Earth NEVER rotates obviously. You been fooled by Roman-Jesuit-Freemasons. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76724217 United Kingdom 11/23/2019 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78190830 United States 11/23/2019 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76724217 United Kingdom 11/23/2019 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. "Physicists" say that this acceleration/deceleration happens so gradually that we don't notice it. What I want to know is why don't we see a COMPLETELY different set of stars/constellations in the night sky every 6 months? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7835328 United States 11/23/2019 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's right. ALL of the scientists have been wrong. The only thing in the universe that is not moving is the Earth. It is incredible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76948262 So you believe that RELATIVE TO YOU in the USA, that some one in Australia is standing upside down? Let me help you, go grab a ball and look at it. It doesn't matter if you are standing on the side, bottom or top of the ball. The bottom is under your feet and the top is over you head. That's why trillions of gallons of water can cling to the Southern Ocean while you are sailing on the North Atlantic, do you get it now? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77454933 United States 11/23/2019 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. "Physicists" say that this acceleration/deceleration happens so gradually that we don't notice it. What I want to know is why don't we see a COMPLETELY different set of stars/constellations in the night sky every 6 months? because local stars are hundreds of light years away and the diameter of earth's orbit around the sun is 16 light minutes. Bascially the distance we travel every 6 months is completely insignificant when observed stars at a distance. |
szlachta User ID: 78169927 Poland 11/23/2019 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78143035 United States 11/23/2019 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I love these idiots who talk about "the vacuum of space" not even realizing that when that term is used by science that they are referring to vacuum as being simply a lack of matter and not a vacuum cleaner like that Statue of Liberty looking thing in Spaceballs, roflmao! Think about it... If the vacuum of space is such, is it equally pulling on the Earth from all directions? In movies, when somebody gets sucked out of spacecraft, or shot out from the airlock... It's only because that ship is pressurized, just like an airplane at altitude. But notice that when an away team, puts on a spacesuit, and explorers a ship that had been attacked, with no crew, and or abandoned; they don't constantly keep getting sucked out of that ship just because they enter it. In other words, there's no such thing as a "vacuum in space" as in a vacuum cleaner pull or suck scenario. There may be gravity Wells, black holes, or some kind of pulling effect some objects such as the sun, or even the Earth's own gravity. Here this might help you understand better. Now imagine that string, as if it existed in space, instead of a flat plane like that bubble solution. Now see that bubble solution as the many layers, thicker and thin, of the Earth's atmosphere. Equal distribution of pressure from every side as he get into the Earth's upper atmosphere and what you have as a result is the encapsulated or as we know it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76615577 United States 11/23/2019 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76615577 United States 11/23/2019 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76615577 United States 11/23/2019 10:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | is magnetism an important factor? what about solar winds and magnetosphere?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76615577 does the sun and its solar winds cause induced magnetism? what about induction, almost like a transformer? could gravity be caused by induced magnetism on a level that rotation isnt able to overcome it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78192303 United States 11/23/2019 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78192303 United States 11/23/2019 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | is magnetism an important factor? what about solar winds and magnetosphere?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76615577 does the sun and its solar winds cause induced magnetism? what about induction, almost like a transformer? could gravity be caused by induced magnetism on a level that rotation isnt able to overcome it? SOMETHING THAT OUR SENSES CAN'T FEEL OR SEE BUT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING ON A ROTATING BALL OF SENSES GOT IT |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76615577 United States 11/23/2019 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | is magnetism an important factor? what about solar winds and magnetosphere?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76615577 does the sun and its solar winds cause induced magnetism? what about induction, almost like a transformer? could gravity be caused by induced magnetism on a level that rotation isnt able to overcome it? [link to www.google.com (secure)] what if as in this type of example, the base of this model is what our sun is doing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78192303 United States 11/23/2019 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Neil WeakLegs User ID: 69682309 United States 11/23/2019 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Morpheus User ID: 76680043 United States 11/23/2019 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78192303 United States 11/23/2019 10:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78192303 United States 11/23/2019 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/23/2019 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. Except the Earth and everything on it being in orbit around the Sun would not feel that acceleration. Orbit is freefall. You don't feel acceleration in freefall. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/23/2019 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. "Physicists" say that this acceleration/deceleration happens so gradually that we don't notice it. What I want to know is why don't we see a COMPLETELY different set of stars/constellations in the night sky every 6 months? You do. The stars and constellations rise at different times throughout the year. Some that are visible in the middle of the night in December are behind the sun in June. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
TheLordsServant User ID: 78192412 United States 11/23/2019 11:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77666943 United States 11/23/2019 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nineteeneightyfive User ID: 72728643 United States 11/23/2019 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 78185229 United States 11/23/2019 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Monty Python User ID: 77726670 United States 11/23/2019 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes thank you! Earth is stationary. If this thread makes it a few pages it will disappear like they always do. The truth brings down the house of cards potentially. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78185229 A simple Foucault pendulum experiment proves it is turning. But you aren't interested in evidence. Fuckaults Pendulum carnie trick 100% fully debunked a million times over, nxt plz Well its new to me. Nevef even knew it existed. Can you debunk it for me? Curious to learn. Nothing to debunk since it's legit science. A pendulum on a low friction bearing will swing in a fixed plane as the earth turns underneath it. On the poles, the pendulum's path will appear to move a full 360 degrees in 24 hours. On the equator it will not move at all. If the earth were flat there would be no difference between the poles and the equator. flat earthism is the "carnie trick" Last Edited by Monty Python on 11/23/2019 12:39 PM Monty Python's Flying Circus |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76724217 United Kingdom 11/23/2019 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. "Physicists" say that this acceleration/deceleration happens so gradually that we don't notice it. What I want to know is why don't we see a COMPLETELY different set of stars/constellations in the night sky every 6 months? because local stars are hundreds of light years away and the diameter of earth's orbit around the sun is 16 light minutes. Bascially the distance we travel every 6 months is completely insignificant when observed stars at a distance. No, no. That won't wash. Every 6 months we are looking at the other hemisphere of the night sky, 180 degrees away from where we were looking 6 months before. There should be two distinctly different views every 6 months. |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/23/2019 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78190830 Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. "Physicists" say that this acceleration/deceleration happens so gradually that we don't notice it. What I want to know is why don't we see a COMPLETELY different set of stars/constellations in the night sky every 6 months? because local stars are hundreds of light years away and the diameter of earth's orbit around the sun is 16 light minutes. Bascially the distance we travel every 6 months is completely insignificant when observed stars at a distance. No, no. That won't wash. Every 6 months we are looking at the other hemisphere of the night sky, 180 degrees away from where we were looking 6 months before. There should be two distinctly different views every 6 months. And there are. different constellations are up at different times when viewed 6 months apart and some aren't visible as they are behind the sun. [link to flatearth.ws (secure)] Last Edited by LHP598 on 11/23/2019 12:42 PM If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77506855 United States 11/23/2019 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, but Owen Benjamin Smith is an authority only on his own insanity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76724217 Jus' sayin' Yes, I'm sure. But did you listen to what he's explaining? Earth's revolution around the sun is an elliptical path. So it cannot therefore maintain a constant speed. Would cause intense acceleration at 66000 mph, that would not only be felt but be extremely destructive. I think he makes a good point with this. "Physicists" say that this acceleration/deceleration happens so gradually that we don't notice it. What I want to know is why don't we see a COMPLETELY different set of stars/constellations in the night sky every 6 months? Agreed. This is the question ball earthers like Astroshill are afraid to address and run from instead choosing to deceive others. |
RuneMistress User ID: 78039412 Australia 11/23/2019 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 78185229 United States 11/23/2019 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monty Python A simple Foucault pendulum experiment proves it is turning. But you aren't interested in evidence. Fuckaults Pendulum carnie trick 100% fully debunked a million times over, nxt plz Well its new to me. Nevef even knew it existed. Can you debunk it for me? Curious to learn. Nothing to debunk since it's legit science. A pendulum on a low friction bearing will swing in a fixed plane as the earth turns underneath it. On the poles, the pendulum's path will appear to move a full 360 degrees in 24 hours. On the equator it will not move at all. If the earth were flat there would be no difference between the poles and the equator. flat earthism is the "carnie trick" It detects the movement of the things above* wipe yer tears away globetard clinger |