ISON Webcast Update Thread! *Going to pick up the pace if government shutdown occurs* | |
DVCMCM User ID: 38180304 Italy 09/18/2013 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is that the siren that goes off every time your ridiculous beliefs are threatened (such as ISON being fake)? YES its fake as you should well know. - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 09/18/2013 12:10 PM |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 09/18/2013 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DVCMCM User ID: 38180304 Italy 09/18/2013 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, this below is more credible than your stuff: [link to fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net (secure)] Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 09/18/2013 12:25 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47013482 United States 09/18/2013 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47065395 United States 09/18/2013 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thank you for all your info Astro, but look at this link, what do you have to say about this, on Ison? [link to modernsurvivalblog.com] |
Tangy User ID: 43994199 United States 09/18/2013 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/18/2013 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thank you for all your info Astro, but look at this link, what do you have to say about this, on Ison? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47065395 [link to modernsurvivalblog.com] It was written by someone with no clue about comets or celestial mechanics. "What about this… ‘what if’ the nucleus of the comet explodes into smaller chunks as it swings around the sun? If the chunks survive, on what trajectory will they be? Could we be in danger? Of course no one knows. It hasn’t happened… yet." A) Meteor showers happen all the time, and the well-known ones are all far more dense than anything we'll encounter from a single pass by a comet with an earth MOID of about .05 AUs. B) No it won't hit us if it breaks up at perihelion as it "swings around the sun." We're not in danger. In order to put any piece of the comet on an earth-collision course at perihelion would require more than 50 km/s delta-V in a sunward direction. That's insane. [link to img12.imageshack.us] 57590 next to "Tot" is the total delta-V needed to put it on an earth collision trajectory in m/s. That's 57.59 km/sec. Not happening. To put this in some perspective, that's about 5 times as much velocity as the total velocity the Apollo command module had at entry interface coming back from the moon. To get that velocity required a rocket the size of a skyscraper to propel a payload smaller than the space shuttle. So no, even if ISON breaks up at perihelion, its fragments are not going to receive over 50 km/s delta-V in a sunward direction. Not even close. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47065395 United States 09/18/2013 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47070208 Jamaica 09/18/2013 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check this website [link to www.cometison2013.co.uk] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46998272 United Kingdom 09/18/2013 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So what's the point Doc? As the man said, why not go watch in on TV? Nothing to see here!! [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46970135 United States 09/18/2013 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dogfood User ID: 8490939 United States 09/18/2013 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 09/18/2013 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astro please explain how you know the nucleus isn't made of dark matter and the tail made of cyanide. Nancy Lieder said that it will poison us with the tail! She said that a well known NASA agent is telling lies when he says it's a normal comet. Is she talking about you? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46970135 Stalker troll, go back to your ghost town of a ning. There is probably cyanogen gas in the tail but it's too tenuous to affect us and we're not going to pass through the tail anyway. As for the nucleus being made of "dark matter," if it were then we wouldn't be able to see the coma or tail of the comet since that would be made of dark matter too. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3194069 United States 09/18/2013 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 09/18/2013 04:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46592274 Brazil 09/18/2013 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/18/2013 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well it's currently still raining here, so it doesn't look promising for tomorrow morning. I may have to wait until Friday morning, but if so, so be it. In case it does clear up, here is the ephemeris for ISON from my observing site on the 19th. I'll be talking about this some more during the webcast to show that ISON's orbit has not changed as is being claimed on youtube and elsewhere lately. [link to dropcanvas.com] ISON's orbit and the resulting ephemeris were calculated using the astrometric data excluding any observations from the month of September. So if the orbit has recently "changed" as claimed, these coordinates shouldn't work. |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/18/2013 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well it's currently still raining here, so it doesn't look promising for tomorrow morning. I may have to wait until Friday morning, but if so, so be it. In case it does clear up, here is the ephemeris for ISON from my observing site on the 19th. I'll be talking about this some more during the webcast to show that ISON's orbit has not changed as is being claimed on youtube and elsewhere lately. Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to dropcanvas.com] ISON's orbit and the resulting ephemeris were calculated using the astrometric data excluding any observations from the month of September. So if the orbit has recently "changed" as claimed, these coordinates shouldn't work. If the weather clears by 4:30 am eastern I'll post a separate thread for that morning's webcast, otherwise I'll try again Friday morning. |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/19/2013 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality420 User ID: 41799758 United States 09/19/2013 05:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well it's currently still raining here, so it doesn't look promising for tomorrow morning. I may have to wait until Friday morning, but if so, so be it. In case it does clear up, here is the ephemeris for ISON from my observing site on the 19th. I'll be talking about this some more during the webcast to show that ISON's orbit has not changed as is being claimed on youtube and elsewhere lately. Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to dropcanvas.com] ISON's orbit and the resulting ephemeris were calculated using the astrometric data excluding any observations from the month of September. So if the orbit has recently "changed" as claimed, these coordinates shouldn't work. You know, if this is going to be your continuing ISON tracking thread, you may want to consider: To preclude the above sort of thing, you could post a daily ephemeris from say 01Oct 2013 through 31Dec 2013 generated either by JPL or MPC so when the claim is made again (and you know it will be made again ... Elenin!!!!) you can point to the date stamped post and ephemeris. You could edit your OP with an addendum so it is up front - first thing. Generating the ephem. when the claim is made and comparing it to the one in the OP generated in Sept. will exhibit only minor arcsecond changes as the orbit is continuously refined. Those dates include most of what the woo²s would consider "ominous" dates: Mars close approach, Earth close approach both ways, crossing Earth's orbit inbound and outbound, crossing the ecliptic (north to south... "OMG!!!! It's the Chartreuse CatChina!!!!"), perihelion, etc. Just a thought... Have fun. R. |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 44557506 United States 09/19/2013 05:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 09/19/2013 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well it's currently still raining here, so it doesn't look promising for tomorrow morning. I may have to wait until Friday morning, but if so, so be it. In case it does clear up, here is the ephemeris for ISON from my observing site on the 19th. I'll be talking about this some more during the webcast to show that ISON's orbit has not changed as is being claimed on youtube and elsewhere lately. Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to dropcanvas.com] ISON's orbit and the resulting ephemeris were calculated using the astrometric data excluding any observations from the month of September. So if the orbit has recently "changed" as claimed, these coordinates shouldn't work. You know, if this is going to be your continuing ISON tracking thread, you may want to consider: To preclude the above sort of thing, you could post a daily ephemeris from say 01Oct 2013 through 31Dec 2013 generated either by JPL or MPC so when the claim is made again (and you know it will be made again ... Elenin!!!!) you can point to the date stamped post and ephemeris. You could edit your OP with an addendum so it is up front - first thing. Generating the ephem. when the claim is made and comparing it to the one in the OP generated in Sept. will exhibit only minor arcsecond changes as the orbit is continuously refined. Those dates include most of what the woo²s would consider "ominous" dates: Mars close approach, Earth close approach both ways, crossing Earth's orbit inbound and outbound, crossing the ecliptic (north to south... "OMG!!!! It's the Chartreuse CatChina!!!!"), perihelion, etc. Just a thought... Have fun. R. Not a bad idea. One problem though is that the claim's already been made so if I generate it from JPL or MPC now they could just say, "well the new orbit accounts for the change." That's why I'm generating it myself from FindOrb while excluding any recent data, but the results do agree with JPL to within a couple arcseconds which is all that really matters. I do like the idea of a daily ephemeris though. I think I'll generate one that runs for that time period on the half hour. That should give me enough points to make my point at any time in the future. |
DVCMCM User ID: 38180304 Italy 09/19/2013 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality420 User ID: 41799758 United States 09/19/2013 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know, if this is going to be your continuing ISON tracking thread, you may want to consider: Quoting: Reality420 41799758 To preclude the above sort of thing, you could post a daily ephemeris from say 01Oct 2013 through 31Dec 2013 generated either by JPL or MPC so when the claim is made again (and you know it will be made again ... Elenin!!!!) you can point to the date stamped post and ephemeris. <snip> Have fun. R. Not a bad idea. One problem though is that the claim's already been made so if I generate it from JPL or MPC now they could just say, "well the new orbit accounts for the change." That's why I'm generating it myself from FindOrb while excluding any recent data, but the results do agree with JPL to within a couple arcseconds which is all that really matters. I do like the idea of a daily ephemeris though. I think I'll generate one that runs for that time period on the half hour. That should give me enough points to make my point at any time in the future. :tgcheers: Yeah, it won't help with the current woo, but it would pose a problem for future woo. Fro example: On 02Oct a kOOk starts posting that ISON's orbit has changed!!!!!!. There is a 19Sept dated post on this thread with an ephem for 02Oct and beyond. It is a small matter to show that observations made after 02Oct agree with the ephem posted here on 19Sept proving that the orbit has not changed. For written observations you can merely select the independent amateur reports to the MPC and for images you can solve astrometrically - both showing RA and Dec matching the 19Sept values. kOOk will have to do some heavy hoaxing to get around the ephem record and numerous independent reports showing ISON exactly where