| Users Online Now: 1,758 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 686,126 | |
| Pageviews Today: 885,625 | Threads Today: 231 | Posts Today: 3,020 |
| 07:42 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,758 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 686,126 | |
| Pageviews Today: 885,625 | Threads Today: 231 | Posts Today: 3,020 |
| 07:42 AM | ||
Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70983956  United Kingdom12/07/2015 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "If a ban on semi automatic guns and large capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting and makes the public feel safer as a result, that’s a substantial benefit," Judge Frank Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, wrote. Quoting: ItsAllOneBigLie " The PERCEIVED risk?! So even by admission, it has no factual basis for being this way. Just if the public feels it will. It's almost a 100% certainty that this Judge Easterbrook character is a feelingstard, libtard Democrat! |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator  User ID: 4211721  United States12/07/2015 03:08 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where in the 2nd Ammendment does it say assault weapons are protected ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70985374 When that was written the muzzle loader was the height of gun technology. Where in the 1st amendment does it say that posting on the internet is protected? When that was written the printing press was the height of publication technology.  |
