What Events FEMA Agents Say Is Going To Happen In The Immediate Future!!

I am totally on board with this theory.

There was just 4.7 mag at Bamboo Flats, India.

Look at the locations of the deep trenches on this map:

[link to www.physicalgeography.net]

M7.8 - 27km SSE of Muisne, Ecuador: 19.2 km/Peru-Chile Trench (maximum depth 8.065 km)
5.7 2km NW of Ozu, Japan: 10 km/Nansei Shoto Trench (maximum depth 7.46 km)
7.0 1km WSW of Kumamoto-shi, Japan 10 km/ Nansei Shoto Trench (maximum depth 7.46 km)
6.4 95km NW of Port-Olry, Vanuatu 16 km/New Hebrides Trench
6.0 6km E of Uto, 6 km/ Nansei Shoto Trench (maximum depth 7.46 km)
6.2 7km SW of Ueki, Japan 26.8 km/ Nansei Shoto Trench (maximum depth 7.46 km)
6.9 74km SE of Mawlaik, Burma 134.8 km/(in line with) Java Trench (maximum depth 7.725 km)
6.6 39km WSW of Ashkasham, Afghanistan 210.4 km (none)
6.7 106km W of Sola, Vanuatu 26.8 km / New Hebrides Trench (maximum depth 7.6 km)
6.7 105km WSW of Sola, Vanuatu 24.0 km /New Hebrides Trench (maximum depth 7.6 km)
6.9 81km NNW of Port-Olry, Vanuatu 35 km /New Hebrides Trench (maximum depth 7.6 km)
4.2 5km NNE of Crescent, Oklahoma/ none
6.4 211km S of Ust'-Kamchatsk Staryy, Russia 31 km/Aleutian Trench (maximum depth 8.019 km)

Dude. Edgar Cayce was phenomenal. I'd take whatever he said seriously.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Although it would make sense to me that they should post relief efforts along all coast lines as well....

FU? The Earth expanded, the continents don't float. I agree and think the Grand Canyon is evidence of that expansion. And yes the Earth is constantly gaining mass in several ways however the sea floor points to a larger expansion over a shorter period of time. Not the tens of millions of years in the video. The dating of many things is wrong because of major cataclysmic events. Modern " science" and it's desire for unifomitarianism does the dating, not reality.

My point is there may be more than one explanation for earthquakes/earth changes than water weight.

"FU" are my initials. I wasn't disagreeing with your post.

FU

Thank you so much for posting that video! I love his stuff and I'm a subscriber!

Yea. I'm not sold on tbis yet and am questioning the credibility of one guy talking about a meeting that allegedly occurred.

I ask him about this ............No answer or I get deleted

Ok this guy attended a mandatory meeting between FEMA agents. The video is only 11 minutes long...watch this!



He talks about the data at Yellowstone being hidden.

Our future looks really bad folks....

I would like to thank the OP for trying to keep this thread on topic and free from troll food. It is so frustrating to have to sift through endless crap posts that contribute absolutely nothing but chaos to the thread.

And to all the ones complaining about your posts being deleted, well maybe if your comments were more intelligently phrased as conversation instead of insults and bashing, they wouldn't get deleted. It's not about your disagreement, it's about how you aggressively and abusively you insult. If you disagree with the thread's info then, present why, in a way that doesn't make you look like a butt hurt 12year old, If you don't like the thread, don't participate, no need to fuck thing up for others. Now go away trolls.

Now to the post at hand - I tend to believe what is going on, not because I think the video is credible but because of other global events and activity are defiantly ramping up.

And don't think I'm a fear monger cause I don't wana warn anybody, I don't want the competition when TSHTF!!

Our future looks really bad folks....

So having the majority of our population living on the coastline turns out to be a bad idea. Who would think the weight of all the buildings would make a difference.

He mentions separation of landmass. At first I thought of California and the San Andreas. But judging from where fema is concentrating their bases... It looks like they are preparing for the great lakes to drain into the Gulf of Mexico. That would be a true separation of landmass causing mass migration. And it requires gems to be on both sides of the Mississippi

Lake Michigan isn't going to drain into the Gulf. It's 700' deep or so if I recall correctly. That would take one hell of a crevice to form and drain.

Lake Michigan isn't going to drain into the Gulf. It's 700' deep or so if I recall correctly. That would take one hell of a crevice to form and drain.

[link to www.seattletimes.com]

One of the more hair-raising quotes was from a FEMA official who said “our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.”

Actually, a meeting like this probably goes on once a week. FEMA has it's problems, but they aren't the "debil" incarnate. In fact, I hope FEMA remains intact in the event of such a massive disaster otherwise, it'll be planet of the fuckin' apes.

So having the majority of our population living on the coastline turns out to be a bad idea. Who would think the weight of all the buildings would make a difference.

He mentions separation of landmass. At first I thought of California and the San Andreas. But judging from where fema is concentrating their bases... It looks like they are preparing for the great lakes to drain into the Gulf of Mexico. That would be a true separation of landmass causing mass migration. And it requires gems to be on both sides of the Mississippi

That's what I was thinking..