September 6,2001 bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the WTC

why? due to threats? did they have enough time to cut losses before 9/11?
does anyone know more about this?

Heightened WTC Security Alert Had Just Been Lifted

The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. [NY NewsDay]
[link to www.whatreallyhappened.com]

That's when the explosive charges were planted in the central core.

They probably used laminated plastic explosives consisting of fast burning and slow burning shaped charges to punch a hole in the concrete then cut through the main support beam.

They probably placed 47 charges on floor 10, then another 47 on 20, and so on through the 60th floors, left the remaing floors open through 90th, then picked up again on the 100th floor and the roof.

2 teams of 4 could have rigged each tower in 8 to 12 hours.

So how come you can read a memorial website to a sniffer dog that died on 9/11?
BTW, do some research, find the site for yourself. You know NO, "the gov' did it" website will mention this, as it DISPROVES another lie.

I love the way that any unproven staement is accepted as fact because it re-inforces your pre-determined opinion, yet the documented FACT that a sniffer dog died in the WTC is rejected.

What a way to find the, "truth".

I love the way that any unproven staement is accepted as fact because it re-inforces your pre-determined opinion, yet the documented FACT that a sniffer dog died in the WTC is rejected.

What a way to find the, "truth".

I love the way that any unproven staement is accepted as fact because it re-inforces your pre-determined opinion, yet the documented FACT that a sniffer dog died in the WTC is rejected.

What a way to find the, "truth".



Quit freaking trying to obfuscate you paid zionist shill.

Nobody said bomb-sniffing dogs were not in the towers on 9-11.

What was said, and what is documented, is that the bombing sniffing dogs were TEMPORARILY removed from the towers for a period of time prior to 9-11.

Quit freaking trying to obfuscate you paid zionist shill.

Nobody said bomb-sniffing dogs were not in the towers on 9-11.

What was said, and what is documented, is that the bombing sniffing dogs were TEMPORARILY removed from the towers for a period of time prior to 9-11.

From the op:

"The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed."

What you're meant to infer from this is clear.

From the op:

"The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed."

What you're meant to infer from this is clear.

But posts all over the net based on zilch that there were no dogs there are 100% accurate although based on twisted to fit quote harvesting?

You're meant to infer the were, "abruptly removed." as in gone, not there.

The quote does NOT mention, as posted, any temporary nature to the removal. It implies that the dogs were removed to allow the placing of explosives. It is dishonest and so is repeating it without adding temporary, if that was the case.

BTW they must have been fucking useless sniffers NOT to notice the explosives at 50 miles, considering the amount needed. If you suggest the explosive used was something the dogs were not familiar with, then why would they need removing.

See the problem here?

"Bomb sniffing dogs would have never discovered the explosives in the central core with steel reinforced concrete and other material between the explosive charges, which may have also been wrapped in aluminum packaging, and the dogs."

Oh, so they placed all these tons of explosives around the central structure, without stripping it back, as you would need to, to allow them work effectively, or did they just pack in tons and tons of the stuff hoping? But managed to do this without leaving any trace?
Dream on.

For instance, how much money would it take to get you to kill 3,000 random, innocent Americans? Or, say you stumbled upon somebody else's plan to kill 3,000 innocent Americans. How much would it take to get you to stay silent afterward?

some will keep mouths shut just so they and/or families aren't killed actually.



there are people reading this right now who took that deal. No kidding.

you may be right, who knows?



Forget the fact that no experts on the subject agree with them.

none whatsoever?


Now, maybe you could keep the plan itself a secret. A few dozen murderous black ops guys, demolitions experts with a grudge against the USA, maybe they've been brainwashed. Who knows. Maybe it could be done. People point out that the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb was kept a secret, so why not this?

there was a Manhattan Project and people kept quiet about it???



First, picture the demolitions teams wiring up the World Trade Center towers with explosives prior to the attack.


4 to 8 men to a team.

Obviously you couldn't do it during business hours, since it'd be kind of hard to explain to the 100,000 people who worked at or visited the WTC towers on any given day why you had a huge chunk of wall torn out and were wiring up a bomb on the steel beams there.

wall not torn out odd as they were working on the electircal parts on the 9/11 date. there is a link if you'd like. so there were security as well as electricians walking in and out fixing things. then they'd had phone threats so that would be increased people checking. any one of them could have done about anything with no bomb sniffing dogs there.


I mean, keep in mind, I don't know how big of a job that would be (no one has ever demolished a building that size before) but a building just half the size of one WTC tower took 4,000 separate charges to bring down. Four thousand.


would depend on what you're using of course.


That job took seven months of prep work... and they had the run of an abandoned building, without having to hide their work from 100,000 people every day. Our demolition crew, on the other hand, can work only at night and has to spend the last bit of every shift carefully repairing the wall and hiding any evidence of charges or detonators as not to be discovered during the day.

they can work day and nigh in 12 hour shifts as the article said.


Huge teams of demolitions experts, who had no problem wiring a building full of innocent New Yorkers to explode, hired in secret, worked every night for what had to be a year (and that's only if they had a big enough crew) placing maybe 10,000 separate charges in each tower and another few thousand in WTC 7 (the smaller WTC tower that also collapsed, later in the day on 9/11).

you're putting out some streetchy stuff there.
And nobody notices.


Truckloads of bombs, dozens of mysterious workers, going in and out of the building, night after night. Security at the building doesn't catch them, Port Authority Police don't catch them, random eyewitnesses who stumble across the operation and call the cops don't catch them, maintenance workers who stumble across wet paint and repaired walls and bits of strange wire don't catch them, security cameras don't catch them.

you didn't read the aricle and go on a tribate of something off the wall. where did you get truckloads of boms? mysterious workers? they did the electricial stuff for the WTC for a bit over a month.


The theory even says it was the commander of the FDNY itself who detonated one of the buildings, and therefore he was in on the decision to kill 343 of his own firefighters and 60 police officers.

pfffttt. the officers on the first floor said there are bombs going off.

You guessed it. They were paid to stay silent. Hey, why not? Probably half a million people there, but, you know. Since we've got the checkbook out anyway...

Also, think of all of the friends and family of these paid conspirators, who suddenly see all this mysterious wealth...

...Wouldn't some rumors get started?

You've got some hypothetical professor who was about to write a paper proving the towers were demolished, suddenly coming into Powerball-sized wealth and abandoning the paper at the same time... his wife never let it slip? His kids didn't object? All his jealous colleagues who noticed the sudden new cars and new home and elaborate vacations, nobody asked questions? Nobody made an anonymous call to the IRS, just out of spite? All the bank employees who noticed thousands of mysterious deposits, all of which have to be reported to the IRS, that didn't leave a trail?


And keep in mind, this can't be chump change. Even in a world where every structural engineering desk jockey is okay with mass murder, they're still not going to risk jail and career ruin and walk away from a huge book deal for ten grand. Oh, no, it's got to be millions, per person, just to make it worth it. Even a dedicated conspirator would need to know he or she was set for life.


And here's the kicker...

100% of the people who were offered the deal, took it.


And that, is the conspiracy mindset.

All were written fat checks, say the conspiracy guys, to cover up the murder of 3,000 New Yorkers.