Another fail of Poleshit-Nancy - Planet X Moons Visible in Light from Venus!

OOOKAYYYYYYYY

It never left.. It's still in the solar system, completing yet another revolution around the Sun.. We'll see it with the naked eye in about 50-60 years from now, but until then, you'll need the Hubble telescope!

Disarm the Establishment?

May 15, 2003: Planet X White Lie
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

May 15, 2003: Military held "Operation Planet X"
[link to www.enotes.com]
[link to www.globalsecurity.org]

Duh Nancy has been wrong soo many times!
However why would the Military name something.. "Operation Planet X" on the EXACT same day as Planet X lady Nancy made a claim?
Is there a hidden agenda here or some kind of a hint?
Perhaps it's Nancy herself that is black ops! lol who knows!

However this is wayyyy more than just a coincidence, that's for sure.
Some people say the Military was poking fun at Nancy Lieder.
Really?
Why would the Military even give acknowledgement to a "crazy lady" and "crazy Planet X"?
There has never been a David Wilcock raid, or Operation Harold Camping lol. Makes you wonder eh!?!
Mind fu*k!!!!!!!

I always felt the operation was named by some military kid who was a fan of Art Bell -- it would be interesting to know all the names of similar operations at that time. Who knows what names they use for Ops now? Operation Oprah? Operation Bieber?

But the single fact that there was such an Op does not bolster Nancy's idea. There are much more mundane and plausible explanations.

!ZETAS RIGHT AGAIN! NIBIRU IS COMING.

A "Military kid who listens to Art Bell" is who is in charge of naming Military Operations?
That makes as much sense as the airplane that hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
Or even Earth being halted in it's orbit!

ZetaTalk is a money whore, only need dollar and free-sex slaves!!!

The whole purpose of the planet X theory was to explain the perceived perturbations of the outer planets, specifically uranus and neptune. Once it was realized that pluto wasn't nearly massive enough, it could not fit the theory and cannot be planet X. Its discovery was serendipity after a diligent, almost never-ending search, not because of the theory itself (Neptune, by contrast, was found almost immediately after its orbit was hypothesized based on perturbations of Uranus; the math worked because Neptune was indeed the cause of the perturbations). Once it was discovered in the mid-90's that the mass figure for Neptune was slightly off and this caused the "perturbations" that people thought was being caused by a "planet X," the entire hypothesis ceased to be valid. Theories like this are based on evidence, you don't just ignore the entire purpose of the theory in order to make it retroactively "valid" when in fact reality showed that it was false. It's like saying the flat earth belief was right, it just turned out that the disc of the earth happened to actually be a sphere.

Last Edited by Astromut on 07/09/2012 10:52 PM

Pluto is never a naked eye object, nor do you need the Hubble to see it. I have no idea what you're talking about at this point.

In 50-60 years you'll know. ;)

No, I already know; there's no massive object anywhere near here. The planets are all right where they should be, and in fact at this point I've even directly ruled out the old planet X theory which "only" called for a 4 earth mass object at the outer solar system.
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
Cute little cryptic games don't fly with me.

I prefer Nibiretards.

Can somebody please pull the plug on that woman's computer!?!?!?!



Last Edited by Ozone Baby on 07/09/2012 11:59 PM

The director's kid wrote the theme song "Suicide is Painless" for the movie and then the TV show "MASH". Just sayin'... that sort of thing DOES happen.

you just eat that babble up don't ya?

your esu saw you coming, stuck out like a sore thumb.

the ego is hard to miss

and you will get your esu and hazel melchezidek

but you won't be happy with the end results

A hypothetical 4 earth mass planet, but since pluto is the next best thing, hypothetically, it is PlanetX.

Face it, i'll never waiver my opinion on pluto(aka planetx).

You can say no all day long and it still won't change the fact that you're basing your assertions on a flawed and deliberately overlooked calculation.

No, that is not how it works. The whole purpose of the planet X theory was to explain the perceived perturbations of the outer planets, specifically uranus and neptune. Once it was realized that pluto wasn't nearly massive enough, it could not fit the theory and cannot be planet X. Planet X is not just whatever you want it to be, it was a specific theory that turned out to be wrong.

That's fine, but your opinion has nothing to do with reality nor does it have anything to do with what "planet X" actually means.

I am basing my assertions on neither. Show me where my calculations are flawed. Pluto is not 4 times earth's mass, nor is it the cause of the previously believed perturbations of Neptune and Uranus, which don't even exist in the first place. I showed all this already, THAT is what planet X was supposed to be. Pluto is not it. End of story.

Last Edited by Astromut on 07/10/2012 09:09 AM

What telescope do you use Ant ?

That's exactly what I was thinking, only funnier!

I understood perfectly, what it does prove ( again ) is Nancy is a delusional fraud.