ALIEN MONOLITH FOUND ON SATURN'S IAPETUS | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 618347 United States 01/25/2010 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 871779 United States 01/25/2010 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 868957 Australia 01/25/2010 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
lime flavoured User ID: 873500 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How is it a prediction? Clarke never said any of his work was meant to be prophetic (although he did sort of claim to have invented the concept of geosynchronous orbits). One thing I did find odd about his work is the fact that the asteroid impact that starts off Project Spaceguard which finds the Alien craft in "Rendezvous with Rama" occurs on 9-11-2077. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How is it a prediction? Clarke never said any of his work was meant to be prophetic (although he did sort of claim to have invented the concept of geosynchronous orbits). Quoting: lime flavouredOne thing I did find odd about his work is the fact that the asteroid impact that starts off Project Spaceguard which finds the Alien craft in "Rendezvous with Rama" occurs on 9-11-2077. Clarke DID invent the concept of geo-sync satellites, back in the 1940's. He should have patented it, then he would have become richer than God! At least, he made a damn' good hunk of cash from his excellent sci-fi novels, and movies, though. |
The Monk User ID: 515245 United States 01/25/2010 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.alienvideo.net] Quoting: masonfreepartyClarke's Alien Monolith Prediction Author of the 1968 "2001: A Space Odyssey", Arthur C. Clarke, writes about Iapetus. In the final chapters of the book, astronaut Dave Bowman finds an enigmatic alien monolith waiting for him on the surface of Iapetus. Did Arthur C. Clarke have access to secret knowledge? It is speculated that some of hollywood's best writers, including George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have been privy to accessing secretive occult knowledge. In other words: not all of their ideas are original. It is interesting that Arthur C. Clarke wrote about an alien monolith on Saturn's Moon Iapetus, at a time in the 1960's when NASA knew very little about this moon. Then, in 2004 it is discovered an incredible mountain ridge encompasses nearly the entire planet - in what is likely the most bizarre formation in the solar system. What is inside the equilateral ridge? Does an alien monolith await us? Special people do get special tours and access from the govt. However, this monolith thing is overblown. It's a natural formation that was discovered and sci-fi writers have been speculating about it ever since. |
lime flavoured User ID: 873500 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Clarke DID invent the concept of geo-sync satellites, back in the 1940's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 873812As far as I can tell it was invented independently by various people (including Clarke). Clarke said about patenting it that all it would do is be like "A license to be sued". Last Edited by lime flavoured on 01/25/2010 06:33 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.alienvideo.net] Quoting: The Monk 515245Clarke's Alien Monolith Prediction Author of the 1968 "2001: A Space Odyssey", Arthur C. Clarke, writes about Iapetus. In the final chapters of the book, astronaut Dave Bowman finds an enigmatic alien monolith waiting for him on the surface of Iapetus. Did Arthur C. Clarke have access to secret knowledge? It is speculated that some of hollywood's best writers, including George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have been privy to accessing secretive occult knowledge. In other words: not all of their ideas are original. It is interesting that Arthur C. Clarke wrote about an alien monolith on Saturn's Moon Iapetus, at a time in the 1960's when NASA knew very little about this moon. Then, in 2004 it is discovered an incredible mountain ridge encompasses nearly the entire planet - in what is likely the most bizarre formation in the solar system. What is inside the equilateral ridge? Does an alien monolith await us? Special people do get special tours and access from the govt. However, this monolith thing is overblown. It's a natural formation that was discovered and sci-fi writers have been speculating about it ever since. What about the one on Phobos? The one referred to by the Buzzmeister? It looks symmetrical, and smooth. Totally artificial. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 859591 United States 01/25/2010 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vesper User ID: 860438 United States 01/25/2010 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I knew it..... "I am searching for the bones of your father but cannot distinguish them from those of a slave." Diogenes "Some have little power to do good, and have likewise little strength to resist evil" (Samuel Johnson). "The basic difference between an ordinary man and a warrior is that a warrior takes everything as a challenge, while an ordinary man takes everything as a blessing or as a curse."--Don Juan |
Free Store User ID: 144456 Canada 01/25/2010 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK? Didn't think so. Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade. Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do. non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
Free Store User ID: 144456 Canada 01/25/2010 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Having looked the photo over, I can only compare it to the Rocky mountains, which are made by a compressing force and the very sharp peaks that form are due to this I don't see the same forces at work here, though there maybe other forces at work that we do not know about |
masonfreeparty (OP) User ID: 873990 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 08:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.youtube.com] Subscribe Unsubscribe adjuk 26 November 2008 A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo... A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004. The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video... [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007 [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] or [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall" Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes? Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up. [link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk] [link to www.enterprisemission.com] Category: Science & Technology Last Edited by antimasonparty on 01/25/2010 08:15 PM |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.youtube.com] Quoting: masonfreepartySubscribe Unsubscribe adjuk 26 November 2008 A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo... A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004. The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video... [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007 [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] or [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall" Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes? Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up. [link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk] [link to www.enterprisemission.com] Category: Science & Technology So watching a youtube vid and listening to conmen is a substitute for elementary science and rational thought? Is that what you are saying, bunky? non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
