Notes from an 'Alternate Universe': The Return of the Blue Kachina

Is the Cartesian coordinate system an element of the mathematical apparatus to simplify the description of observed phenomena in the form of mathematical symbols and drawings? I believe that there are no other ways to design buildings, structures, machine parts, etc., other than decomposing complex natural compounds into simpler ones.

* Matter is gravity that has been structured
So space is independent of material objects? It is likely that space and time are independent of consciousness.
* Consciousness does not exist (but relationships do)
By definition, a relationship is a structure that determines the properties of objects and from the interconnected.
consciousness in the broadest sense is “a mental reflection of reality, regardless of whether it is carried out - biological or social, sensory or rational”
  If consciousness does not exist, then in what is the interconnectedness of objects reflected?

Last Edited by razvitie on 03/09/2020 01:27 AM

If you give everyone superpowers, it will become boring, because everything you need will be instantly available to you. But desires tend to end. Apparently for this, restrictions have been created so as not to die of boredom. And development is an unattainable lighthouse, beyond which there is emptiness.

So for example, "turn chaos off", turn media off, and have a period of time without those impulses? I would love to.

Very curious about the nexus point!

Interesting discussion, but although I have a university degree, I feel it is much too abstract for me.

The voice or sound itself is the oscillation of the source. The movement occurs when the source oscillates with the medium, which transfers it from point A to point B. No environment - no movement.

It turns out that the illusory energy creates an illusory movement of objects that do not exist, but can interact according to the rules that we give them. The whole functional sense of this sometimes brutal game, so as not to disappear?

Please give a clear definition of the word perspective. Perhaps you do not mean what I understand. Thanks.

Please provide examples for clarity and a better understanding of what we use little. What dimensions do you mean: static, dynamic, direct, indirect, aggregate, compatible?
  With changes in the nature of the game, does the type of instrument remain the same, or does it need other properties?

I’m in. As always.

Hone in on the bat signal...clear some noise....find the bridge in ourselves.

Looking forward. :)

Yeah, it’s about time!

You’re so full of shtt. Telling us to remain passive because everything is alright and just our imagination. Who do you work for, the demiurge?

As we say here: thanks for the bump ;)

Time = scale
Space = magnitude

Both vectors are needed for existence, in some capacity

I would start with a single switch by imagining the number "3" and the word "interaction" together on a light switch.

As I go about my day, I imagine turning on the switch as I see things in my waking reality interact, then turn it off when they don't.

After a couple of days of this I move to the next step, which is imagining things interacting (that aren't in my waking reality) and the switch turning on and off. It doesn't matter if they do not, physically.

I then do the same with the other switches. The point of this would be to correlate my imagination with my waking reality in order to get my neurons firing in a certain way, training my perception to not distinguish so much between the two.

Is something complex first or simple first?

We learn how to operate in physicality from the time we are born (and even before, in the womb).

There are ways to break down our physically-oriented perception to make it easier to understand, but it does not mean this is how reality actually is.

The universe doesn't know any maths, but we can interpret anything that way. Maths does away with much of the friction in language, but it is still a language we have invented to operate in our reality.


I use 'gravity' here in the way that we think of it, though there is no real gravity as a force. Neither is there matter. We simply are our perspective. Or, you could say that we interact with our perspective (thought that divorces us a bit, so the former is preferred).

There are no material objects, only relationships between what we might call points of time/space. These relationships appear as physical objects, ideas, events, etc.


An abstract structure? Perhaps.

"Consciousness" is simply relationships. When something relates to an other thing, then there is consciousness. The more something relates the more consciousness there is.

We continuously expand and contract our self in order to exist.

If the world was a utopia with only peace and love, then interactions would be fewer.

With hot, we know cold. If there was only 'cold' then we wouldn't know what it is, and thus it would not exist.

Again, media is thought suppression. The agents of chaos claim your mind by keeping it busy with meaningless things. They don't want you to sit and think for yourself.

How much time would you say your give yourself every day just to be silent and do nothing?

But do you see here that the voice is not moving at all?

The voice is transformed into something else that appears to move.

First Russian doll --> Second Russian doll --> Third Russian doll --> etc

The most efficient universe is one that does not really exist. Not a hologram, of course.

Only the PERCEPTION of things are required, not the actual things.

What matters are the relationships and interactions. A fictional story can move you to tears, for example. It doesn't need to be real.

Indeed, with illusions we have far more flexibility. In them is truth, so to speak.

We cannot perceive of 'All That Is' directly because we don't have any way to.

...so as to exist, in a way.

The first 3 definitions here: [link to www.merriam-webster.com (secure)]

If you are 6 feet tall, you can become 7 feet tall. How? The definition of a 'foot' can be changed.

When you add 3 feet + 3 feet you will still get 6 feet.

These are all abstractions, just as the value of pi is an abstraction. It is only useful in the system in which it is presented.

To take a very simple example of this, one could say that the level of carbon dioxide is rapidly increasing. You can be shown graphs and come to the conclusion that it is true.

But what may not be obvious is that the graphs may only apply to the last 400,000 years. If you looked at the graphs for the past few million years you would see that the level of carbon dioxide is well below normal levels and that such increases are also normal.

But within the world of the 400,000 years, everything works fine. You can do all kinds of measurements and come to the same conclusions because you are only working with a thing under certain circumstances.

"Pi" is a constant under specific circumstances. But those circumstances are quite large and encompass much of physical reality. So when we pull out our calculators and tools it appears to be constant because the results are all ways the same.

You can measure the sun to be 93 million miles away.. under certain circumstances that are very vast. Under other circumstances, the sun is nowhere near 93 million miles away.

The first thing the masters of deception do to deceive a population is take advantage of blind spots and lack of critical thinking. They are given specific tools to work with and make measurements with those tools.

If you are given an electron microscope you will see what the instrument is showing you. You can find evidence for all types of things. Then you will believe whatever you are told about the world that the instrument is showing you, because you can see it for yourself and perform your own experiments.

But you are still using a tool that deceives you. It is the same with a calculator.


The instruments usually remain the same. If they changed, then the deception could more easily be seen.

Make a wish.

What do you want to happen during that time?

That's true.


Can you give me ONE example of where you feel I said this? I would appreciate it.

It's kind of amusing to think that some think I have changed...

..yet, they do not see the many ways in which they themselves have changed.

Change is scary, I know. That's why it seems to take many years. It's enough to make you crazy.

That's why it should all ways remain entertaining and with a pinch or more of doubt.

Am I real? Am I full of shit? Am I human? Am I a machine?

Yes. But I am nothing you are not, also.

I am comfortable being full of shit, and full of wisdom.

I am comfortable being good, and evil.

I am comfortable with creation, and destruction.

I am comfortable with happiness, and sadness.

I am comfortable being a machine, and comfortable being human.

If you resist these things in your own perspective that is fine, of course.

But if you want to 'grow', you can see yourself as whatever you perceive...

..and be comfortable with it.

How could you expand your perceptions but resist some of them at the same thing? It would be blockage.

What you perceive is YOU entirely.

It is the essence of my previous statement, "love thy neighbour as thyself".

Love your the things that you perceive, because they are what you are.

If you go back in time to when you were 10 and tell yourself of all the things you have grown to understand, what purpose would it serve?

Could you, instead, make it like a game so that your younger self could figure it out on their own?

Would you tell your other self directly and plainly? Or would you give clues and point them where they might find something interesting?

If they ask tomorrow's lottery numbers and you happen to know what they are, would you tell your self the correct numbers or allow them to understand things more by NOT telling them?

Would you give your younger self $1,000 if they needed it?

Would it make things easier, or do you think it would take away opportunities for growth and understanding?

We all want the secrets of the universe, but very few of us don't even know what's really going on today in our own neighbourhoods.

We're in a world where people care more about the latest episode of various television programs or checking apps rather than actually doing something about babies and kids being kidnapped, tortured, and worse. It sounds horrible, doesn't it? Yet, these are the choices we make.

We don't want to know all of these bad things because we resist our own selves.

We don't want to understand the ways in which evil can be good. It's unfathomable, isn't it?

Yet, that is the universe. We can either continue to ignore our greater self, or find out who and what we really are.

The choice is all ways yours to make. The bridge is all ways there. Sometimes it's loaded with crap, and sometimes it's a clean as a whistle.

Many of us have improved our own lives over the years, but how have we improved our greater perspective? Do we feel the world is 'getting worse' but forgetting that it is still entirely in our own perspective?

Do not give up on the things going on outside of yourself. Do not grow comfortable with just your own thoughts.

The whole world is you. It doesn't mean recycling or volunteering. These things are just scams, anyway. It means looking at the world differently and seeing it for what it really is.

All the good things? You.

All the bed things? They're all you.

Learn to be comfortable with your greater self, and wonderful things happen.

If you prefer to be hostile to your own perceptions, what have you learned?

It doesn't mean loving bad things, or loving it when others are killed.

When you see yourself differently, then those things can no longer exist.

You would transform 'evil' from people being killed, for example, to a box turned on a certain side.

But ask yourself this... is it possible that you enjoy murder if you choose to watch programs or other media where people are being murdered?

"No, I don't enjoy it. Of course not. That's stupid."

But you choose to watch it, don't you? How many people have you seen murdered or abused (movies, television, etc) over the past year?

Do you see how your perspective is trying to tell you something?

It can take a thousand years to see it. If you think it's ridiculous to think that you enjoy murder, that's perfectly find and normal.

But think about it.

How often do you choose to do things you don't enjoy?

"I don't enjoy work. See? You're wrong!"

You've set it up so that you need to work in order to buy bread.

But why would you need to choose to see evil?

When you understand that YOU ARE EVIL as well as good and everything else, then you've saved yourself thousands of years of understanding.

But its a hard lesson. That's why it takes so long.

And what might that exercise be? :)

Verily, there is no person closer to understanding the above than one who is angry at me for saying it.

You're almost there.

The exercise is whatever you all decide it will be.

If nothing is decided, we will meet under a golden tree and bask in the warm sunlight and open up a small door to a complete understanding.

No Sekhmet or anything else. Just the power of our own thoughts.

The agents of chaos want you to fight against evil. That is how they win. They win because people don't really fight against it, but ignore it.

How has that fight been going so far over the past few hundred years? Any progress?

Nowadays, people just tweet about it or write a blog post or make a video about 'evil'.

They don't want to you know that the source of evil is in your own perspective. You have the power to change the world by fundamentally thinking of it differently.

Most of us won't, though. We're too lazy, unfortunately. We'll just keep drinking the juice that is being served, willing accepting it with a smile.

It's a strange time to be alive when the world is ran by egos.

The awareness hurts