There Is Scientific Dissent From Darwinism. It deserves to be heard.

Way ahead of ya.

There's plenty more

[link to freerepublic.com]

"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."

(Dr. George Wald, evolutionist, Professor Emeritus of Biology at the University at Harvard, Nobel Prize winner in Biology.)


epic.

5 stars OP, keep it up

Complicated things (like life) are always composed of less complex components, which again have lesser parts and so on. It follows then, that the very start of things is going to be the simplest spontaneous accident possible. This is probably the way God likes it.

'Darwinism' is a TOTALLY FAKE, NON - EXISTANT RELIGION, MADE UP BY christ TARDS, TO TRY TO DISPROVE SCIENCE.

(because science hurts god, science makes jesus cry.)

OF COURSE REAL SCIENTISTS HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT !!

Anyone who thinks they know without a doubt how life started knows nothing about how life started.

sure. there are lots of dumbasses in Science. that's why "the peer review process" and "critical thinking" are so important.

.

ok, now that Christians basically have disproved it, now they are accused of making it up to discredit science.

amazing Gracie, keep the intellectual thoughts coming

Except you will face the problem of irreducible complexity, ex. a flagellum.


next

So your statement is false, since you think you know in the same way.

Truth is the third way... the bipolar interaction of energy with matter..that's it

yeah, but the education-tards think the same system that pollutes their water, air and foods will leave out education…

given the enormous amount of evidence for Creationism, you would think it would at least get a fair representation in school somewhere…

thoughtfulness as to why the river deltas of the world do not have more than a few thousands of years worth of silt build-up at their deltas, why all the species are so much bigger than modern one though they look nearly identical to modern ones, the topic of giants, DNA complexity, polystrate rocks, the grand canyon (no evidence for erosion) etc…

of course this might connect too well with the evidence for the Bible among scholars and archeologists… can't have that…



Lee Strobel - The Case for the Resurrection
[link to www.youtube.com]
The Bible Is True! ~ The New Evidence That Demands A Verdict
[link to www.youtube.com]

Micro Evolution: YES

Macro Evolution: NO

This thread: science fails, ergo it has to be God.

It always was God, even if science finally gets things right.

Science is knowledge gained from observation. The idea of abiogenesis could not be further from science.

i like to compromise that somewhere above is a scientist that is light years ahead of our times. end of!

Matter IS ENERGY.

Protons, electrons, neutrons, and their smaller, also-electric components.

"Matter" does not exist.

EVERYTHING is comprised of energy.

and if you'll notice: all subatomic particles are described (Mass) as "electron Volts"
.
.

So you're willing to believe what less than 1% of scientists have to say abut evolution, over the other 99% who do believe evolution is true?

Natural selection is a fact, a proven fact.
Genetic mutations are also a fact, a proven fact.

There's ALWAYS been scientific dissent to Darwinisn; why would anyone start listening now?

Anyone doubting evolution needs to read this book:

Why Evolution Is True by Jerry A. Coyne

[link to www.amazon.com]

Watch out with Lee Strobel he's not only Megachurch (which is a sure sign something isn't right) he's also an Theistic Evotard. He's right on Jesus and so BUT he think men came from monkeys.

So be very careful with that guy.

Here's some good stuff:

Testimonies of Scientists Who Believe the Bible
This book debunks the commonly-held view that no true scientist today is a creationist. It features the testimonies of 70 scientists with doctorates who reject evolution and believe in a six-day creation.
[link to www.wayoflife.org]

This article still de-balls the evotards:
[link to web.archive.org]

Evolution is necessary for the NWO, hence the big push for that retarded shit.

Last Edited by -GLP-Christian- on 04/14/2014 06:43 PM

What do you think happens over time?

Micro evolution leads to macro evolution, you cannot have one without the other.

"
3% fish, 97% land walking lizard
2% fish, 98% land walking lizard
1% fish, 99% land walking lizard
100% land walking lizard
99% land walking lizard, 1% mammal
98% land walking lizard, 2% mammal
97% land walking lizard, 3% mammal..."

-your link

The author does not understand species.