There REALLY IS something strange in western sky around sunset...!!! | |
in5d User ID: 44344886 United States 10/17/2013 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thank you for posting the video. I think you did a great job! I have been here since page one, even greened pinned it at one point. So glad several of you, including 3rdEye's impressive techniques, are putting this thread back on track. Edit: I mean "green karma pinned" you're very welcome... it's an amazing thread |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11859877 New Zealand 10/17/2013 01:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Setheory User ID: 41894184 United States 10/17/2013 01:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And oh by the way, the fact that I know you have NO wife and No kids, comes as no surprise to me. How ironic? Quoting: 3rdEyeE Almost everything you say is wrong. I have a 16 year old girl and a 12 year old boy. I stated this earlier in the thread. You are insane and you seem proud of that. If it wasn't for the fact that you have a family, I would find it funny. |
in5d User ID: 44344886 United States 10/17/2013 01:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am fairly sure the finger test can only be done by the person taking the picture prior to actually taking the picture. Which means there would be no one here who could actually perform this test on your picture #6. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6270523 Thanks, but he doesn't seem to understand anything technical. This is a hoot to watch. He has to be a troll. Nobody can actually be so wrong so often. I love it Seth. You continue to prove my points. Check the thread. It was I who pointed this out and even indicated that it was a desperate, irrelevant attempt to distract people. Did you miss that? You have my interest because you claim to be able to see what people are interpreting as filter/lens flare with your naked eye. However you are losing me in your attempt to mock, discredit or whatever it is your are doing to your distracters. Making demands on these folks is going to get you no where, especially if you suspend posting your pics. They win by not responding so I am not sure I understand your methods. Why not just ignore those who you do not agree with as has been suggested by others in this thread, present your evidence to the best of your ability and let that presentation speak for itself? I hope that you have what you claim to have, then again I am hoping you do not. I encourage you to share your pictures and ignore your distracters, it would be better for everyone. |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Intermission Joke...Waiting on Zoom of pic 3 and 6 AND Theory post 1 rebuttal or Counter Theory. Quoting: 3rdEyeE While we wait, it will be awhile, they are ALL in a strategy meeting aka "Operation Circle The Wagons" aka "Operation Who the Fuck Does this 3rd Eye Bitch Think He is" Please help me find my lizard and kitty... Lost my BIG, lizard...looks like Godzilla doing a face-palm and lost my Bitch Kitty. Anybody seen them? ROTFLMFAO!!! Usually works, but usually I am not here--check my stats. I'll just bump your own words here. WTF? Lost my big lizard? Help me find my lizard and kitty? If you have meds, please take them. This is some of the craziest shit I've seen on this site. wow.... This must be him He is going to somehow interpret that as kudos. LOL! No interpretation needed, the kudos are documented on the thread. |
Setheory User ID: 41894184 United States 10/17/2013 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seth, what is YOUR technique to confirm/prove/whatever word you want to use that an "object" is lens flare OR "two version flare" etc? To be clear, I am referring to a photo that has ALREADY been taken, not by YOU, and NO WIRES are running through said object? Can you or will you answer this question? If not, your comments and opinions mean NOTHING. |
Bluepill User ID: 1016088 United States 10/17/2013 01:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great job folks, almost 200 hundred pages because EVERYONE (MINUS 5) are seeing the "new" venus, remote-controlled planes flying the same worldwide routes, etc. This thread has NOTHING to do with my 1 illustrated pic and 5 pictures (released to date). But we need to tighten up, so here is where we are going now: Quoting: 3rdEyeE 1) No more email pics--Dishonest folks lied to get pics, didn't even post them. Need I say more 2) We are going to continue with pic review...starting with pic #6. It has been posted, the aforementioned "planet" and "moon" are STILL there. No wire, no nothing...just the same TWO "versions" of lens flare. Same distance and orientation to each other. Now consider this, knowing the "conditions" which will cause lens flare...VERY EASY. To take dozens of pictures over SEVERAL months, from varying locations, times of day/night, angles, vantage points and have said pictures produce NEARLY IDENTICAL "two version" lens flare is IMPOSSIBLE, even if we knew what the fuck that was--"two version". Anybody got a quad venti double pump Lens Flare to go? ROTFLMFAO. 3) We are going to simultaneously begin a THEORY debate on this same thread. I will take one for the team and put MY theory out there. We will go point by point, blow for blow. Point is the pics and theories are related, but different. My posts from now on will be a PICTURE (numbered by order of release) or dialogue to support my theory or challenge those that I don't believe (subjective of course) to be plausible. Feel free to add your pics or theories. I am dying to see the 230 pm naked eye pic of Venus, but "they" don't have ANY. I just posted a new article on In5D that shows a plethora of photos and all of the different colors that this object is emitting.... but I can't post the link to In5D on GLP. I also captured an image that looks like a purple Metatron's Cube.... quite fascinating Just went through your website photos, videos, etc. You are on the west coast of Florida? A very serious question. Do you plan on "bugging out" soon? Thanks |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And oh by the way, the fact that I know you have NO wife and No kids, comes as no surprise to me. How ironic? Quoting: 3rdEyeE Almost everything you say is wrong. I have a 16 year old girl and a 12 year old boy. I stated this earlier in the thread. You are insane and you seem proud of that. If it wasn't for the fact that you have a family, I would find it funny. Bitch I was joking, I don't care about your kids or their loser dad. Any wife? You brought up family....Same shit, bring up some irrelevant inflammatory bullshit. And then get defensive when someone clowns you. Classic. Vis a vis, "I'm not a loser, I have kids, too." |
saturn12 User ID: 1063102 United States 10/17/2013 01:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seth, what is YOUR technique to confirm/prove/whatever word you want to use that an "object" is lens flare OR "two version flare" etc? Quoting: 3rdEyeE To be clear, I am referring to a photo that has ALREADY been taken, not by YOU, and NO WIRES are running through said object? Can you or will you answer this question? If not, your comments and opinions mean NOTHING. I am not sure I understand your methods, you say you saw what people are interpreting as lens flare with your naked eye. If this is the case, why would you rely on a distracter to prove otherwise? If you know what you have, why not back up what pictures you have with performing the suggested finger test which makes sense and has been proven to work and then come back with that second set of photos to back up your first. In this method, you could give yourself some peace by ignoring those you claim to be wrong while completely vindicating your position. Instead you have stooped to a level that could turn off those you are trying to reach, like myself. While others are supporting your methods, I am not sure I could, they seem counter productive to me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11421136 New Zealand 10/17/2013 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am fairly sure the finger test can only be done by the person taking the picture prior to actually taking the picture. Which means there would be no one here who could actually perform this test on your picture #6. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6270523 Thanks, but he doesn't seem to understand anything technical. This is a hoot to watch. He has to be a troll. Nobody can actually be so wrong so often. I love it Seth. You continue to prove my points. Check the thread. It was I who pointed this out and even indicated that it was a desperate, irrelevant attempt to distract people. Did you miss that? You have my interest because you claim to be able to see what people are interpreting as filter/lens flare with your naked eye. However you are losing me in your attempt to mock, discredit or whatever it is your are doing to your distracters. Making demands on these folks is going to get you no where, especially if you suspend posting your pics. They win by not responding so I am not sure I understand your methods. Why not just ignore those who you do not agree with as has been suggested by others in this thread, present your evidence to the best of your ability and let that presentation speak for itself? I hope that you have what you claim to have, then again I am hoping you do not. I encourage you to share your pictures and ignore your distracters, it would be better for everyone. He doesn't have shit. Just another shill who can't provide any evidence of this "object" everyone is supposed to be seeing. All talk & spam = weaksauce. |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seth can you and/or Astro post some non-telescopic photos of Venus. It is very bright and brilliant right now. Easy to photograph. Can you do this to help the forum and thread? If not, tell us why not. Thanks in advance, btw is the boy Sethy Jr.? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In5D, you have some really interesting footage, I liked the violet metatron cube screen capture. I am curious though how your footage relates to what people have claimed to see in this thread other than it being in the western sky. Are folks not posting what they are seeing occurs prior to sunset and then it disappears? How is what you are filming clearly in the night time sky supposed to be the same object? These do not seem related to me, perhaps you can explain how they are? |
Bluepill User ID: 1016088 United States 10/17/2013 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In5D, you have some really interesting footage, I liked the violet metatron cube screen capture. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6270523 I am curious though how your footage relates to what people have claimed to see in this thread other than it being in the western sky. Are folks not posting what they are seeing occurs prior to sunset and then it disappears? How is what you are filming clearly in the night time sky supposed to be the same object? These do not seem related to me, perhaps you can explain how they are? Agreed. Also, none seem to be Sunnydaze's "flaming V" which she was adamant about. Still, they're damn interesting.. |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 41894184 Thanks, but he doesn't seem to understand anything technical. This is a hoot to watch. He has to be a troll. Nobody can actually be so wrong so often. I love it Seth. You continue to prove my points. Check the thread. It was I who pointed this out and even indicated that it was a desperate, irrelevant attempt to distract people. Did you miss that? You have my interest because you claim to be able to see what people are interpreting as filter/lens flare with your naked eye. However you are losing me in your attempt to mock, discredit or whatever it is your are doing to your distracters. Making demands on these folks is going to get you no where, especially if you suspend posting your pics. They win by not responding so I am not sure I understand your methods. Why not just ignore those who you do not agree with as has been suggested by others in this thread, present your evidence to the best of your ability and let that presentation speak for itself? I hope that you have what you claim to have, then again I am hoping you do not. I encourage you to share your pictures and ignore your distracters, it would be better for everyone. He doesn't have shit. Just another shill who can't provide any evidence of this "object" everyone is supposed to be seeing. All talk & spam = weaksauce. Who the fuck are you? What sauce do you have? What have you posted? I have posted an illustration from a depiction of a celestial body dating back thousands of years ago. And have already stated that I have a "double version" lens flare that is an near identical representation of the illustration. Since I didn't make the illustration and I cannot "custom design" lens flare...even while shooting at the sun...You get what you get, do you realize how improbable/impossible that is. If not, you do it and post it. I invited anyone to do what I have done. None have offered. By the way, being anonymous, but talking shit is like being a hooker that doesn't fuck--WORTHLESS. Where's the red-light district in your village? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Setheory 41894184 Thanks, but he doesn't seem to understand anything technical. This is a hoot to watch. He has to be a troll. Nobody can actually be so wrong so often. I love it Seth. You continue to prove my points. Check the thread. It was I who pointed this out and even indicated that it was a desperate, irrelevant attempt to distract people. Did you miss that? You have my interest because you claim to be able to see what people are interpreting as filter/lens flare with your naked eye. However you are losing me in your attempt to mock, discredit or whatever it is your are doing to your distracters. Making demands on these folks is going to get you no where, especially if you suspend posting your pics. They win by not responding so I am not sure I understand your methods. Why not just ignore those who you do not agree with as has been suggested by others in this thread, present your evidence to the best of your ability and let that presentation speak for itself? I hope that you have what you claim to have, then again I am hoping you do not. I encourage you to share your pictures and ignore your distracters, it would be better for everyone. He doesn't have shit. Just another shill who can't provide any evidence of this "object" everyone is supposed to be seeing. All talk & spam = weaksauce. His methods are making it easy for a curious bystander like myself to dismiss what he is saying. Especially now that he himself is using language that he disparaged earlier. It would be nice if he just rose above all the non sense and posted his evidence and let that speak for itself. If it gets shilled, it gets shilled, you cant stop it. However you can follow up with the appropriate finger test to rule out any sort of flare which would simply end all speculation. One wonders why he does not do this. |
Stripper Orphanage User ID: 46856858 United States 10/17/2013 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shills aside Arguments aside Personal attacks aside What is it?? Please send my shill checks to: 2600 Scenic dr Austin TX 78703 If I have a bill for $4.27 and give the cashier $5.02, the stunned look on their faces as they give me back $.75 (three quarters) is akin to a magic trick. How did you do that? You've never been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3. "- i liked the song before boobs were added. but now. well, boobs. they make everything better dont they? " ~ Green Girl Credit to all uploaders whose content I steal ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11859877 New Zealand 10/17/2013 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
