Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

so we can see that what we label as time is the amount of motions (cause/effects) experienced.


Correct.



in out material dimension all cause/effects occur at light speed or less thus our time (human time) is fixed against cause /effects within a slice of observed/experienced cause effects all of which occur within an environment that is maintained coherent by cause/effects happening at velocities above light speed.



Correct, but that is also making the assumption that supraluminal existence actually exists. This is one of the areas that they are having difficulty in accepting...because to 'measure' anything that exists supraluminal, takes a supraluminal measuring device. Then, to bring the measurements back from supraluminal into subluminal, the measurements would be effected from traveling through the transition zone. So, the only thing they can actually observe, is the effect, and never the cause of anything that has nonlocal qualities. Perhaps THAT is the barrier, and not actual constant of light.



thus what we label as time is relevant to what we experience within our environment and is not when labeled at light speed the only time that exists



Why? Because of the reason I have stated above. They can only ever have half of the cause/effect law. They observe the effects, never being able to observe the cause. Or they can create a cause, but never observe what effects are made when doing the nonlocal research. They merely create a cause, the effect is non-observable, and they observe a result.




it is the only time that is relevant to our awareness at present

Instead of thinking of speed of light needed to get from point A to B. How about the removal of what we see as light. Push it aside, part it, remove it. Almost like making a hole in a picture and stepping through to the other side.....I know crazy.

Instead of thinking of speed of light needed to get from point A to B. How about the removal of what we see as light. Push it aside, part it, remove it. Almost like making a hole in a picture and stepping through to the other side.....I know crazy.

starting at 0:38
[link to www.youtube.com]

ha...when you say remove it make a whole....reminds me of forming a new shape...lol

That is something similar to what I said above in response to aether.

So, the only thing they can actually observe, is the effect, and never the cause of anything that has nonlocal qualities. Perhaps THAT is the barrier, and not actual constant of light.

Edmund Husserl (1859-1938)...Phenomenology

Phenomenology is a form of modern philosophy initiated by Edmund Husserl (1859-1938). The phenomenological approach to doing philosophy begins by acknowledging that much of philosophic activity is tainted by hidden, unquestioned presuppositions that slip unnoticed into our thought. Moreover, even our experience itself is conditioned by interpretive presuppositions and their related habits of attention. This natural attitude toward the world presents us with what amounts to a naive semblance of reality, together with its associated set of unquestioned concepts and categories.

Instead of thinking of speed of light needed to get from point A to B. How about the removal of what we see as light. Push it aside, part it, remove it. Almost like making a hole in a picture and stepping through to the other side.....I know crazy.

Some Principles of
Phenomenological Hermeneutics

Copyright 1996 by John Lye. This text may be freely used, with attribution, for non-profit purposes.
As with all of my posts for this course, this document is open to change. If you have any suggestions (additions, qualifications, arguments, corrections), mail me.

1. We live in the world: in history, in concretion: we do not live any where else, and all meaning is only meaning in relation to particular, concrete, historical existence.

2. Our existence as beings includes: our situation; our tools-to-hand with and through which we manipulate and articulate the world; and our fore-understandings of the world.

3. We share reality through common signs. We cannot share anyone else's reality except through the mediation of our symbolic world -- that is, through a 'text' of some sort, which text has a context -- in fact, many contexts. On the other hand, as Gadamer says in Truth and Method, "Thanks to the linguistic nature of all interpretation every interpretation includes the possibility of a relationship with others. There can be no speech that does not bind the speaker and the person spoken to." When one "understands" another, one assimilates what is said to the point that is becomes one's own, lives as much as possible in the person's contexts and symbols.

....

It was the methodology I used in my thesis, Hilos. My thesis is ongoing through the pages of everything we are all processing. Again, I come from a background and education of Sociology. People are going to resonate in different ways. I have no issues with math. It is not my language. But yes it is others.

I feel like you have a unicorn inside you.

you know blue that is not crazy, that is clever because light is only a portion of what is "there" and it is the slowest portion.

so if you throw away light and step forward there is still material to support your weight but you and it flow faster than light;

analogy:
leap of faith

hey amm,
your velocity is amazing this moment
quicker than my vodka assisted
so you know

Wow. What an amazing happenstance onto that one.

you know blue that is not crazy, that is clever because light is only a portion of what is "there" and it is the slowest portion.

so if you throw away light and step forward there is still material to support your weight but you and it flow faster than light;

analogy:
leap of faith

Here you go Aether save this for when you have

[link to www.youtube.com]

Cool......I can see me doing this in my sleep now. lol

yep, but remember what tesla meant by energy (information)
and the carrier of the information is charge (distributed)

hang tight, this will go on for some time and will maybe be surprising (pleasant)
i`m the translator, these are not my formula

"the second says a photon has mass, bot not at rest."

whoa, wait a minute, einstein must have known a photon by default can never be stationary!!!

so what he is saying is when the photon slows down to light speed BINGO, it hits inertia (resistance) because it is now slow enough to experience the influence (force) of resistance from that which the photon is now within, by definition, the light speed material dimension of matter, thus it acquires mass

now if maxwell is correct, the information (energy) carrier is charge (photon), thus the photon slows down to meet resistance at light speed and lower thus acquire mass therefore possess substance to force what the information within it forces it to do to the higher scales of material particles it now has the ability (physical presence) to influence

There can be no lapse of physical time on a photon...hmmm


In physics, a photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force. The effects of this force are easily observable at both the microscopic and macroscopic level, because the photon has no rest mass; this allows for interactions at long distances. Like all elementary particles, photons are currently best explained by quantum mechanics and will exhibit wave–particle duality, exhibiting properties of both waves and particles. For example, a single photon may be refracted by a lens or exhibit wave interference with itself, but also act as a particle giving a definite result when its position is measured.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

LOL thats part of the point Blue ... helps visualizing for astral travel. *giggle*
How are you ?
Plus there is information flow in that video also.=X

are we matching w/f?