Republicans "surrender monkey" to Obama on deadly Iran nuke deal

Interesting. This vote by the Senate brings each of us DOOM like nothing else they have done in quite some time.

Does anybody have anything to say about that?

What's new? The senate repubs are actually more honest for the most part about voting with Obammy than the house fakers who scream and roll around on the floor before they go along with the program but it's business as usual.

What's the POTUS holding over them?
Or has all of congress sold their souls.

The latter

Disgusting.
Surely the house & senate know that the obama administration can not ratify a treaty without their vote and approval.

It's written in the constitution that they took an oath to obey.

The Senate has capitulated in a way that they have NEVER done before.

It's quite extraordinary. Their vote to enable Iran to get nuclear missiles was like Neville Chamberlain on steroids.

Dump Saudi Arabia. Make friends with Iran.

The Saudis did 9/11. It's in the 28 pages that the government refuses to declassify.

the republicans are disgusting pigs. liars and fucking evil to the fucking core!@

I now realize Republicans are as big of Liars as Obama!

here's a fox link op

[link to foxsportswausau.com]

Never seen a monkey surrender dude. I've seen em fling shit, stick their finger in their butt, then their nose, then mouth, back in the butt and repeat. But surrender? Never.

another link... I dont think this is and approval of obama's deal... its not an agreement of a treaty..
[link to www.timesofisrael.com]

Surrender money's might be a term used by the radio talk show host Laura Ingraham. Or is it "But monkey?"

Oh well, you get the idea. They are surrendering and they are acting like monkeys when they are on their best behavior.

Even Fox news appears to be oblivious as to what the vote actually does. It's a message to Obama to go ahead with the illegal deal.

For this point forward those Senate weasels will unashamedly say, "That's why I voted for the resolution, "when they are questioned as to why they are letting Obama do this deadly deal.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 03/28/2015 06:53 PM

The resolution absolutely is a 100% surrender for the three reasons I've already given.

It's shocking to me that Fox News and the Times of Israel are failing to see what a disgraceful surrender this resolution is.

Ask yourself, "If Iran breaks the agreement, how will the US Senate get Obama to sign off on restoring sanctions??"

Use your brain! There is no effing way the Senate has any power whatsoever to restore sanctions!

The resolution is a signal to Obama to go forward without Senate approval of a treaty!!!

And now a minorette dominates New York's skyline, and the surrounding architechture inversely mimics Mecca.

Sad.

Because they are all compromised and know what information will be leaked about them if they actually do the right thing.

I would have guessed Obama would have been the surrender monkey.

You wouldn't be satisfied with anything less than the world's largest menorah, so let's cut the shit that you're all broken up about the theoretical loss of postmodern architecture.

You just NOW realized this??

Iran is already working on a nuclear program. They have the technology and they are getting by with material from other countries.

The deal Obama is trying to make will restrict their fuel to non-weapons grade. I don't understand what power you think the US has other than the sanctions, which aren't stopping Iran's progress, they are merely making the lives of Iranians difficult because they seem to believe they need nuclear protection.

Obama is probably trying to do what he said he was going to do. If he didn't, people would be attacking him for that. We all knew what Kerry was doing with Iran. No?

Would you rather be at the table, ( along with other nations) with a country that has the technology to develop nuclear weapons? Or would you rather we continue to sanction them and have them develop them anyhow.

Assertions made without evidence.

Do you think that in order to follow Rome into an age of Caesar the Senate is doing this so that in the next couple of presidents a dictatorship will be firmly established?

Are you trying to make my head explode due to your raft of falsehoods played out one after the other?

The US has been successful both with the sanctions and with their sabotage efforts to prevent Iran from getting their nukes.

Now put your ears closely to the screen so you don't miss a word:

"IRAN IS AT WAR WITH THE US!! THAT IS WHY THEY CHANT WEEKLY "DEATH TO AMERICA!!" AT THEIR REVOLUTIONARY COUNCIL MEETINGS. IT'S ALSO WHY IRAN HAS A NATIONAL HOLIDAY CALLED "DEATH TO AMERICA!"

YOU DON'T MAKE DEALS WITH COUNTRIES THAT CHANT DEATH TO YOUR COUNTRY!!

Now go outside and play in some freeway traffic. Maybe the passing cars and trucks can knock some sense into you.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 03/28/2015 08:07 PM

Once Iran gets nukes and hits us with an EMP attack, there won't be any next couple of presidents.

Why the Senate makes Neville Chamberlain look like a war monger by comparison, I have no idea. We have no one to represent American ideals anymore - not a one.

At this point, you think one, JUST ONE would not give a flying ***** what he has on them. Seriously, what is the worst that could happen? For instance, if someone had proof of Obamas past, and he had dirt on them so they won't release it, do you really think the dirt would override the truth?i believe that no one would really care about the dirt. IMHO

While during the negotiations the supreme leader is seen on tape chanting death to America? I'd say neither of those options.

Sold their souls. Never could I have ever imagined that republicans could deviate so far from the very basic tenents that supposedly constitute the party. Den of thieves, liars and traitors, all of em

You actually believe any of that crap? Nagger, pleassse.....

EMP attack would likely come from one of our corrupted intel agencies, not some other country.