Facebook censors images of Prophet Mohammed

I am also against presenting Jesus in humorous way. Its Wicked and it's blasphemy.

I am also against presenting anyone in humorous way if certain community of people don't want it to be seen.

It's not freedom of speech it's a provocation.

Well of coarse FB will accommodate the murdering mudslimes. It should be clear under the terms of service only Christians can be ridiculed, portrayed unfavorably etc.

After all if they'll kill you for nothing more than to make a point...just imagine what will happen if you upset them?

Last Edited by CMcC on 01/28/2015 08:15 AM

For any kind of speech, there is someone who would take offense.

Grow up.

So you're week minded, and easily allow yourself to be controled?

Clueless retards, don't even know what craphead looked like.

No there is Authority = GOD!

Insulting God is blasphemy.

But you are right, we are living in a secular = Without God countries therefore we have nothing to expect from God either.

Nope but muzz have been painting him for a long time, with and without face:
[link to zombietime.com]

muzz only use that shit as an excuse to murder.

Once again the worlds bully's (pisslam) bully their way into getting what they want.

What's an antisemite?

well in the olden days people would BOYCOTT a company if they disagreed with their beliefs. but sheep dont boycott.

So is it only in Turkey or worldwide?

Oh, and here's another reason to ditch facebook, as if there weren't enough already.

Charlie Hebdo had waaaaay more insulting covers toward Christianity (mostly the RCC) and Jesus in its history than they ever had of the pedophile prophet.

Some of the anti-Christian drawings were rather blasphemous or downright disgusting.

We never saw any Christians attacking them if maybe in the court houses.



[link to ripostelaique.com]

[link to www.artslife.com]

[link to p2.trrsf.com]

[link to static1.purepeople.com]

[link to www.iconovox.com]

[link to www.artslife.com]

[link to www.contrepoints.org]

[link to static.nanopress.it]

I do.

I believe that is someone who says bad things about Jews.

Kind of like Jesus did in Matthew 23, and other places. He made no bones about who they were...

The Pharasees did not go away after they conspired to have Jesus crucified...

Not going to end well. Saw Sniper and it wasn't that good. It must be popular for only one reason. It showed Muslims as rabid dogs. So they can censor this images thing but most likely it's still not going to end well.

Did you know that attempting to boycott Israeli goods or services is a violation of US federal law?

Antiboycott Laws:

During the mid-1970's the United States adopted two laws that seek to counteract the participation of U.S. citizens in other nation's economic boycotts or embargoes. These "antiboycott" laws are the 1977 amendments to the Export Administration Act (EAA) and the Ribicoff Amendment to the 1976 Tax Reform Act (TRA). While these laws share a common purpose, there are distinctions in their administration.
Objectives:

The antiboycott laws were adopted to encourage, and in specified cases, require U.S. firms to refuse to participate in foreign boycotts that the United States does not sanction. They have the effect of preventing U.S. firms from being used to implement foreign policies of other nations which run counter to U.S. policy.
Primary Impact:

The Arab League boycott of Israel is the principal foreign economic boycott that U.S. companies must be concerned with today. The antiboycott laws, however, apply to all boycotts imposed by foreign countries that are unsanctioned by the United States.

[link to www.bis.doc.gov]

If the American sheeple were to attempt a boycott of Israeli goods and services to show their disagreement with Israeli beliefs, they could find themselves facing hefty fines and prison terms.

Actually the Germans and other European Countries like Spain, Portugal,
Italy, Scandinavians, etc. have Rules for that.

You are not allowed to endanger the Public Peace through Blasphemy!

§ 166
§ 166 StGB: Beschimpfung von Bekenntnissen, Religionsgesellschaften und Weltanschauungsvereinigungen (1) Wer öffentlich oder durch Verbreiten von Schriften (§ 11 Abs. 3) den Inhalt des religiösen oder weltanschaulichen Bekenntnisses anderer in einer Weise beschimpft, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören, wird mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe bestraft. (2) Ebenso wird bestraft, wer öffentlich oder durch Verbreiten von Schriften (§ 11 Abs. 3) eine im Inland bestehende Kirche oder andere Religionsgesellschaft oder Weltanschauungsvereinigung, ihre Einrichtungen oder Gebräuche in einer Weise beschimpft, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören." -

See more at: [link to info.arte.tv]

More Info:

Blasphemy law is a law limiting the freedom of speech and expression relating to blasphemy, or irreverence toward holy personages, religious artifacts, customs, or beliefs.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org]

Mohammed wasn't a prophet. He was a very sick man who was inspired by the devil, not God.

You can start the dismantling of the myth that is "Prophet Mohammed" by stopping calling him "Prophet Mohammed". Just call him Mohammed.

Prophets are truth-tellers sent by God. Mohammed was neither.

You're all-powerful god can't defend itself, why should anyone else?

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France, which has been deliberating on the issue of blasphemy law, the resolution that blasphemy should not be a criminal offence,[13] adopted on 29 June 2007 in the Recommendation 1805 (2007) on blasphemy, religious insults and hate speech against persons on grounds of their religion. This Recommendation set a number of guidelines for member states of the Council of Europe in view of Articles 10 (freedom of expression) and 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In place of blasphemy or in addition to blasphemy in some European countries is the crime of "religious insult", which is a subset of the crime of blasphemy. It is forbidden in Andorra, Cyprus, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, Finland, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine.

On 23 October 2008, the Venice Commission, the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters, issued a report about blasphemy, religious insult, and incitement to religious hatred.[15] The report noted that, in Europe, blasphemy is an offense only in Austria, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Italy, Liechtenstein, the Netherlands, and San Marino.

In its conclusions, the report stated "it is neither necessary nor desirable to create an offense of religious insult" and "the offense of blasphemy should be abolished".

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org]

Maybe the () Xtians just don't have the balls to stand up for themselves when somebody takes a shit on them.

If a Frenchman makes fun of the Jews, they get arrested.



But a Jew can say anything he wants about () Xtians, and nothing happens.

allah allah boom boom.

:jesussaved1:

Who cares its abc ran Facebook.

OMG! ahaah. it's a keeper.

I am also against idiots like you making laws for nations. Good thing most nations have weeded those types out when possible.

Should antisemitism be a crime?