Up Your Asses - Moon Landing HappenedTARDS!

Moon is a projection it's not really there. Sorry..

Hmm.

Let's say that the moon is hit by 10,000,000 meteorites per year.
Let's further assume that the space suite of an astronaut has a surface of 5 square metres.
And now let's take into account the surface of the moon: 9,478,715,965,038 square metres.

Now tell me how big is the probability that one of the astronauts is hit by a meteorite during a 10 day stay on the moon and how this affected the moon landings.

Did you ever win the lottery jackpot?


And it seems that you are one of the dimwits that still don't know about the Van Allen Belt thing: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

.

that was SHILLTASTIC.

Without erosion Earth would look pretty pockmarked too.

BTW, your source is based on LRO data, the same data that PROVED that Apollo went to the Moon.
You can't have it both ways.

Sure it did. Take another blue pill, idiot.

how did they handle the weather up there? considering they would have had no idea what it would be like how would they know what insulation to use and how much

from what i read (correct me if i'm wrong) the moons surface temperature during its daylit time is over 100 degrees celcius, thats boiling temperature, and it drops as much as -170 degrees in the night.

is there any evidence their spacesuits can handle such temperatures?

Same thermal environment as in low Earth orbit as it is the same average distance from the Sun. Plus they sent multiple probes there first.

Are there any vids of the Moon being hit by meteors and sheyot? What if all those craters are ancient mining operation? What if the Moon was also once covered with giant trees and it was all cut down and mined out? Just asking "what if"?

The moon we observe is impossible with the ball Earth theory.

Seems all the ballTards have is insults and Character Assassination. When your only argumnet is abusive words you have none. It is not your fault that you have been decived since who were a child. You are grown up now, so should do your own thinking. A ballEarth lie often told is still a lie.

There is zero physical proof of the ball Earth Theory, none. There is no curvature, no curvature not a ball, not a ball then you cannot call the Earth a sphere.

The Earth is and shall always remain a flat plane.

its all rubbish what they say really, so i looked up the spacesuits and how they are designed to reflect heat blah blah blah they have all the answers but they are totally illogical answers.

fact remains we've seen the unedited footage from nasa that proves without any doubt at all it was all a staged hollywood production..thats actual hard video evidence proving deception as opposed to the ridiculous concept they went to the moon 50 years ago and no single country has managed to do so ever again since..thats all the evidence i really need to make a logical conclusion, though theres so much more to reinforce the fact it was all staged and never really happened :)

YES, THE MOON LANDING REALLY HAPPENED.

These guys are all dark age mentality! Or shills because NWO is being treated like a reset, take away civilization, shove us in the dark ages, so they can sit on their mountain of gold and high tech and we get sent back to beheadings and ignorance with no rights or services.

THAT IS THE ELITE'S WETDREAM

BUT THEY DON'T GET IT, THE TECH WAS GIVEN FROM THE COSMOS FOR THE UPGRADE AND POPULATION GROWTH BECAUSE EARTH IS NOT BEING RESET TO THE DARK AGES, BUT MOVING AHEAD THIS TIME.

AND THEY CAN FUCK RIGHT OFF!

Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 10/15/2016 10:38 AM

The only reason there was faked video's put out, was to hide the reality of ET presence and structures on the moon!

Surely you're not speaking of the images that purportedly show "evidence" of human presence in the moon. The "evidence" that, if NASA didn't tell us what it was, no one would have the faintest idea what it was. Those images prove absolutely nothing. As a matter of fact, if that is the best "evidence" for manned Apollo landings 47 years ago, you and NASA need to hire a better public relations firm.

*on

For temperature, but not for radiation, as the Van Allen Belts are above earth orbit.

Halcyon Dayz, why is your avatar a piece of shit with an antenna sticking out of it? Are you trying to tell us you're full of shit? Is it code? Are you being held against your will and being made to post pro-NASA propaganda? Hang on! Help is on the way!

Wow the usual suspect shills jumped right in, well done OP.

You shills know that you're not changing any minds, right? The "moon landings" were just an exercise in modern myth-making, nothing more.

Astro-NOTS!

Everyone knows that the liftoff jets would turn the surface of the moon into a hot gooey platter of nachos!!

Yes, as the post I replied to mentioned temperature I was correct. Are you sure you're following along?

As for the Van Allen belts, they went around them

I am speaking of the LRO images that show the artefacts that should be there exactly where they should be at a resolution of 25 cm/pixel.

The LRO also imaged Lunokhod 1, btw.
There being a retroflector in that position has been confirmed by APOLLO (Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation), proving the the Soviets didn't fake their moon programme either.


That only applies to hoaxies.
Since hoaxies are by definition epically ignorant of Apollo they of course don't know what should be where.

Meanwhile in grown-up land the images match the documentation.


They prove once again that hoaxies have a very asymmetric standard of evidence.
Actually calling it a standard is an insult to standards.
The only thing hoaxies have is denial.


There's a shit-ton of evidence.
But you are hoaxie, and thus unaware of 99.6% of it.
Nor are you equipped to properly assess it.

Meanwhile in grown-up land hoaxies have yet to prove A SINGLE RELEVANT EVIDENTIARY CLAIM.

And since, in grown-up land, the accuser has THE BURDEN OF PROOF, that is a rather lethal flaw in hoaxism.




We're still on page 1 and you are already fleeing towards the Shill Gambit, providing proof positive that you lack any rational arguments?

Why are all hoaxies such losers?