Cambridge Analytica Uncovered: Secret filming reveals election tricks

question is , how many of those fakers operate world wide?....

how many lives have they destroyed?.....

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Thread: Social Physics, 5G, Blockchain, Data Mining and AI

Shouldn't this topic be super pined?
This rabbit hole is deep.

Cambridge Analytica exposé is dangerous political attack posing as journalism

[link to www.rt.com (secure)]

Here's Part 3 that just aired.

An investigation by Channel 4 News has revealed how Cambridge Analytica claims it ran ‘all’ of President Trump’s digital campaign - and may have broken election law. Executives were secretly filmed saying they leave ‘no paper trail’.

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Still one more hour to come...that one should be interesting.

Also:

Thread: I Predict That Steve Bannon Will Be Arrested For Overseeing Cambridge Analytica Data Collection For Election Tampering.

Steve Bannon directly oversaw Cambridge Analytica’s theft of Facebook user data.

This means, in no uncertain terms, that Bannon cheated on Trump’s behalf. Once the specific criminal parameters of Cambridge Analytica’s cheating are properly defined, whether it be a mere cyber crime or an outright conspiracy against the United States, Bannon will be first in line to face those charges.

That is, of course, unless Steve Bannon has already cut a deal with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and he’s already confessed to all of the above. Bannon was given motivation to flip when a falling out with Donald Trump ruined his life. The Trump-controlled House Intel Committee then hauled in Bannon, seemingly to try to figure out what Bannon was planning to tell Mueller. Bannon’s refusal to answer questions was a clear sign that he was saving it for Mueller. Bannon spent twenty hours giving cooperative testimony to Mueller. If Bannon lied during that testimony, he’s going to prison. If he hasn’t cut a plea deal, he’s all but definitely going to prison.

That's funny. Mods have deleted several of the Cambridge Analytica threads that I was following.

Barack Obama harvested the private data of millions of citizens on Facebook during his 2012 campaign, according to a high ranking staffer.

Carol Davidsen, who worked as the media director at Obama for America, says Facebook willingly handed over massive amounts of sensitive private data on American citizens to the Obama campaign because they supported the Democratic party.

Davidsen posted this in the wake of the uproar over Cambridge Analytica, and their mining of information for the Trump campaign.
Meanwhile, British privacy regulators are seeking a warrant to search the offices of the U.K.-based Cambridge Analytica as both US and European lawmakers demand an explanation of how the consulting firm gained access to the data.

Why do you think that is?

Somebody on a mission to suppress some damaging information, obviously.

Here's the origin point.

The one who smelt it, dealt it.

Source: [link to swampland.time.com]

In the last two weeks, Zuckerberg sold 228,400 shares a day on March 8 and March 9, 220,000 shares a day on March 12 and March 13, and 245,400 shares on March 14, the Vickers data showed.

That’s a total of just over 1.14 million shares sold at an average price of $183.81, for a payout of nearly $210 million. As of Wednesday, Zuckerberg still held nearly 393.1 million shares, or 13.53 percent of common shares outstanding, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Trying to influence an election is NOT illegal. That's what ads are for. That's what polls are for, etc.

What is the agenda to all this?

what else (and to whom) did he sold?...

any knowledge about that?....

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters (CA) has boasted that Barack Obama managed to extract data on 200 million American citizens from Facebook, helping him win the 2012 election.

Can get the same info from your Citi group credit cards. Cash Back is the cheapest they can pay for the marketing research that tells all, or most all, of your secrets.

places, friends , comments , links , photos .....
world wide....

First and foremost, Facebook itself is the one that allows app creators and others to mine users' data, harvesting users' information, as well as Facebook itself using that data to advise advertisers as to the best targeted audiences.

Previously Facebook has been caught manipulating the moods of users as a psychological experiment, treating them like guinea pigs time and time again, with a number of controversial, but legal experiments, as well as censoring conservative opinions, while artificially manipulating news feeds to insert liberal content.

When we see, via Daily Mail, that this latest Facebook scandal has "sown distrust into users who fear their information is not protected," we have to shake our heads in amazement. Have they all been living under a rock?

Independent Media has consistently informed readers that Facebook is nothing more than a data collection site, and how it is the first time in history that users were basically creating their own dossiers because of the amount of information they share with and on the Facebook platform. According to whistleblower Edward Snowden, Facebook is nothing more than a"surveillance company" rebranded as "social media" as he explained on March 17, 2018.