| Users Online Now: 2,255 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,911,109 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,648,206 | Threads Today: 647 | Posts Today: 12,363 |
| 08:18 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,255 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,911,109 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,648,206 | Threads Today: 647 | Posts Today: 12,363 |
| 08:18 PM | ||
What happened on the moon? | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54052734  Canada07/20/2019 12:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know at least 3 Apollo astronauts had allergic reactions to the lunar soil? Armstrong, Cernan and Schmidt. Cernan and Schmidt even talked about it over the radio. I think it was Cernan who probably got it the worst. He had a very strong reaction after the first EVA. His nose plugged up with mucus, he sneezed. The second EVA it was a little less intense, and after the third one it was mild. With each exposure he was gaining immunity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54052734 Over the radio Cernan and Schmidt and the Cap Com talked about why they were never allowed to go to the storage lab and sniff some of the soil from other missions to see if they were allergic to it. It was already known that some people had reactions to the soil. Armstrong was the first one. Talk to any allergist. Soil allergies are not caused by tiny chips of inert rock pulverized into powder. They are caused by organic matter in the soil. Like pollen, spores, bacteria, plant and animal matter. There was life in the soil. Everybody at NASA knew it, they just didn't tell you, and still to this day haven't. I could imagine really fine sharp pieces of dust could irritate your sinuses and cause some weird reactions. It may have been quite a bit of dust too, maybe more than we're all thinking. But you raise a point that I wish there was a more complete answer to. That's not the only piece of evidence suggesting life. On the surface of the soil was a crust. They first discovered it in the middle 60's with the Lunar Surveyor unmanned lander missions. Soil crusts form in only three ways, impact by raindrops, cementation, which requires a liquid to be present, usually water, and the third method, crusts formed by biological organisms. It doesn't rain on the moon, the soil was found to be dry. The only possibility left was biological. The NASA linked geologists like Gene Shoemaker and Thomas Gold knew what that meant in 1967, two years before Apollo 11. But they were never allowed to tell anybody. They discussed it amongst each other openly. But never with the press or anyone outside of NASA. After Apollo 12 they denied the crust ever existed, claiming it was a trick of light and an optical illusion. Utter bullshit, but it allowed them to put that to rest officially, for the few people who got wind of it outside of the closed system. And there's more than that. Tons more. |
psyoptics  User ID: 76886181  United States07/20/2019 12:42 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I asked my older brother whether we went to the moon ... Quoting: A1Janitor His response: Yes of course. Having met and spoken with Neil, Buzz, and Alan I can testify that yes we did land on the moon. When I brought up the conspiracy theory we didn’t ... he responded: Nonsense. Going to the moon was a decade long project that invented the new technology as it went along. Mercury, Gemini missions helped evolve into Apollo.  so they gave out millions to thousands of workers making all kinds of things ....like tracking telescopes... or my father worked for Bell labs creating the equipment to talk to people on the moon....guess what, because of the space program...basically...we have the internet...the computer you are on now....cell phones....all forms on modern communication you use today..... but slam boomer.....believe or not what you want.... your school science failed you badly. a good video editor can make anyone say anything the editor wants. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77771589 United States07/20/2019 12:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know at least 3 Apollo astronauts had allergic reactions to the lunar soil? Armstrong, Cernan and Schmidt. Cernan and Schmidt even talked about it over the radio. I think it was Cernan who probably got it the worst. He had a very strong reaction after the first EVA. His nose plugged up with mucus, he sneezed. The second EVA it was a little less intense, and after the third one it was mild. With each exposure he was gaining immunity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54052734 Over the radio Cernan and Schmidt and the Cap Com talked about why they were never allowed to go to the storage lab and sniff some of the soil from other missions to see if they were allergic to it. It was already known that some people had reactions to the soil. Armstrong was the first one. Talk to any allergist. Soil allergies are not caused by tiny chips of inert rock pulverized into powder. They are caused by organic matter in the soil. Like pollen, spores, bacteria, plant and animal matter. There was life in the soil. Everybody at NASA knew it, they just didn't tell you, and still to this day haven't. I could imagine really fine sharp pieces of dust could irritate your sinuses and cause some weird reactions. It may have been quite a bit of dust too, maybe more than we're all thinking. But you raise a point that I wish there was a more complete answer to. That's not the only piece of evidence suggesting life. On the surface of the soil was a crust. They first discovered it in the middle 60's with the Lunar Surveyor unmanned lander missions. Soil crusts form in only three ways, impact by raindrops, cementation, which requires a liquid to be present, usually water, and the third method, crusts formed by biological organisms. It doesn't rain on the moon, the soil was found to be dry. The only possibility left was biological. The NASA linked geologists like Gene Shoemaker and Thomas Gold knew what that meant in 1967, two years before Apollo 11. But they were never allowed to tell anybody. They discussed it amongst each other openly. But never with the press or anyone outside of NASA. After Apollo 12 they denied the crust ever existed, claiming it was a trick of light and an optical illusion. Utter bullshit, but it allowed them to put that to rest officially, for the few people who got wind of it outside of the closed system. And there's more than that. Tons more. Fascinating so far... A question if I may... Why does it appear to always face earth? |
| A1Janitor User ID: 58658563 United States07/20/2019 12:43 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know at least 3 Apollo astronauts had allergic reactions to the lunar soil? Armstrong, Cernan and Schmidt. Cernan and Schmidt even talked about it over the radio. I think it was Cernan who probably got it the worst. He had a very strong reaction after the first EVA. His nose plugged up with mucus, he sneezed. The second EVA it was a little less intense, and after the third one it was mild. With each exposure he was gaining immunity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54052734 Over the radio Cernan and Schmidt and the Cap Com talked about why they were never allowed to go to the storage lab and sniff some of the soil from other missions to see if they were allergic to it. It was already known that some people had reactions to the soil. Armstrong was the first one. Talk to any allergist. Soil allergies are not caused by tiny chips of inert rock pulverized into powder. They are caused by organic matter in the soil. Like pollen, spores, bacteria, plant and animal matter. There was life in the soil. Everybody at NASA knew it, they just didn't tell you, and still to this day haven't. I could imagine really fine sharp pieces of dust could irritate your sinuses and cause some weird reactions. It may have been quite a bit of dust too, maybe more than we're all thinking. But you raise a point that I wish there was a more complete answer to. That's not the only piece of evidence suggesting life. On the surface of the soil was a crust. They first discovered it in the middle 60's with the Lunar Surveyor unmanned lander missions. Soil crusts form in only three ways, impact by raindrops, cementation, which requires a liquid to be present, usually water, and the third method, crusts formed by biological organisms. It doesn't rain on the moon, the soil was found to be dry. The only possibility left was biological. The NASA linked geologists like Gene Shoemaker and Thomas Gold knew what that meant in 1967, two years before Apollo 11. But they were never allowed to tell anybody. They discussed it amongst each other openly. But never with the press or anyone outside of NASA. After Apollo 12 they denied the crust ever existed, claiming it was a trick of light and an optical illusion. Utter bullshit, but it allowed them to put that to rest officially, for the few people who got wind of it outside of the closed system. And there's more than that. Tons more. Interesting. What else? |
| Vision Thing User ID: 77822945 United States07/20/2019 12:45 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Loup Garou User ID: 76961630 United States07/20/2019 12:53 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah.. Watch part 2. Can I be blunt with you? I already knew all that stuff in 1965 and so did NASA. Solar Radiation the Van Allen belts, the Apollo spacecraft was designed to beat all of them with Technology the people that claim it was all a hoax, still don't even understand. For instance... The exterior of the Command Module was covered in a radiation shield which appears in photographs as a mirrored surface. [link to amazingstories.com (secure)] The windows were lined with gold foil and lead to reflect radiation which gave the windows depending on the angle either a gold tint or steel grey color. [link to cdn2.picryl.com (secure)] The LM also used the same methods for protecting the Astronauts as did their space suits. The Helmets had a gold foil mesh that the could see out of, embedded in the plastic helmet. The suits themselves had 21 layers with several layers of Mylar sandwiched under the outer layer to reflect radiation. [link to assets7.thrillist.com] Instead of celebrating perhaps one of the greatest achievements of mankind, we have small minded people that just cannot figure out how we did it to begin with. Wow, you really know your stuff, thanks for sharing. Just because YOU don’t believe in the Rougarou; or the Loup Garou, don’t make you safe; No ! The Constitution is a blend of 'moral certitude' -- which is one of the reasons that criminals are determined to be rid of it and We the People must be even more determined to defend it. "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - Thomas Paine The only thing the Illuminati fears is an independent person who can live, eat, sleep, stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the Lord gives us more time! The End is near and time is short! A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion. ~Proverbs 18:2 For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible "A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle" - James Keller Checkd, Keked, and Rekt! #Kids2 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11126160 United States07/20/2019 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74996924 United States07/20/2019 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah..  |
| Terrebonne User ID: 77825204 United States07/20/2019 01:07 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54052734 Canada07/20/2019 01:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There's a report I read a bunch of years back. Titled something like, Preliminary Analysis of Returns From Apollo 12. Absolutely unbelievable report. For Apollo 12 they landed 500 yards away from one of those Lunar Surveyor Unmanned landers. During the EVA they walked over and inspected it and took a bunch of parts off of it and brought them back to earth. The onboard TV camera was the biggest piece. It was found to be covered with some unknown brown slime. Initially they though it might have been that the paint was turned brown by the intense sunlight. But then they found the glass lenses were covered with it too. They took samples but of course those were for further study. I tried to find the results of those further studies but in the end found nothing. In addition to that, they found and photographed single grains of soil stuck to the camera that had tiny hairs growing on them. There were pictures of them in the report taken with a microscope. Again, they were collected for further study, but nobody knows where that final paper on the hairy soil grains, if that's what they were, is located. Then they take the camera apart and find inside it a living bacteria. S. mitis. It's a common bacteria of the human respiratory tract. Somebody coughed that little bastard into the camera while they were assembling it. It flew to the moon, stayed there 22 months, flew back to earth and was still alive and they were able to culture it and grow more. So when they tell you that typical line of NASA shit about the moon being a place that life cannot possibly exist, they are just bald faced lying to you. Their own documents say that even earth bacteria can survive at least 2 years on the surface of the moon. Water, atmosphere, it's all right in the photos, the reports, the astronaut radio conversations. I could go on all night about what's there, and none of it is deniable. In fact when Edgar Mitchell was still alive he had a discussion forum on his site. A bunch of years ago i went there and showed him the official NASA photos of the red sunrise on the moon taken from Apollo 11 as it was on it's way back home, 20 thousand or so miles out. Red sunrises are caused by water vapor in the atmosphere. A bunch of the people there discussed it. Nobody could say it wasn't what I said it was. it was clearly there. Eventually Mitchell himself wandered in. Now, he was under lifetime orders I'm sure not to tell anybody anything. But he says, "Good research done by all." In other words, yeah, it's there, you figured it out but I can't tell you it's there. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76552256  Iceland07/20/2019 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I asked my older brother whether we went to the moon ... Quoting: A1Janitor His response: Yes of course. Having met and spoken with Neil, Buzz, and Alan I can testify that yes we did land on the moon. When I brought up the conspiracy theory we didn’t ... he responded: Nonsense. Going to the moon was a decade long project that invented the new technology as it went along. Mercury, Gemini missions helped evolve into Apollo. so they gave out millions to thousands of workers making all kinds of things ....like tracking telescopes... or my father worked for Bell labs creating the equipment to talk to people on the moon....guess what, because of the space program...basically...we have the internet...the computer you are on now....cell phones....all forms on modern communication you use today..... but slam boomer.....believe or not what you want.... your school science failed you badly. Keep coping. It's all you can do. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74996924 United States07/20/2019 01:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Saw today that they had some pos 'launcher' to get off the moon and if it had failed they would die- bwhahahahaha the stupid it burns anyone care to explain how they went 238k MILES one way then came back and nothing went wrong?!?!?! you couldn't have gone around the world if land bridges existed in a car at that time w/o breaking down! idiots! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19887678 United States07/20/2019 01:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah.. Watch part 2. Can I be blunt with you? I already knew all that stuff in 1965 and so did NASA. Solar Radiation the Van Allen belts, the Apollo spacecraft was designed to beat all of them with Technology the people that claim it was all a hoax, still don't even understand. For instance... The exterior of the Command Module was covered in a radiation shield which appears in photographs as a mirrored surface. [link to amazingstories.com (secure)] The windows were lined with gold foil and lead to reflect radiation which gave the windows depending on the angle either a gold tint or steel grey color. [link to cdn2.picryl.com (secure)] The LM also used the same methods for protecting the Astronauts as did their space suits. The Helmets had a gold foil mesh that the could see out of, embedded in the plastic helmet. The suits themselves had 21 layers with several layers of Mylar sandwiched under the outer layer to reflect radiation. [link to assets7.thrillist.com] Instead of celebrating perhaps one of the greatest achievements of mankind, we have small minded people that just cannot figure out how we did it to begin with. Can I be blunt with you? youre dumber than a box of nasa moonrocks |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74996924 United States07/20/2019 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Saw today that they had some pos 'launcher' to get off the moon and if it had failed they would die- bwhahahahaha Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74996924 the stupid it burns anyone care to explain how they went 238k MILES one way then came back and nothing went wrong?!?!?! you couldn't have gone around the world if land bridges existed in a car at that time w/o breaking down! idiots! not to mention the moon moves and that's just too complex for pos modules to come back to Earth and land bwhahahha omfg they probably just started putting power steering into expensive cars then and you expect me to believe they turned that rocket that rocket that couldn't hold much more fuel then your semi truck today and think they made it back 238k miles bwhahahahah omfg how stupid are the people that believe we went anywhere near that ice plug we call the moon!??!?! LOL |
| A1Janitor User ID: 58658563 United States07/20/2019 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah.. Watch part 2. Can I be blunt with you? I already knew all that stuff in 1965 and so did NASA. Solar Radiation the Van Allen belts, the Apollo spacecraft was designed to beat all of them with Technology the people that claim it was all a hoax, still don't even understand. For instance... The exterior of the Command Module was covered in a radiation shield which appears in photographs as a mirrored surface. [link to amazingstories.com (secure)] The windows were lined with gold foil and lead to reflect radiation which gave the windows depending on the angle either a gold tint or steel grey color. [link to cdn2.picryl.com (secure)] The LM also used the same methods for protecting the Astronauts as did their space suits. The Helmets had a gold foil mesh that the could see out of, embedded in the plastic helmet. The suits themselves had 21 layers with several layers of Mylar sandwiched under the outer layer to reflect radiation. [link to assets7.thrillist.com] Instead of celebrating perhaps one of the greatest achievements of mankind, we have small minded people that just cannot figure out how we did it to begin with. Can I be blunt with you? youre dumber than a box of nasa moonrocks  I suspect most people would disagree with you. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77626440 United States07/20/2019 01:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54052734 Canada07/20/2019 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another thing about the bacteria they brought back from the moon. I was never able to really nail this down but it's something I highly suspect. In the 1980's NASA all of the sudden got interested in air and water quality. Now what does air quality and water pollution have to do with what they do? Fuck all. Yet they spent about a decade sending out teams of technicians testing for air pollution, taking pollen counts, looking for spore contamination all that kind of stuff. And pulling water samples out of lakes and streams. And when you looked at the locations where they did most of the testing it was always heavily around Houston and Atlanta. Houston had the Lunar Receiving Laboratory, where they keep all the dirt. Atlanta is where the NASA space biology lab is. I suspect that what they had got out of containment into the environment at large. And they spent a decade studying it's effects, tracking it's spread etc. All the while under a cover story about studying air and water pollution. They let that shit out and who knows what it did. Like I said, I can't prove that, but I highly suspect it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11126160 United States07/20/2019 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can I be blunt with you? I already knew all that stuff in 1965 and so did NASA. Solar Radiation the Van Allen belts, the Apollo spacecraft was designed to beat all of them with Technology the people that claim it was all a hoax, still don't even understand. For instance... The exterior of the Command Module was covered in a radiation shield which appears in photographs as a mirrored surface. [link to amazingstories.com (secure)] The windows were lined with gold foil and lead to reflect radiation which gave the windows depending on the angle either a gold tint or steel grey color. [link to cdn2.picryl.com (secure)] The LM also used the same methods for protecting the Astronauts as did their space suits. The Helmets had a gold foil mesh that the could see out of, embedded in the plastic helmet. The suits themselves had 21 layers with several layers of Mylar sandwiched under the outer layer to reflect radiation. [link to assets7.thrillist.com] Wow, so two pictures and cartoon like diagram of the material "used" proves we went to and landed on the moon, LOL!!! |
| A1Janitor User ID: 58658563 United States07/20/2019 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another thing about the bacteria they brought back from the moon. I was never able to really nail this down but it's something I highly suspect. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54052734 In the 1980's NASA all of the sudden got interested in air and water quality. Now what does air quality and water pollution have to do with what they do? Fuck all. Yet they spent about a decade sending out teams of technicians testing for air pollution, taking pollen counts, looking for spore contamination all that kind of stuff. And pulling water samples out of lakes and streams. And when you looked at the locations where they did most of the testing it was always heavily around Houston and Atlanta. Houston had the Lunar Receiving Laboratory, where they keep all the dirt. Atlanta is where the NASA space biology lab is. I suspect that what they had got out of containment into the environment at large. And they spent a decade studying it's effects, tracking it's spread etc. All the while under a cover story about studying air and water pollution. They let that shit out and who knows what it did. Like I said, I can't prove that, but I highly suspect it. Great post. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46156487 United States07/20/2019 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah.. We went to the moon because the Russians did not say we did not. Pretty convincing. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77626440 United States07/20/2019 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another thing about the bacteria they brought back from the moon. I was never able to really nail this down but it's something I highly suspect. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54052734 In the 1980's NASA all of the sudden got interested in air and water quality. Now what does air quality and water pollution have to do with what they do? Fuck all. Yet they spent about a decade sending out teams of technicians testing for air pollution, taking pollen counts, looking for spore contamination all that kind of stuff. And pulling water samples out of lakes and streams. And when you looked at the locations where they did most of the testing it was always heavily around Houston and Atlanta. Houston had the Lunar Receiving Laboratory, where they keep all the dirt. Atlanta is where the NASA space biology lab is. I suspect that what they had got out of containment into the environment at large. And they spent a decade studying it's effects, tracking it's spread etc. All the while under a cover story about studying air and water pollution. They let that shit out and who knows what it did. Like I said, I can't prove that, but I highly suspect it. Great post. Right next door to the CDC? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74996924 United States07/20/2019 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah.. We went to the moon because the Russians did not say we did not. Pretty convincing. unless RUssia is ran by communists which came from NYC which they did- look it up moron- think the whole world isn't controlled and enemies 'made' to have a duality - you haven't learned much on GLP or elsewhere hugh?!?!?! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19887678 United States07/20/2019 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can I be blunt with you? I already knew all that stuff in 1965 and so did NASA. Solar Radiation the Van Allen belts, the Apollo spacecraft was designed to beat all of them with Technology the people that claim it was all a hoax, still don't even understand. For instance... The exterior of the Command Module was covered in a radiation shield which appears in photographs as a mirrored surface. [link to amazingstories.com (secure)] The windows were lined with gold foil and lead to reflect radiation which gave the windows depending on the angle either a gold tint or steel grey color. [link to cdn2.picryl.com (secure)] The LM also used the same methods for protecting the Astronauts as did their space suits. The Helmets had a gold foil mesh that the could see out of, embedded in the plastic helmet. The suits themselves had 21 layers with several layers of Mylar sandwiched under the outer layer to reflect radiation. [link to assets7.thrillist.com] Instead of celebrating perhaps one of the greatest achievements of mankind, we have small minded people that just cannot figure out how we did it to begin with. Can I be blunt with you? youre dumber than a box of nasa moonrocks :chuck I suspect most people would disagree with you. and 'most people' are just as ignorant as you are about science. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11126160 United States07/20/2019 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Plato User ID: 77134059 United States07/20/2019 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Apollo Lucian Aeli User ID: 77789111  Romania07/20/2019 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah.. simple physics it is impossible to send a radio wave at 400000 km away:)) because the radio wave goes into a cone the cone gets bigger and bigger with distance when it reaches the moon it is bigger than the moon |
| Apollo Lucian Aeli User ID: 77789111 Romania07/20/2019 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States07/20/2019 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every one that tries to say we didn't go to the moon skips a couple of very important points. Quoting: Masiro® Let me try to explain this in the simplest of terms. 1) the Apollo spacecraft had a radio transponder in it. The job of this transponder was to receive and transmit signals between the tracking stations on earth all around the globe and of course the Apollo spacecraft. The signals received and the replies transmitted were used to track the spacecraft on it's course to the moon using the science of telemetry. The differences between the signals and the various tracking stations were used to compute the actual course and distance of the Apollo spacecraft. The tracking stations first rotated their dishes to get the best possible signal strength giving them a sight line out into space and then sent a radio signal to the Apollo spacecraft, the time delay (the Doppler effect) gave them the actual distance between the earth and Apollo to within inches along it's flight path from earth to the moon. Using several tracking stations and triangulation methods the Apollo spacecraft's course to the moon was tested constantly by ground control. 2) The Communists in China and the Soviet Union would have scored a huge political win if they proved at the time that the US never went to the moon. So why didn't they? Well for one thing the Soviets tried to land a robot on the moon at the same very time as the Apollo 11 mission. It's name was Luna 15. Oddly enough everyone that says we never went to the moon skips the fact that the Russians also sent a spacecraft to the moon during the same week we went. It crashed on landing and wasn't able to return to the earth. Yet another reason why the Soviets would have dearly wanted to expose Apollo as a hoax, but they didn't. Their tracking stations also recorded Apollo's trip to the moon and back using the same radio signals we used to check it's trajectory. In order for this to be the biggest fraud of all time you would have to convince all the world's scientific minds to lie about everything,and our worst enemies to be silent about it while we were at war with them in Vietnam... Yeah..  Fun fact: JFK wanted to go to the moon with the Russians to end the Cold War and possibly all wars since. Imagine that! We could have had a global party on the 17th. Something truly awesome for mankind to celebrate - 50 years of NO WAR, but here we are stuck in the mud. Where might we find another true leader like JFK? . |
| Plato User ID: 77134059 United States07/20/2019 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and in order to have a triangulation Quoting: Apollo Lucian Aeli 77789111 you must make a triangle:))) the 3 points must be far away from each other which was the third point? Only possible way is if there are marines in other solar systems Ala "stargate" the motion picture sub veste, invenimus in homine. Sub hominem, invenimus ejus nucleus. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States07/20/2019 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
