PLANET X - FOUND? (You Should Watch This) | |
TBar1984 User ID: 1537588 United States 10/05/2011 06:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shephardi User ID: 2888010 United Kingdom 10/08/2011 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 935589 United States 10/08/2011 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You, Sir are most definitely borderline retarded. I'll make some point: 1. Those object is there near our sun, i don't know since?? But it's there near our sun possibility those object attracting by our sun & constant there. 2. Nasa never admit what it is. 3. The object is yes moving , but very slowly, and i look at it a year since 2010. It's always near our sun, but the positon moving very slowly. 3. There are some yotube video footage shot from aircraft/aeroplane . Very clear footage & it's like a sun. Possibility it's a dwarf star near mercury. Also aug 31. When elenin hit jupiter near mercury is not jupiter but possibility elenin hit impact near those object. It's called ele: extinction level event. Nin: near impact nibiru Is that those object: nibiru? Or maybe just cw leonis? I don't know. U must go to astronom/astronout to ask it. But nasa never admit this officially to public. 4. In year 2003. Zetatalk.com explain about double mercury red cross near mercury via stereo/soho. Nibiru? I don't know. But, nasa have an agenda when every they go to space: public agenda is the main nasa agenda & public know for it. And the secret agenda is : to study planet-x. Why nasa very ambitious go to space, begin since zetcharia sitchin out his book 12th planet. Nasa has a drawing when release pioner satelite on the drawing beside our sun&planet they also draw planet-x and dark star on it. If u read sitchin book u'll know that sitchin explain about his research from sumerian artefact. It's mean sitchin explain a history with artefact. He is not tell a pseudoscience story. But in public sitchin nibiru marks as a pseudoscience. History event on space could come again, with our sun as the main point binary star, but what will happen in the future is not always the same with past history coz if an history event come again to future it's already through new process that could bringing diference result from the past history. The only controversial about nibiru is anunnaki .they god creating a human. In relligion we just believe god. In islam alqur'an human create by god from soil. Angel from iridescent &demon from fire. But alkitab comes after earth born. So, who could explain it? Who creating human/who is our god? |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1322561 United States 10/17/2011 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astromut I believe youve done it. You've exposed these liars once and for all! How dare they try and fool the public with their nonsense! Quoting: Hawkeye1958 He exposed that astronomers lie. I wouldn't call these guys astronomers, but they do steal work from real amateur astronomers: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 849736 United Kingdom 10/17/2011 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KingDingaLing User ID: 1559124 United States 10/17/2011 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1322561 United States 10/17/2011 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've known about it for a long time. Check this diagram... You can either think its the 10th planet that NASA shows or the Dead Star... both well within our solar system and the kepler belt. Quoting: KingDingaLing Without even realizing it, you just showed why the pioneer anomaly proves that diagram wrong. Think about it for a moment and remember that the pioneer anomaly was in a sunward direction... for both probes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3245901 United States 10/17/2011 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3245901 United States 10/17/2011 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 935589 United States 10/17/2011 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dude, shut the fuck up. Astromut is just about the only sane, rational person on this board. And the there's you, who uses "planet x and OWS" in the same sentence. That's like a five year old saying "I like fire trucks.... and onions...." |
Daikirai User ID: 1528322 Netherlands 10/17/2011 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Searchalot User ID: 1289575 Netherlands 10/17/2011 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :256senseup: Quoting: Astromut I'll be looking for where this came from. I have a very strong feeling this was ripped straight out of one of my broadcasts and then post-processed to reduce and change the colors and histogram levels, basically try to make it unrecognizable. They also cropped the edges a good bit, you can just barely see the edge of the arrow that points to the word "MANUAL" from the left side. Not sure if they filmed it "off screen" with another camera or just did that in post. So? You found planet x? Why are you holding out? You don't get it; that's not planet x. oh ok, so where is it then? I'm not your enemy, you are... © 2004, Maus E. Only your thoughts create your world. © 2015 Maus E. Learning is knowing you learn nothing when you know. © 2016 Maus E. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 849735 United Kingdom 10/17/2011 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 1322561 United States 10/17/2011 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :256senseup: Quoting: Astromut I'll be looking for where this came from. I have a very strong feeling this was ripped straight out of one of my broadcasts and then post-processed to reduce and change the colors and histogram levels, basically try to make it unrecognizable. They also cropped the edges a good bit, you can just barely see the edge of the arrow that points to the word "MANUAL" from the left side. Not sure if they filmed it "off screen" with another camera or just did that in post. So? You found planet x? Why are you holding out? You don't get it; that's not planet x. oh ok, so where is it then? Where is what? |
Searchalot User ID: 1289575 Netherlands 10/17/2011 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Searchalot Where is what? Planet X, ofcours. I'm not your enemy, you are... © 2004, Maus E. Only your thoughts create your world. © 2015 Maus E. Learning is knowing you learn nothing when you know. © 2016 Maus E. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 10/17/2011 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny you should ask. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] If you want to try to search for Harrington's hypothetical planet x, the predicted location is public knowledge and anyone can look for it: Thread: The Detailed Position Of Planet X ~ R.S. Harrington Last Edited by Astromut on 10/17/2011 06:02 PM |
Volar User ID: 1387606 United States 10/17/2011 11:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've known about it for a long time. Check this diagram... You can either think its the 10th planet that NASA shows or the Dead Star... both well within our solar system and the kepler belt. Quoting: KingDingaLing :10thplanet: So NASTY sends up two (2) probes, and unconsciously makes a chart of “Planet X”, 4.7 billion miles away. Now, according to Astronut, only real astronomers are suppose to have credibility, If so, then, Astronut, the amateur, or should I say “real amateur”, is putting himself above the information put out by his buddies, who really should know what they are talking about. With all the different types, styles, locations, and sizes, their equipment should blow any amateur out of the water. NASA, unlike Astronut, even uses “real variable infrared telescopes” instead of a cheap filter, attached to the lens. You have also got to ask yourself why Astronut thinks viewing the night time sky is sufficient enough proof of Nibiru's non-existance. What is so laughable is, most of all the photography displayed is done by “real amateur astronomers”, and photographers, who are avid followers of the elusive “Planet X”, or “Nibiru”. Without their assistance, disinformation, and air brushing would be the dominating factor, and the public, who pays billions in taxes for accurate information, would suspiciously never know who to believe. A very good example of airbrushing, at its best, is SOHO where you will accidentally see Nibiru, once in awhile, before it is doctored. Kudos for all the real Astrophotography Astronomers, less the “shills”. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 10/17/2011 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've known about it for a long time. Check this diagram... You can either think its the 10th planet that NASA shows or the Dead Star... both well within our solar system and the kepler belt. Quoting: KingDingaLing So NASTY sends up two (2) probes, and unconsciously makes a chart of “Planet X”, 4.7 billion miles away. It's a picture from an encyclopedia showing the hypothetical positions of planet X and nemesis as they were thought to possibly exist decades ago. Now, according to Astronut, only real astronomers are suppose to have credibility, If so, then, Astronut, the amateur, or should I say “real amateur”, is putting himself above the information put out by his buddies, who really should know what they are talking about. Quoting: volarWrong. [link to adsabs.harvard.edu] What astronomers realized decades ago is that Harrington's hypothetical planet does not exist. You can search for it yourself using Harrington's own information. I have myself. NASA, unlike Astronut, even uses “real variable infrared telescopes” instead of a cheap filter, attached to the lens. Quoting: volarYou lie constantly. Amateurs, myself included, do have telescopes that can see into the infrared and see the stars that can only be seen in infrared. That destroys your whole basis for disregarding my observations, that's why you have to lie. What is so laughable is, most of all the photography displayed is done by “real amateur astronomers”, and photographers, who are avid followers of the elusive “Planet X”, or “Nibiru”. Quoting: volarReal amateur astronomers like me know you're full of it. Just ask in any popular astronomy forum or star party how many are "avid followers of planet x and nibiru." |
Volar User ID: 1387606 United States 10/18/2011 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've known about it for a long time. Check this diagram... You can either think its the 10th planet that NASA shows or the Dead Star... both well within our solar system and the kepler belt. Quoting: KingDingaLing :10thplanet: So NASTY sends up two (2) probes, and unconsciously makes a chart of “Planet X”, 4.7 billion miles away. It's a picture from an encyclopedia showing the hypothetical positions of planet X and nemesis as they were thought to possibly exist decades ago. Now, according to Astronut, only real astronomers are suppose to have credibility, If so, then, Astronut, the amateur, or should I say “real amateur”, is putting himself above the information put out by his buddies, who really should know what they are talking about. Quoting: volarWrong. [link to adsabs.harvard.edu] What astronomers realized decades ago is that Harrington's hypothetical planet does not exist. You can search for it yourself using Harrington's own information. I have myself. NASA, unlike Astronut, even uses “real variable infrared telescopes” instead of a cheap filter, attached to the lens. Quoting: volarYou lie constantly. Amateurs, myself included, do have telescopes that can see into the infrared and see the stars that can only be seen in infrared. :m42infraredbw: That destroys your whole basis for disregarding my observations, that's why you have to lie. What is so laughable is, most of all the photography displayed is done by “real amateur astronomers”, and photographers, who are avid followers of the elusive “Planet X”, or “Nibiru”. Quoting: volarReal amateur astronomers like me know you're full of it. Just ask in any popular astronomy forum or star party how many are "avid followers of planet x and nibiru." Professional Astronomers are under the "gag order", and threatened to lie, or get their license suspended. And....again, viewing the stars with a cheap night filter does not prove a thing. Most of your Astronomy Clubs, and forums, are sponsored by NASA, and every answer, especially concerning Nibiru, is very carefully scrutinized, and monitored, by NASA. And....of course NASA’s chart should be found in an encyclopedia. Where do you think the encyclopedia publishers get their information? Face it, Astronut, you are a paid shill, or should get paid for all the hard work you meticulously do, in trying to debunk Planet X. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 10/18/2011 12:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Professional Astronomers are under the "gag order", and threatened to lie, or get their license suspended. Quoting: Volar 1387606 License lol And....again, viewing the stars with a cheap night filter does not prove a thing. Quoting: volarNight filter? LMFAO, you're sooo full of it dude, I just showed you that I'm able to view stars in infrared that are not seen in visible light. What part of that do you not get? Most of your Astronomy Clubs, and forums, are sponsored by NASA, Quoting: volarWrong. My astronomy club receives 0 dollars from NASA. NADA. My favorite astronomy forum has many sponsors, but NASA is not one of them. You fail, repeatedly and in epic fashion dude. They include astronomics, astrozap, meade, celestron, TMB optical and many other telescope and accessory makers, but not NASA. and every answer, especially concerning Nibiru, is very carefully scrutinized, and monitored, by NASA. Quoting: volarWow, completely wrong again. Is there anything you say that is actually true and correct? Where do you think the encyclopedia publishers get their information? Quoting: volarOh yeah, like they're completely incapable of reading the literature of the day and making it themselves. If it exists it must have come from NASA. Nice logic fail there. As already shown, Harrington's planet X has since been ruled out and as TBar so brilliantly showed, you could look for yourself in the location Harrington said it would be using the information Harrington himself published. Go on, look for it with that telescope you claim to own. Oh right, "amateurs can't see in infrared," they just lie and use "night filters." LOL Face it, Astronut, you are a paid shill, Quoting: volarFace it Volar, you are a defamatory liar. That is a statement of fact, not opinion by the way. You can't stand the fact that amateurs like me can see stars in infrared light, it destroys the foundation of the cult of Nibiru. Last Edited by Astromut on 10/18/2011 12:51 AM |
zacksavage User ID: 1410797 United States 10/18/2011 12:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
starrynytes User ID: 1542864 United States 10/18/2011 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've started recording video of Neptune even as I type. Just eyeballing it I can tell it's where it should be relative to the star field around it. Don't worry though, I'll post the proof as soon as the astrometry is completed. Here's the astrometric solution and image: [link to flickr.com] The bright object in the center is Neptune. At 10:04 (2:04 UT) its coordinates as seen from my location should have been 22h 02m 39.20s, -12d 35' 04.4" According to the above astrometric solution, the coordinates for Neptune in that image were 22h 02m 39s, -12d 35' 04" well within the 2.24 arcsecond per pixel resolution of the picture. [link to i319.photobucket.com] Here's raw video of Neptune at f/10: There was some cloud cover causing it to occasionally fade, and the video above is flipped and higher apparent magnification than the above image, but the stars you can see at the end are the same stars as in the still, just closer-up and inverted. In other words, there is no perturbation of Neptune, those hoaxers were full of crap. Very cool Astromut!! I have a 8" Dob but haven't tried looking at Neptune yet, I figured it just may be too far out. I've seen some galaxies and of course Saturn and Jupiter. I do have the typical EP's set that includes a 2X barlow, 32mm, 12.5mm, 6mm and 4mm and some various colored lenses as well. Did you use a filter or colored lens? And last question, do you think I'd be able to find Neptune in my dob? (I recently was in a car accident and don't want to lug it out very far if it will only look like a ball of fuzz, it's a little heavy) Any other time I wouldn't care and do it... lol So glad you can clarify these rumors by the way- So bring on the nasty comments/karma anyone who doesn't like me appreciating objective information from someone like Astromut. Also, go get'em if they stole your work! In God I trust |
Volar User ID: 1387606 United States 10/18/2011 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, Astronut, Professional Astronomers have to have a license, or PHD in Physics, and/or Astronomy. [link to www.mypursuit.com] Most all of your Amateur Astronomy Clubs are sponsored by NASA. Why don’t you search, and see for yourself how much control NASA has? And....why should NASA care about monitoring your club, since they have YOU in their back pocket? [link to nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov] Again, Astronut....searching for Nibiru in the night sky, with a cheap night filter, is not the same as a variable Infrared scope designed to locate objects near the Sun. [link to science.hq.nasa.gov] |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 1222987 Netherlands 10/18/2011 03:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, Astronut, Professional Astronomers have to have a license, or PHD in Physics, and/or Astronomy. Quoting: Volar 1387606 [link to www.mypursuit.com] Shifting the goalposts. Again. An astronomer is a person who has the skills, knowledge, and equipment to make useful astronomical observations. The Sky View Team, BTW, is sooo professional they won't even tell us their names. Your link does not indicate that NASA gives money to astronomy clubs. You make the claim... This whole burden of proof thingie is still a mystery to you, isn't it? And....why should NASA care about monitoring your club, since they have YOU in their back pocket? Quoting: Volar 1387606 Begging the question. Your link does not show that 'NASA monitors astronomy clubs'. Again, Astronut....searching for Nibiru in the night sky, with a cheap night filter, Quoting: Volar 1387606 Pray tell, what is a 'night filter'? People have been trying to teach you some astronomy here for something like two years now, and you still don't know how a CCD camera works? Are you dense on purpose, or are you rely that stupid? is not the same as a variable Infrared scope designed to locate objects near the Sun. Quoting: Volar 1387606 Were we discussing objects near the Sun? We were not. You are just trying to squeeze your pet delusion into the discussion. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
yamaniac User ID: 1487178 India 10/18/2011 03:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3109512 United States 10/18/2011 03:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TBar1984 User ID: 1537588 United States 10/18/2011 03:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3542831 United Kingdom 10/18/2011 03:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man, this is hilarious!! I love the idea that NASA (and why NASA?) issues licenses to professional astronomers and monitors amateurs all over the world. Are you really so mad as to think that any astronomers, professional or amateur, most of whom aren't even in the US, would listen if NASA told them what they should be doing? And given that the US is not exactly popular in a lot of countries, why aren't the governments, space agencies, and astronomers of those countries exposing this huge NASA-controlled cover-up? Oh, and BTW, I'm a committee member in my local club, and I've never had any communication from NASA telling us what we should do... |
Volar User ID: 1387606 United States 10/18/2011 04:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, Astronut, Professional Astronomers have to have a license, or PHD in Physics, and/or Astronomy. Quoting: Volar 1387606 [link to www.mypursuit.com] Shifting the goalposts. Again. An astronomer is a person who has the skills, knowledge, and equipment to make useful astronomical observations. The Sky View Team, BTW, is sooo professional they won't even tell us their names. Your link does not indicate that NASA gives money to astronomy clubs. You make the claim... This whole burden of proof thingie is still a mystery to you, isn't it? And....why should NASA care about monitoring your club, since they have YOU in their back pocket? Quoting: Volar 1387606 Begging the question. Your link does not show that 'NASA monitors astronomy clubs'. Again, Astronut....searching for Nibiru in the night sky, with a cheap night filter, Quoting: Volar 1387606 Pray tell, what is a 'night filter'? People have been trying to teach you some astronomy here for something like two years now, and you still don't know how a CCD camera works? Are you dense on purpose, or are you rely that stupid? is not the same as a variable Infrared scope designed to locate objects near the Sun. Quoting: Volar 1387606 Were we discussing objects near the Sun? We were not. You are just trying to squeeze your pet delusion into the discussion. NASA does not give money to clubs. They assist with information, and guidance. Money is collected through donations, and dues. I did have a conversation with a Amateur Astronomy Club officer about Planet X. He was very tight lipped, and angry when I posed the question about its existence. He just did not want to talk about it. There is, by the way, an IR night filter for telescopes. Your ignorance to this fact shows what little you know. Daytime filters are not the same as night filters. [link to www.lumiconfilters.com] Am I dense? No. At least I know how to spell. What grade did you drop out of in school. People like you will never give in, or compromise. No matter how true a statement is, you, and Astronut will always find a way to debunk, or discredit someone who does not agree with your fixed mindset. By the way, how much does your handlers pay you for your trolling negativity towards Planet X. |
Volar User ID: 1387606 United States 10/18/2011 05:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man, this is hilarious!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3542831 I love the idea that NASA (and why NASA?) issues licenses to professional astronomers and monitors amateurs all over the world. Are you really so mad as to think that any astronomers, professional or amateur, most of whom aren't even in the US, would listen if NASA told them what they should be doing? And given that the US is not exactly popular in a lot of countries, why aren't the governments, space agencies, and astronomers of those countries exposing this huge NASA-controlled cover-up? Oh, and BTW, I'm a committee member in my local club, and I've never had any communication from NASA telling us what we should do... Never said NASA issues licenses to professional astronomers. Universities are responsible for PHDs, and other diplomacies. There are countries like Russia, who are apprised to Planet X, and freely lashes out at the US Government for the cover-up. The less major, or third world countries, would rather buy food than own an amateur telescope. I just have to say you do not appear bright enough to be in control of anything. Most likely being on a club committee is the highest achievement you have ever made, which is nothing to brag about, especially if there may be only a few members in the club. There will always be your everyday people who believe a punk rock band out shines a concert pianist. |