Challenge to Globe earthers.

Im not the one claiming you can cross antartica to other side of the earth based on no evidence because no one ever done it - you are.

Stronger at the poles? Yes. Way stronger? Well, no. At the equator where the velocity is greatest, 1,700 km per hour, the corresponding acceleration induced by earth's rotation is equal to v^2/r where v = 1,700 km per hour and r = 6,378,000 m. Converting that to meters per second you get v = 472.222 m/s, so the acceleration would be 0.03 m/s^2. Earth's gravity provides an acceleration of about 9.8 m/s^2, so the amount it is offset by earth's rotation is essentially negligible. The difference between the equator and the poles is quite small. Do the math yourself, here's a calculator:
[link to www.calctool.org]

yeah I know the official number - 0.5% less gravity.

BULLSHIT!

100% less centrifugal force = 0.5% gravity?

only in equation fantasy land, not real world.

No I haven't crossed Antarctica, true, but what you told me without telling me is that you know nothing.NOTHING. If you knew how to sail a boat you would never believed that flat brain theory. NEVER.

no matter where you are, take out your compass and head south, eventually you will get to a wall of ice... thats the edge.

you welcome.

So you lied, you knew the answer to start with, and you claimed it should be "50%-100% stronger" at the pole. Got it. The math doesn't lie, you do.

You do realize that people have been to the South Pole , right?

Your premise is flawed on so many levels that it is laughable.

Are you aware the earth is hurling through space, rotating around the sun, which in turn rotates whithin the galaxy, which is moving through the universe?
Do you have even the slightest grasp of relativity?

Go back a few steps, learn to color inside the lines, then move on to the first grade.

I lied?

where?

Fact A: centrifugal force acts opposite to gravity in a spinning globe model

Fact B: if the earth's spin slows down centrifugal force gets weaker - and gravity stronger

Fact C: at the poles the speed of the spin is exactly 0.000 MPH
___________

assumption: the force of gravity at the poles is stronger than at the equator by 100% (or at least 50%)... but its not

which math? you as a mathamatician pre decide the result you want to get, you can get any number you want.

there is no explanation.

its a flaw in their lie, the earth is not a globe it doesnt exist and there is no such thing as gravity

Wrong.
[link to www.fourmilab.ch (secure)]

We did an experiment with centrifugal force and it would make sense on a concave earth. In theory, anyway.

We are working on a flat earth model, it's the easiest one to replicate so far.

We can't work out a spherical earth model. I told him we needed the vacuum of space to do it.

Am I incorrect? Does anyone know of any experiment (computer or accomplished in a mini vacuum) I could use as a reference?

--

--

well I can use my eyes and see 20 miles of stright horizon line

I can read history books and see how no one circumnavigated south north, only east west... wonder why?

wrong because gibberish.

explain it in layman terms, it will also attest to your understanding of this.

I lied?

where?

You just admitted you knew the actual number was less than 1%. You lied.


No, I can't. Show where I fudged any of my numbers on the size or velocity of earth. Otherwise you have nothing. You are a liar.

Your history books suck too.
Polar crossing circumnavigation has occurred several times.

Do you people EVER tell the truth?

It's not gibberish, it IS in layman terms. If you don't understand it then you really need to go back to school. But given your propensity to lie, there is no point in discussing it with you further. You knew the answer to start with in your thread and lied about it.

yeah I know the official number - 0.5% less gravity.

BULLSHIT!

100% less centrifugal force = 0.5% gravity?

only in equation fantasy land, not real world.

where did I say I didnt know there is an official number? where have I implied there isnt such a number?

It's not gibberish, it IS in layman terms. If you don't understand it then you really need to go back to school. But given your propensity to lie, there is no point in discussing it with you further. You knew the answer to start with in your thread and lied about it.

You claimed in your opening post the number was between 50-100% difference in gravity between the poles and equator. You knew the math showed a dramatically different number was to be expected. The math is an actual description of reality. You are a liar. You are dismissed.

Read my posts. Spherical earth works. Flat doesn't, for a wide variety of reasons I don't have time to list.

obviously intelligent you can explain it cant you?

come on, surely you can deduce it to one or two paragraphs.

didnt einstien say that if you cant explain something in a simple manner, it means you have no understanding of it.

You claimed in your opening post the number was between 50-100% difference in gravity between the poles and equator. You knew the math showed a dramatically different number was to be expected. The math is an actual description of reality. You are a liar. You are dismissed.

the math says... the math says the holy math says!

well we can make holy math say what ever we want in fantasy land!

100% less centrifuge doesnt account for only 0.5% increase in gravity in the world of COMMON SENSE LOGIC!!!

you see my OP?! its based on COMMEN SENSE LOGIC! not fantasy math.

OP STILL CORRECT!

Obviously it works, we are on the earth.

My question is are there any models or experiments I can use to show him how it works?

The YouTube generation are watching these videos and we need to be able to counter them with something credible.

Everyone on here is calling each other names and dismissing this as stupid, but it isn't stupid to ask questions and explain it to the younger generation.

--

oh yeah I forgot... here's the challenge: debunk the OP.

Sure, I can explain it simply, I simply don't care to discuss it further with you. You have proven yourself to be dishonest and there is no point in discussing the fact that a torsion balance demonstrates gravity even between relatively small objects on earth.

the calculated max centrifugal force at the equator is less than 1/2 of 1 percent of gravity. And the difference in gravity HAS been measured.