"We dance with the skulls in the church" The Most Disturbing Video You Will Ever Watch!!! Court Decision to be Released TODAY pg. 200

its all so hard to piece together i know. only thing for sure is these kids were abused by someone and their parents dont truly care as much as they try to seem

Yip.Watched them all.
The kids have been destroyed.

Those who abuse :The Sin is yours , The crime is yours and the shame is yours. TO Those which protect the perpetrators blaming the victims only masks the evil within and makes you as guilty as well as those who abuse . Stand up and Fight for the innocent or go to hell and perish with the others .

i dont wanna live here anymore.

I suggest everyone who reads this thread backup all the material regarding this case to multiple locations. They are removing evidence all over the web right now.

It was in Lambeth, apparently: [link to tapnewswire.com]

All these masonic, Crowleyanity freaks had to do to get the kids to change their story was to pull an MKultra Dr. Ewan Cameron on them over five days--- they simply send a "driving message" into their brains while they sleep or even during the day, such as:

"It was your friend Millie who told you about the white willies"
"It was your friend Millie who told you about the white willies"
"It was your friend Millie who told you about the white willies"
"It was your friend Millie who told you about the white willies"

OR
"It was the Zorro movie where you got the story."
"It was the Zorro movie where you got the story."
"It was the Zorro movie where you got the story."


After hearing these driving messages for five days, and after being subtly threatened and drugged-- these two little kids of course retracted their original stories. Simple.

Also, if the cops were busy arresting the mother and her lawyer and the activist for publishing videos then WHY ON EARTH DID THE COPS RELEASE THE RETRACTION VIDEOS FOR ALL TO SEE???

The COPS are playing a DIRTY deceptive game here--- its plain for all to see.

The devil is a liar and the father of all lies. We must pray against the chinese box of LIES in Hampstead. The best way to start is to lift your hands up and PRAISE the real FATHER Jesus, and focus on what is GOOD, KIND, LOVING, JOYFUL, PEACEFUL and TRUE. Lucifer, the father of all LIES can't STAND this.
LIFT YOUIR HANDS UP
[link to soundcloud.com (secure)]

Marking a spot

So i did a quick search on video channels like liveleak. the videos are still there, but one that was linked on glp yesterday and posted in this thread was deleted. what this means is this is a honey trap. they are deleting material that enters this site. video remains that was uploaded to liveleak weeks ago, only the one that was posted here was deleted.

I wonder why TPTB spend so much time and money destroying and perverting humanity? Isn't that fucked up?

They like anal rape. It makes them feel "even."

Last Edited by Free Me on 02/19/2015 09:34 AM

holy shit!! you're right!

Indeed, VERY good point.

It may well be the only reason this thread is still up.

this video was posted in this thread yesterday, and was uploaded to liveleak yesterday. others that are days old remain at liveleak.



this one deleted along with others on google posted here. that's kind of obvious, don't you think? honey trap

Would someone please clarify:


As per youtube type videos of the children being INFORMALLY interviewed: these interviews were done by the boyfriend ABE/ABRAHAM CHRISTIE and/ or by a former policeman friend Finbar and that these videos are not the FORMAL police interviews.


This thread keeps referring to the POLICE INTERVIEWS - these will have been done at the police station PRIOR to the informal video evidence.


The informal video evidence is like a back-up copy and shows that the children have not been coerced to speak.


Which is the case - are the youtubes the formal or informal evidence?

this is a re direction attempt using persona management software. this is a dude operating many personas. notice ti does not address the deleting of material evidence above it, as it tries to carry on info gathering rhetoric.

I already checked out the births, deaths and marriage registry and this is what I found out.

Ella Raulyevna Gareeva gave birth to James Anthony between April and June 1997 in Leicestershire. He has 2 entries in records one with the surname Draper and one with Gareeva(he now uses the surname Draper according to his fb acc)

Ella Raulyevna Draper and James William Draper married between January and March 1999 in the borough of (?) & Kensington. Sorry can't remember the first name off the top of my head head! I did post about this earlier if you back :) remembered it's Chelsea & Kensington

Alisa Grace is registered twice also. The record has the surname as Gareeva and the other record as Dearman. Both entries say she was registered in Camden district between April and June 2005.

No record for Gabriel because archive's only go up to 2005.

I checked out why there was 2 records for the births and it's because the parent's were not married at the time of registration.

However upon reading the 'Chronology leading to the Snatch of the Children Alesa* and Gabriel' from the Google drive link on here around pg 114 I think [link to drive.google.com (secure)]
, (*yes this is her name is spelt in the title - however further into the text the name is spelt correctly) this document reads as though it was written by the mother but is full of inconsistencies...

1: the mother cannot spell her daughters name? - As per the title

2: The mothers opening paragraph states that she married Mr Draper in Russia - but as the records confirm this to be untrue. - They married in UK in 1999

3: the mothers opening paragraph also claims she gave birth to her first born son James Anthony Draper/Gareeva after she'd Married his Father. - James Draper

All I'm saying here is we need to really look hard at all uploaded docs because there are some cracks appearing now.

Don't know if this doc was written and uploaded by a friend of the mother trying to help her or It's being planted in that drive for other purposes of discrediting things said in statements.

All I know is this document is suspicious and I think we should examine every scrap of info with utmost scrutiny.

For the record I completely believe the children have been abused badly. I am not a shill. I'm just pointing thing out as I notice them.

You can't say that in a police interview unless it is on tape that the expression was used prior to this: if there is no evidence this was said prior - then.. like this:



Someone - maybe Abe - tells the kids their new story - they saw it all on telly - they made it up - he says you made up secret rooms and tunnels from the Mask of Zorro



then the kids go to the other interviewer who was not there when Abe said this; they do not mention this to him - THEN when the other interviewer says this TO THEM - having expected them to have said it as told to by ABE/ members of the group


This then creates an association between this interviewer and the other in the children's minds - and it means the other person they have trusted and spoken to is ONE OF THEM; in that way the Mask of Zorro connects the interviewer to the group


This would mean - these informal interviews were set up with the purpose - to destroy the children's evidence.

humanity is their enemy.

Ooh I just noticed that in the first 2 lines on the last page of that doc 'the mother' (I'll use the term loosely loosely) states 'I was told that the children are saying that they saw this image on their friend Sarah's iPad.'

All of us who watched the retractions should remember that Alisa stated that she had seen the image on Sophie's iPad.
Sophie Has been mentioned in both allegations and retractions so can't understand how the mother would get that name wrong??

BS. The north/deprived regions are the top.
Dartford is an ex-military town. Working class tough people - wouldn't tolerate a Rotherham type thing...

[link to www.mirror.co.uk]

Top ten in the UK
TOP TEN

Hull // Humberside // 390 // 174.0
Wolverhampton // West Midlands // 377 // 172.5
City // Nottinghamshire // 467 // 171.5
Denbighshire and Conwy // North Wales // 305 // 162.0
Middlesbrough // Cleveland // 190 // 157.8
Plymouth // Devon and Cornwall // 354 // 154.4
Stoke // Staffordshire // 332 // 152.9
Manchester // GMP // 643 // 144.7
All // City of London // 10 // 140.8
Newport // Gwent // 180 // 140.8

----------------------------

not shillin btw - just the facts

Ooh I just noticed that in the first 2 lines on the last page of that doc 'the mother' (I'll use the term loosely loosely) states 'I was told that the children are saying that they saw this image on their friend Sarah's iPad.'

All of us who watched the retractions should remember that Alisa stated that she had seen the image on Sophie's iPad.
Sophie Has been mentioned in both allegations and retractions so can't understand how the mother would get that name wrong??

A lot of bad stuff going on lately.

Can I just ask have you ever been to Rotherham? Steel work and mines...very tough people actually.

System Admin here - Too much information from everywhere. I need ALL EVIDENCE DOWNLOADED ASAP! Store SECURELY ON FLASHDRIVES ETC. Don't lose your copies! I need existing hard evidence such as documents and videos. No bullshit opinions etc. I need to find a constructive way to provide all of this information. Everyone who has something please bump. I need to know that my work is not in vain. Shills, FUCK OFF.

Oh I see: so there is some partial transcript of official police interview in documents - then there are the videos - and this is what is being referred to.

Formal with Steve - in transcript form where interviewing technique is referred to

Informal with Finbar and Abe/ Abraham

??


This link from one of the docs

[link to thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com (secure)]


It got confusing what all the links were that were being posted up.


[link to drive.google.com (secure)]