predicted on 19Sept. Have fun. R. |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/19/2013 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know, if this is going to be your continuing ISON tracking thread, you may want to consider: Quoting: Reality420 41799758 To preclude the above sort of thing, you could post a daily ephemeris from say 01Oct 2013 through 31Dec 2013 generated either by JPL or MPC so when the claim is made again (and you know it will be made again ... Elenin!!!!) you can point to the date stamped post and ephemeris. <snip> Have fun. R. Not a bad idea. One problem though is that the claim's already been made so if I generate it from JPL or MPC now they could just say, "well the new orbit accounts for the change." That's why I'm generating it myself from FindOrb while excluding any recent data, but the results do agree with JPL to within a couple arcseconds which is all that really matters. I do like the idea of a daily ephemeris though. I think I'll generate one that runs for that time period on the half hour. That should give me enough points to make my point at any time in the future. Yeah, it won't help with the current woo, but it would pose a problem for future woo. Fro example: On 02Oct a kOOk starts posting that ISON's orbit has changed!!!!!!. There is a 19Sept dated post on this thread with an ephem for 02Oct and beyond. It is a small matter to show that observations made after 02Oct agree with the ephem posted here on 19Sept proving that the orbit has not changed. For written observations you can merely select the independent amateur reports to the MPC and for images you can solve astrometrically - both showing RA and Dec matching the 19Sept values. kOOk will have to do some heavy hoaxing to get around the ephem record and numerous independent reports showing ISON exactly where predicted on 19Sept. Have fun. R. Alright, here is my computation of the orbit with ephemeris for my usual observing location with a sample rate of about every half hour from now until January. [link to dropcanvas.com] The results do agree with JPL to within a fraction of an arcsecond for the current time and to within a few arcseconds by January. This despite the fact that I deliberately omitted every astrometric observation from the month of September. So no, the orbit hasn't changed. I'll use that file to find ISON for my webcasts to show that it works. Last Edited by Astromut on 09/19/2013 08:21 PM |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/19/2013 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality420 User ID: 41799758 United States 09/19/2013 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Alright, here is my computation of the orbit with ephemeris for my usual observing location with a sample rate of about every half hour from now until January. Quoting: Reality420 [link to dropcanvas.com] The results do agree with JPL to within a fraction of an arcsecond for the current time and to within a few arcseconds by January. This despite the fact that I deliberately omitted every astrometric observation from the month of September. So no, the orbit hasn't changed. I'll use that file to find ISON for my webcasts to show that it works. Very good. You know these dishonest tards will most likely make the claim again. Allow me to post the JPL ephem. for Oct 01 - Dec 31 2013 here on GLP so no one can accuse you of swapping the ephem file: JPL/HORIZONS - - - - - - ISON (C/2012 S1) - - - - 2013-Sep-19 06:54:20 Rec #:903910 (+COV) Soln.date: 2013-Sep-16_13:13:54 # obs: 4266 (2011-2013) Ephemeris / WWW_USER Thu Sep 19 06:54:20 2013 Pasadena, USA - - / Horizons Initial FK5/J2000.0 heliocentric ecliptic osculating elements (au, days, deg.): EPOCH= 2456333.5 != 2013-Feb-10.0000000 (CT) - RMSW= n.a. EC= 1.000004233506487 - QR= .01249404771654018 - TP= 2456625.2787711076 OM= 295.7244706878164 - W= 345.5171498294994 - IN= 61.9338829062995 Earth - Geocentric: Date__(UT)__HR:MN - R.A._(ICRF/J2000.0)_DEC ------ r ------------- delta 2013-Oct-01 00:00 -- 09 34 34.63 +17 37 29.8 1.651029884483 2.15073815511332 2013-Oct-02 00:00 -- 09 36 43.19 +17 25 01.3 1.632109702574 2.12132341137355 