masonfreeparty (OP) User ID: 873990 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.youtube.com] Quoting: The CommentatorSubscribe Unsubscribe adjuk 26 November 2008 A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo... A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004. The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video... [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007 [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] or [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall" Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes? Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up. [link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk] [link to www.enterprisemission.com] Category: Science & Technology So watching a youtube vid and listening to conmen is a substitute for elementary science and rational thought? Is that what you are saying, bunky? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK? Didn't think so. Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade. Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do. Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know? I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there. |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Andrew Johnson isnt a con man...he's one of the most respected researchers on the planet as you can see by his website [link to www.checktheevidence.com] Quoting: masonfreeparty[link to www.youtube.com] Subscribe Unsubscribe adjuk 26 November 2008 A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo... A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004. The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video... [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007 [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] or [link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov] It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall" Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes? Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up. [link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk] [link to www.enterprisemission.com] Category: Science & Technology So watching a youtube vid and listening to conmen is a substitute for elementary science and rational thought? Is that what you are saying, bunky? Notice you ignore Hoaxland..... And anyone who invokes crackpot science like Johnson is not a respected figure except to the terminally ignorant and pathologically gullible types. Gonna have to do better, kid. But you won't because you can't. Better luck next time, kid. Last Edited by The Commentator on 01/25/2010 08:42 PM non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK? Didn't think so. Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade. Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do. Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know? I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there. But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone. Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much? non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 317023 United States 01/25/2010 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How is it a prediction? Clarke never said any of his work was meant to be prophetic (although he did sort of claim to have invented the concept of geosynchronous orbits). Quoting: lime flavouredOne thing I did find odd about his work is the fact that the asteroid impact that starts off Project Spaceguard which finds the Alien craft in "Rendezvous with Rama" occurs on 9-11-2077. Are those movies or what? I'd like to watch a good on-demand netflix movie tonight. Any Arthur C. Clark movies that I don't know about? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK? Didn't think so. Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade. Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do. Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know? I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there. But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone. Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much? No, really. I'd like to do this. How can we meet? |
zombieintraining User ID: 839757 United States 01/25/2010 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about the one on Phobos? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 873812The one referred to by the Buzzmeister? It looks symmetrical, and smooth. Totally artificial. Phobos itself may be entirely artificial. [link to www.mactonnies.com] Last Edited by zombieintraining on 01/25/2010 08:47 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873812 United Kingdom 01/25/2010 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK? Didn't think so. Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade. Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do. Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know? I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there. But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone. Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much? No, really. I'd like to do this. How can we meet? Come on, Common-Hater! Let's meet! |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Note, to people checking out this thread. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 873812The "Common-Hater" is a well-known shill, at GLP. It never presents any arguments. Just look back on this thread, for proof. It always attacks the messenger. That should tell you all that you need to know. And you are a hate filled, zetatard bunker. So where does that leave you, bunky? The follower of a delusional old woman who hears voices in her head. But personal attacks are the best you can come up with. Just because you are the brightest window licker on the short bus it does not follow you are mentally capable, kid. Now run along. non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 01/25/2010 08:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags! Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it? Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance.... [link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk] Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me. No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit. Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK? Didn't think so. Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade. Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do. Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know? I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there. But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone. Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much? No, really. I'd like to do this. How can we meet? Come on, Common-Hater! Let's meet! Get your ass out to Mojave and we can have some fun. if you have your parent's written permission i'll take you flying. You will like it. But you will have to have an adult drive you there.... non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |