Ted Cruz: I don't agree with Rand Paul on foreign policy | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54996364 United States 03/09/2014 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BxMac User ID: 54215455 United States 03/09/2014 08:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55353768 Canada 03/09/2014 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55353768 Canada 03/09/2014 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/09/2014 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55374054 United States 03/09/2014 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to m.washingtonexaminer.com] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, admitted that he actually opposes his friend and fellow conservative Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on foreign policy. "I'm a big fan of Rand Paul. He and I are good friends. I don't agree with him on foreign policy," Cruz said in an interview aired Sunday on ABC's "This Week." Cruz's remarks are perhaps the strongest sign of opposition to Paul, since he stood with the Kentucky senator during his drone filibuster last year. "I think U.S. leadership is critical in the world. And I agree with him that we should be very reluctant to deploy military force aboard," Cruz explained. "But I think there is a vital role, just as Ronald Reagan did. More in link Ted Cruz is an imposter and a whore. Just like Rubio, Palin, McCain, and the rest of the Neoconservative warmongers. None of them have the courage to tell the truth regarding our foreign policy. That's why the Republicans will once again lose the election. They had their last chance with Ron Paul. i think that neocons really believe that they will win by default if obama really super sucks in polls. they then could continue their reign of world wide terror. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36938205 United States 03/09/2014 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55031614 United States 03/09/2014 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45111549 United States 03/09/2014 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/09/2014 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47013694 United States 03/09/2014 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | fuck that, he doesnt like rand paul's foreign policy because he is a yes man of military industry contractors So then, he cannot legitimately favor a position of military strength? He can not favor engaging our military anywhere in the world without Congressional Declaration of War from Congress. All current wars and military operations are illegal without Congressional war declaration for them to be activated and used by the President. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47013694 United States 03/09/2014 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to the courts, he is a natural born citizen. Since the Constitution doesn't define "natural born citizen" or provide an example, we have to rely on court interpretations. The following is from Legal Insurrection: [link to legalinsurrection.com] "Rubio, Jindal and Cruz, as did Obama, fall between those points of inclusion and exclusion. Rubio and Jindal were born in the United States to parents neither of whom was a United States citizen at the time; Cruz was born in Canada to parents one of whom (his mother) was a United States citizen. Under the law existing at the time of their birth, each became a citizen of the United States at birth. Rubio and Jindal by the 14th Amendment, Cruz by statute." FYI, I like Rand Paul better. We need a powerful military - one that assures the annihilation of our bona fide enemies - but Congress needs to start legally declaring wars and we can no longer afford the blood and treasure required to be the world's police man. Just a heads up...... Definitions are found in dictionaries. The Constitution is not a dictionary. If you want to know the meaning of the words in question, you refer to their meaning as they were written when they were written. You refer to Blacks Law Dictionary. The intention was to make sure there would be no dual, or more, allegiances. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/09/2014 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | fuck that, he doesnt like rand paul's foreign policy because he is a yes man of military industry contractors So then, he cannot legitimately favor a position of military strength? He can not favor engaging our military anywhere in the world without Congressional Declaration of War from Congress. All current wars and military operations are illegal without Congressional war declaration for them to be activated and used by the President. Obama just did that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51175536 United States 03/09/2014 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I cannot get on board with Cruz. His wife is a CFR member. If you don't know "Counsel on Foreign Relations". CFR creates the wars in our world. They do this to make money for the military industrial complex. No wars, no money for them. They love war. I hate war. Cruz is mixed up in the war machine. He talks a good talk, but does not do the walk. I think Cruz is a ringer, designed to pull good thinking people away from the "no War" area of thought. I will not go with him. I want peace. |
*HAARP Lady* User ID: 54367062 United States 03/09/2014 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to m.washingtonexaminer.com] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, admitted that he actually opposes his friend and fellow conservative Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on foreign policy. "I'm a big fan of Rand Paul. He and I are good friends. I don't agree with him on foreign policy," Cruz said in an interview aired Sunday on ABC's "This Week." Cruz's remarks are perhaps the strongest sign of opposition to Paul, since he stood with the Kentucky senator during his drone filibuster last year. "I think U.S. leadership is critical in the world. And I agree with him that we should be very reluctant to deploy military force aboard," Cruz explained. "But I think there is a vital role, just as Ronald Reagan did. More in link I like them both! I'd love to see a Cruz/Paul ticket and put Palin as Secretary of STate!! WOW what a cabinet!!! Don't get mad - Get a Pepsi! |
*HAARP Lady* User ID: 54367062 United States 03/09/2014 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 48661115 United States 03/10/2014 02:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cruz is ineligible. Rand is a big R Republican and small l libertarian. isolationism and non-interventionism do not mean the same thing and are not interchangeable. too many people are still blind to the fly-paper Mobius Strip of death. :shakes head: sad. Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |