9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

Yes. I am not clear about that either.








Yeah....shock can evoke a lot of controversial behavior.

My brother is/was sane.
However, I was/am from the cheering team of 'no planes but missiles hit the WTC and Pentagon' so it's hard for me to understand why my brother of 50 years is saying that.

Having never been witness to such an event (I was upstate NY at the time), it's hard to say why people reacted the way they did (and concluded to what they saw). I have a feeling....TV (plus shock) was much of the culprit that day!

He says the following in comments section of the final video:

"Thanks. I don't want to name here the one who did it, for even though I didn't name anyone yet, by now I am already marked on some chauvinistic web site as 'potentially harmful to Jews and/or Israel'."

That seems like a fairly strong hint to me.

4 hours watching these videos!

Thanks!


Looks like you'll have to buy the book to find out whose behind 9-11


Not sure what I think now..................

There are some interesting points here EVERYONE seems to be missing:

1) The point about the site being called "ground zero" is something I never considered before. "Ground zero" really does refer to a nuclear blast site.

2) The fact NOTHING has been built there after all of these years. It seems so weird.

3) If there was an underground nuclear blast, I would expect some radiation, but not enough to cloak the whole city in it. So I'm not surprised some people came down with sickness but it was explained as asbestos, etc. This could be covered up, in other words, it is not inconceivable. So people will say, "Oh, there would be radiation everywhere!" Would there be? I'm not so sure. It also explains why the materials were quickly carted off.

4) The siesmic readings, the ground shaking ten seconds or so before the collapses, this lends some credibility to the theory of an underground nuke going off.

5) However, he says there was no "thermite", which then erases the evidence OF thermite and even the video evidence of squibs. I'm baffled as to where he is coming from on that point. Use of a nuclear device, to me, would not preclure the use of further explosives to ensure the buildings fell. Of course, the use of demolitions indicates to me some kind of pre-planning, because I don't think for 30 years the buildings sat there pre-fitted with explosives. That would have to at least be maintained, as wiring failures would occur over that span of years. However, a pre-fit nuclear option could have been in place. Again, even if this nuclear option was used, but USA was still somehow a "victim", I find it hard to believe there was no pre-knowledge.

6) His contradictions are many: says a Russian missile struck Pentagon, but it wasn't the Russians. It wasn't Bin Laden. Who the hell was it?

7) Says USA was a "victim", yet we managed to use video trickery to turn missiles into planes. Wouldn't that require an enormous amount of pre-planning? And doesn't pre-planning indicate complicity?

8) Says "white plane" over D.C. only used for nuclear attack -- interesting point.

In all, he offers some very interesting theories, but to say USA was a "victim" seems odd in light of the level of coordination and pre-planning required to erase missiles and turn them into digital planes, in addition to the bogus claim of 19 hijackers of which some are still alive, in addition to the planeloads of people who vanished, in addition to the bogus cell phone calls...

He seems to dispense of one wacky claim only to use another to support his theory. You sort of have to take them all in as one whole.

he is drawing from his past experience, his own research on the web, and information directly from the FBI.

one of these things just dont belong here, one of these things.....

i buy the nuke thing. its the closest to ever making sense. the thermite was necessary to breach the buildings like a plane had gone in. this wasnt done on the fly.

bush knew. he had the same look on his face as he did when he got caught with that sheep as a teenager.

You do realise that when the first building was hit fkg hundreds of people where looking at those towers from the street...im sure alot of them would have mentioned at some point that there was no plane involved....

The government silenced them all maybe, I don't think so...

oh my, isnt that the truth. the fact that they have gone through and changed the definition is a crime against humanity. they didnt add the second and third meanings that current events gave us as an understandably changing and living language. no. they expunged the ONLY meaning "ground zero" had before 9/11, which only referred to nukes. it was synonymous with NUKES.

that is not excusable. its an admission of guilt!

lets try to keep the level of evidence above what you(or anyone else) think.

I remain opened minded as far as "how this was pulled off" (I do NOT believe in the OS) so..............what you ask/say is interesting.
To that I ask: Where are the photos/videos of the hundred/thousands of people whose eyes where upon these towers?

the discipline of reading these signatures and fully developed. but as usual, you only get the best science you can afford these days. this could be self taught and researched by a commited researcher.

very good question. you would think there would be hundreds of camcordings of this event. and cameras. its new york, for heavens sake! show me the youtubes.

i agree. there are some things that work and some things that dont. the things that work, work like gangbusters. the nukes and the missiles. it seems to me that someone did use at least one missile on the pentagon. it looked more like our global predator in that pentagon guard shack video.

Wait! Dimitri was gonna name the 9-11 perpetrators (and they will get to that later.....) then the video ends?


Hey now!

If I paid, I'd want my money back.

no planes
not one

"So, you ask who was the chief organizer of 911?

Actually, I have already mentioned it on my web site that I don't want to reveal it online, otherwise, people will have less insentive to buy my book (and I don't have any income, except from the book, unfortunately, so it is just a matter of my survival). But it is OK to me - I will make an exception to this rule if you really want to know it, but don't want to buy the book...

His name was Mike Harari - a former Deputy Chief of the Mossad, a former friend of President Bush Senior, and a former deputy of General Noriega - the Dictator of Panama."

[link to www.clubconspiracy.com]

-Caveat Lector-

why mention michael harari?

4,000 isrealis had day off on 9-11

instant messages to isreal warned of attack

by far the most intense censorship of conspiracy
'theories' online have involved what is deemed
anti-semitic, i.e. anti-israel [the equivalent of
saying it is unamerican to question US foreign policy]

the MEDIA was quite in place for coverage

public sentiment was beginning to turn pro-palestinian
and against israeli policy

since 9-11, the israelis have managed to pour into
palestine and wreak havoc...and pull out just in time
for the overcoming of kabul - with FAR less
international press coverage than they were getting
before the event, when the oppression was nought
compared to the last two months

the mossad saying 'by deception shalt thou make war'

harari is called the fixer

harari enjoys the protection of london as an employee
of the isreali embassy there even though norway wants
his ass for masterminding dozens of political killings
there

harari's connections to the bush enterprises are
thorough...he was in charge of operation watchtower -
the program of drugs to LA gangs for money for guns
for nicaragua - read more below

Prosecutors in Norway have issued an international
arrest warrant for a former Israeli intelligence
agent, suspected of involvement in the mistaken
killing of a Moroccan man nearly twenty-five years
ago.

Read more:
[link to www.mail-archive.com]

I wonder if this "dipolat" was him!

"'Mossad boss' expelled from Britain over passport killers"

[link to www.mirror.co.uk]

I agree with you, I think the no plane theory is bullshit.

But the fact that the buildings were pre-wired with micro nukes makes sense from the start. You don't build huge buildings like that without a plan of taking it down without harming other buildings. They had to have preplanned it all.

Can someone get me to a site that I can order the book?

It seems like it has been pulled already...!

I can't see any new york planning department allowing the use of nukes let alone three within a city the size of NY this just seems ludicrous.
He also claimed that the usa didn't know about the attacks but in the next breath claims they edited the live footage to cover it up.

Another odd thing is the supposed placement of the nukes underground shows the Marriot hotel in the line of destruction...so that would have caused it to fall at the same time as one of the towers...did it fall then?

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Actually, it was the WTC 4 to the right and Marriott to the left in most photos...AND
BOTH WERE DESTROYED when the tower fell, so this is consistent with Dimitri's story.

Watch how the external column is polvarised @ 50 sec mark in this vid

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

This image of WTC 4 IS consistent with the radius of the nuke below WTC 2.

I would like to see video and watch only WTC-4 in action as WTC 2 falls.