in5d User ID: 44344886 United States 10/17/2013 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great job folks, almost 200 hundred pages because EVERYONE (MINUS 5) are seeing the "new" venus, remote-controlled planes flying the same worldwide routes, etc. This thread has NOTHING to do with my 1 illustrated pic and 5 pictures (released to date). But we need to tighten up, so here is where we are going now: Quoting: 3rdEyeE 1) No more email pics--Dishonest folks lied to get pics, didn't even post them. Need I say more 2) We are going to continue with pic review...starting with pic #6. It has been posted, the aforementioned "planet" and "moon" are STILL there. No wire, no nothing...just the same TWO "versions" of lens flare. Same distance and orientation to each other. Now consider this, knowing the "conditions" which will cause lens flare...VERY EASY. To take dozens of pictures over SEVERAL months, from varying locations, times of day/night, angles, vantage points and have said pictures produce NEARLY IDENTICAL "two version" lens flare is IMPOSSIBLE, even if we knew what the fuck that was--"two version". Anybody got a quad venti double pump Lens Flare to go? ROTFLMFAO. 3) We are going to simultaneously begin a THEORY debate on this same thread. I will take one for the team and put MY theory out there. We will go point by point, blow for blow. Point is the pics and theories are related, but different. My posts from now on will be a PICTURE (numbered by order of release) or dialogue to support my theory or challenge those that I don't believe (subjective of course) to be plausible. Feel free to add your pics or theories. I am dying to see the 230 pm naked eye pic of Venus, but "they" don't have ANY. I just posted a new article on In5D that shows a plethora of photos and all of the different colors that this object is emitting.... but I can't post the link to In5D on GLP. I also captured an image that looks like a purple Metatron's Cube.... quite fascinating Just went through your website photos, videos, etc. You are on the west coast of Florida? A very serious question. Do you plan on "bugging out" soon? Thanks not really... I have supplies but I'm not going anywhere |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This should be the focus, not all the other non sense. I can not help with providing any evidence as I have no horizon or camera, only mountains in my sw sky and a dumb phone. However this thread has me curious especially as it is not the only place this is being discussed. So I would again encourage 3rdeye and whoever else who may have important evidence as to what may or may not be in the wsw sky at dusk to provide the evidence and dispense with the drama. If you have managed to take a picture of something that you can see with your naked eye, it should be there tomorrow and can be supported by doing the finger test. Why waste so much energy in such a negative fashion? If you have what you say you have, who cares what anyone else says, post it and then support it with another set of pictures with the finger test if you feel the need to. It really is that simple. |
in5d User ID: 44344886 United States 10/17/2013 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In5D, you have some really interesting footage, I liked the violet metatron cube screen capture. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6270523 I am curious though how your footage relates to what people have claimed to see in this thread other than it being in the western sky. Are folks not posting what they are seeing occurs prior to sunset and then it disappears? How is what you are filming clearly in the night time sky supposed to be the same object? These do not seem related to me, perhaps you can explain how they are? The days are getting shorter by one minute each day as we near winter, so each night's videos or pictures will appear to be somewhat darker than the previous nights. I took this video between 6:30-7:45PM Eastern Time. It caught my eye when I was at a drum circle last weekend and I have been researching it ever since |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: 3rdEyeE I love it Seth. You continue to prove my points. Check the thread. It was I who pointed this out and even indicated that it was a desperate, irrelevant attempt to distract people. Did you miss that? You have my interest because you claim to be able to see what people are interpreting as filter/lens flare with your naked eye. However you are losing me in your attempt to mock, discredit or whatever it is your are doing to your distracters. Making demands on these folks is going to get you no where, especially if you suspend posting your pics. They win by not responding so I am not sure I understand your methods. Why not just ignore those who you do not agree with as has been suggested by others in this thread, present your evidence to the best of your ability and let that presentation speak for itself? I hope that you have what you claim to have, then again I am hoping you do not. I encourage you to share your pictures and ignore your distracters, it would be better for everyone. He doesn't have shit. Just another shill who can't provide any evidence of this "object" everyone is supposed to be seeing. All talk & spam = weaksauce. His methods are making it easy for a curious bystander like myself to dismiss what he is saying. Especially now that he himself is using language that he disparaged earlier. It would be nice if he just rose above all the non sense and posted his evidence and let that speak for itself. If it gets shilled, it gets shilled, you cant stop it. However you can follow up with the appropriate finger test to rule out any sort of flare which would simply end all speculation. One wonders why he does not do this. I turn the bad words on an off, you want off? No problem, for how long? Indefinitely. I will do it for you. Here's the deal, it they can bait me into a single FCC banned term, I will leave. Can I use "expletive" when appropriate? You all who post NO pics can call the shots for the person who has posted 6 (soon to be 9) distinctly different pictures. And oh by the way, I have used several tests on my pics, the finger test is neither original NOR the holy grail. What test did you use for your Venus pics? Thanks. |
3rdEyeE User ID: 47643291 United States 10/17/2013 01:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BoxerLvr User ID: 1248172 Puerto Rico 10/17/2013 01:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great job folks, almost 200 hundred pages because EVERYONE (MINUS 5) are seeing the "new" venus, remote-controlled planes flying the same worldwide routes, etc. This thread has NOTHING to do with my 1 illustrated pic and 5 pictures (released to date). But we need to tighten up, so here is where we are going now: Quoting: 3rdEyeE 1) No more email pics--Dishonest folks lied to get pics, didn't even post them. Need I say more 2) We are going to continue with pic review...starting with pic #6. It has been posted, the aforementioned "planet" and "moon" are STILL there. No wire, no nothing...just the same TWO "versions" of lens flare. Same distance and orientation to each other. Now consider this, knowing the "conditions" which will cause lens flare...VERY EASY. To take dozens of pictures over SEVERAL months, from varying locations, times of day/night, angles, vantage points and have said pictures produce NEARLY IDENTICAL "two version" lens flare is IMPOSSIBLE, even if we knew what the fuck that was--"two version". Anybody got a quad venti double pump Lens Flare to go? ROTFLMFAO. 3) We are going to simultaneously begin a THEORY debate on this same thread. I will take one for the team and put MY theory out there. We will go point by point, blow for blow. Point is the pics and theories are related, but different. My posts from now on will be a PICTURE (numbered by order of release) or dialogue to support my theory or challenge those that I don't believe (subjective of course) to be plausible. Feel free to add your pics or theories. I am dying to see the 230 pm naked eye pic of Venus, but "they" don't have ANY. Yup. Nearly 200 pages and your side hasn't posted a single clear image of the so called object....just pics of Venus, Contrails, and your silly lens/filter flares. Not playing your troll game. You've been outed! Oh, I already posted my photo of Venus. Still waiting for my apology like you said you would..... It is precisely because it is fashionable for Americans to know no science, even though they may be well educated otherwise, that they so easily fall prey to nonsense. They thus become part of the armies of the night, the purveyors of nitwittery, the retailers of intellectual junk food, the feeders on mental cardboard, for their ignorance keeps them from distinguishing nectar from sewage. — Isaac Asimov |
Bluepill User ID: 48485037 United States 10/17/2013 01:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great job folks, almost 200 hundred pages because EVERYONE (MINUS 5) are seeing the "new" venus, remote-controlled planes flying the same worldwide routes, etc. This thread has NOTHING to do with my 1 illustrated pic and 5 pictures (released to date). But we need to tighten up, so here is where we are going now: Quoting: 3rdEyeE 1) No more email pics--Dishonest folks lied to get pics, didn't even post them. Need I say more 2) We are going to continue with pic review...starting with pic #6. It has been posted, the aforementioned "planet" and "moon" are STILL there. No wire, no nothing...just the same TWO "versions" of lens flare. Same distance and orientation to each other. Now consider this, knowing the "conditions" which will cause lens flare...VERY EASY. To take dozens of pictures over SEVERAL months, from varying locations, times of day/night, angles, vantage points and have said pictures produce NEARLY IDENTICAL "two version" lens flare is IMPOSSIBLE, even if we knew what the fuck that was--"two version". Anybody got a quad venti double pump Lens Flare to go? ROTFLMFAO. 