Self Proclaimed CT Expert Abbie Richards Claims Conspiracy Theorists are "Not Based in Reality"

lol

She is in for a rude awakening!

According to Abbie Richards, this DOJ report would be placed in the "Detached From Reality" category - because, if we all believed in her "expertise" - they just don't make viruses and diseases in labs:

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
...
Zaosong Zheng, 30, a Chinese national, was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China. On Jan. 21, 2020, Zheng was indicted on one count of smuggling goods from the United States and one count of making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements. He has been detained since Dec. 30, 2019.

[link to www.justice.gov (secure)]

Alleged Chinese Spy Arrested with Vials of Biological Material at Boston Airport in December
[link to www.westernjournal.com (secure)]

Who cares what this psycho bitch thinks?

Another brain dead communist.

That sounds like a conspiracy theory. She should seek help!

So believe whatever media tells you makes you based in reality?
How does she know whats true and fake?

Last Edited by Seething on 10/07/2020 12:31 PM

^^ Sounds like gaslighting. People have different perspectives, life experiences, etc.

It sounds like SHE, that CT "expert" is very limited in her views on life.

That says more about her than it does anyone else. Also, much projecting, she is doing.

OOhhow mainstream! A rudimentary bit of research will disprove most of whats on this chart. New World Order isnt real? GHW Bush started talking about it 1991 and it gave me chills the first time he said it. Denver airport even has a plaque dedicated by the NWO airport commission - how much evidence does one need? Notice how antisemitism is nicely tied in with all the "worst" conspiracy theories. Invert that and what does it tell us? Hmmmmmm....

"A climate science student"

Done reading.

People who believe UFOs are on that chart?


[link to news.stanford.edu (secure)]


^^ So I guess she is saying the whole of Standford is like that. That's her conclusion


Why does she lend selective bias to some scientists, but not to others? She herself is biased, and doesn't consider other points of view, again, which is saying more about her than it does about others.


[link to blogs.scientificamerican.com (secure)]

I also suppose that George Soros talking about his part in the Ukraine revolution, with CNNs Fareed Zakaria, is another one that Abbie Richards would label as "The Point of No Return" and anyone who believes should "Get Help":

George Soros’ Giant Globalist Footprint in Ukraine’s Turmoil


Billionaire investor/activist George Soros has a giant footprint in Ukraine. Similar to his operations in dozens of other nations, he has, over the past couple of decades, poured tens of millions of dollars into Ukrainian non-governmental organizations (NGOs), ostensibly to assist them in transforming their country into a more “open” and “democratic” society.

Many of the participants in Kiev’s ‘EuroMaidan’ demonstrations were members of Soros-funded NGOs and/or were trained by the same NGOs in the many workshops and conferences sponsored by Soros’ International Renaissance Foundation (IRF), and his various Open Society institutes and foundations. The IRF, founded and funded by Soros, boasts that it has given ‘more than any other donor organization’ to ‘democratic transformation’ of Ukraine.

[link to thenewamerican.com (secure)]

George Soros told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria over the weekend he is responsible for establishing a foundation in Ukraine that ultimately contributed to the overthrow of the country’s elected leader and the installation of a junta handpicked by the State Department.

“First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?” Zakaria asked Soros.

“Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now,” Soros responded.

...

Soros worked closely with USAID, the National Endowment for Libshit doing work formerly assigned to the CIA), the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the Freedom House, and the Albert Einstein Institute to initiate a series of color revolutions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia following the engineered collapse of the Soviet Union.

[link to transcripts.cnn.com]

I suppose George Soros funding BLM and Democrat DAs is outlandish to believe as well.

Soros gave $650,000 to BLM
[link to www.breitbart.com (secure)]

George Soros gave more than $400,000 to super PAC’s supporting Foxx in her 2016 race
[link to bigleaguepolitics.com (secure)]

It's definitely gaslighting. It's making the rounds on liberal social media - another tactic used to shame and silence people who question their government.

Anyone who believes our agencies are corrupt, that there's a "deep state", questions the origins of Covid 19, looks at dissenting scientific research - will be labeled a "CT", will be banned from social media and deplatformed.

She's popular on China's tik tok and is garnering a lot of attention from the liberal sheep.

Painting with kind of a large brush isn't she?

Yes, she is.

See, this ugly bitch is thirsty for attention.
Ignore her.
Tik tok lol... What a maturity!!!

Yes, she's a basic little shill bitch.

oddly they only believe stuff like Trumps a Russian agent. imagine

After reviewing her chart I take that back. Actually she is full of shit, and sucking up to those in power.

Seems like she's learned the Zen of Debunkery,,,




[link to www.skepticalaboutskeptics.org (secure)]

"II. REDEFINING SCIENCE
• Portray science not as an open-ended process of discovery but as a pre-emptive holy war against invading hordes of quackery-spouting infidels. Since in war the ends justify the means, you may fudge, stretch or violate the scientific method, or even omit it entirely, in the name of defending it.

• Equate the narrow, stringent, rigorous and critical elements of science with all of science, while summarily dismissing the value of inquiry, exploration and discovery.

• Though stubborn negativity can no more be equated with science than a braking system can be equated with an automobile, insist that science consists wholly of the ruthless application of doubt. If anyone objects, accuse them of viewing science in exclusively fuzzy, subjective, or mystical terms.

• Likewise, while it would be ridiculous to equate a vehicle with a particular destination, declare that “science equals the existing body of scientific conclusions!”"

Well, most of the garbage CT junk on GLP is not based in any reality so I would tend to agree with him.

So how come most 'conspiracy theories' eventually turn into 'conspiracy fact' - it may not be right away, however. I guess truth IS the first casualty in any confrontation.

Further Reading here, about Abbie Richards' techniques, that her and a lot of "scientists" employ

Thread: ***>>Debunking the Skeptics, an Antidote to Abbie Richards about CTs << Skeptical of Skeptics

According to climate science student Abbie Richards - if you believe Jimmy Savile abused children, then you are "Not Based in Reality":

https://twitter.com/_/status/1312816956538523649

Thread: 'Easy Meat.' Britain's Muslim Rape Gang Cover-Up

Thread: An Open Secret (blacklisted Hollywood pedophilia documentary)

Thread: How is it that Robert Mueller is not being investigated? Jeffrey Epstein - David Asimov

^^ Treefiddy, shill.

"• In the same manner, insist on classes of evidence that are impossible to obtain. For example, declare that unidentified aerial phenomena may be considered real only if we can bring them into laboratories to strike them with hammers and analyze their physical properties. Disregard the accomplishments of the inferential sciences — astronomy, for example — which gets on just fine without bringing actual planets, stars, galaxies and black holes into its labs and striking them with hammers.

• At every opportunity reinforce the notion that familiarity equals rationality. The unfamiliar is therefore irrational, and consequently inadmissible as evidence.

• “Occam’s Razor,” or the “principle of parsimony,” says the correct explanation of a mystery will usually involve the simplest fundamental principles. Insist, therefore, that the most familiar explanation is by definition the simplest! While you’re at it, imply strongly that Occam’s Razor is not merely a philosophical tool that cuts whichever way you point it, but an immutable law that always supports your particular views."


[link to www.skepticalaboutskeptics.org (secure)]

Last Edited by Milekiel on 10/07/2020 01:02 PM

the Pedophiles, Communists, Satanist and Corrupted are going down .. the 70 year Mafia is Finished

Is saying she isn't really blond a conspiracy?

I hate Abbie Richards for this off based chart of lies to get people to fall back asleep and return to normal programming. Please troll all of her social media accounts including her TikTok