| Users Online Now: 1,608 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 630,732 | |
| Pageviews Today: 809,225 | Threads Today: 215 | Posts Today: 2,718 |
| 07:06 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,608 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 630,732 | |
| Pageviews Today: 809,225 | Threads Today: 215 | Posts Today: 2,718 |
| 07:06 AM | ||
Roman Catholicism Is The Mother Of ALL Christian Churches. It's The First. | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 42523484  France02/09/2014 08:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16479589  United States02/09/2014 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| FHL(C) nli User ID: 54129177  China02/09/2014 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Very true, the Levant alone had various denoms(rome is just a big old greedy one, which cant rewrite history anymore to suit/serve its lies), I mean its stand to reason from the op's own research that the Egyptian church was not only earlier but still exists, as does the Syriac/ach(sub reference peshiita [link to www.ask.com] |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42523484 France02/09/2014 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Show me evidence of Jesus Church before Rome. "Proto Christianity" existed for thousands of years before the Jesus story, as I said it came out of Africa and was throughout the Levant. The only "Christian" church we know to have existed first is the roman Catholic. Stop trying to make yourself feel better, you even use the Book Rome created called the Bible. |
Messenger7779  User ID: 26069139 United States02/09/2014 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589  Op to answer ur Q (Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.) (Matthew 7:21-23 KJV) Kisses |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47974732  Netherlands02/09/2014 08:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Orthodox church(s) were the first, roman church not before 380 BC, after Constantine converted. And then they started to fuck up the bible, taking and adding during the next few hundred years. The orthodox use a older, less polluted version of the "book". Bible means book in Latin, btw. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54148233 United States02/09/2014 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Show me evidence of Jesus Church before Rome. "Proto Christianity" existed for thousands of years before the Jesus story, as I said it came out of Africa and was throughout the Levant. The only "Christian" church we know to have existed first is the roman Catholic. Stop trying to make yourself feel better, you even use the Book Rome created called the Bible. Not only that but the knowledge that the printing press was invented on a specific date. anything before that can not realistically be called a religion, and just oral hand me downs. I think we all seen how a simple word is turned into something else when simply repeated down the line in a small study group. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47974732 Netherlands02/09/2014 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54148233 United States02/09/2014 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Orthodox church(s) were the first, roman church not before 380 BC, after Constantine converted. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47974732 And then they started to fuck up the bible, taking and adding during the next few hundred years. The orthodox use a older, less polluted version of the "book". Bible means book in Latin, btw. derp. spain le bib. Or The Bib its shown clearly on the cattle on the 1611 bible art. As is your number of man 666 on the top. But some are animals such as the "lion" of the tribe of judah. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16479589 United States02/09/2014 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Show me evidence of Jesus Church before Rome. "Proto Christianity" existed for thousands of years before the Jesus story, as I said it came out of Africa and was throughout the Levant. The only "Christian" church we know to have existed first is the roman Catholic. Stop trying to make yourself feel better, you even use the Book Rome created called the Bible. Where are you getting this information? You might want to consult other sources for a wider more rounded view. Did you bother asking some Christians how and where there beliefs originated? How about some historical records? Your view on the subject seems narrow and filled with arrogance. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42523484 France02/09/2014 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Op to answer ur Q (Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.) (Matthew 7:21-23 KJV) All you did was quote a book written by Roman Catholics and proved MY point. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42523484 France02/09/2014 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Show me evidence of Jesus Church before Rome. "Proto Christianity" existed for thousands of years before the Jesus story, as I said it came out of Africa and was throughout the Levant. The only "Christian" church we know to have existed first is the roman Catholic. Stop trying to make yourself feel better, you even use the Book Rome created called the Bible. Where are you getting this information? You might want to consult other sources for a wider more rounded view. Did you bother asking some Christians how and where there beliefs originated? How about some historical records? Your view on the subject seems narrow and filled with arrogance. The Church and its history is well known as is the control of the Vatican over the Levant and Early Europe. The only "Crusaders" were catholic crusader's because there were no other denominations. For MOST of Christianities history the ONLY church was the Catholic church. Am I wrong? |