2013-Oct-03 00:00 -- 09 38 53.99 +17 12 12.5 1.613080079230 2.09181128007472 2013-Oct-04 00:00 -- 09 41 07.12 +16 59 02.6 1.593938441632 2.06220668844423 2013-Oct-05 00:00 -- 09 43 22.71 +16 45 30.3 1.574682106719 2.03251486557905 2013-Oct-06 00:00 -- 09 45 40.87 +16 31 34.6 1.555308274973 2.00274136758425 2013-Oct-07 00:00 -- 09 48 01.73 +16 17 14.3 1.535814024363 1.97289209889072 2013-Oct-08 00:00 -- 09 50 25.43 +16 02 28.0 1.516196303208 1.94297332745093 2013-Oct-09 00:00 -- 09 52 52.11 +15 47 14.4 1.496451922017 1.91299169474977 2013-Oct-10 00:00 -- 09 55 21.94 +15 31 32.0 1.476577544441 1.88295422351006 2013-Oct-11 00:00 -- 09 57 55.09 +15 15 19.2 1.456569677398 1.85286832700164 2013-Oct-12 00:00 -- 10 00 31.73 +14 58 34.3 1.436424660297 1.82274182384277 2013-Oct-13 00:00 -- 10 03 12.07 +14 41 15.3 1.416138653301 1.79258296135273 2013-Oct-14 00:00 -- 10 05 56.32 +14 23 20.5 1.395707624478 1.76240044947000 2013-Oct-15 00:00 -- 10 08 44.70 +14 04 47.5 1.375127335774 1.73220350663499 2013-Oct-16 00:00 -- 10 11 37.45 +13 45 34.2 1.354393327598 1.70200191874852 2013-Oct-17 00:00 -- 10 14 34.83 +13 25 38.0 1.333500901895 1.67180611227261 2013-Oct-18 00:00 -- 10 17 37.13 +13 04 56.4 1.312445103496 1.64162724216245 2013-Oct-19 00:00 -- 10 20 44.64 +12 43 26.5 1.291220699532 1.61147729458861 2013-Oct-20 00:00 -- 10 23 57.69 +12 21 05.3 1.269822156652 1.58136920355555 2013-Oct-21 00:00 -- 10 27 16.62 +11 57 49.5 1.248243615750 1.55131698005259 2013-Oct-22 00:00 -- 10 30 41.81 +11 33 35.7 1.226478863859 1.52133585264985 2013-Oct-23 00:00 -- 10 34 13.66 +11 08 19.9 1.204521302806 1.49144241944858 2013-Oct-24 00:00 -- 10 37 52.60 +10 41 58.3 1.182363914162 1.46165481264918 2013-Oct-25 00:00 -- 10 41 39.10 +10 14 26.4 1.159999219928 1.43199287827408 2013-Oct-26 00:00 -- 10 45 33.66 +09 45 39.6 1.137419238295 1.40247837450409 2013-Oct-27 00:00 -- 10 49 36.82 +09 15 32.9 1.114615433711 1.37313519261823 2013-Oct-28 00:00 -- 10 53 49.17 +08 44 00.9 1.091578660310 1.34398960476329 2013-Oct-29 00:00 -- 10 58 11.34 +08 10 58.0 1.068299097594 1.31507054283870 2013-Oct-30 00:00 -- 11 02 44.02 +07 36 18.2 1.044766177012 1.28640991270205 2013-Oct-31 00:00 -- 11 07 27.94 +06 59 55.0 1.020968497794 1.25804294762214 2013-Nov-01 00:00 -- 11 12 23.89 +06 21 41.6 0.996893730054 1.23000860428010 2013-Nov-02 00:00 -- 11 17 32.74 +05 41 31.0 0.972528502675 1.20235000349719 2013-Nov-03 00:00 -- 11 22 55.40 +04 59 15.9 0.947858272954 1.17511491625515 2013-Nov-04 00:00 -- 11 28 32.85 +04 14 48.6 0.922867174189 1.14835629382101 2013-Nov-05 00:00 -- 11 34 26.16 +03 28 01.5 0.897537836432 1.12213283959461 2013-Nov-06 00:00 -- 11 40 36.46 +02 38 46.9 0.871851174355 1.09650962028832 2013-Nov-07 00:00 -- 11 47 04.95 +01 46 57.2 0.845786134442 1.07155871498463 2013-Nov-08 00:00 -- 11 53 52.92 +00 52 25.3 0.819319391516 1.04735990114700 2013-Nov-09 00:00 -- 12 01 01.72 -00 04 55.1 0.792424981434 1.02400137488496 2013-Nov-10 00:00 -- 12 08 32.75 -01 05 09.5 0.765073852626 1.00158049818963 2013-Nov-11 00:00 -- 12 16 27.48 -02 08 21.6 0.737233313195 0.98020455957120 2013-Nov-12 00:00 -- 12 24 47.43 -03 14 33.1 0.708866341938 0.95999152902803 2013-Nov-13 00:00 -- 12 33 34.10 -04 23 43.1 0.679930719584 0.94107078614165 2013-Nov-14 00:00 -- 12 42 49.03 -05 35 47.0 0.650377918784 0.92358380398894 2013-Nov-15 00:00 -- 12 52 33.68 -06 50 36.2 0.620151664742 0.90768478504068 2013-Nov-16 00:00 -- 13 02 49.49 -08 07 56.9 0.589186037316 0.89354127396793 2013-Nov-17 00:00 -- 13 13 37.73 -09 27 29.4 0.557402920469 0.88133482558274 2013-Nov-18 00:00 -- 13 24 59.57 -10 48 47.6 0.524708498847 0.87126189899502 2013-Nov-19 00:00 -- 13 36 55.97 -12 11 18.0 0.490988321643 0.86353530641498 2013-Nov-20 00:00 -- 13 49 27.72 -13 34 20.2 0.456100136712 0.85838681147929 2013-Nov-21 00:00 -- 14 02 35.48 -14 57 05.9 0.419863109180 0.85607193546779 2013-Nov-22 00:00 -- 14 16 19.87 -16 18 40.0 0.382040879285 0.85687888234763 2013-Nov-23 00:00 -- 14 30 41.81 -17 38 00.3 0.342313456746 0.86114519760441 2013-Nov-24 00:00 -- 14 45 43.09 -18 53 57.4 0.300227239832 0.86928956368423 2013-Nov-25 00:00 -- 15 01 27.72 -20 05 11.0 0.255097490511 0.88187572347968 