| Users Online Now: 2,044 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,873,474 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,768,986 | Threads Today: 756 | Posts Today: 15,730 |
| 10:37 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,044 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,873,474 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,768,986 | Threads Today: 756 | Posts Today: 15,730 |
| 10:37 PM | ||
STEPHEN HAWKING 1/25/14 -- "There Are No Black Holes" ! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16479241  United States01/26/2014 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stephen Hawking has now said (or gurgled) that 'BLACK HOLES' can be VASTLY DIFFERENT from the theoretical models we are accustomed to In his paper, Hawking writes: "The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes - in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity." ... Don Page, a physicist and expert on black holes at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada told Nature that "the picture Hawking gives sounds pretty reasonable". “You could say that it is radical to propose there’s no event horizon", he said. "But these are highly quantum conditions, and there’s ambiguity about what space-time even is, let alone whether there is a definite region that can be marked as an event horizon.” [link to www.independent.co.uk] Utterly fucking clueless! Many students of the PRIMORDIAL AETHER have long viewed the notion of BLACK HOLES as ridiculous There is no such animal as "space time" Einstein's field equations, general relativity and the light-speed 'barrier' are the current iteration of bullshit promoted to keep plebs feeding from the trough of Scientific Dogma  ( theoretical black hole model ) |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16479241 United States01/26/2014 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16479241 United States01/26/2014 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 53256215 United States01/26/2014 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stephen Hawking has now said (or gurgled) that 'BLACK HOLES' can be VASTLY DIFFERENT from the theoretical models we are accustomed to Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479241 In his paper, Hawking writes: "The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes - in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity." ... Don Page, a physicist and expert on black holes at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada told Nature that "the picture Hawking gives sounds pretty reasonable". “You could say that it is radical to propose there’s no event horizon", he said. "But these are highly quantum conditions, and there’s ambiguity about what space-time even is, let alone whether there is a definite region that can be marked as an event horizon.” [link to www.independent.co.uk] Utterly fucking clueless! Many students of the PRIMORDIAL AETHER have long viewed the notion of BLACK HOLES as ridiculous There is no such animal as "space time" Einstein's field equations, general relativity and the light-speed 'barrier' are the current iteration of bullshit promoted to keep plebs feeding from the trough of Scientific Dogma ( theoretical black hole model ) Then show us your proofs and equations that back your hypothesis. What's that? You don't have any and are just stating your opinion? Cool. Opinions can change, science can learn more and evolve. Maybe someday we'll have a better view of the universe and we can end this childish quest to be "right". We are all equally clueless OP. All you are doing is putting down another's search for answers. He's doing it his way, the best he knows how. As are we all. You don't have any better of a "clue" than he does. Continue the search OP, in your own idiom. Just lose the ego and your quest will be a righteous one.  |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16479241 United States01/26/2014 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then show us your proofs and equations that back your hypothesis. What's that? You don't have any and are just stating your opinion? Cool. Opinions can change, science can learn more and evolve. Maybe someday we'll have a better view of the universe and we can end this childish quest to be "right". We are all equally clueless OP. All you are doing is putting down another's search for answers. He's doing it his way, the best he knows how. As are we all. You don't have any better of a "clue" than he does. Continue the search OP, in your own idiom. Just lose the ego and your quest will be a righteous one. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53256215 The 'proofs and equations' are the immutable laws revealed eternally by Nature -- you do remember Nature, don't you? Would you not concede that ego has no power beyond that which is granted by an individual? Ego is an anthropogenic construct, not a function of the Natural Order. Accordingly, spare yourself the use of Freudian analyses unless you aspire to be a literal motherfucker... lol! |
Emlapal  User ID: 30657134 United States01/26/2014 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Emlapal User ID: 30657134 United States01/26/2014 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 52511705 United States01/26/2014 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 53459556 United States01/27/2014 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stephen Hawking has now said (or gurgled) that 'BLACK HOLES' can be VASTLY DIFFERENT from the theoretical models we are accustomed to Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16479241 In his paper, Hawking writes: "The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes - in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity." ... Don Page, a physicist and expert on black holes at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada told Nature that "the picture Hawking gives sounds pretty reasonable". “You could say that it is radical to propose there’s no event horizon", he said. "But these are highly quantum conditions, and there’s ambiguity about what space-time even is, let alone whether there is a definite region that can be marked as an event horizon.” [link to www.independent.co.uk] Utterly fucking clueless! Many students of the PRIMORDIAL AETHER have long viewed the notion of BLACK HOLES as ridiculous There is no such animal as "space time" Einstein's field equations, general relativity and the light-speed 'barrier' are the current iteration of bullshit promoted to keep plebs feeding from the trough of Scientific Dogma ( theoretical black hole model ) Then show us your proofs and equations that back your hypothesis. What's that? You don't have any and are just stating your opinion? Cool. Opinions can change, science can learn more and evolve. Maybe someday we'll have a better view of the universe and we can end this childish quest to be "right". We are all equally clueless OP. All you are doing is putting down another's search for answers. He's doing it his way, the best he knows how. As are we all. You don't have any better of a "clue" than he does. Continue the search OP, in your own idiom. Just lose the ego and your quest will be a righteous one. then how come astrophysics contradicts conservation of energy what "powers" our planet, and has for "billions of years" while at the same time we can't keep a satellite up after it runs out of fuel where is the electron that circles the nucleus "plugged in at" (oh, by the way, I am a scientist, a paid one, with 35 years in the business....) dr |
