Queen Elizabeth II - is NOT the rightful heir to the throne of England | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46220132 Australia 09/03/2013 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45889123 United Kingdom 09/03/2013 03:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sigh, if you are going to take that route then the whole line from William the Bastard (1066AD) have no right to the Throne. William took the throne on a supposed death bed promise by Edward the Confessor, a seemingly false claim that has no evidence except being backed up by Rome.. Even if Edward did promise the Kingship to William that promise has no weight or value in Saxon law as No Anglo-Saxon King could promise the throne to another, there where laws in place to deal with succession and failing that all arguments where settled by the Witan (Council) The Witan decided in favour of Harold so any ruler since that point is null and void.. However the world worked and still works by the notion might is right therefore Queenie is the rightful Monarch. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12497652 Australia 09/03/2013 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46220132 Australia 09/03/2013 03:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sigh, if you are going to take that route then the whole line from William the Bastard (1066AD) have no right to the Throne. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45889123 William took the throne on a supposed death bed promise by Edward the Confessor, a seemingly false claim that has no evidence except being backed up by Rome.. Even if Edward did promise the Kingship to William that promise has no weight or value in Saxon law as No Anglo-Saxon King could promise the throne to another, there where laws in place to deal with succession and failing that all arguments where settled by the Witan (Council) The Witan decided in favour of Harold so any ruler since that point is null and void.. However the world worked and still works by the notion might is right therefore Queenie is the rightful Monarch. Fuck off you old mole who asked you? Bloody big git! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46220132 Australia 09/03/2013 03:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24495372 Canada 09/03/2013 03:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45889123 United Kingdom 09/03/2013 03:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sigh, if you are going to take that route then the whole line from William the Bastard (1066AD) have no right to the Throne. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45889123 William took the throne on a supposed death bed promise by Edward the Confessor, a seemingly false claim that has no evidence except being backed up by Rome.. Even if Edward did promise the Kingship to William that promise has no weight or value in Saxon law as No Anglo-Saxon King could promise the throne to another, there where laws in place to deal with succession and failing that all arguments where settled by the Witan (Council) The Witan decided in favour of Harold so any ruler since that point is null and void.. However the world worked and still works by the notion might is right therefore Queenie is the rightful Monarch. Fuck off you old mole who asked you? Bloody big git! LOL... The whole line where setup by Rome to impose Canon law on the English, and then Gregorian law on the Irish... *raspberry* the usual back stabbing double dealing that goes on... If Queenie (always brings up images of Blackadders Queenie) is not rightful heir then none are.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46220132 Australia 09/03/2013 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sigh, if you are going to take that route then the whole line from William the Bastard (1066AD) have no right to the Throne. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45889123 William took the throne on a supposed death bed promise by Edward the Confessor, a seemingly false claim that has no evidence except being backed up by Rome.. Even if Edward did promise the Kingship to William that promise has no weight or value in Saxon law as No Anglo-Saxon King could promise the throne to another, there where laws in place to deal with succession and failing that all arguments where settled by the Witan (Council) The Witan decided in favour of Harold so any ruler since that point is null and void.. However the world worked and still works by the notion might is right therefore Queenie is the rightful Monarch. Fuck off you old mole who asked you? Bloody big git! LOL... The whole line where setup by Rome to impose Canon law on the English, and then Gregorian law on the Irish... *raspberry* the usual back stabbing double dealing that goes on... If Queenie (always brings up images of Blackadders Queenie) is not rightful heir then none are.. You are shit I am shit we came from shit we will all become shit once again. All your highfaluting poonceyness will not save your stinky ass from this. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9419678 Israel 09/03/2013 04:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
alexisj9 User ID: 45014658 United Kingdom 09/03/2013 04:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45889123 United Kingdom 09/03/2013 04:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sigh, if you are going to take that route then the whole line from William the Bastard (1066AD) have no right to the Throne. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45889123 William took the throne on a supposed death bed promise by Edward the Confessor, a seemingly false claim that has no evidence except being backed up by Rome.. Even if Edward did promise the Kingship to William that promise has no weight or value in Saxon law as No Anglo-Saxon King could promise the throne to another, there where laws in place to deal with succession and failing that all arguments where settled by the Witan (Council) The Witan decided in favour of Harold so any ruler since that point is null and void.. However the world worked and still works by the notion might is right therefore Queenie is the rightful Monarch. Fuck off you old mole who asked you? Bloody big git! LOL... The whole line where setup by Rome to impose Canon law on the English, and then Gregorian law on the Irish... *raspberry* the usual back stabbing double dealing that goes on... If Queenie (always brings up images of Blackadders Queenie) is not rightful heir then none are.. You are shit I am shit we came from shit we will all become shit once again. All your highfaluting poonceyness will not save your stinky ass from this. No idea what you are trying to say or why you seem so nancy about the truth.. The Saxons where usurped and enslaved by Rome, and the free peoples enslaved to religion and religious laws, quite clear if you actually look at history.. NO amount of stroppiness will change that fact.. and if one monarch since then is not legit then none of them are since they all come from the same illegitimacy.. to say otherwise seems to me the pansy argument of a sore loser.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1457378 United States 09/03/2013 11:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |