The New York Times Destroys Obama

in case that link doesn't work here is another link.

[link to www.jpost.com]

Didn't the Chinese want this paper?

Act II, Scene 1:

Ties in with this very interesting article.

Thread: Did Chief Justice Roberts Actually Set A Trap For Obama?

New York Times Gets it Wrong on Benghazi – Did they Do it on Purpose?

[link to eaglerising.com]

It is called a "play" if you watch Homeland they talk about stuff like this

Are you sure we even have would could be called a "Policy" on the middle-east, because no one can seem to make heads or tails of it from one day to the next...

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 01/03/2014 10:31 PM

Yeppers.

NYT always bombs us with truth in rare instances to remain somewhat credible, as all of mainstream media. Who knows what that's all about.

In the meantime, the rest is spin and bullshit.

Obama is like a fucking mother ship in a video game and you need more ships than just the New Cork Fucking Post to bring him down. Love it but its no where near enough to stop that piss you cant control early in the morning.

This is like the Ministry of Propaganda writing a bad article about Hitler. IT DONT ADD UP. Sheep.

But don't you think it's a little too late? The President is well-entrenched in office, going nowhere, and in any case his agenda is largely accomplished. Now, NYT can afford to speak out. Perhaps their agenda is largely accomplished as well.

How can an empty suit have any say in any kind of policy at all?

It's a quintuple blind scam, you fools.

That's why I wont read it. Don't call me a fucking sheep I hate that really ,im a badger and I have been on to there shit and fuckery since ever since.

If we could just get the college kids on board. Get them out in the streets tearing everything down (lol), maybe we could make some head way....

Scene one was Nixon being brought up the other is the thought of democrat losing the senate, there really is a different in conservative republican and liberal democrats. If they have blue dog democrats in the senate, they work with the republicans which help. It is better than the extreme liberals democrats and calling them liberals is an insult to liberals.

Panic perhaps.

fyi just cancelled my subscription to the MSM newspaper I've been getting most of my adult life because I just can't take it anymore.

It's painful believe me. But it became impossible to ignore the problems.

Just an fyi.

Well if they (msm newspapers) all go down the circling drain, take down the internet, then we'll have nothing left but to organize ourselves against them, won't we ;)

The NYT does what they're told. Any more questions?

,

I try to hear what all sides in an issue have to say, if possible. You don't have to buy into anything they're putting out, but shouldn't you at least hear them out?

I'm waiting to see what impact, if any, this article will actually have. In the link I provided before, the lack of Hillary Clinton's name in the piece is brought up.
I believe there's always more to the story.

Well yeah actually I have questions. That is the point.

Who is orchestrating them to be globalist/politically correct and then shockingly truthful?

Everyone seems to be tearing Obama apart. I'd say you lot better prepare yourselves for a massive False Flag soon.

Hey stranger.

I've been saying something to that effect for a while.
Especially since the heat seems to be turned up recently.
The pesky 'distraction'.

If they force them to spend $300-$400 a month on Obamacare and they can't afford their iphones and ipads, and can't afford to dine their ladies or have their nails done, they will be.

BIG DISTRACTION, duck! Obama has no intention of leaving.

TPTB are setting Obama up for the backlash card as they have been for the better part of his second-term.

Protip: They also setup his god-like status pre-2008 election to ensure he would be at peak popularity heading into this debacle.

Yes, I think you are right! All MSM is against Obama! Plus....

Just before going on holiday, he's sought the War Power's Resolution in South Sudan which allows him to use the US forces for the next (well, about 73 more days and counting) without the need for the declaration of war. As we have learnt, the situation there had deteriorated and forces are also being sent to Uganda and what have you. Who knows where next this is heading.

And the funny thing is this....

When it mattered most in Libya, the WPR wasn't required. But now it does. Hmmmmm!!! We'll just have to wait and see but I think a huge distraction is in the works. Obama isnt going anywhere in a hurry and if Kissinger is right, that distraction might just be big enough to earn him a third term to secure the New World Order.

Last Edited by Ohwell on 01/04/2014 12:05 AM

Obammy care is a dead duck in the water iffin they cant get enough of those youngins ta sign up.