Challenge to Globe earthers.

oh yeah I forgot... here's the challenge: debunk the OP.

Pointless

there is no gravity, only buoyancy, and density.

we are denser than air - thus we "sink" till we hit a layer denser than us - the ground.

Your facts are wrong...

Thus, your conclusions are wrong...

That wasn't difficult...

show how they are wrong.

OP; stop huffing paint

Nah...

You clearly aren't bright enough to understand...

Now run along, and declare how intelligent you are...

There's a good lad...

Your post seems to be based on the premise of gravity NOT being a form of electro-magnetic connection. Everything is made of different wavelenghts of electromagnetic radiation (and also emits emf radiation in the form of light) so to assume 'gravity' is not electromagnetic attraction then your post would be mind opening.

fine, lets assume gravity is electro magnetism, why is it not way stronger at the poles since at the poles there is no centrifugal force???

See?

I said you weren't bright enough to discuss this topic...

And I was right...

yeah Im stupid.

how come then when we connect two magnets together, and then spin them fast enough they may disconnect due to centrifugal force???

This is some fucking great shit...

can you point me to the edge?

then you will have my interest

no matter where you are, take out your compass and head south, eventually you will get to a wall of ice... thats the edge.

you welcome.

Oh no...

It's an insidious plot to keep you from finding "The Edge"...

Is the earth also hollow? Because tennis balls are.

Remember what did the Inquisition to Galileu Galilei?
You flat brains are no different than those unfair bastards.

Always making sure Humanity continues retarded. Fortunatly the retards are a minority.

for some reason the very church begged some dude to publish his heliocentric model years before galileo.

gelileo was a charade, a lip service to say the church was against heliocentrism.

but the truth is, heliocentrism is straight from the satanic pagan neo platonic jesuit schools.

And if you continue south, eventually you will hit the ocean again and get straight to north.

You flat brains never sailed a boat, haven't you?

Simplest answer to your question, Size makes a huge difference.

The bigger an object is the more it shows the force we call gravity. Now what gravity actually is is still up for grabs but the way Einstein described it wasn't a force that the pulls you to the center of the planet, but more like the planet bends light, and space time. That bend is what is keeping you on the planet, the only way to increase or decrease that effect is to change the size of the planet. So your spinning analogy has no affect on the planet other than make us have day and night.

I'd honestly like this explained as well. My nephew is taking an interest in planets and asked me this question...but I can't explain it further than centrifugal force.

Btw OP, that video is pretty neat...the spinning ball reminds me of our galaxy. Beautiful.

--

well no one else ever done it, so why are you so sure?

Einstein was another tool to keep the world ignorant.

Want to know more about "gravity"?
Read this [link to www.haroldaspden.com]

Yes, there are scientists that are pro-Creation.

This was funny. Just so know

spinning has no effect on the force of gravity???

you do know nasa says the earth is wider at the equator because of the spin?

are you seriously saying there is no centrifugal force?

Your answer told me everything I already knew.

there is no explanation.

its a flaw in their lie, the earth is not a globe it doesnt exist and there is no such thing as gravity

Im not the one claiming you can cross antartica to other side of the earth based on no evidence because no one ever done it - you are.

Stronger at the poles? Yes. Way stronger? Well, no. At the equator where the velocity is greatest, 1,700 km per hour, the corresponding acceleration induced by earth's rotation is equal to v^2/r where v = 1,700 km per hour and r = 6,378,000 m. Converting that to meters per second you get v = 472.222 m/s, so the acceleration would be 0.03 m/s^2. Earth's gravity provides an acceleration of about 9.8 m/s^2, so the amount it is offset by earth's rotation is essentially negligible. The difference between the equator and the poles is quite small. Do the math yourself, here's a calculator:
[link to www.calctool.org]

Wrong.
[link to www.fourmilab.ch (secure)]