| Messenger7779 User ID: 26086685 United States02/09/2014 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Op to answer ur Q (Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.) (Matthew 7:21-23 KJV) All you did was quote a book written by Roman Catholics and proved MY point. The following gives the most widely accepted dates for the composition of the New Testament book Matthew together with the earliest preserved fragment for each text. Dates determined by scholars composition- 70-110 Ce earliest preserved fragments - (150–200 CE) since Constantine didn't come around till early three hundreds he wrote it before he was born yea that makes sense Kisses |
| FHL(C) nli User ID: 54129177 China02/09/2014 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | lol, you are so strawmanishly ignorant OP, in the face of fact and history, that it means you are deliberately, so, which means you are maybe a co-coadjutor, a shill for sure, psy-op stirrer, and generally nasty minded wind-up, and many other less than pleasant and grossly unsavory list of character and moral defaults hiding behind the large spoon for stirring excrement that has its handle in your nether regions with its lip protruding from your mouth, imo. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42523484 France02/09/2014 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not the first. Do more research. The church started with Jesus and his apostles none of which where Catholics. Rome attempted to hijack Christianity very early on and continues to do so. You have been deceived my friend. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479589 Op to answer ur Q (Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.) (Matthew 7:21-23 KJV) All you did was quote a book written by Roman Catholics and proved MY point. The following gives the most widely accepted dates for the composition of the New Testament book Matthew together with the earliest preserved fragment for each text. Dates determined by scholars composition- 70-110 Ce earliest preserved fragments - (150–200 CE) since Constantine didn't come around till early three hundreds he wrote it before he was born yea that makes sense So you admit Rome wrote the Bible and that the Catholic Church is the only true Christian Church. The others are Heretic. I'm not saying that Rome was not Wicked. I know it was and still is. |
| Messenger7779 User ID: 26086685 United States02/09/2014 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Messenger7779 Op to answer ur Q (Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.) (Matthew 7:21-23 KJV) All you did was quote a book written by Roman Catholics and proved MY point. The following gives the most widely accepted dates for the composition of the New Testament book Matthew together with the earliest preserved fragment for each text. Dates determined by scholars composition- 70-110 Ce earliest preserved fragments - (150–200 CE) since Constantine didn't come around till early three hundreds he wrote it before he was born yea that makes sense So you admit Rome wrote the Bible and that the Catholic Church is the only true Christian Church. The others are Heretic. I'm not saying that Rome was not Wicked. I know it was and still is. No I'm not .. And I see now that ur a shill . Kisses |
| beeches User ID: 28167778 United States02/09/2014 09:26 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I believe it is the first Church - never broke away from anything, never had a schism. Last Edited by beeches on 02/09/2014 09:26 PM Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42523484 France02/09/2014 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42523484 All you did was quote a book written by Roman Catholics and proved MY point. The following gives the most widely accepted dates for the composition of the New Testament book Matthew together with the earliest preserved fragment for each text. Dates determined by scholars composition- 70-110 Ce earliest preserved fragments - (150–200 CE) since Constantine didn't come around till early three hundreds he wrote it before he was born yea that makes sense So you admit Rome wrote the Bible and that the Catholic Church is the only true Christian Church. The others are Heretic. I'm not saying that Rome was not Wicked. I know it was and still is. No I'm not .. And I see now that ur a shill . Shilling for whom? You sound ridiculous. Can't you even have an honest historical discussion about the christian Church and its writings? I guess not. |
| Nine's User ID: 51681086 United States02/09/2014 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, wondering if you can answer a question for me? I have a book that says only "Diaglott" on the cover. Inside it says: The Emphatic Diaglott Containing The Original Greek Text Of What Is Commonly Styled The New Testament. (According To The Recension of Dr. J.J. Griesbach) With An Interlineary Word for Word English Translation A new Emphatic Version Based on the Interlineary Translation, on The Renderings of Eminent Critics, On The Various Readings Of The Vatican Manuscript No. 1209 in the Vatican Library Together With Illustrative And Explanatory Footnotes A Copious Selection Of References To The Whole Of Which Is Added A Valuable Alphabetical Appendix By Benjamin Wilson Publishers: International Bible Students Association Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society Brooklyn, New York, U.S.A. Also: London, Syndey, Cape Town, Berne, Stockholm, etc. Made in the United States of America 1942 Edition Do you know anything about this book? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 53305804  Australia02/09/2014 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
