Question: If Sitchin is wrong...

Good question!

Bump

there is no other translation.
everyone is so quick to holler "wrong!! wrong!!"
but no one else has come forward with any sort of alterior translation or explanation.

The Lost Book was a story built on a scaffold of ancient historical writings.

some of the ancient writings quoted what may have been the lost tablets

no one can provide an alternative to it because no one who claims it to be wrong has any resource to draw upon to provide said alternative. they simply listen to their professors who say "sitchin is wrong because he's wrong"

that's the best argument that they have

"sitchin is wrong because he's wrong".

no one ever claims to have the info "right", so fuck' 'em. fuck 'em in the ear. people like michael heiser are nothing but fucking shills.

the best argument to be made against nibiru are made from a current astronomical stand-point, but those are all based on Nancy Leider's "calculations" (I.E.: "mad ravings"). if sitchin is to be considered, then he claimed that nibiru would likely be hundreds of years away, perhaps over a thousand years away. if it was thousands of years away its influence would still not affect our system in any appreciable way.

any astronomer who claims to know everything in the sky can be counted on to be nothing more than an amateur, since professional astronomers are the first to admit that they have only found a very small amount of what there is to find in our sky, and that there are many many things still left to be discovered, even in our own close system. shills, however, will claim that a backyard scope shows them our entire system and everything it can do (they know who they are, if they're reading this)

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 10/11/2012 01:02 PM

sichin was legit.
I dont care who says otherwise the man made it his career to expose this lost knowledge risking his career and reputation to do so.

My only exposure to this issue has been from GLP threads, mixed with a bit of outside digging, however, since it is all based on actual relics from our past history, I am inclined to believe that Sitchin's work is important.

It seems much MORE than romanticized fiction.

So, I continue to listen and learn.

thanks.

GREAT question!

I hear crickets coming from sitchin detractors.

SpookyWatcher

I believe Sitchin isn't on the up and up.
A while before he passed away, he appeared on Coast to Coast with no name. Noory was all excited to have him as a guest. But throughout the interview, when George asked him specific questions on his theories, Sitchin would avoid them by saying you have to read his books.
The same went when the callers asked questions. " Yu have to read my books "

Towards the end of the program, Noory point blank told Sitchin that his appearance on the show was " .....just an infomercial on your part to sell your books, right? "

Sitchin giggled at that and Noory was very frustrated.

I think Sitchins version of the Sumerian legends are by and large B.S.
He comes up with tales that don't appear in the tablets.

is he wrong?


ahahah


Sitchin isnt Wrong,


Sitchin is a Liar,




Planet XX = is Saturn

Thread: Anunnaki, Nibiru created a stable genetic stock, eventually became so numerous some of us were expelled from the Annunaki city centers (Page 4)

One of the most basic things Sitchin says is the Anunnaki created man as a slave to mine gold. Man was created as a hybrid of Anunnaki DNA with the homo erectus being that was here on Earth.

One question that Sitchen fails to answer is what are the chances that two separate forms of life from different planets are so compatible enough that they can be successfully mated?
The Anunnaki were in human form in every way enough to be compatible with homo erectus?

Sitchin debunkers are not is worried whether he misinterpreted things like location of Sumerian cities, dates of kingdoms or dynasties timelines. The concerning of Sitchin debunkers is conveniently to discredit everything he said about giant extraterrestrial aliens colonizing Earth half million years ago. If Sitchin had never mentioned the ANUNNAKI, nobody would be concerned in "debunk" him, therefore it's obviously a biased agenda to stop people reasoning on this subject.

If you Google for archeological excavations in the Middle East and Egypt you will find out that most of them were funded by the Rothschilds, so obviously the mainstream scholars follow the Zionist agenda to dumb-down the masses, and definitely Sitchin books don't fit in this agenda.

in his time..variant! he was spot on, BUT NOW?! no way

we are on a different line now, it is like sci-fi novel..
it made its work with the reader, but reality shifts according to choices and possibilities of many,

where the summ of energy leads the vector into future

..our line is secure now..

Sitchin didn't invent the Anunnaki name. It was from the Sumerian tales.
What Sitchin did was spin a wild tale that has errors all along the way. And when confronted, he would get angry and defensive about it.
No one questions the Anunnaki from the Sumerian legends or even the ones who appear in HP Lovecrafts ' Necronomicon '.

[link to www.sitchiniswrong.com]

Sitchin's books are great. Read them all.

Immanuel Velikovsky's books are GREAT. READ THEM ALL.

After reading these 12 or so books by these brilliant scholars, then read the Bible with "new eyes" and you will be ASTOUNDED at what you have been told and did not have eyes to see.

Luke 21:25
And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;

he made up his version for profit and like von daniken, bought his own private islands to live on with book revenue.


it's not a matter of debunking, they made book profits also.

if your interested, look at the tablets and do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

thet real story, in my opinion , is harder to sell books aboit as it it dull, depressing and repetitive.

three major cultures spanning nearly eight thousand years have elite groups within them that represent the 'divine' . they live off the slaves they indoctrinate. the method is so successfull even breakaway states of former slaves adopt it. they are of course the sumerians, egyptians and todays roman/western/abraamic

it is called religion or monotheism these days and while only a ever shrinking number of humans participate in the charade, your book will be far more successful if alien gods and weird planets that appear in super long orbits are in it.

Oh, bullshit.

There is much room for play between "right" OR "wrong". What if Sitchin had it Right but mankind translates his expression wrong? What if he was recieving his translation from a spiritual source and thus his right only depends upon the spiritual realm? Sitchin was right and wrong depending upon your perspective of translation of his works.

The Online Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL)
[link to etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk]

Well if he was right then he wouldn't have been defensive and difficult everytime he was questioned about it, right?

You're full of bullshit.

There's a history of 3650 year destruction in the archeological records consistent with the return of the planet of the crossing.

WE ARE AT THE CROSSING, bozo. Here's a clue:

[link to www.pcmag.com]

[link to www.livescience.com]



[link to www.youtube.com]

Zecharia sitchin is a demented lying resident of the deepest depths of hell, his college degree is in economics, he NEVER learned to read sumerian, his life achievement is deceiving people into believing in ancient aliens on earth, another satanic cult designed to drag more ignorant people into hell.

No. There is a knowing you're right but not understanding how. Very much like Prophecy. There have been a number of Prophets, or seers, that knew things, in context within their consciousness limits, and outside their personal perspectives, that delived "visions" or what ever, that were corrrect over time, but couldn't be expressed in modern day understandings between the person the prophet was and the people of his day.

Does that make sense?

If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
[/quot
Wow!! On coast 2 coast tonight ...they are discussing this same topic....check out the replay.....sounds convincing to me.
Chick out. LOL

Then please explain to me the chances of two separate species from two different planets which are so close that DNA infusion can be compatible enough to create a hybrid race?
After all, the Anunnaki created man from their DNA infused into the existing homo erectus being on Earth.
How?

coo-coo for coco puffs, I see.

Thorazine is what you need, son.

ahahhahahahaahahhahahahahhahahahahahha
hhahahahahaahha
hahahhahahahaahha

The guy on Coast to Coast is a laughable as Sitchin.