Why does it look like night time in all the Apollo moon landing photos? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44067513 United States 07/26/2013 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Unixlike User ID: 44037532 United States 07/26/2013 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/26/2013 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/26/2013 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27249373 United States 07/26/2013 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/26/2013 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44077151 United States 07/26/2013 03:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27249373 United States 07/26/2013 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Search "Game Over NASA Moonlanding Hoax". We did like 400 pages on this last time. Can you summarize please. Being a non-scientist it's one of those things where almost everyone thinks there's a reasonable explanation for it and it doesn't imply anything and then a few people really really disagree. Those people coincidentally require that you buy an incredibly widespread and sinister conspiracy to justify their argument. To me the question is what's the benefit of faking the moon landing? I guess it butthurt the USSR somewhat but they didn't really seem to devastated by it. Maybe you can come up with a better reason. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36553700 United Kingdom 07/26/2013 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Douche Bigalow User ID: 44093491 United States 07/26/2013 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/26/2013 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/26/2013 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Search "Game Over NASA Moonlanding Hoax". We did like 400 pages on this last time. Can you summarize please. Being a non-scientist it's one of those things where almost everyone thinks there's a reasonable explanation for it and it doesn't imply anything and then a few people really really disagree. Those people coincidentally require that you buy an incredibly widespread and sinister conspiracy to justify their argument. To me the question is what's the benefit of faking the moon landing? I guess it butthurt the USSR somewhat but they didn't really seem to devastated by it. Maybe you can come up with a better reason. Im not trying to prove the moon landing is fake. I am simply trying to remove contradictions that I have percieved with my senses. |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/26/2013 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43974499 United Kingdom 07/26/2013 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Im no scientist, but I would guess that because theres no atmosphere on the moon there is nothing for the light from the sun to reflect against unlike on earth, which is why it is in darkness. Not sure if thats the case but that would be my best guess. I don't know if the moon landings were a hoax or not, if they weren't not sure why they are struggling to go back there again. [link to news.sciencemag.org] Surely if they could do it with the tech in the 60s and 70s 40 odd years on they should be able to do it easier and cheaper then before. Who knows. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44064513 United States 07/26/2013 04:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | because for stanley kubrick to pull off the front screen projection trick, the backdrop had to be completely blacked out or the hoax would've been obvious. also, they couldn't put stars in the sky cause astronomers on earth would have caught it and exposed the lie Quoting: Douche Bigalow I'm of Tesla's belief that the reason you dont see stars (suns) in open space is because you can't ANY suns in open space, not even our own. He believed the sun was/is not a solid object, that it is actually a generator of some sort and is not burning anything. It generates energy from another dimension somehow (nobody really understands how) and puts it out. And when u see the blcak spots on the sun u r actually seeing right through it. Watch the short movie with Orson Wells called Tesla on netflix, maybe u can find it on you tube. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29968914 United States 07/26/2013 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | in the photos it looks much darker on the moon than it does on earth during the day. When I look at the moon with my telescope I need to use a filter to darken the image because its so bright. These ideas seem to contradict themselves. Quoting: rexxturbo obviously they couldn't shoot the footage during the day coz you will see the beautiful Navada sky and clouds and birdies |
Op User ID: 14980757 United States 07/26/2013 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43965702 Australia 07/26/2013 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14980757 United States 07/26/2013 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14980757 United States 07/26/2013 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40628802 New Zealand 07/26/2013 07:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
darkade User ID: 42306866 United States 07/26/2013 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43183965 Canada 07/26/2013 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The moon seems so bright from Earth because we are seeing the entire surface worth of reflected light at the same time, but while actually on the moon you only have the bit of light reflecting in your general area, which is a tiny tiny portion of the whole surface (that faces earth). This isn't rocket science. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40770746 United States 07/26/2013 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even if the photos were fake, and we never landed on the moon; that does not change the fact that there is no atmosphere on the moon to have "daylight". The moisture and gases in our atmosphere causes the "daylight" that we see here on earth. If you don't believe me, please research into 3rd grade science. Google might help you too. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43954859 Australia 07/26/2013 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40770746 United States 07/26/2013 08:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44104802 United States 07/26/2013 08:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | because for stanley kubrick to pull off the front screen projection trick, the backdrop had to be completely blacked out or the hoax would've been obvious. also, they couldn't put stars in the sky cause astronomers on earth would have caught it and exposed the lie Quoting: Douche Bigalow Front screen projection doesn't work when the foreground or actors are brightly lit and highly reflective, like the Moon and spacesuits. As for the stars, they are relatively dim compared to sunlight and can NOT appear in the same images. |
Lucky Charms User ID: 44019450 Ireland 07/26/2013 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | in the photos it looks much darker on the moon than it does on earth during the day. When I look at the moon with my telescope I need to use a filter to darken the image because its so bright. These ideas seem to contradict themselves. Quoting: rexxturbo Then you must ask yourself what properties Earth has that the Moon lacks. It's not rocket science... mostly. 'Magically Delicious' |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42392596 United States 07/26/2013 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27249373 Search "Game Over NASA Moonlanding Hoax". We did like 400 pages on this last time. Can you summarize please. Being a non-scientist it's one of those things where almost everyone thinks there's a reasonable explanation for it and it doesn't imply anything and then a few people really really disagree. Those people coincidentally require that you buy an incredibly widespread and sinister conspiracy to justify their argument. To me the question is what's the benefit of faking the moon landing? I guess it butthurt the USSR somewhat but they didn't really seem to devastated by it. Maybe you can come up with a better reason. Im not trying to prove the moon landing is fake. I am simply trying to remove contradictions that I have percieved with my senses. There is no atmosphere for diffusion and light scatter in the sky. Can you explain more what you mean by the film and pictures looking like night time? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42392596 United States 07/26/2013 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |