Media In Full-Blown Freak-Out Mode After Epic Obama Fail! - DNC ad: "Romney Wasn't Nice!" | |
*Heisenberg* User ID: 21948600 United States 10/04/2012 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 LOL...id like to see him try and slice and dice me. Id debate him anytime. Oh, and just for the record. Debate withstanding, just remember here is where we stand. [link to realclearpolitics.com] You couldn't beat Pravda, lady jane or even my dumb ass... direct you to above post. Cant wait until the 6th of November. You guys gonna come and take your whoopin that day. Or will you run with your tails between your legs. I will neither have a whoopin to take, nor a tail between my legs no matter who wins... My candidate was out a while ago.... But I will delight in liberals being brought back to reality. |
PravdaDemocrat (OP) User ID: 19228212 United States 10/04/2012 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 LOL...id like to see him try and slice and dice me. Id debate him anytime. Oh, and just for the record. Debate withstanding, just remember here is where we stand. [link to realclearpolitics.com] You couldn't beat Pravda, lady jane or even my dumb ass... Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. YOUR ANALYSIS IS DATED!!! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME THE FIRST TIME????!!!! It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: PravdaDemocrat The poster has never been exposed to REAL ACHIEVERS, has he. People like Romney would slice, dice, and spit this guy out, before he ever realized he was bleeding on the floor. that's how good they are. Romney cut the Gay Media Messiah to ribbons last night, and the MSM just can't believe it happened, after all these years of shilling for him. LOL...id like to see him try and slice and dice me. Id debate him anytime. Oh, and just for the record. Debate withstanding, just remember here is where we stand. [link to realclearpolitics.com] Your little map has not received a current update. Go away. Nope not going anywhere. I like hanging in fantasy land with you guys. What update? by the way. Wont the polls be skewed for the D's? Then stick around. We enjoy having a fuzzy ball to swat about. Last Edited by LJS on 10/04/2012 02:19 PM Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1579668 United States 10/04/2012 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Governor User ID: 24944414 United States 10/04/2012 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fact is Obama's campaign was 90% sure that Richy Rich take jobs off-shore Romney was going to say something stupid and goof-up. Quoting: Truth 1307494 Heck, I couldve debated against Romney and beat him with the facts. Obama was told to sit back talk nice and let him goof. You are 114% full of bullshit on all counts, did you know that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11208970 United States 10/04/2012 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 LOL...id like to see him try and slice and dice me. Id debate him anytime. Oh, and just for the record. Debate withstanding, just remember here is where we stand. [link to realclearpolitics.com] You couldn't beat Pravda, lady jane or even my dumb ass... Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. Do you account the +8-9 points they give dems based on 08' turnout? I didn't think so.. Keep livin in fantasy land. For the last fucking time, there are more D's than R's. Documented fact. |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. YOUR ANALYSIS IS DATED!!! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME THE FIRST TIME????!!!! It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Yep. Not like he has a job to go to. Just waiting for the local Oblabla camapign office to unlock so he can make annoying phone calls during dinner time, while wolfing the free donuts. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
*Heisenberg* User ID: 21948600 United States 10/04/2012 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. Do you account the +8-9 points they give dems based on 08' turnout? I didn't think so.. Keep livin in fantasy land. For the last fucking time, there are more D's than R's. Documented fact. So is that a no? |
Renegade (Me too) User ID: 24639180 United States 10/04/2012 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You think that debate last night made any difference? Wow, talk about desperation. I hope you arent hanging your hat on ONE debate performance. Last night was the political equivalent of prevent defense. It wasnt a good idea, but Obama is still leading the game. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 Go away! You're like a turd that won't flush. Or a gnat that goes in one ear and out the other. Who is John Galt? |
PravdaDemocrat (OP) User ID: 19228212 United States 10/04/2012 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 LOL...id like to see him try and slice and dice me. Id debate him anytime. Oh, and just for the record. Debate withstanding, just remember here is where we stand. [link to realclearpolitics.com] Your little map has not received a current update. Go away. Nope not going anywhere. I like hanging in fantasy land with you guys. What update? by the way. Wont the polls be skewed for the D's? Then stick around. We enjoy having a fuzzy ball to swat about. |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last Edited by LJS on 10/04/2012 02:22 PM Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You think that debate last night made any difference? Wow, talk about desperation. I hope you arent hanging your hat on ONE debate performance. Last night was the political equivalent of prevent defense. It wasnt a good idea, but Obama is still leading the game. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 Go away! You're like a turd that won't flush. Or a gnat that goes in one ear and out the other. ... or in your eye & climbs out your nose, lol!! Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Renegade (Me too) User ID: 24639180 United States 10/04/2012 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't bother watching any debates, waste of time. Quoting: andy (uk) 1582847 Obama will continue as president, no matter what happens he will be there next term. Come back and prove me wrong if he loses..... even if romney wins, it will be more of the same. we'll still have obamacare, we'll still be bombing other nations and the police state will continue to get worse. and that's only a small bit of it i totally disagree. if romney wins ...doom will be on . the govt dependent folks ...will riot. Racial tensions will increase 100 fold. ... likely will play into the economic collapse Good! Bring it on! I've been wanting to ping those dependent shits in the ass for a long time. Who is John Galt? |
PravdaDemocrat (OP) User ID: 19228212 United States 10/04/2012 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope not going anywhere. I like hanging in fantasy land with you guys. What update? by the way. Wont the polls be skewed for the D's? Then stick around. We enjoy having a fuzzy ball to swat about. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11208970 United States 10/04/2012 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. YOUR ANALYSIS IS DATED!!! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME THE FIRST TIME????!!!! It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. |
PravdaDemocrat (OP) User ID: 19228212 United States 10/04/2012 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You think that debate last night made any difference? Wow, talk about desperation. I hope you arent hanging your hat on ONE debate performance. Last night was the political equivalent of prevent defense. It wasnt a good idea, but Obama is still leading the game. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 Go away! You're like a turd that won't flush. Or a gnat that goes in one ear and out the other. It should ask Richard Nixon, John Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan about one debate making all the difference. |
Renegade (Me too) User ID: 24639180 United States 10/04/2012 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You think that debate last night made any difference? Wow, talk about desperation. I hope you arent hanging your hat on ONE debate performance. Last night was the political equivalent of prevent defense. It wasnt a good idea, but Obama is still leading the game. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 So the liberal gameplan is to just say "nuh uh" "Obama still winning" "Nothing happened"? Ok then. Although just so you know, everyone can see through that... just sayin The entire Obama "Phenomenon" is based ON A LIE, a careful construct of what the media thought a President SHOULD BE, in their eyes. A live recreation of "The West Wing" NBC TV show. Even his 2007-2008 speeches were written by the staff writers at NBC entertainment. A LOT of people are emotionally wrapped up in Obama now, and this is quite the shock for them. The polls over the next week will tell the tale. THEN WE ALL GET TO SEE THE BIDEN-RYAN COMEDY SHOW!! Ryan is going to rip Biden into shreds. It's going to be like the Roman arena. Who is John Galt? |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. YOUR ANALYSIS IS DATED!!! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME THE FIRST TIME????!!!! It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. Hey, Fuzzy-Ball! I live in Northern Virginia. I just told you that conservatives are intentionally refusing to answer polls. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
PravdaDemocrat (OP) User ID: 19228212 United States 10/04/2012 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 Nice comeback. You guys provide subjective reasons why you think Romney is going to win. Based on the results of ONE debate. Then I provide statistical analysis on why you are wrong. And thats the best you can do to counter. You're right, you are a dumbass. YOUR ANALYSIS IS DATED!!! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME THE FIRST TIME????!!!! It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. "legitimate, respected polling company" Only those that show Obama LEADING qualify, right? |
Truth User ID: 1307494 United States 10/04/2012 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fact is Obama's campaign was 90% sure that Richy Rich take jobs off-shore Romney was going to say something stupid and goof-up. Quoting: Truth 1307494 Heck, I couldve debated against Romney and beat him with the facts. Obama was told to sit back talk nice and let him goof. ROTFLMAO!! And you BELIEVE THAT??? No wonder Obama appeals to the lowest common denominator. IT WORKS! Hi OP. I couldve debated against Obama and beat him too...fact is both are evil. Under both you thou shalt... Worship Government Fear police Ask no questions and do as they want Detest evil conspiracies Indulge in Usuary Ignore the truth Live and Die for them Stand by falshood Not defend true freedom BELIEVE THAT and none of the two appeal two me Peace |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You think that debate last night made any difference? Wow, talk about desperation. I hope you arent hanging your hat on ONE debate performance. Last night was the political equivalent of prevent defense. It wasnt a good idea, but Obama is still leading the game. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 So the liberal gameplan is to just say "nuh uh" "Obama still winning" "Nothing happened"? Ok then. Although just so you know, everyone can see through that... just sayin The entire Obama "Phenomenon" is based ON A LIE, a careful construct of what the media thought a President SHOULD BE, in their eyes. A live recreation of "The West Wing" NBC TV show. Even his 2007-2008 speeches were written by the staff writers at NBC entertainment. A LOT of people are emotionally wrapped up in Obama now, and this is quite the shock for them. The polls over the next week will tell the tale. THEN WE ALL GET TO SEE THE BIDEN-RYAN COMEDY SHOW!! Ryan is going to rip Biden into shreds. It's going to be like the Roman arena. Oh Yeah!! Nothing like watching a real man draw blood!!! Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
*Heisenberg* User ID: 21948600 United States 10/04/2012 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. Hey, Fuzzy-Ball! I live in Northern Virginia. I just told you that conservatives are intentionally refusing to answer polls. Shhh...they don't operate in the land of facts. |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. "legitimate, respected polling company" Only those that show Obama LEADING qualify, right? Fuzzy-Ball seems to have that Flori-duh way of thinking going on. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Lady Jane Smith Forum Administrator User ID: 19147018 United States 10/04/2012 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: PravdaDemocrat It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. Hey, Fuzzy-Ball! I live in Northern Virginia. I just told you that conservatives are intentionally refusing to answer polls. Shhh...they don't operate in the land of facts. Oh, you are right, H. Sorry if I upset you, Fuzzy-Ball. Last Edited by LJS on 10/04/2012 02:31 PM Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
PravdaDemocrat (OP) User ID: 19228212 United States 10/04/2012 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: PravdaDemocrat It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. "legitimate, respected polling company" Only those that show Obama LEADING qualify, right? Fuzzy-Ball seems to have that Flori-duh way of thinking going on. No, no... You just don't understand. Fuzzy-balls like this one think that only Obama's WHITE-HALF showed up, and that's why he got his ass licked. His BLACK HALF was somewhere else! Last Edited by PravdaDemocrat on 10/04/2012 02:32 PM |
*Heisenberg* User ID: 21948600 United States 10/04/2012 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. Hey, Fuzzy-Ball! I live in Northern Virginia. I just told you that conservatives are intentionally refusing to answer polls. Shhh...they don't operate in the land of facts. Oh, you are right, H. Sorry if I upset you, Fuzzy-Ball. fuzzy-ball |
Renegade (Me too) User ID: 24639180 United States 10/04/2012 02:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: *Heisenberg* So the liberal gameplan is to just say "nuh uh" "Obama still winning" "Nothing happened"? Ok then. Although just so you know, everyone can see through that... just sayin The entire Obama "Phenomenon" is based ON A LIE, a careful construct of what the media thought a President SHOULD BE, in their eyes. A live recreation of "The West Wing" NBC TV show. Even his 2007-2008 speeches were written by the staff writers at NBC entertainment. A LOT of people are emotionally wrapped up in Obama now, and this is quite the shock for them. The polls over the next week will tell the tale. THEN WE ALL GET TO SEE THE BIDEN-RYAN COMEDY SHOW!! Ryan is going to rip Biden into shreds. It's going to be like the Roman arena. Oh Yeah!! Nothing like watching a real man draw blood!!! Sexy! Who is John Galt? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11208970 United States 10/04/2012 02:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It heard ya, it's just ignoring it, like it's MSNBC Media programming has told it to do. Haters gotta hate, ya know? Nope not ignoring it. Only laughing at you guys. So when the polling comes out and shows little change, but not much. What is the excuse going to be then? Oversampling D's? Not enough land lines called? How about when Obama is re-elected? What is the excuse going to be then? Your opinions on the debate are based on subjective analysis. Nothing of a substantial nature. In fact the daily gallup tracking poll still shows Obama +4. Is there any reason for me to think that the polls in Ohio, or Iowa, or Virginia have changed that much? Based on your subjective analysis of last nights debate? Its comical coming here, because its like talking to a wall. Show me a legitimate, respected polling company that says that this debate was a race clincher for Romney, and I will admit that I am wrong. "legitimate, respected polling company" Only those that show Obama LEADING qualify, right? No only those with sound statistical models. |
The Governor User ID: 24944414 United States 10/04/2012 02:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For the last fucking time, there are more D's than R's. Documented fact. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11208970 And yet, you're unable to provide a cite. Hmmmm... Obviously you don't know what a "fact" is. Here is an example of a fact: There are more conservatives than liberals. Cite: [link to www.gallup.com] You will see the largest swing of Democrats voting for the Republican since 1980. That is also a fact. |