| Users Online Now: 2,150 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,778,812 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,615,848 | Threads Today: 712 | Posts Today: 14,837 |
| 09:17 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,150 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,778,812 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,615,848 | Threads Today: 712 | Posts Today: 14,837 |
| 09:17 PM | ||
BREAKING: MH370 team searching ON THE GROUND with exact jungle location where ‘plane came down’ | |
| Fast and Bulbous Offer Upgrade  User ID: 73567507  Canada09/14/2018 03:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| 30IF User ID: 73258238  United States09/14/2018 03:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Sheila The Muckraker! User ID: 76862334 United States09/14/2018 03:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Educated Redneck User ID: 69010652 United States09/14/2018 03:50 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So how did a Google Maps/Earth photo show a complete plane with intact fuselage, 2 wings and a tail but with a helicopter they could see nothing because the jungle was so thick? This one doesn't pass the smell test. If you spend any time with Google Earth/Maps you will find these satellite photos that caught a plane in flight. But you can't really have an intact aircraft crash in the jungle showing up clearly on a satellite image as a still intact aircraft and the be invisible to the helicopters looking for it. |
| clock User ID: 74739351  United Kingdom09/14/2018 05:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Agent Smith 2014 User ID: 26333327 United Kingdom09/14/2018 05:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| clock User ID: 74739351 United Kingdom09/14/2018 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If that plane landed (crashed) intact as the satellite shows, then there'd be survivors, I'm sure of it, but this doesn't add up as the poster above says, a little common sense has to be used here, and I mean no disrespect to any other posters views. none |
| Lime Flavoured Redux User ID: 76882329 United Kingdom09/14/2018 05:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| clock User ID: 74739351 United Kingdom09/14/2018 06:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Fast and Bulbous (OP) User ID: 60376540 United States09/14/2018 07:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So how did a Google Maps/Earth photo show a complete plane with intact fuselage, 2 wings and a tail but with a helicopter they could see nothing because the jungle was so thick? Quoting: Educated Redneck This one doesn't pass the smell test. If you spend any time with Google Earth/Maps you will find these satellite photos that caught a plane in flight. But you can't really have an intact aircraft crash in the jungle showing up clearly on a satellite image as a still intact aircraft and the be invisible to the helicopters looking for it. Exactly my question. The "aircraft" in the image is completely intact as is all the surrounding vegetation. There is not track where it descended through the jungle before it impacted, no burned out vegetation, nothing. But of course the aliens who intercepted it could have transported it there using a transporter beam, right? |
| clock User ID: 74739351 United Kingdom09/14/2018 08:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ErikV User ID: 76660544  Sweden09/14/2018 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ***SUPERFLY*** User ID: 75817200 United States09/14/2018 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So how did a Google Maps/Earth photo show a complete plane with intact fuselage, 2 wings and a tail but with a helicopter they could see nothing because the jungle was so thick? Quoting: Educated Redneck This one doesn't pass the smell test. If you spend any time with Google Earth/Maps you will find these satellite photos that caught a plane in flight. But you can't really have an intact aircraft crash in the jungle showing up clearly on a satellite image as a still intact aircraft and the be invisible to the helicopters looking for it. You do know at times in areas that aren't developed have google maps shots which are 2-3 years old? If you don't then you should! ***SUPERFLY*** If we only knew what the fly on the wall knows!! |
| Magna Cacca User ID: 74966929 United States09/14/2018 08:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| catnahalf Deplorables assemble User ID: 71790446 United States09/14/2018 08:38 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Fast and Bulbous (OP) User ID: 60376540 United States09/14/2018 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ErikV User ID: 76660544 Sweden09/14/2018 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| rob2 User ID: 76870111 United States09/14/2018 08:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i just watche dthe little video with the article and the picture looks like CGI. all of the green so called vegetation is under the fake looking plane, there is nothing higher than the plane. its all fake. |
| Fast and Bulbous (OP) User ID: 60376540 United States09/14/2018 08:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So here is the point on Google maps which "tech expert" Ian Wilson wants to keep secret. [link to www.google.com (secure)] Pretty obviously one of those Google maps satellite images that capture an aircraft in flight. |
| Dogsbollocks User ID: 76925037 United Kingdom09/14/2018 09:12 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand the point, it would be pointless looking from above given the time elapsed is now 3- 4 years. The vegetation would have grown back really quickly camouflaging the Plane. Making identifying from above almost impossible. I have seen the image. It appears to show a Plane fully intact lying in the middle of a dense jungle. Yet if a Plane crashes in a Jungle, as can be witnessed in a couple of episodes of Aircraft Investigation on NatGeo. A Plane clears a significant sized path when hitting the dense Jungle, both wings detach from the fuselage whilst clearing the Path. Leaving only the fuselage, broken in to two or three pieces by said impact and the stresses of the wings detaching. Point being it looks fake as fuck. Dogsbollocks |
| GERT User ID: 16324882 United States09/14/2018 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand the point, it would be pointless looking from above given the time elapsed is now 3- 4 years. The vegetation would have grown back really quickly camouflaging the Plane. Making identifying from above almost impossible. Quoting: Dogsbollocks I have seen the image. It appears to show a Plane fully intact lying in the middle of a dense jungle. Yet if a Plane crashes in a Jungle, as can be witnessed in a couple of episodes of Aircraft Investigation on NatGeo. A Plane clears a significant sized path when hitting the dense Jungle, both wings detach from the fuselage whilst clearing the Path. Leaving only the fuselage, broken in to two or three pieces by said impact and the stresses of the wings detaching. Point being it looks fake as fuck. This^^ |
| Educated Redneck User ID: 69010652 United States09/14/2018 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So how did a Google Maps/Earth photo show a complete plane with intact fuselage, 2 wings and a tail but with a helicopter they could see nothing because the jungle was so thick? Quoting: Educated Redneck This one doesn't pass the smell test. If you spend any time with Google Earth/Maps you will find these satellite photos that caught a plane in flight. But you can't really have an intact aircraft crash in the jungle showing up clearly on a satellite image as a still intact aircraft and the be invisible to the helicopters looking for it. You do know at times in areas that aren't developed have google maps shots which are 2-3 years old? If you don't then you should! Google Earth has multiple pics for multiple dates for many locations, where you can pick which date to view. Pretty cool. |
| Mr. T-Rex User ID: 33160200  Romania10/20/2018 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mr. T-Rex User ID: 33160200 Romania10/20/2018 04:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
