The FORGED Origins of the New Testament

Ridiculous.

I want you to watch these very carefully.
They are actually based upon facts.

NOTHING IS FORGED.



[link to twitter.com (secure)]


Thy will be done !

Can't bear to hear the truth, eh?

From the article...

"And it shall be the doctrine of my people, which I will recommend unto all nations, that there shall be no more war for religions' sake."

The unintended consequence of lies.

Interesting read. Thank you.

Ignore the cowards.

who let the dog out?

Did you check the validity of these quotes? Do it here [link to archive.org (secure)]
You may get a surprise.

Very interesting how the name Jesus Christ was determined.

Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna,
Mithra, Horus and Zeus. Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit
for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God. Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally deify two deities as one, and did so by democratic consent. A new god was proclaimed and "officially" ratified by Constantine.That purely political act of deification effectively and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composite. That abstraction lent Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion; and because there was no letter "J" in alphabets until around the ninth century, the name subsequently
evolved into "Jesus Christ".

So there you have it. That's how you "create" a new god!!

Very interesting BeeBee, Thanks.

Are you a christian?

I read it. There's a lot of citations here... A lot of them from other books of almost equal antiquity to the gospels. What gives these citations any credibility? As far as the espistles being biased to their writers... What kind of idiot logic was this? Every writing is biased to its author. This would be you know, kinda obvious since a lot of the new testament were letters he wrote to churches in surrounding countries by Paul about his own personal accounts and suggestions to them. This article spins some things and ommits others completely (such as the earliest known piece of the gospels being written in "miniscule" which was not used in anywhere near 400AD). Even the citations offer little evidence other than what some other person from antiquity claimed.From an academic standpoint this article is total crap.

You have never Met BeeBee before

damn

Christ is the Savior, not the bible book.

2 Corinthians 3:4-6King James Version (KJV)

4 And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward:

5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;

6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

TIME MEANS NOTHING TO GOD!

HIS TRUTH IS ETERNAL ABSOLUTE UNCHANGING AND FOREVER!

ALL PRAISE HONOR GLORY AND THANKSGIVING BE UNTO GOD OUR CREATOR AND REDEEMER FOREVER!!

Who wrote the NT books and when?

[link to web.archive.org (secure)]

[link to www.datingthenewtestament.com]

KJV History

[link to youtu.be]