3) We are going to simultaneously begin a THEORY debate on this same thread. I will take one for the team and put MY theory out there. We will go point by point, blow for blow. Point is the pics and theories are related, but different. My posts from now on will be a PICTURE (numbered by order of release) or dialogue to support my theory or challenge those that I don't believe (subjective of course) to be plausible. Feel free to add your pics or theories. I am dying to see the 230 pm naked eye pic of Venus, but "they" don't have ANY. I just posted a new article on In5D that shows a plethora of photos and all of the different colors that this object is emitting.... but I can't post the link to In5D on GLP. I also captured an image that looks like a purple Metatron's Cube.... quite fascinating Just went through your website photos, videos, etc. You are on the west coast of Florida? A very serious question. Do you plan on "bugging out" soon? Thanks not really... I have supplies but I'm not going anywhere Thanks. I suspect that no matter what this is, I'm not going anywhere either. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In5D, you have some really interesting footage, I liked the violet metatron cube screen capture. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6270523 I am curious though how your footage relates to what people have claimed to see in this thread other than it being in the western sky. Are folks not posting what they are seeing occurs prior to sunset and then it disappears? How is what you are filming clearly in the night time sky supposed to be the same object? These do not seem related to me, perhaps you can explain how they are? The days are getting shorter by one minute each day as we near winter, so each night's videos or pictures will appear to be somewhat darker than the previous nights. I took this video between 6:30-7:45PM Eastern Time. It caught my eye when I was at a drum circle last weekend and I have been researching it ever since That is a good explanation though quite the wide range in time. Do you think the object you filmed it what folks in this thread are seeing? Are you considering trying to film it earlier, say at sunset? I appreciate your research and contribution here, whatever you have filmed, it sure is interesting. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6270523 You have my interest because you claim to be able to see what people are interpreting as filter/lens flare with your naked eye. However you are losing me in your attempt to mock, discredit or whatever it is your are doing to your distracters. Making demands on these folks is going to get you no where, especially if you suspend posting your pics. They win by not responding so I am not sure I understand your methods. Why not just ignore those who you do not agree with as has been suggested by others in this thread, present your evidence to the best of your ability and let that presentation speak for itself? I hope that you have what you claim to have, then again I am hoping you do not. I encourage you to share your pictures and ignore your distracters, it would be better for everyone. He doesn't have shit. Just another shill who can't provide any evidence of this "object" everyone is supposed to be seeing. All talk & spam = weaksauce. His methods are making it easy for a curious bystander like myself to dismiss what he is saying. Especially now that he himself is using language that he disparaged earlier. It would be nice if he just rose above all the non sense and posted his evidence and let that speak for itself. If it gets shilled, it gets shilled, you cant stop it. However you can follow up with the appropriate finger test to rule out any sort of flare which would simply end all speculation. One wonders why he does not do this. I turn the bad words on an off, you want off? No problem, for how long? Indefinitely. I will do it for you. Here's the deal, it they can bait me into a single FCC banned term, I will leave. Can I use "expletive" when appropriate? You all who post NO pics can call the shots for the person who has posted 6 (soon to be 9) distinctly different pictures. And oh by the way, I have used several tests on my pics, the finger test is neither original NOR the holy grail. What test did you use for your Venus pics? Thanks. Friend, I am not trying to tell you how to go about your business. I am simply pointing out that your current track is a good way to turn off those who you might wish to reach. You have to decide how to proceed. I am looking forward to your other three pics and would ask if you might link the previous ones with the most recent so it is easier for those of us trying to see what you have without have to go through pages of non sense trying to do so. Again I am not trying to call the shit, I feel however it would benefit your position to do so and thus encourage it. The finger test has been a proven method to rule out flares as has been shown already in this video. Its simple to do and an easy way for you to shut anyone who doubts you up. I question why you just do not do this and save yourself the hassle of arguing, especially if you know you are right. Let your evidence speak for itself, it is all that matters. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6270523 United States 10/17/2013 01:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |