT WITH THEIR BELIEFS. THAT'S WHY THE GATE TO HEAVEN IS SO NARROW...BECAUSE OF THEIR NARROW MIND. CHRIST COULDN'T EVEN TELL THEM HE IS CHRIST FOR ANYONE INTRODUCING HIMSELF AS CHRIST WOULD IMMEDIATLY BE REGARDED AS THE ANTICHRIST. THEY HAVE CREATED A TRAP TO PREVENT THEM TO GO TO HEAVEN. IT'S A SUICIDE...UNLESS SOME WORDS OF THE BIBLE WERE WRITTEN BY THE ENNEMY OF CHRIST... MOST OF CHRISTIANS are really good at believing in human-builded beliefs. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43890231 United States08/11/2013 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOT ONE CHRISTIAN has ever seen or heard Jesus-Christ in flesh or spirit, BUT ALL CHRISTIANS KNOW WHAT HE WILL DO OR BE, OR NOT DO OR NOT BE, FOR HIS RETURN, EVEN WHEN NOTHING CLEAR IS WRITTEN IN THE SCRIPTURES ABOUT IT! NOTHING CLEAR. If you disagree with them you just are evil or say blasphemy. They have no choice to defend their opinion (just OPINIONS) but to demonize you and your claims while they have not a clue about the future and Christ's plan. CHRISTIANS LOVE TO LIE TO THEMSELVES. WHAT A PITY! WHEN THEY WILL DISCOVER THE ETS SOON, THEY WILL BELIEVE THEY ARE DEMONS WHEN THERE ARE PLENTY OF EXAMPLES OF ANGELS / BENEVOLENT ETS IN THE BIBLE! THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE CHRIST'S PLAN TO RETURN BUT THEY WILL TELL YOU THAT THEY KNOW MORE THAN CHRIST HIMSELF ABOUT WHAT IS GOOD TO DO OR BE FOR CHRIST HIMSELF. THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT JESUS-CHRIST, THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR BELIEFS. IF HE EVER INTRODUCES HIMSELF TO THEM TODAY THEY WILL NOT BELIEVE HIM IF HE DOESN'T FIT WITH THEIR BELIEFS. THAT'S WHY THE GATE TO HEAVEN IS SO NARROW...BECAUSE OF THEIR NARROW MIND. CHRIST COULDN'T EVEN TELL THEM HE IS CHRIST FOR ANYONE INTRODUCING HIMSELF AS CHRIST WOULD IMMEDIATLY BE REGARDED AS THE ANTICHRIST. THEY HAVE CREATED A TRAP TO PREVENT THEM TO GO TO HEAVEN. IT'S A SUICIDE...UNLESS SOME WORDS OF THE BIBLE WERE WRITTEN BY THE ENNEMY OF CHRIST... MOST OF CHRISTIANS are really good at believing in human-builded beliefs.  |