2013-Nov-26 00:00 -- 15 18 05.02 -21 09 58.7 0.205791371843 0.89975417237326 2013-Nov-27 00:00 -- 15 35 58.81 -22 05 31.1 0.150136693086 0.92443553899262 2013-Nov-28 00:00 -- 15 56 28.78 -22 43 29.0 0.082582713746 0.95945160822858 2013-Nov-29 00:00 -- 16 23 17.64 -19 52 50.8 0.032205030309 0.97616739260291 2013-Nov-30 00:00 -- 16 21 22.40 -16 20 29.6 0.114502986707 0.91250970866644 2013-Dec-01 00:00 -- 16 19 11.81 -13 59 05.4 0.175675739457 0.86804387647474 2013-Dec-02 00:00 -- 16 17 23.83 -11 56 01.3 0.228163114834 0.83089687244201 2013-Dec-03 00:00 -- 16 15 54.24 -10 00 53.2 0.275454839022 0.79802936228828 2013-Dec-04 00:00 -- 16 14 39.46 -08 09 21.4 0.319145032901 0.76809554902800 2013-Dec-05 00:00 -- 16 13 36.99 -06 19 03.2 0.360129570069 0.74036078766276 2013-Dec-06 00:00 -- 16 12 45.05 -04 28 25.8 0.398974861941 0.71437695228466 2013-Dec-07 00:00 -- 16 12 02.36 -02 36 21.8 0.436067656368 0.68985253336197 2013-Dec-08 00:00 -- 16 11 27.94 -00 41 57.5 0.471686807818 0.66659109227512 2013-Dec-09 00:00 -- 16 11 01.06 +01 15 32.7 0.506041726738 0.64445863390700 2013-Dec-10 00:00 -- 16 10 41.16 +03 16 49.0 0.539294721710 0.62336487077520 2013-Dec-11 00:00 -- 16 10 27.81 +05 22 28.2 0.571574813044 0.60325180563248 2013-Dec-12 00:00 -- 16 10 20.69 +07 33 04.8 0.602986702668 0.58408644246080 2013-Dec-13 00:00 -- 16 10 19.60 +09 49 10.5 0.633616835283 0.56585594261513 2013-Dec-14 00:00 -- 16 10 24.38 +12 11 15.2 0.663537631383 0.54856427135508 2013-Dec-15 00:00 -- 16 10 34.98 +14 39 45.4 0.692810526887 0.53222975485326 2013-Dec-16 00:00 -- 16 10 51.43 +17 15 04.6 0.721488208325 0.51688316983245 2013-Dec-17 00:00 -- 16 11 13.81 +19 57 31.3 0.749616290617 0.50256610108040 2013-Dec-18 00:00 -- 16 11 42.33 +22 47 18.4 0.777234599303 0.48932936858511 2013-Dec-19 00:00 -- 16 12 17.27 +25 44 31.3 0.804378166112 0.47723136958198 2013-Dec-20 00:00 -- 16 12 59.04 +28 49 06.5 0.831078012939 0.46633621618254 2013-Dec-21 00:00 -- 16 13 48.19 +32 00 49.9 0.857361777019 0.45671158649677 2013-Dec-22 00:00 -- 16 14 45.46 +35 19 15.6 0.883254215177 0.44842625284693 2013-Dec-23 00:00 -- 16 15 51.80 +38 43 44.6 0.908777614716 0.44154730767870 2013-Dec-24 00:00 -- 16 17 08.50 +42 13 24.9 0.933952131363 0.43613717421603 2013-Dec-25 00:00 -- 16 18 37.24 +45 47 11.6 0.958796069592 0.43225055736105 2013-Dec-26 00:00 -- 16 20 20.28 +49 23 48.8 0.983326116927 0.42993154819517 2013-Dec-27 00:00 -- 16 22 20.69 +53 01 51.6 1.007557541165 0.42921112740568 2013-Dec-28 00:00 -- 16 24 42.73 +56 39 49.5 1.031504357425 0.43010530578953 2013-Dec-29 00:00 -- 16 27 32.47 +60 16 10.1 1.055179470481 0.43261408810729 2013-Dec-30 00:00 -- 16 30 58.81 +63 49 22.3 1.078594796689 0.43672135618999 2013-Dec-31 00:00 -- 16 35 15.28 +67 18 00.0 1.101761368954 0.44239565649452 R.A._(ICRF/J2000.0)_DEC = J2000.0 astrometric right ascension and declination of target center. Adjusted for light-time. ***************************************** Now, should anyone state the orbit has changed one can merely pull up the Geocentric Astrometric JPL ephem for Oct 01 - Dec 31 2013 @00:00UT each day and compare to this post. They will be virtually the same. And because they will be the same, it is legitimate to use the Horizons' ephem at that future time to find the predicted position to compare to that of any observation, since it is shown that the ephem then is the same as the ephem now (Sept 19 2013). I've a story about the close approach of Toutatis in Sept. 2004 that somewhat mirrors what you are doing and the dishonest fearmongering "truth seekers" that came out of the woodwork... complete with stealing my work and calculations and altering the data and reposting at an alternate woowoo forum to imply I had found an anomaly in the orbit and DOOM was immanent... amongst other outrageous behaviours of the kOOks. Later. Have fun. R. |
The Zissou User ID: 38724976 United States 09/20/2013 12:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro (OP) Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 09/20/2013 04:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DVCMCM User ID: 38180304 Italy 09/20/2013 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |