8.0+ earthquake on May 19, 2012 due to renegade asteroids | |
Not Anonymous Coward User ID: 4696606 United States 05/20/2012 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12478270 New Zealand 05/20/2012 02:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
pray_Italy User ID: 16357609 Italy 05/20/2012 03:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KN User ID: 16304238 Estonia 05/20/2012 03:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KN User ID: 16304238 Estonia 05/20/2012 03:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Magnitude 6.0 Date-Time Sunday, May 20, 2012 at 07:19:55 UTC Sunday, May 20, 2012 at 05:19:55 PM at epicenter Location 39.597°N, 143.242°E Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) Region OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN Distances 179 km (111 miles) SE (124°) from Hachinohe, Honshu, Japan 181 km (112 miles) E (94°) from Morioka, Honshu, Japan 253 km (157 miles) NE (53°) from Sendai, Honshu, Japan 534 km (332 miles) NE (34°) from TOKYO, Japan Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 14.9 km (9.3 miles); depth +/- 4.1 km (2.5 miles) Parameters NST=407, Nph=407, Dmin=269.4 km, Rmss=0.84 sec, Gp= 32°, M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=9 Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D) Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D) |
captainchocobo18 User ID: 3022519 United States 05/20/2012 03:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | my face when i went back in my memory and was like...wait a sec...i just read a post..wait a. a...MY FACE... O _ O officially creeped out. it would seem as if OP is correct. maybe objects in space really do have a say in earthquakes. if thats true...then god only knows what will happen in the coming months.... and what the eff is TPTB and nasa hiding...good gally..... all i know is that i am not going any where near california in the coming months. the prophecy by you know who...sorta sounds like california as maybe a place of interest to some quakes. maybe not but just to fold out the wrinkles....its better to be safe than sorry. just look what happened to san fran a long time ago. yikes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 935589 United States 05/20/2012 04:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ok i just happened to be reading this post and usually only check up on godlikeproductions every few weeks just to get my read on so to speak. then logged off my pc. turned back on and i check google news.....earthquake....italy some other places... Quoting: captainchocobo18 3022519 my face when i went back in my memory and was like...wait a sec...i just read a post..wait a. a...MY FACE... O _ O officially creeped out. it would seem as if OP is correct. maybe objects in space really do have a say in earthquakes. if thats true...then god only knows what will happen in the coming months.... and what the eff is TPTB and nasa hiding...good gally..... all i know is that i am not going any where near california in the coming months. the prophecy by you know who...sorta sounds like california as maybe a place of interest to some quakes. maybe not but just to fold out the wrinkles....its better to be safe than sorry. just look what happened to san fran a long time ago. yikes. No, dipshit. The OP predicted an 8.0 earthquake. Which is 20 times larger than a 6.0. The Earth is geologically active. Earthquakes happen all the time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15099242 United States 05/20/2012 04:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ok i just happened to be reading this post and usually only check up on godlikeproductions every few weeks just to get my read on so to speak. then logged off my pc. turned back on and i check google news.....earthquake....italy some other places... Quoting: captainchocobo18 3022519 my face when i went back in my memory and was like...wait a sec...i just read a post..wait a. a...MY FACE... O _ O officially creeped out. it would seem as if OP is correct. maybe objects in space really do have a say in earthquakes. if thats true...then god only knows what will happen in the coming months.... and what the eff is TPTB and nasa hiding...good gally..... all i know is that i am not going any where near california in the coming months. the prophecy by you know who...sorta sounds like california as maybe a place of interest to some quakes. maybe not but just to fold out the wrinkles....its better to be safe than sorry. just look what happened to san fran a long time ago. yikes. No, dipshit. The OP predicted an 8.0 earthquake. Which is 20 times larger than a 6.0. The Earth is geologically active. Earthquakes happen all the time. This. If it wasn't active, we would be on a dead planet .. WE would be Dead... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15776005 France 05/20/2012 05:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7839680 Australia 05/20/2012 05:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ok i just happened to be reading this post and usually only check up on godlikeproductions every few weeks just to get my read on so to speak. then logged off my pc. turned back on and i check google news.....earthquake....italy some other places... Quoting: captainchocobo18 3022519 my face when i went back in my memory and was like...wait a sec...i just read a post..wait a. a...MY FACE... O _ O officially creeped out. it would seem as if OP is correct. maybe objects in space really do have a say in earthquakes. if thats true...then god only knows what will happen in the coming months.... and what the eff is TPTB and nasa hiding...good gally..... all i know is that i am not going any where near california in the coming months. the prophecy by you know who...sorta sounds like california as maybe a place of interest to some quakes. maybe not but just to fold out the wrinkles....its better to be safe than sorry. just look what happened to san fran a long time ago. yikes. No, dipshit. The OP predicted an 8.0 earthquake. Which is 20 times larger than a 6.0. The Earth is geologically active. Earthquakes happen all the time. Slight correction smart a$$ M8 is 100 X stronger than a M6 with energey release, at least, 64 X more. |
KN User ID: 16304238 Estonia 05/20/2012 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 05/20/2012 08:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | STRONG TIDALLY TRIGGERED QUAKES IN ITALY, CHILE, JAPAN EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY FOR MAY 19, 2012 "Three strong earthquakes of M 5.8-6.1 hit in the world today and were probably triggered by tidal forces associated with the upcoming solar eclipse which will occur later today. .." MORE [link to earthquakesummary.info] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16368061 United States 05/20/2012 08:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
mikebo2 User ID: 4907712 United States 05/20/2012 10:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Serendipitous User ID: 11340036 United States 05/20/2012 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People just love to say "fail". May 20th isn't over yet, here we have another 13 hours. And when/if a huge quake hits, I'm sure those people won't be back to apologize. "May your electricity go out a second before the shit hits the fan." -Conspiracy Theorist's Blessing |
KN User ID: 16304238 Estonia 05/20/2012 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16334336 Germany 05/20/2012 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | STRONG TIDALLY TRIGGERED QUAKES IN ITALY, CHILE, JAPAN Quoting: TheTruthWorker EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY FOR MAY 19, 2012 "Three strong earthquakes of M 5.8-6.1 hit in the world today and were probably triggered by tidal forces associated with the upcoming solar eclipse which will occur later today. .." MORE [link to earthquakesummary.info] 1) There is a little differenc between a M 6 and a M 8 quake: The difference is 200x 2) Times of earthquakes are in UT - so you failed. 3) If you assume "In some places there are hours to go til the end of the day" you demand not +/- 1 day but +/-2 days. 4) Strong tidal forces we have 26 times a year: at every full and new Moon. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1550152 United States 05/20/2012 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rain-Man User ID: 11468141 Bosnia and Herzegovina 05/20/2012 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was earlier predicted so00 not so hard to copy prediction or forecast .. Thread: Most Dangerous Time for Strong Earthquakes in 2012, Super Full Moon, Alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter, Venus Transit, Solar Eclipse over USA & JP (Page 5) Quoting: Rain-Man Also you have asteroid passing Earth every day, lo0l .. [link to neo.jpl.nasa.gov] Last Edited by Rain-Man on 05/20/2012 11:12 AM Thread: Most Dangerous Time for Strong Earthquakes in 2012, Super Full Moon, Alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter, Venus Transit, Solar Eclipse over USA & JP Thread: Strange Sounds,Strange Rumblings, Sonic Booms, The Hum, Groaning, Earthquake Connection, Electromagnetic Voices, Post Your Recordings Here EARTHQUAKE FORECAST [link to igipop.webs.com] |
Rain-Man User ID: 11468141 Bosnia and Herzegovina 05/20/2012 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last Edited by Rain-Man on 05/20/2012 11:12 AM Thread: Most Dangerous Time for Strong Earthquakes in 2012, Super Full Moon, Alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter, Venus Transit, Solar Eclipse over USA & JP Thread: Strange Sounds,Strange Rumblings, Sonic Booms, The Hum, Groaning, Earthquake Connection, Electromagnetic Voices, Post Your Recordings Here EARTHQUAKE FORECAST [link to igipop.webs.com] |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 1307920 United States 05/20/2012 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was earlier predicted so00 not so hard to copy prediction or forecast .. Quoting: Rain-Man Thread: Most Dangerous Time for Strong Earthquakes in 2012, Super Full Moon, Alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter, Venus Transit, Solar Eclipse over USA & JP (Page 5) Quoting: Rain-Man Also you have asteroid passing Earth every day, lo0l .. [link to neo.jpl.nasa.gov] Not this again... so I am "stealing" your earthquake predictions? You keep doing this with me and others. You give yourself too much credit. Thread: AMAZING new discovery... earthquakes influenced by asteroids! |
mikebo2 User ID: 4907712 United States 05/20/2012 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People just love to say "fail". May 20th isn't over yet, here we have another 13 hours. And when/if a huge quake hits, I'm sure those people won't be back to apologize. Quoting: Serendipitous Incorrect. I would most definitely be back to apologize. I actually think it is very important to find out if there is a way to predict earthquakes. So far... nothing. |
RayGun User ID: 2404633 United States 05/20/2012 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 1307920 United States 05/20/2012 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *** Damning Admission by OP *** Why did I make this May 19th prediction on April 24th? On March 14th I predicted a quake for March 20 +- one day and HIT with a 7.6 in Mexico on March 20th due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates: Thread: HIT! March 20 earthquake in Mexico was predicted on March 14 It was confirmed on Sergman’s list: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] On March 21st I predicted a 7.0+ quake within a day of April 3 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates but FAILED as we only got a 6.0 quake. Sergman posted the miss on his thread. On March 25th I predicted a 7.0+ quake within a day of April 12 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and HIT with a 8.4 in Sumatra during that window on April 11th: Thread: HIT! April 11 earthquake in Sumatra was predicted on March 25 This time Sergman fought me on my hit confirmation and instead of posting it CHANGED his criteria for tracking earthquake predictions -- and removed my previous confirmation, along with some others. On April 12th I predicted a quake over 6.5 within a day of April 18 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and HIT with a 6.8 falling within the 3 day window on April 17th: Thread: HIT! April 17 earthquake was predicted on April 12 On April 20th I predicted an earthquake to occur within a day of April 22nd with a magnitude of 6.8 or more due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and got a 6.6 earthquake on April 21st, the largest and only "significant' quake per USGS since April 17th: Thread: 6.8 earthquake on April 22 due asteroids approaching Earth On April 22nd I predicted an earthquake magnitude 6.8 or more within a day of April 24th due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates. This forecast MISSED with only a 6.0 quake. On April 23rd I saw Sergman restated his new "policy" about tracking earthquake predictions on his thread, saying only 8.0+ quake prediction will count. This drummed up unresolved issues for me. So out of spite I posted this May 19th prediction. Why magnitude 8.0+? Just to get on Sergman’s list. Normally the criteria would be 6.8 or greater, or a “significant” quake making news due to deaths and destruction. There is a 21% chance to hit a 6.8 or higher during a 3 day window by pure luck. Predicting quakes less than 6.5 occur too often to be meaningful. Why May 19th? I was anxious to make a new prediction but none of the asteroids I looked at would indicate a related quake history anytime before June. But I did notice May 19 a high number of asteroids making close approaches. So if there was truly an asteroid/earthquake connection then this would be the next candidate. Why Chile or Japan location? To be honest, I researched where the biggest quakes have occurred in the past. Why a related tsunami? I figured if it hit big it would be offshore. Why less than 5,000 deaths? Actually it was to reduce fear. My predictions a pseudo-science done for entertainment on GLP and to publicly share my research and theories. They are not meant to be a warning… if anything just a reminder to be prepared for anything. Last year I privately predicted quakes on my blog and got a 78% hit rate. Over past few days I completed an analysis the demonstrates that a high number of NEO on a given date does increase the chance of a quake: Thread: AMAZING new discovery... earthquakes influenced by asteroids! So why did I make this May 19th prediction? Was hoping for a hit to thumb my nose at Sergman and was OK if it failed. If it wasn’t for this selfish reason I would have just said I expect a “significant quake” making USGS list, or a quake of 6.8+, within a day. Next quake date I'm watching is June 25, 2012 due high number of NEOs on that date. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16257329 Finland 05/20/2012 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16257329 Finland 05/20/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13128847 United Kingdom 05/20/2012 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vesper33 User ID: 5245441 United States 05/20/2012 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *** Damning Admission by OP *** Quoting: TheTruthWorker Why did I make this May 19th prediction on April 24th? On March 14th I predicted a quake for March 20 +- one day and HIT with a 7.6 in Mexico on March 20th due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates: Thread: HIT! March 20 earthquake in Mexico was predicted on March 14 It was confirmed on Sergman’s list: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] On March 21st I predicted a 7.0+ quake within a day of April 3 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates but FAILED as we only got a 6.0 quake. Sergman posted the miss on his thread. On March 25th I predicted a 7.0+ quake within a day of April 12 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and HIT with a 8.4 in Sumatra during that window on April 11th: Thread: HIT! April 11 earthquake in Sumatra was predicted on March 25 This time Sergman fought me on my hit confirmation and instead of posting it CHANGED his criteria for tracking earthquake predictions -- and removed my previous confirmation, along with some others. On April 12th I predicted a quake over 6.5 within a day of April 18 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and HIT with a 6.8 falling within the 3 day window on April 17th: Thread: HIT! April 17 earthquake was predicted on April 12 On April 20th I predicted an earthquake to occur within a day of April 22nd with a magnitude of 6.8 or more due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and got a 6.6 earthquake on April 21st, the largest and only "significant' quake per USGS since April 17th: Thread: 6.8 earthquake on April 22 due asteroids approaching Earth On April 22nd I predicted an earthquake magnitude 6.8 or more within a day of April 24th due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates. This forecast MISSED with only a 6.0 quake. On April 23rd I saw Sergman restated his new "policy" about tracking earthquake predictions on his thread, saying only 8.0+ quake prediction will count. This drummed up unresolved issues for me. So out of spite I posted this May 19th prediction. Why magnitude 8.0+? Just to get on Sergman’s list. Normally the criteria would be 6.8 or greater, or a “significant” quake making news due to deaths and destruction. There is a 21% chance to hit a 6.8 or higher during a 3 day window by pure luck. Predicting quakes less than 6.5 occur too often to be meaningful. Why May 19th? I was anxious to make a new prediction but none of the asteroids I looked at would indicate a related quake history anytime before June. But I did notice May 19 a high number of asteroids making close approaches. So if there was truly an asteroid/earthquake connection then this would be the next candidate. Why Chile or Japan location? To be honest, I researched where the biggest quakes have occurred in the past. Why a related tsunami? I figured if it hit big it would be offshore. Why less than 5,000 deaths? Actually it was to reduce fear. My predictions a pseudo-science done for entertainment on GLP and to publicly share my research and theories. They are not meant to be a warning… if anything just a reminder to be prepared for anything. Last year I privately predicted quakes on my blog and got a 78% hit rate. Over past few days I completed an analysis the demonstrates that a high number of NEO on a given date does increase the chance of a quake: Thread: AMAZING new discovery... earthquakes influenced by asteroids! So why did I make this May 19th prediction? Was hoping for a hit to thumb my nose at Sergman and was OK if it failed. If it wasn’t for this selfish reason I would have just said I expect a “significant quake” making USGS list, or a quake of 6.8+, within a day. Next quake date I'm watching is June 25, 2012 due high number of NEOs on that date. Thank you OP for the above explanation. Very cool of you to express your thoughts on your hypothesis, and to state that you do this for entertainment on GLP and for research. I believe what you are doing is interesting and important. Keep up the good work as many of us appreciate your efforts. Perfer et Obdura;Dolor hic tibi proderit olim.Fortes Fortuna Iuvat! (Be Patient & Strong; someday this pain will be useful to you. Fortune favors the brave) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16345106 United States 05/20/2012 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16385987 New Zealand 05/20/2012 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *** Damning Admission by OP *** Quoting: TheTruthWorker Why did I make this May 19th prediction on April 24th? On March 14th I predicted a quake for March 20 +- one day and HIT with a 7.6 in Mexico on March 20th due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates: Thread: HIT! March 20 earthquake in Mexico was predicted on March 14 It was confirmed on Sergman’s list: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] On March 21st I predicted a 7.0+ quake within a day of April 3 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates but FAILED as we only got a 6.0 quake. Sergman posted the miss on his thread. On March 25th I predicted a 7.0+ quake within a day of April 12 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and HIT with a 8.4 in Sumatra during that window on April 11th: Thread: HIT! April 11 earthquake in Sumatra was predicted on March 25 This time Sergman fought me on my hit confirmation and instead of posting it CHANGED his criteria for tracking earthquake predictions -- and removed my previous confirmation, along with some others. On April 12th I predicted a quake over 6.5 within a day of April 18 due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and HIT with a 6.8 falling within the 3 day window on April 17th: Thread: HIT! April 17 earthquake was predicted on April 12 On April 20th I predicted an earthquake to occur within a day of April 22nd with a magnitude of 6.8 or more due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates and got a 6.6 earthquake on April 21st, the largest and only "significant' quake per USGS since April 17th: Thread: 6.8 earthquake on April 22 due asteroids approaching Earth On April 22nd I predicted an earthquake magnitude 6.8 or more within a day of April 24th due asteroids with a pattern of earthquakes on their close approach dates. This forecast MISSED with only a 6.0 quake. On April 23rd I saw Sergman restated his new "policy" about tracking earthquake predictions on his thread, saying only 8.0+ quake prediction will count. This drummed up unresolved issues for me. So out of spite I posted this May 19th prediction. Why magnitude 8.0+? Just to get on Sergman’s list. Normally the criteria would be 6.8 or greater, or a “significant” quake making news due to deaths and destruction. There is a 21% chance to hit a 6.8 or higher during a 3 day window by pure luck. Predicting quakes less than 6.5 occur too often to be meaningful. Why May 19th? I was anxious to make a new prediction but none of the asteroids I looked at would indicate a related quake history anytime before June. But I did notice May 19 a high number of asteroids making close approaches. So if there was truly an asteroid/earthquake connection then this would be the next candidate. Why Chile or Japan location? To be honest, I researched where the biggest quakes have occurred in the past. Why a related tsunami? I figured if it hit big it would be offshore. Why less than 5,000 deaths? Actually it was to reduce fear. My predictions a pseudo-science done for entertainment on GLP and to publicly share my research and theories. They are not meant to be a warning… if anything just a reminder to be prepared for anything. Last year I privately predicted quakes on my blog and got a 78% hit rate. Over past few days I completed an analysis the demonstrates that a high number of NEO on a given date does increase the chance of a quake: Thread: AMAZING new discovery... earthquakes influenced by asteroids! So why did I make this May 19th prediction? Was hoping for a hit to thumb my nose at Sergman and was OK if it failed. If it wasn’t for this selfish reason I would have just said I expect a “significant quake” making USGS list, or a quake of 6.8+, within a day. Next quake date I'm watching is June 25, 2012 due high number of NEOs on that date. Thank you OP for the above explanation. Very cool of you to express your thoughts on your hypothesis, and to state that you do this for entertainment on GLP and for research. I believe what you are doing is interesting and important. Keep up the good work as many of us appreciate your efforts. |